Submitted by Dirtperson Steve
Delta Variant explained. This was written in February 2021, 6 months ago.
“What about vaccinees who become ill several months after being vaccinated, suffering the classic range of symptoms associated with many respiratory diseases (including COVID), such as fever, chills, cough, shortness of breath, headache, fatigue, and so on? Will they know that these symptoms might be related to enhanced COVID disease mediated by the vaccination given to them months before, something that didn’t occur to them because they thought the vaccine gave them protection from COVID?”
Scientists Warn of Potential COVID Vaccine-Related ‘Ticking Time Bomb’
Associate Professor of Health Sciences Adam MacNeil at Brock University, Canada and his Ph.D. student Jeremia Coish were among the earliest to warn, last June, of the dangers of not looking very carefully at the possibility that vaccines might trigger antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) of disease. This could mean that people who are vaccinated might, paradoxically, suffer more severe disease when exposed to the wild virus than if they hadn’t been vaccinated.
In their aptly titled article, “Out of the frying pan and into the fire? Due diligence warranted for ADE in COVID-19,” published in the journal Microbes and Infection in June 2020, MacNeil and Coish argue that ADE is well known to be a risk for coronavirus-mediated infections, as well as dengue.
For those not already familiar with ADE, it is the paradoxical immune response that makes a person who was previously exposed to the disease, or a vaccine targeting it, more — not less — susceptible in the event that they’re subsequently infected.
Proceed with caution
Seemingly countering this view, in August 2020, was viral epidemiologist Leah Katzelnick Ph.D., a dengue and zika specialist now in the employ of the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases headed by Dr. Tony Fauci. Along with co-author Scott Halstead,. Katzelnick argued that ADE shouldn’t be something to be feared. Katzelnick and Halstead proposed that the fundamental differences between SARS-CoV-2 infection that can cause COVID-19 and other diseases, for which ADE has been shown, meant that ADE would be highly unlikely.
They supported their arguments with evidence from cases of classic, intrinsic ADE, notably infectious peritonitis, a coronavirus infection in cats, as well as from respiratory syncytial virus, dengue and SARS — suggesting significant differences in the pathology, epidemiology and immune responses involved in these diseases as compared with COVID and SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Careful readers of Halstead and Katzelnick’s paper will note that while the authors largely dismiss the ADE risk, they very clearly identify a risk of vaccine hypersensitivity (or VAH), a closely related immunological hyper-reaction that was first identified in the late 1960s when children developed atypical measles following measles vaccination.
Many who’ve used the paper to dismiss ADE risks may only have read the title and abstract and not picked up that Katzelnick and Halstead dismiss only intrinsic ADE or iADE (i.e. the risk of disease enhancement on re-infection in the absence of vaccination).
They also may not have read the sombre advisory in the paper’s last sentence: “Given the magnitude of the repertoire of COVID-19 problems and the need for an effective vaccine, the full force of worldwide investigative resources should be directed at unravelling the pathogenesis of VAH.”
There is not much to suggest that this advisory has been heeded, other than the fact that thousands of volunteers have been put through Phase 3 trials and there has been no evidence of spikes in more severe reactions among those vaccinated with the real thing, as opposed to the placebo.
Herbert Virgin, Ann Arvin and colleagues, writing in Nature, one of the most influential journals in the world, made a not dissimilar call for caution back in July. These authors discuss the great difficulties in identifying the incidence and frequency of ADE (and VAH) and suggest that “… it will be essential to depend on careful analysis of safety in humans as immune interventions for COVID-19 move forward.”
Transparency is key
This requires full transparency of surveillance data so that cases of infection and reinfection post-vaccination can be correlated against severe reactions following infection or vaccination. It also requires time — much more time than we’ve had so far.
Presently, data released by VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) in the U.S. and the MHRA (Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency) in the UK don’t come close to telling us anything about the ADE or VAH risk. In fact, there will have to be a lot more re-infection before we know conclusively one way or another. And will we be able to find out if there are genuine issues with ADE or VAH, or will the authorities manage to keep a lid on it by just not communicating them given many reactions will be substantially delayed following vaccination?
Timothy Cardozo from New York University and Ronald Veazy from Tulane University took it a step further in their article in the International Journal of Clinical Practice published in October, when Phase 3 trials for the COVID frontrunner vaccines were in full swing. They argued not only that vaccine-mediated ADE (i.e. VAH) risks were more than just theoretical, they also suggest that the risks may be greater following particular types of mutations in the circulating viruses.
