The Popular Fanatic

Guest Post by The Zman

An old criticism of liberal democracy was that the system would inevitably become less stable, as each election would result in a wild swing in direction. The people would support position X in one election and then support position Y in the next election, with X and Y being opposite positions on some issue. We are getting a sense of that now with Biden’s handlers promising a reversal of Trump’s policies, which were allegedly a sharp break from the policies of predecessors.

One reason for this is that liberal democracies are bourgeois societies, in which the old instinct to dress up interests in objectivity and civic virtue remain strong. It is considered immoral for a group to press their interests in a purely partisan way, so everyone insists that science and the public good are the motivations. The deliberate destruction by the elites of the civic life of societies is not just a naked attempt to remake the world in their image, but an effort to build back better.

Bourgeois objectivity, however, does not work as a brake on the partisanship that comes with democracy. Instead, it works to magnify it. Every issue, instead of being a fight between interested parties, is a fight for eternal truth and cosmic justice. Voting for party X is not about where your bread is buttered, but about where you stand in the moral hierarchy, relative to the people in party Y. The polarization we are seeing today is not about practical politics, but about good versus evil.

Of course, in order to arrive at the point of bourgeois partisanship, you first must arrive at a post-scarcity society. When the threat of extinction is no longer obvious, the people are free to indulge in fantasy and leisure items. In the Cold War, the West avoided this state because the threat of nuclear war was real. The sober-minded had the primary duty of keeping the frivolous under control. Once that was removed, the frivolous and insane were free to run wild through society.

The result is a strange paradox. The issues that rise to the top are increasingly trivial and ridiculous, but the partisanship around them becomes more intense. Two men playing house is a fact of life going back to the dawn of man, but suddenly the embrace of this became a defining issue. If that was not ridiculous enough, what followed was a parade of men in dresses demanding we play along with them. Then it was people with a list of bizarre pronouns demanding validation.

At some level, the bourgeois partisan knows this, but instead of acknowledging the obvious, the demand for public judgement becomes more intense. In the Cold War, the Left had get out the vote drives, by which they meant rigging the voting in major urban areas. Otherwise, there was a quiet understanding that voting should be left to those who pay attention. Today, voting is a moral duty and we are endlessly reminded of it in the months before an election. The truth must be decided.

This is probably the only thing about liberal democracy that makes sense. If everyone votes, then the winners can claim a mandate. If Trump voters, for example, realized the vote was being rigged and boycotted the election last week, the winners could not legitimately claim a mandate. This used to be a tactic in low-trust societies ruled by an elite seeking legitimacy at the ballot box. In modern societies, everyone assumes the truth is fifty-percent-plus-one, so everyone must vote.

Here is where we stumble into another paradox of liberal democracy and another source of partisan anger. All human societies have elites and those elites control the institutions of the society. In theory, popular forms of government either check the power of the elites or place real power into the hands of the people. In one variation, the powerful propose and people dispose. In the other variation the people both propose and dispose. Democracy is about the public will.

In reality, voting is entirely meaningless in a liberal democracy, as the elites control public policy exclusively. The winning side in 1992 thought they were getting a folksy John F Kennedy, when they just got a skeevy Bush I. Bush voters thought they were getting a dim version of Reagan, but got Lyndon Johnson. The people celebrating Biden think they will get reeducation camps and proscription lists, but instead they will end up with a less coherent version of Bush II.

As the researchers in this 2014 study found, those elites that are a permanent feature of all societies control public policy in a liberal democracy, just as they do in every other form of government. In liberal democracy, however, the people are blind to this reality, instead believing that the market place of democracy decides. If elite opinion tracked public opinion, no one would mind, but when elite opinion is at war with the public, it becomes another source of partisan rage.

This leads to the final paradox of liberal democracy. The most rational strategy for minority interests is to withdraw consent, as this strips some legitimacy from the winner of the democratic process. Instead, partisans become more intensely partisan after each electoral defeat and every betrayal. In two years, those red MAGA hats will be a bloody shirt inspiring partisans to vote for the GOP, who will promptly betray those voters at the first opportunity. The anger will keep rising.

The reason that the world appears to be going mad is that liberal democracy, without the brake of thermonuclear war, is a runaway train of partisan fury. Instead of disputes being settled at the ballot box, each election intensifies the dispute. Haldane famously observed that fanaticism is man’s greatest invention. That’s because it is his greatest weapon. As partisan fury rises in liberal democracy, the fanatic becomes the most valued participant. It becomes rule by fanatic.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
10 Comments
oldtimer505
oldtimer505
November 10, 2020 7:26 pm

Did I miss something? When did the United States become a liberal democracy? Why are you using the USA in this article?

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer
November 10, 2020 7:51 pm

The Oparin-Haldane hypothesis suggests that life arose gradually from inorganic molecules, with “building blocks” like amino acids forming first and then combining to make complex polymers.

Ohhhh. That’s where we came from. Duly noted.

Haldane looks like he has intimate knowledge of fanatics, don’t he?
comment image

Ain’t No Saint
Ain’t No Saint
November 10, 2020 8:20 pm

In a “Christian” society, as America when founded, political decisions were based on a common guideline, namely the Bible and the character of Jesus Christ that Christians try (and fail, more often than not) to emulate. The further we allow society to separate from those precepts, the further society has unraveled.
The return to civility and unity will only happen if we return to Christ.

TN Patriot
TN Patriot
  Ain’t No Saint
November 10, 2020 9:33 pm

Ain’t – We have become too diverse to return to our Christian roots.

Neuday
Neuday
  TN Patriot
November 11, 2020 9:46 am

They have to go back.

Nothing but the truth.
Nothing but the truth.
  Ain’t No Saint
November 11, 2020 6:09 am

All societies that have strayed from Christian faith , beliefs and God’s word have disintegrated, becoming wretched ,despondent and dispirited. Agree with you Ain’t , our only salvation is repentance and turning back to Christ.

Kid Jupiter
Kid Jupiter
November 10, 2020 10:19 pm

Z Man assumes that Biden will be taking the Oath of Office on January 20, 2021. Actually, President Trump will be taking the Oath, not Biden. Then the fun can really begin, as the Right’s gloves will come off, in earnest.

None Ya Biz
None Ya Biz
  Kid Jupiter
November 11, 2020 7:53 pm

KJ, I think that Z Man sees the eventual end of the experiment called the united States. Doesn’t matter if Trump is erected or not.

Middleagedmadgnome
Middleagedmadgnome
November 11, 2020 6:36 am

I usually like Zman articles. This one seems to miss reality by a country mile:

1. Why does Zman think a mandate has anything to do with the exercise of raw power over the people (e.g. Covid 19 tyranny).

2. Why does Zman think the radical left’s multiple promises to marginalize, separate then destroy the people who support the right is somehow an empty promise?

3. Withdrawing consent without tangible pushback is merely…submission.

I think Zman’s normalcy bias produced this specious article.

Horseless Headsman
Horseless Headsman
November 11, 2020 5:47 pm

This idea would make sense if withholding a vote resulted in anything besides one less voter. If only 70M people voted this year, all Blue, they would consider that a mandate to push their favorite programs, not a protest of the people who don’t agree with them.