Guest Post by Paul Craig Roberts
It appears that my reading of the Covid information is correct. The official reported cases and deaths are a scam, and the vaccine is more dangerous than the virus.
America’s Frontline Doctors have filed a federal lawsuit to stop the emergency use of untested and unapproved vaccines on three groups of people.
We will see if Big Pharma owns the courts too.
We have been lied to by medical bureaucrats such as Fauci at NIH and Rochelle Walensky at CDC, by the medical establishment, by ignorant politicians, and of course by the scum presstitutes and social media. The question is: did they lie out of ignorance or on purpose? Are they concerned with our health or with Big Pharma’s profits, government control over people, and perhaps darker agendas such as population reduction and the WEF’s “Great Reset”?
As Americans are so gullible and insouciant, these mass murderers are likely to get away with their monstrous crimes.
One of the doctors involved with the lawsuit stated;
“My child will not be the subject of an experiment. What kind of monsters are we allowing to control us? Perfectly healthy children have developed heart inflammation, brain bleeding and even died! I have had enough. I am not sacrificing my child so a pharmaceutical company can experiment on her. This madness has to stop.”
For Covid facts divergent from the official lies see:
https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2021/07/15/how-the-covid-pandemic-was-orchestrated/
Federal Lawsuit Seeks Immediate Halt of COVID Vaccines, Cites Whistleblower Testimony Claiming CDC Is Under-Counting Vaccine Deaths
America’s Frontline Doctors filed a motion to stop the use of Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) COVID vaccines for anyone under 18, anyone with natural immunity or anyone who hasn’t received informed consent.
By Megan Redshaw
(The Defender is experiencing censorship on many social channels. Be sure to stay in touch with the news that matters by subscribing to our top news of the day. It’s free.)
America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) filed a motion July 19, seeking immediate injunctive relief in Alabama Federal District Court to stop the use of Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) COVID vaccines — Pfizer/BioNTech, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson (J&J) — for three groups of Americans.
According to a press release, AFLDS is asking to immediately stop administration of experimental COVID vaccines in anyone 18 and younger, all those who have recovered from COVID and acquired natural immunity, and every other American who has not received informed consent as defined by federal law.
The 67-page motion requests the judge issue a preliminary injunction pursuant to § 360bbb–3(b)(1)(C) for the following reasons:
There is no emergency, which is a prerequisite to issuing EUA and EUA renewals for COVID vaccines.
There is “no serious or life-threatening disease or condition.”
Vaccines do not diagnose, treat or prevent SARS-CoV-2 or COVID.
Known and potential risks of the vaccine outweigh their known and potential benefits.
There are adequate, approved and available alternatives to vaccines.
Healthcare professionals and vaccine candidates are not adequately informed.
The authors of the motion attached a declaration by a whistleblower who came forward alleging deaths occurring within 72 hours of receiving a COVID vaccine are significantly under-reported in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) maintained by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Tell Schools/Universities No Vaccine Mandates for Children/Young Adults!
As of July 9, reported deaths in the VAERS totaled 10,991. Of those, 4,593 occurred within 72-hours of vaccination.
The whistleblower — a computer programmer who developed more than 100 distinct healthcare fraud algorithms, and who has expertise in healthcare data analytics that allows her to access Medicare and Medicaid data obtained by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Systems (CMS) — filed a sworn statement under penalty of perjury alleging the actual number of COVID vaccine-related deaths is closer to 45,000.
The whistleblower alleged that VAERS, while extremely useful, is under-reported by a conservative factor of at least five.
In her statement, she said:
“On July 9, 2021, there were 9,048 deaths reported in VAERS. I verified these numbers by collating all of the data from VAERS myself, not relying on a third party to report them. In tandem, I queried data from CMS medical claims with regard to vaccines and patient deaths, and have assessed that the deaths occurring within 3 days of vaccination are higher than those reported in VAERS by a factor of at least 5. This would indicate the true number of vaccine-related deaths was at least 45,000. Put in perspective, the swine flu vaccine was taken off the market which only resulted in 53 deaths.”
AFLDS said the findings were shocking, and informed consent is impossible when safety data is not accurate.
In a press release, AFLDS said:
“It is unlawful and unconstitutional to administer experimental agents to individuals who cannot make an informed decision as to the true benefits and risks to the vaccine on an independent basis. They must be of an age or a capacity to make informed decisions and have been provided with all of the risk/benefit information necessary to make an informed decision.”
One of the named plaintiffs, Deborah Sobczak, the mother of a 15- and 17-year-old, said in the press release:
“My child will not be the subject of an experiment. What kind of monsters are we allowing to control us? Perfectly healthy children have developed heart inflammation, brain bleeding and even died! I have had enough. I am not sacrificing my child so a pharmaceutical company can experiment on her. This madness has to stop.”
There is no emergency warranting EUA of COVID vaccines, plaintiffs allege
According to the complaint, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) secretary, named as one of the defendants in the lawsuit, declared on Feb. 4, 2020, pursuant to § 360bbb–3(b)(1)(C), that SARS-CoV-2 created a “public health emergency.”