In their discussion on SARS-CoV-2, they discuss how very tiny changes, such as changes in the conformity (shape) of its spike protein both before and after fusion with host cells, via ACE2 receptors might impact those who’ve been vaccinated. Several months on with emerging evidence that some variants are able to evade the immune response that has been trained to offer protection against the original Wuhan variants, there is cause for even greater concern. This risk also can’t be dismissed on the basis of the results of the Phase 3 trials
What Cardozo and Veazy also suggest is another point we’ve long been concerned about. That relates to the fact that trial subjects — let alone members of the public who’re now lining up for COVID vaccines — are just not being informed of these potential risks, and the delayed nature of possible ADE/VAH reactions.
What about vaccinees who become ill several months after being vaccinated, suffering the classic range of symptoms associated with many respiratory diseases (including COVID), such as fever, chills, cough, shortness of breath, headache, fatigue, and so on? Will they know that these symptoms might be related to enhanced COVID disease mediated by the vaccination given to them months before, something that didn’t occur to them because they thought the vaccine gave them protection from COVID?
Cardozo and Veazy then show how informed consent forms for volunteer subjects in vaccine trials fail to meet the required ethical standards for informed consent. While ADE is mentioned, it is generally added at the end of the list of possible risks and its implications and identification are unlikely to be adequately understood by the lay public.
With a tick in the box and a sense from regulators and vaccine makers that they’ve successfully negotiated the hurdle of ADE/VAH risks, there’s been no further discussion of the issue. The vast majority of pre-vaccinees lining up as part of the global mass vaccination roll out simply have no idea of the risk — because they’re not being told.
Could ADE be a ticking time bomb?
Does non-disclosure as part of the informed consent process constitute not only a breach of medical ethics, but also a breach of law? In our view, that’s highly likely and should evidence accrue in the future, this will be something the courts will need to grapple with.
Presently there is no evidence of any significant ADE/VAH signal — but it is too early to tell and many cases could have gone undetected.
Is it possible that some instances of ‘long COVID’ could be a form of ADE? This is a possibility we have been considering. Typically people who get long COVID don’t test as positive from nasopharyngeal swab tests. But in deep seated systemic infections the mucosa may not show evidence of viral multiplication, whereas the infection may become systemic in certain tissues and be enhanced. This possibility cannot easily be dismissed.
Could the problem increase with new variants of SARS-CoV-2? Yes, as explained above.
What you can do:
- Anyone who is deciding to have the vaccine should inform themselves of the ADE and VAH risk, where there could be a considerable delay between vaccination and the experience of disease symptoms that may be more severe than those that would occur without the vaccine.
- Let those you know who are considering or planning to have the COVID vaccine of this risk. Read and share our article, “Informed consent — is this fundamental right being respected?“
- Share this article widely.
Originally published by Alliance for Natural Health International.
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
We need to stop trying to convince the sheep that the Jab is dangerous.
Those that wish to self select for extermination should be encouraged to do so.
They won’t be missed and life for the rest will be better without the fools and their demands that we embrace their foolishness.
They can’t be convinced. They may only change their opinion AFTER themselves and people who close to them die or get heavy injured by the vaxx, and even that’s a slim possibility. So I totally and wholeheartedly agree with you. The sooner they get out of the picture, the better.
It makes a person wonder what death rates from the jab will be like in a few years. I bet they won’t admit it and come up with a story.
The Gain of Function SPIKE PROTEIN Gene Therapy.
The coronavirus spike protein is a multifunctional molecular machine that mediates coronavirus entry into host cells. It first binds to a receptor on the host cell surface through its S1 subunit and then fuses viral and host membranes through its S2 subunit. Two domains in S1 from different coronaviruses recognize a variety of host receptors, leading to viral attachment. The spike protein exists in two structurally distinct conformations, prefusion and postfusion. The transition from prefusion to postfusion conformation of the spike protein must be triggered, leading to membrane fusion. This article reviews current knowledge about the structures and functions of coronavirus spike proteins, illustrating how the two S1 domains recognize different receptors and how the spike proteins are regulated to undergo conformational transitions. I further discuss the evolution of these two critical functions of coronavirus spike proteins, receptor recognition and membrane fusion, in the context of the corresponding functions from other viruses and host cells.
