Executive Order

Guest Post by Jim Kunstler

In this pause between past and future Deep State seditions, and the full-blown advent of Corona Virus in every region of the world, we pause to consider Mr. Trump’s executive order requiring new federal buildings to be designed in the classical style. The directive has caused heads to explode in the cultural wing of Progressive Wokesterism, since the worship of government power has replaced religion for them and federal buildings are their churches — the places from which encyclicals are hurled at the masses on such matters as who gets to think and say what, who gets to use which bathroom, and especially whose life and livelihood can be destroyed for being branded a heretic.

Federal Building San Francisco by Thom Mayne

The religion of Progressivism (under various names) has been growing for over a century, based on the idea that the material abundance of techno-industrial societies should be centrally managed by national bureaucracies, finally leading to a nirvana of perfect fairness. The part that’s always left out is that this is accomplished by coercion, by pushing people around, telling them what to do and how to think, and by confiscating their property or docking their privileges if they seem to have too much of either. You can observe the operations of this doctrine in the current crop of Democratic Party aspirants to the White House.

The architecture that expressed all that is loosely called “Modernism” mostly because it was supposed to represent the distilled essence of everything that is up-to-date, and the idea of coercing an unfair world toward universal fairness has ruled the elite managerial class ever since Karl Marx lanced his boils of social grievance on the printed page. The First World War really sealed the deal for Modernism. The industrial-scale slaughter — well-depicted in the recent movie, 1917 — so horrified the elites that the architecture branch of elite-dom decided to shit-can all the offensive claptrap of history as expressed in buildings and replace them with bare boxes of one kind or another. A whole metaphysical theology was constructed to justify this attempt at a totalistic do-over for the human race. “Less is more…” et cetera.

Meanwhile, along came Stalin and Hitler who persisted in the dirty business of neoclassical architecture, and they screwed the pooch on that theme for all time, while the Second World War reaffirmed the urge to cleanse the world of all that filthy symbolism. By the 1950s, Modernism ruled the scene as the architecture of Decency and Democracy. It very quickly became the architecture that glorified corporate America, viz, the rows of glass box skyscrapers hoisted up along the grand avenues of midtown Manhattan, and then every other city center in America. Before long, as the old government buildings of yore grew obsolete, they too were replaced with confections of Modernism, and then the university libraries, and finally… everything.

The trouble with being up-to-date in architecture is that buildings last a long time and dates fade into history, and if you hate history you have created a problem. The world is a restless place. The main feature of this particular moment is that techno-industrial society has entered an epochal contraction presaging collapse due to over-investments in hyper-complexity. That hyper-complexity has come to be perfectly expressed in architecture lately in the torqued and tortured surfaces of gigantic buildings designed by computers, with very poor prospects for being maintained, or even being useful, as we reel into a new age of material scarcity and diminished expectations — especially the expectation for reaching that technocratically engineered nirvana of fairness.

Of course, the mandarin uber-class among the elite, especially the poohbahs in the architecture schools, can’t bear the thought that things are tending this way. Their theology of up-to-date-ness, of “the cutting edge,” is all about fashion. That things go out of fashion has given them the opportunity to create and cash-in on ever more new fashions, to keep up the pretense of perpetually surfing that cutting edge, for which they derive their status. And this incessant reach for status, and the power it confers, belies and betrays the whole business of representing the ultimate nirvana of fairness, revealing them to be the mendacious frauds they are.

The Trumpian reach backward toward classicism is certainly a quixotic move, even though one can make a case for it being a national style, at least in the early years of the USA when that mode of building was supposed to represent the democracy of ancient Greece and the dignity of the Roman republic — hence, Greco-Roman architecture. Some things to consider: We’re going to have to reduce the scale of the things we build. The cutting edge grandiosity of today is about to go of style. National bureaucracies will shrink, if they don’t vanish altogether, and so will the buildings that house their operations.

We’re going to need buildings that don’t go out of style, so you can forget about the cutting edge, and classicism does have the virtue of timelessness — or at least it did, for a long time. These new buildings ought to have the capacity for adaptive re-use over generations, even centuries. They will probably have to be made out of non-exotic materials, namely, masonry and wood, since the scarcities we face will include a lot of modular fabricated materials ranging from plate glass to aluminum trusswork to steel I-beams, to sheetrock — all things requiring elaborate, complex mining and manufacturing chains.

