WATCH: The president of the Human Rights Campaign Kelley Robinson is unable to answer the simple question is there a difference between women and men under questioning from Sen. Ted Cruz.pic.twitter.com/iWu1WCkRgx
— Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) June 21, 2023
-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Man are women , but with dicks…duh.
Boomer Fox fags think they return to the 1950s just by voting the right money grubbing shitstain into public office.
Their average 68 yr old viewers are so caged by FNC, wretched.
===
Despite the constant appearances of Lindsey Graham & Mark Levin, Faux Nooz finds Hannity in 14th place behind Joy Reid after Tucker Carlson’s ouster.
Man are women , but with dicks…but are lesbians as they want to have sex with women!
(see trans prison and school rapes)
The point is this: if your words do not comport very closely with reality, then you are either delusional or you are lying.
These Marxists like this black women are purposely lying to our faces. Then the question then becomes: why?
The answer is either they are trying to confuse us, steal from us, take power from us, separate us from God, or otherwise harm us.
Any of those reasons makes them a threat to society and everyone in it.
Threats to people and society need to be minimized or removed.
Nationalists understand the value of society, cohesiveness, and the value of the people as a whole healthy entity.
This is why Nationalists always seek to remove Marxists.
I envision a future with free helicopter rides.
If You are NOT (separated), then You Should know how this ends. Question of timing.
EZPZ.
“Political correctness is communist propaganda writ small. In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, not to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is in some small way to become evil oneself. One’s standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control. I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same effect and is intended to.”
― Theodore Dalrymple
One of the most brilliant quotes ever.
The truth of it reveals itself in visceral terms. The disgust I feel toward those who engage in this as well as those who fail to see their own humiliation – or worse, consider their humiliation as a form of beggars currency toward their masters, is so pronounced at this point I have to consciously relax my face because I am getting communist hate wrinkles on my brow.
From Pretend Quotes Magazine we get this gem:
“In order to answer your yes or no question, I need five minutes to establish a foundation of pretzel logic or else I may fail to answer in the correct regime approved “con” text.”
~satire
“To know and not to know, to be conscious of complete truthfulness while telling carefully constructed lies, to hold simultaneously two opinions which cancelled out, knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them, to use logic against logic, to repudiate morality while laying claim to it, to believe that democracy was impossible and that the Party was the guardian of democracy, to forget whatever it was necessary to forget, then to draw it back into memory again at the moment when it was needed, and then promptly to forget it again: and above all, to apply the same process to the process itself — that was the ultimate subtlety: consciously to induce unconsciousness, and then, once again, to become unconscious of the act of hypnosis you had just performed. Even to understand the word ‘doublethink’ involved the use of doublethink.” ― George Orwell, 1984
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Doublethink means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them. The Party intellectual knows in which direction his memories must be altered; he therefore knows that he is playing tricks with reality; but by the exercise of doublethink he also satisfies himself that reality is not violated. The process has to be conscious, or it would not be carried out with sufficient precision, but it also has to be unconscious, or it would bring with it a feeling of falsity and hence of guilt. Doublethink lies at the very heart of Ingsoc, since the essential act of the Party is to use conscious deception while retaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty. To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just so long as it is needed, to deny the existence of objective reality and all the while to take account of the reality which one denies — all this is indispensably necessary. Even in using the word doublethink it is necessary to exercise doublethink. For by using the word one admits that one is tampering with reality; by a fresh act of doublethink one erases this knowledge; and so on indefinitely, with the lie always one leap ahead of the truth. Ultimately it is by means of doublethink that the Party has been able — and may, for all we know, continue to be able for thousands of years — to arrest the course of history.
MORE on doublethink:
https://www.abhafoundation.org/assets/books/html/1984/138.html
https://www.abhafoundation.org/assets/books/html/1984/139.html
https://www.abhafoundation.org/assets/books/html/1984/140.html
The whole enchilada:
https://www.abhafoundation.org/assets/books/html/1984/3.html
Cruz is really good at gathering video clips to be used to build campaign contributions. Not so good at actually doing anything about this blaspheme.
She knows the answer, she just refuses to say it.
Correct.
Move out da way! Bitch, move out da way.
Using words & sentence sidesteps, she tap dances around questions without ever answering one more than Mr. Bojangles.
We have an associate justice on SCOTUS who could/would not define a woman, yet she was approved by the senate and can serve for life.
Shut up nigger
Lol if this copied at the right place…
https://youtu.be/2Yec9xYJxpE
If not, Sam Kinison it telling Rodney to Say It! Comedy gold.
🤣 Puhleeze!
Au79alpha
@au79alpha
·
6h
They want to corrupt our language, because language corrupts thought. If the language is perverted and distorted so that society can no longer agree on terms or elementary definitions, then society collapses into a state of incoherence, depravity and confusion. This is their goal
Makes no sense, these liberals can’t define what a man or women is, yet they got their job because they where a woman and had darker skin then a lot of other people. Of course being gay puts you at the top of the list, but if you don’t know what a womàn is, how can you identify a carpet munching partner?
There is a pattern and a meter to these call and response acts in Congressional hearings. This would indicate that there must be some sort of preparation and coaching that takes places that has specific designs and forms because human beings in any other set of interactions do not speak in this manner.
Think of it like this; when you go through a routine commercial interaction of buying a cup of coffee, we say hello, we order, they confirm, say thank you, we say you’re welcome and the interaction comes to an end. It has a form, we all agree to it, we all understand how it works and agree to participate in it. In these scenes we are offered something completely alien, like two people who speak different languages meeting for the frst time trying to communicate using halting and repetative snatches of sounds, as if through this constant echoing of noise we can somehow get through.
The purpose on the one hand is to convince us that Congress actually does something and that the witnesses will actually tell them the truth, neither of which are going to happen.
Oh they’re coached alright.
In obfuscation. Redirection, with answers that project virtue signaling.
But, you are correct.
The Congress critter uses the old lawyer speak tactic to paint someone into a catch-22 corner.
“Answer Yes or No. Do you still beat your wife?”
-I have never beaten my wife.
“Simple yes or no, please”
-No.
“Oh, but you used to at one time, we can postulate.”
Blacks – are their own worst enemies. See intra-race murder stats as well as testimony exchanges like this and the myriad of other examples historically and in the contemporary context. Don’t forget E. St. Louis and Camden, NJ either.