This initial emergency declaration has been renewed repeatedly and remains in force today — a necessary legal prerequisite for the issuance of vaccine EUAs, the complaint states. EUA allowed the mass use of the vaccines by the American public before the completion of the standard regimen of clinical trials and FDA approval.
Plaintiffs allege the emergency declaration and its multiple renewals are illegal because there is no underlying emergency. Using HHS COVID death data, SARS CoV-2 has an overall survivability rate of 99.8% globally, which increases to 99.97% for persons under the age of 70. This is consistent with the seasonal flu, the complaint states.
Plaintiffs argue HHS deliberately inflated COVID case data
Plaintiffs allege HHS’ data is deliberately inflated. On March 24, 2020, HHS changed the rules applicable to coroners and others responsible for producing death certificates and making “cause of death” determinations exclusively for COVID.
The rule change states: “COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death.”
According to the complaint, HHS statistics showed 95% of deaths classified as “COVID-19 deaths” involved an average of four additional comorbidities. Plaintiffs claim the CDC knew the rules for coding and selection of the underlying cause of death would result in COVID being the underlying cause more often than not.
Plaintiffs said the actual number of COVID cases is also far lower than the reported number due to emergency use of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests, which are used as a diagnostic tool for COVID. The PCR tests are themselves experimental products, authorized by the FDA under separate EUAs. The package inserts state PCR tests should not be used to diagnose COVID.
The complaint alleges the way in which the PCR tests are being administered knowingly guarantees an unacceptably high number of false positive results.
COVID vaccine risks undisclosed and under-reported, lawsuit says
AFLDS medico-legal researchers analyzed the accumulated COVID vaccine risk data and found migration of the pathogenic SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in the body. Yet vaccines were authorized without any studies demonstrating where the spike proteins traveled in the body following vaccination, how long they remain active and what effect they have, the complaint states.
AFLDS researchers analyzed VAERS and discovered an increased risk of death from COVID vaccines. The database indicated vaccine deaths in the first quarter of 2021 represented a 12,000% to 25,000% increase in vaccine deaths, year-on-year.
From 2009 to 2019, there were 1529 reported deaths associated with all vaccines reported to VAERS, according to the motion. In the first quarter of 2021, there were more than 4,000 reported deaths with 99% of all reported vaccine deaths in 2021 attributed to the COVID vaccine. Only 1% were attributed to other vaccines in the system.
Plaintiffs also disclosed evidence of reproductive harm, vascular disease, autoimmune disease, neurological damage and they highlighted an increased risk of harm for children with COVID vaccines to support their position.
Why the secrecy around V-Safe data?
The complaint called attention to the secrecy of the CDC’s V-Safe system — a parallel system used to track reported adverse events via a smartphone app controlled exclusively by the CDC.
Plaintiffs raised concerns that information in V-Safe exceeds that in VAERS. They claim VAERS is inaccurate because it potentially includes fewer than 1% of all vaccine adverse events, and the federal government is failing to provide data from other monitoring sources such as V-Safe, CMS and the military.
Plaintiffs stated informed consent cannot be given without understanding the risks. They said they can’t help but wonder why HHS would fail to disclose to the public critical information related to risk from it’s reporting systems, “particularly in light of the fact that they have had the time and resources to study and extend the authorizations on the vaccines, build an enormous vaccine marketing machine and roll out vaccine clinics all over the nation.”
The lawsuit was filed by several law firms, including RENZ Law. The complaint and whistleblower declaration can be read here: https://renz-law.com/45k-whistleblower-suit
Update:
Lisbon Court Rules Only 0.9% of ‘Verified Cases’ Died of COVID, Numbering 152, Not 17,000 Claimed
https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2021/07/21/facts-that-the-presstitutes-hide-from-you/
Related Development:
A federal district court has ordered NIH to release the Moderna safety data from Moderna’s Covid vaccine trials that Tony Fauci has been hiding.
We will see if the corrupt American establishment will have a higher court overturn the ruling.
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
“We’ll see if big pharma owns the courts too.” Does anyone honestly doubt that they do?
I was about to say the same. You beat me to it.
For as smart as PCR can be ….. at other times he can be as dense as Pb.
You just have to look at how many years it was and how many dismissed lawsuits happened before Monsanto finally landed in front of a Judge they couldn’t buy, bully, blackmail or kill.
I basically feel that Justice Thomas has done a pretty good job at SCOTUS … but remember, too, that he was in-house counsel for monstrous monsanto in the ’70s …
I believe sadly you are very correct on this one. Yes they are. Attorney Linwood of Georgia stated he has proof that Justice Roberts raped and murdered a young girl and is now being blackmailed. We are now hearing reports that the new Justice Barret’s Dad owns a part of the fake dominion voting machines. And many are now saying it was the US SC that ordered the lower courts not to hear any election fraud cases in 2020. Even with thousands of sworn Affidavits. Sadly our Nation has been over thrown by the world Oligarchs who run and control the entire UN.