A virtue of classicism is that it employs structural devices that allow buildings to stand up: arches, columns, colonnades. These are replicable in modules or bays along scales from small to large. These devices honestly express the tectonic sturdiness of a building as well as the realities of gravity. A hidden virtue of classicism is that it is based on the three-part representation of the human figure: the whole and all the parts within it exist in nested hierarchies of base-shaft-and-head. This is true of columns with capitols set on a base, of windows with their sills, sashes, and lintels, and the whole building from base to roof. Classical architecture follows proportioning systems universally found in nature, such as the Fibonacci series of ratios, which are seen in everything from the self-assembly of seashells to the growth of tree branches. Thus, classicism links us to nature and to our own humanity.

University of Virginia by Thomas Jefferson

Classical ornament — the swags, moldings, entablatures, cartouches, corbels, festoons, and what-have-you — are not mandatory, but, of course, they also provide a way of expressing our place in nature, which is a pathway to expressing truth and beauty.

Modernism doesn’t care about truth and beauty; it cares about power.  The main imperative of Modernism was to separate us from nature, since it was human nature that brought about all the horrors of the 20th century and so revolted the intellectual elites. The result of that was a denatured architecture of the machine and an animus against what it means to be human located in nature.

We’re probably not going back to anything like formal classicism because the contraction ahead will leave us in a world of salvage, of cobbling together whatever we can from the detritus left over. But sooner or later — surely well after Mr. Trump has decomposed into his constituent molecules — we will get back to an architecture that is based on our place in nature, so don’t set your on fire over this new executive order, no matter how much The New York Times wants you to.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
14 Comments
TN Patriot
TN Patriot
February 10, 2020 10:25 am

“National bureaucracies will shrink, if they don’t vanish altogether, and so will the buildings that house their operations.”

Who does Kuntsler think he is kidding. the primary objective of any bureaucracy is to grow in power, budget and size.

Drud
Drud
  TN Patriot
February 10, 2020 11:41 am

He is speaking of their lack of ability to grow…not their desire to do so.

TN Patriot
TN Patriot
  Drud
February 10, 2020 12:01 pm

With spending growing at a rate that is 3 times inflation, they do not have a lack of ability to grow. As long as we have politicians who rely on campaign contributions to run and win, we will have explosive growth in givernment bureaucracies.

Everyone wants their “fair share” of the spoils and the more they are willing to “donate” to politicians, the more of their “fair share” they will receive.

Hyperborean
Hyperborean
February 10, 2020 10:31 am

It was to prevent tax payers from funding shit like this…
It’s coming, mark my words.

Pequiste
Pequiste
  Hyperborean
February 10, 2020 3:42 pm

But, but Pope Frankie likes it.

ursel doran
ursel doran
February 10, 2020 10:56 am

Many decades ago I was interviewing an architect for a job to build a new apartment complex, and he proudly showed off a design that he had just done.
Two low to medium rise buildings where he had built the elevators some distance from the main structure which obviously necessitated a considerable cost, thus increasing his fee nicely.
It was considered by him to be, “Architectural Necessity.”

TomMacGyver
TomMacGyver
February 10, 2020 11:18 am

That picture of the SF federal building; did you ever see the screen at an abandoned drive-in theater? Yeah; that’s what it looks like. …Your tax dollars at work…

Anonymous
Anonymous
  TomMacGyver
February 10, 2020 11:44 am

Soon to be playing all across the country; “Closed for the Winter”. Might be held over too, with global cooling and 4th Turning heading our way.

Doubting Tom
Doubting Tom
  TomMacGyver
February 10, 2020 11:55 pm

TM, good one. But SF needs a little more tilt to look like the old screen in my town-maybe after the next Big One it will get the right amount of tilt.

Pequiste
Pequiste
February 10, 2020 3:44 pm

JHK’s forté; describing our cityscapes of Madness.

SeeBee
SeeBee
February 10, 2020 6:38 pm

I don’t get it.

comment image
comment image
comment image

I guess do as I say, not as I do?

Doubting Tom
Doubting Tom
  SeeBee
February 10, 2020 11:56 pm

Can you find a picture of Jarad’s wonky high-rise at 666 Park Avenue?

Vixen Vic
Vixen Vic
  SeeBee
February 11, 2020 9:17 am

You have to think of the time frame these were built. Perhaps reverting back to the classics is because modern architecture is ugly and looks dated very quickly.
Can anyone forget the Brady Bunch house that was so cutting edge at the time but now looks so dated? You know right away when it was built. And then you laugh.
But look at the above photo of the University of Virginia building and you can’t tell when it was built. The style looks good in any age.

Coalclinker
Coalclinker
February 10, 2020 9:56 pm

If there is a trend back to some sort of classicism, where the architecture is timeless, the nod in my opinion would be for Roman Imperial Architecture. Roman brick and concrete work was superior to later styles, and the simpler buildings would never go out of style, such as this one in Triers, Germany, which was built around 310 A.D.
comment image?resize=588%2C400