Guest Post by Joe Guzzardi
For those who doubt the inherent wisdom of the old adage that politics makes strange bedfellows, look at the unlikely union between Sens. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) and Mitt Romney (R-Utah).
President Trump’s strong supporter Cotton and never-Trumper Romney jointly introduced the Higher Wages for American Workers Act. The legislation would gradually raise the federal minimum wage to $10/hr. To ensure that the higher wages are paid only to lawfully present workers, the legislation would mandate E-Verify. As written, the bill offers something for everyone – Democrats get the higher minimum wage they’ve been lobbying for and Republicans finally get E-Verify, the database program they’ve unsuccessfully pursued for decades.
Analyzing the bill at face value, it should sail through Congress. Everyone agrees that whether employers are paying the federal minimum wage, $7.25, or state minimum wage, no employee can enjoy a decent standard of living on that miserly income. In Hawaii, the state that has the highest cost of living, the $10.10 hourly wage doesn’t go very far since the average home price is $1.2 million, and the average monthly energy bill is $389. Unaffordable living costs for minimum wage workers are similar to Hawaii’s in California, New York and the District of Columbia.
Everyone agrees – a minimum wage hike is essential. The bill’s hang-up is E-Verify. In their rhetoric, most in Congress want jobs to go to citizens or lawfully present immigrants, especially in this challenging economy with more than 10 million people unemployed or underemployed. But in practice, Congress – Republican and Democrats alike – hasn’t had the courage to do the right thing and pass E-Verify.
Since 1997 when Congress first instituted E-Verify as the Basic Pilot/Eligibility Verification Program, it’s been used voluntarily, but Congress has blocked mandating it nationally. Yet the program is popular. As of 2020, more than 870,000 employers use it at more than 2.4 million hiring sites, with 1,500 new participating companies every week.
At different stages in their political careers, former President Barack Obama, Senate Judiciary Chair Chuck Schumer and former Immigration and Customs Enforcement Director John Morton enthusiastically endorsed E-Verify. Add to those enthusiasts at The New York Times, The Washington Post and the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.
In 2008, then-Illinois Sen. Obama summed up E-Verify’s merits: It will “remove incentives to enter the country illegally by cracking down on employers who hire undocumented immigrants.” Most foreign nationals who enter the U.S. unlawfully come for employment opportunities. Turn off the jobs magnet for aliens, and the unauthorized inflow would dramatically decline. E-Verify is of unprecedented importance today during the current historic border surge.
For too long, immigration critics have blamed immigrants for breaking the nation’s laws. But the responsibility is with employers who benefit from exploiting the vulnerable and profiting from the cheap labor they provide. Although hiring illegal aliens is a crime, employers are rarely charged.
During the period between April 2018 and March 2019, only 11 employers were prosecuted for hiring illegal aliens and, in the process, bypassing Americans. Of those 11 employers prosecuted, only three received prison time. Without E-Verify, unscrupulous employers can easily hire illegal immigrants, institutionalize a race to the bottom on wages, avoid offering affirmative benefits and potentially evade payroll taxes.
More than any other approach to ending illegal immigration, including a border wall, E-Verify is the solution to illegal hiring. E-Verify also provides an important indirect benefit. There are more opportunities for Americans and lawfully present immigrants when jobs aren’t given to illegal aliens. The Pew Hispanic Center’s latest research found that of the 8 million illegal immigrants employed, the majority worked in occupations other than farming.
More than anyone in Congress, Cotton knows how uphill his proposed legislation’s climb will be. In 2017, Cotton sponsored, and former Georgia Sen. David Perdue co-sponsored, the RAISE Act that included mandatory E-Verify as one of its many immigration-reduction features. Among 100 U.S. Senators, most of whom profess deep concern for American workers’ futures, Cotton and Perdue were the bill’s only co-sponsors.
The RAISE Act didn’t include a minimum raise hike, and the legislation was part of President Trump’s administration which means it would never have drawn bipartisan support. But now that President Biden occupies the White House, the Cotton/Romney bill is a great chance for proponents of a minimum wage increase and enforcement advocates to each walk away with something tangible for their constituents.
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Am I the only one who thinks the least likely explanation for this is that either of those men want to do something good for the country?
The commie left has always embraced the concept of “what’s mine is mine, what’s yours is negotiable”.
Thus they will pretend to agree to this….once they get what THEY want they will then immediately renege on the deal. IT’S HOW THEY WORK.
Or they will pass it, make a big deal and fuss, and then as soon as no one is paying attention they will alter it some nefarious way. IT’S HOW THEY WORK.
E-Verify would have “disparate impact” on Hispanics, so AG Merrick Garland would persecute employers for using it.
E-Verify mandatory? The Social Security number isn’t mandatory, how can E-Verify be made mandatory? For some perspective on the “Social Security Number”, throughout history, only 2 types of people have been enumerated; prisoners and slaves. Which are you?
Soldiers get numbered
Indeed. Unless enlistment (and commission?) terms have changed in the last 25 years, soldiers are still considered government property. (You know, sort of like a slave). Try refusing your orders. My first Article 15 was for ‘Destruction of Government Property’. For shaving my head.
The ‘all volunteer’ army is somewhat of novel concept. Until the end of the Vietnam conflict, conscription was the norm, making the “slave” comparison more clear. Conscription has been used to fill out the ranks of armies for much of history.
Volunteer soldiers used to be called mercenaries. Now only PMCs sometimes get that moniker (usually to denigrate).
e verify will hurt americans far more then it will immigrants–
tred,no idea why it reverted to anon
The name Romney is as much of a Red Flag,
as the name Hillary Clinton.
Remember the few months when she toyed with being known as only “Hillary Rodham”?
Do you blame her
Scam, E-Verify is already required. Real ID, has that info as well. Scam artist as always. How many times they need to be caught in a lie for people to stop trusting anything they say?
E-Verify is not mandatory. This is stated on the first page, second paragraph of their website.
https://www.e-verify.gov/
It is a voluntary program employers may utilize to screen prospective employees (but not current employees) and indemnifies them from legal action for refusing to hire any individual that fails to pass E-Verify. E-Verify is only mandatory for federal contractors.
Real ID is also not mandatory. It is only required if you plan to board a flight or enter a federal building.
This is stated on the first page, first paragraph of their website.
https://www.dhs.gov/real-id
Maybe when you just believe the government and do what they tell you, you never check if you really have to. But hey, YMMV.
Real ID implemented in how many states? All renewed drivers license or new ones are automatically checked in ALL DATA BASES to become real ID. VOLUNTARY E-verify? Is required and used by ALL but the smallest of businesses.
But keep reading the .gov websites, it’s not like they are going to lie to you. I own several businesses and I’m telling you it is a requirement, yearly on all subs and new employees/subs. And you also forget local burocrats that require certain things as well. Your own statement above saying it protects employers is its own reason why its a requirement, no one is going to risk their assets and HR/bookkeepers insure ABSOLUTE compliance/risk mitigation. What do you think happens to insurance rates ones you’re busted?
Wage increase will be written in stone; e-verify in toilet paper.
With a $15 minimum wage, we won’t need e-varify; the entry level jobs will vaporize.
The writer spewed, “President Trump’s strong supporter Cotton…”
Bullshit.
This asshole will never get another vote from me. He turned tail when Trump needed him the most