CDC Admits PCR Tests Cannot Differentiate Between Coronaviruses – It’s Because They Are Not Designed For That!: The PCR test is nothing but a useful tool by tyrants to put fear in the hearts of the masses, nothing more, nothing less. It’s been proven to be a fake and even was called out by Kary Mullis as not to be used for a diagnosis. Now, the corrupt, unlawful Center for Disease Control is telling you that they can’t differentiate between coronaviruses. Well, then where are they coming up with these alleged “variants”?
Dr. Samantha Bailey Explains the Fraud behind the Wuhan “Virus”: Dr. Samantha Bailey, a medical doctor from New Zealand, shows that the so-called Wuhan “virus” started in December 2019 in Wuhan, China, when 41 patients who had pneumonia were hospitalized and six died. There were no laboratory tests or any other evidence that a new, novel, never-seen-before virus was the agent of disease. The much touted genetic sequences came from a single patient who was declared to have COVID-19 without proof or evidence. On January 23, 2020, Christian Drosten’s team published a protocol to test for COVID-19/ SARS-CoV-2 virus using the PCR test, but the test protocol “was designed in absence of available virus isolates or original patient specimens.” The tests were based on simply downloading the hypothetical sequences — no virus required!! A number of papers were published claiming to have used isolated and purified SARS-CoV-2 virus particles, but the authors later acknowledged that they never had purified particles.
CDC/FDA Confess: They Had No Virus When They Concocted The Test For The Virus: Here is a killer quote: “During the early months of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, clinical specimens [of the virus] were not readily available to developers of IVDs [in vitro diagnostics] to detect SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, the FDA authorized IVDs based on available data from contrived samples generated from a range of SARS-CoV-2 material sources (for example, gene specific RNA, synthetic RNA, or whole genome viral RNA) for analytical and clinical performance evaluation. While validation using these contrived specimens provided a measure of confidence in test performance at the beginning of the pandemic, it is not feasible to precisely compare the performance of various tests that used contrived specimens because each test validated performance using samples derived from different gene specific, synthetic, or genomic nucleic acid sources.”
There was no “Covid” until they repurposed the Flu, and exacerbated it with the lockdowns and face diapering.
Now we have the Gain of Function SPIKE PROTEIN Gene Therapy that people are actually getting sick, injured, and dying from. So what do they do? Blame the un-jabbed for the jabbed getting sick, injured, and dying. Look, people were getting sick long before the “Covid” and the jab. But now, everyone who gets sick and is unjabbed, is of the “Covid”, who are giving, according to the Covid-Cult, the jabbed the “Covid”, who were suppose to be protected against the “Covid”. But since the jab is the Corona SPIKE PROTEIN Virus getting the jabbed sick, the Covid-Cult need an excuse. The Covid-Delta, along with the Covid-Alpha, Covid-Beta, Covid-Epsilon, Covid-Gamma, and Covid-Lambda to make it look all official and the un-jabbed are responsible for the jabbed getting the variants.
So, don’t you all just feel guilty for not doing your it takes a village duty to protect the jabbed?
Does anyone see the gish gallop being played on those who are predisposed to cognitive dissonance?
Breakthrough COVID infections show ‘the unvaccinated are now putting the vaccinated at risk’!
But… but…
Surgeon General Vivek Murthy Says Vaccinated People Need to Wear Masks to Protect Unvaccinated People!
Get over it, there is no “Covid”, there is only the Gain of Function SPIKE PROTEIN Gene Therapy.
Surprise!
CDC to Start Using a New COVID Test that Will Better Identify Flu Cases After Seasonal Flu Numbers Disappeared in 2020
And just in time for…
Fauci Defends CDC’s Mask Guidance For Vaccinated Americans, Warns “Things Are Going to Get Worse” (VIDEO)
Flu season is just right around the corner.
But… but… we have this new and approved test here, see? And look! It really-really is the “Covid” this time! See? Our newer better test says so!
What did I say a few months ago?
Imagine Repurposing The Flu
Imagine if you will, that your government compelled MILLIONS of Americans to have a nasal swab shoved up their nose for a Influenza PCR Test every year. Imagine the MILLIONS testing positive for the Influenza. Some would die of the Flu, some would die with the Flu (symptoms or not), some would have severe Flu and survive, some would have moderate to minor symptoms of the Flu, and some would be… Influenza asymptomatic (as many as three-quarters of all flu cases are asymptomatic, meaning they didn’t know they had until they were tested for it). But there would be MILLIONS of Flu CASES! Imagine the government exacerbating the Flu will its lock-down measures. Imagine wearing a face diaper to overload you with carbon monoxide and viral/bacterial overload by re-inhaling the viruses and bacteria you exhaled from your lungs and trapped on the inside of your face diaper. Imagine AmeriKans crapping their diapers.