The lawsuit sure seems to have many excellent merits.
However, merits are irrelevant. Facts … even, truth, in our Courts are irrelevant. Our system of law is adversarial … one side vs the other side … and the only relevance is WINNING. How many times has a lawyer defended their client as being innocent … while surely KNOWING they are guilty as sin? Too many to count!
The success, or failure, of this lawsuit depends mostly on One Big Thing … how honest or corrupt is the Judge?
So, what if the Good and Noble America’s Frontline Doctors lose? What then?? We went to court and lost …. what recourse is left?? Will it really come down to this ….
I think so. I think it’s inevitable. America is too corrupt, top to bottom, to settle things peacefully.
It’s going to be like that everywhere. I post it this article on another thread but it’s worth re-posting.
https://www.rt.com/news/529730-france-covid19-macron-hitler-vaccine/?
Well, in about 7 years the case may wind up in SCOTUS; we all know how diligent they are in parceling out justice, right?
Even if they win in District Court, it is doubtful they will win at the appellate level. You can rest assured that there is incriminating evidence being held over most of the black-robed lawyer’s heads.
This is what is known in military strategy as a feint.
The true purpose behind this tactic is to move from “experimental mode” into “FDA approved”.
This should happen within the next two- possibly three news cycles. I would estimate under a month, probably closer to two weeks.
And this tactic is called “preparing the ground”.
https://www.healthline.com/health-news/when-will-the-fda-give-full-approval-for-covid-19-vaccines
“Experts say full approval may help increase vaccination rates.”
Sounds like an admission that FDA approval is just another COVID shot marketing tool. If approval is granted after less than a year of observations and evidence-gathering, it’s meaningless as relates to safety.
Well, there you go.
This is not about health, it’s about compliance to the demands of the State. Stand here, wear this, don’t go there, take this. To ignore all those components when having this discussion makes the entire issue moot.
They started with the path to least resistance- think of the children, you don’t want to kill your granny do you?- and has since been ratcheting tighter day by day as the baseline of resistance has made itself manifest. The claim is that 2 billion people have received the vax. I doubt it, but let’s just say it’s true. That means 3/4 of the population of the planet have said no thanks.
That can’t be the kind of voluntary compliance that they were hoping for. So now the gloves are coming off.
I would like to think that the majority of those 6 billion people – and 150MM Americans – are resisting because they have real concerns about the safety of the shot, ulterior motives of those pushing it, and tyrannical overreach in general.
The cynic in me is saying that’s not the case. And that most of those are passive resistors who will come around to the shot side eventually , giving the TPTB cover (if not outright support) to really focus their tyranny on a small minority who are active resistors.
The propaganda being deployed to get us there is RELENTLESS.
Guess we’ll see.
It only takes a small minority to effect change.
The powers that want to be. Don’t give them that power. As much as it pains me, I will leave my job if these experimental treatments are mandated. A coworker was pressured into getting the jab and is now sick.
My 14 year old nephew and 17 year old niece got their second doses last week. My nephew had the coof earlier this year. After the jab, he had excruciatingly painful headaches. My niece runs cross country and is now concerned about overworking her heart. Fucking evil.
We outnumber them. That’s called an advantage.
I wonder if the FDA approval will also remove the liability indemnity for the agents of death.
Hold your breath…..
If the so-called vaccine were to be made mandatory in the USA and I were still living there, I’d be seriously considering beating feet for elsewhere before emigration becomes impossible without a “vax passport “. Granted, emigration is ever more difficult and for many an unacceptable option owing to family ties, financial circumstances, language limitations, etc., but for those not so limited, it may soon be a case of now or never, given the momentum of gov’s efforts to “totalitarianize” (did I just coin a neologism?) the USA very nearly past the point of no return.
If people who are vaccinated can still get and spread covid then it’s illogical and irrational to punish people who are NOT vaccinated, right? Right. Likewise, NOBODY can predict WHO will suffer adverse side effects, including DEATH from a covid vaccine, therefore it should NEVER EVER BE MANDATORY, only encouraged, without threat of punishment as NOBODY can predict who will suffer life long side effects from covid 19 vaccine. NOBODY should be forced to gamble with their lives when even those who are vaccinated can still spread covid. We should have mandates on people WASHING THEIR DAMN HANDS or taking Vitamin D3, getting D3 levels checked, taking vitamin C and zinc way before we force this vaccine on anyone. That would make more sense. And don’t forget, if you are willing to wear a mask and get tested, you are choosing the LEAST AVERSIVE AND INTRUSIVE option so don’t be unreasonable. Wear the mask if asked at work. Get tested and then you can avoid the vaccine with a stronger legal argument. Be smarter than these evil people. HE who is in us is greater than he who is in the world.
We must fight them even for a thousand years. We must go and arrest these evil diabolic psychopaths. Hitleer alway thought he was above the laws. he found out different.
Don’t use hitler! If you don’t know anything about the truth about ww2 . Don’t just regurgitate what you have heard somewhere