OMG! We need a Vaccine!
Surprise! Why, we have a Gain of Function Spike Protein Gene Therapy Jab just for you!
See how easy that was?
But we have new test!
Damm Son…wish you were in my family…passing this on to those who have the intelligence and uncommon common sense to appreciate it!
1,000+
Evidence is definitely now pointing towards this sadly. Half tempted to go to a testing site and demand to know what gene they are testing for
We ain’t seen nothing yet. There’s a reckoning coming. I’ve chosen my ground and will stand. “They’re” just getting started. Stock up on ivermectin, we’re all gonna need it before this is through. Somehow ivermectin destroys whatever this “thing” is.
When I see children getting injected it makes my blood boil.
That may be the bridge too far…I hope so…my powder is dry.
My son in law told me they will have to kill him before his son is injected with that shit. (Made my heart swell).
Piss on all the other reasons to fight…if not for our kids, and grand kids, if that doesn’t start firing off the shots heard around the world from all over the world…nothing will.
Of all the over reaches…that is the longest.
Like Flea said…spit polish your dum dums.
The worst was when the Canadians had a ice cream party for the kids, and gave them the jab
If they’d offered Labatt’s they’d have had more takers.
Fuck off with “all but conclusive”, they are conclusive by any current convention.
Nothing will be blamed officially on the experimental injections, but on the newest “variant”.
The covid vax was not rushed to market it had been engineered many years before this fake pandemic. They have the mad rush to get everyone vaxed before the long term effects can no longer be hidden.
The concept of cross-reactivity may be in play in the engineering of the scamdemic and could help explain the observed and under reported VARIETY of adverse effects to the POISONS in the jab.
An example of cross-reactivity follows, but first consider this: often the FIRST time a person’s skin absorbs urushiol, the oily substance from exposure to poison ivy, poison oak, and poison sumac, the body’s immune system deals with the antigens resulting from the urushiol differently because the immune system as yet has any antibodies to urushiol. Strangely, the first exposure seldom results in uncomfortable levels of dermititis or painful skin rash and redness. But upon the SECOND exposure, and with the immune system then having antibodies to fight urushiol’s antigens, the outcome is radically different. Massive inflammation is one of the results of the now hyperactive immune system. Interestingly, some of the immune response mechanisms are identical to what happens in advanced Covid cases-particularly with the cykotene storm.
Now for the cross-reactivity: it is well known that workers in the floral industry are routinely exposed to various irritants from working with certain plants. One example: workers who handle tulip bulbs all day long without plastic gloves wind up with a painful skin irritation known as tulip fingers. Floral arrangers who have frequent exposure to many of the popular Alstroemeria varieties can absorb tulipalin, which in excess can cause dermititis and associated pain. The kicker: a person with any of the irritants from having earlier handled certain flowers who then is LATER exposed to urushiol almost always has a significantly more serious and longer lasting bout of dermititis. Cross-reactivity is at work in those situations where MULTIPLE types of antibodies kick in to combat the antigens resulting from exposure to the urushiol instead of just ONE antibody going to war against the urushiol antigen. There is nothing “novel” about this type of multiple antibody action causing a hyperactive immune response; cross-reactivity has been around for a long, long time, has been well studied and is fully understood in a wide variety of combinations.
Fast forward to the Covid era and the improper use of “vaccines” having as constituents multiple poisons. In particular, if any of those poisons are engineered to elicit a response from an immune system in such a way that multiple antibodies respond at the same time then-and not getting cute here with word choice-there can be AMPLIFICATION of the immune response. Amplification, just like in the urushiol:flower toxin example that leads to more serious outcomes. The kind of stuff that Toni Fauci paid good money to achieve. More to the point: amplification of the immune response so that bodily harm results.
Yes, the longer the scam goes on the faster it unravels. People should hang for their crimes against humanity.
Of course non-sterilizing vaccines (all of the ones for covid) are a ticking timebomb. Anyone who knows the biology can figure that out if they tried real hard and asked for help on the big words.
My niece the nurse is pregnant and I bet she got the jab. I wish her and the unborn baby my best wishes.
it’s really sad how unskeptical everyone is about covid and the Government, big pharma and the story fed to them.