Guest Post by Steve Kirsch
I’m going to share two, verifiable anecdotes, that prove, without a doubt, that vaccines cause SIDS and autism. Basically, the medical community claims black swans don’t exist. I easily found them.
Executive summary
They are lying to you.
Most of the SIDS cases (likely 75% or more) are due to the childhood vaccines. Vaccines are the main cause of autism as well, likely 75% or more.
In fact, pediatric clinics that avoid vaccines have zero, or near-zero, rates of SIDS and autism.
In this article, I’m going to discuss how just two black swans can destroy the medical consensus by proving that the medical community couldn’t have gotten it right on their claims that vaccines don’t cause autism or SIDS:
- A police officer who investigated 300 SIDS cases over a 7 year period (about 3 to 4 cases per month), observed that 75% of the cases happened within 48 hours after a vaccine.
- A couple who got their triplets (not identical) vaccinated all developed autism within hours after the shot (and each other).
These anecdotes happened, and they are “statistically impossible” to have happened by chance (at least not in our lifetime).
I don’t believe it is possible to attack this data or explain it away.
Too many SIDS cases happened within 48 hours of the vaccine for the vaccine not to have caused the deaths
In an earlier Substack, I reported the case of a police officer assigned to investigate SIDS cases over a 7 year period who observed that 75% of the 300 cases happened within 48 hours of a vaccine.
At the time, I wasn’t sure how to calculate the probability of that happening.
But now, thanks to Professor Norman Fenton, I do.
If SIDS is just randomly happening to babies, and babies are vaccinated every 60 days like clockwork, the chance of a SIDS death happening within any 48 hour window post-vaccine is 1/30.
So if there are 300 babies who died of SIDS, we’d expect that 10 of them, on average, would happen within every 48 hour window post vaccine.
So what are the chances of 75% of these deaths (or more) happening within 48 hours after the shot?
The calculation is trivial to get the chance of seeing 225 deaths or more:
>>> poisson.sf(225-1,10)
3.7718601504237225e-213
That’s not a typo. 10 to the -213. That’s as close to impossible as it gets.
In other words, if SIDS is randomly happening with respect to the time of vaccination, it is impossible to have made this observation. We can cherry pick all we want, we’ll never find a cherry like this to pick. Ever.
This leads to the inevitable conclusion that the vaccines are the primary cause of SIDS, and that they are, at a minimum, causing 75% or more of all SIDS cases.
What’s so special about this police officer
She asked the parents of the deceased when the child was last vaccinated!!
Few other police officers in the world would ever ask such a question because they all know that “it couldn’t be the vaccine.”
So we were lucky enough to find a police officer that asked the question for each of her cases.
And by the way, even if she got it wrong and only 10% of the cases were within 48 hours of the vaccine, there is, by random chance, less than 1 chance in a million of observing that.
Our autism anecdote is also impossible if vaccines aren’t causing autism
The McDowell triplets (featured in the movie Vaxxed II) all got autism on the same day, within hours of each other.
Did that happen by chance? It happened within hours of their vaccine injection.
Check this out. Nearly 1M views in less than 24 hours after posting.
Again, the calculation is trivial.
Say kids only get autism between ages 1 and 4 to be conservative, so an exposure window of 3 years = 1095 days. The current rate of autism is 1 in every 35 kids per the CDC, but the McDowell triplets were vaccinated on June 25, 2007.
So around 1 in 100 kids would get autism in the 1095 day exposure period back in 2007.
So what’s the expected number of cases of autism in a single day per child? Pretty darn low: 1e-5. So if you have 3 kids, you’d expect to get 3e-5 autism cases in any 24 hour period, on average in 2007.
To see 3 (or more) events in a 24 hour window when you expected to see 3e-5 events is:
>>> poisson.sf(2,3e-5)
4.499898751214992e-15
This means that the McDowell triplets couldn’t have possibly happened by “bad luck.”
The vaccine they were given just hours earlier is the only possible way this event could have happened.
This means vaccines can cause autism.
We didn’t need more than one anecdote to prove that conclusively.
Speculation re: genes cause autism to happen at the same time
I just provided an anecdote where all three kids got autism within hours after a shot.
If you want to make the hand-waving argument that it is just a coincidence because triplets all get autism at the same time, simply show me a case where the autism happened in triplets all on the same day where a vaccine was not involved.
Also, explain this anecdote where one twin was given the vaccine and developed autism, and the twin not given the vaccine didn’t. You can simply show us the opposite anecdote where after the vaccine shot, the twin who did not get the vaccine got autism and the twin who got the vaccine did not get autism.
If you cannot provide evidence for either, your argument lacks evidentiary support and is simply not credible.
These two verifiable “black swan” anecdotes should be all that is needed to disprove the null hypothesis and totally discredit the medical community on these important issues
The medical consensus was that “black swans” don’t exist, i.e., vaccines don’t cause SIDS or autism.
It takes only a single verifiable sighting of a “black swan” to prove that the consensus was wrong.
That’s what we have here: a black swan for SIDS, and a black swan for autism.
The medical community would be best to embrace this and admit their mistake now because the longer they deny this, the less credible they will be in the eyes of the public.
They surely cannot argue against either of these observations.
But I welcome challenges by anyone who thinks they can!
See my pinned tweet for details for how to challenge me.
Fact checkers wanted! Your opportunity to be a hero!!
If you are a fact checker for the mainstream media, I’m happy to reveal the source of the SIDS statistics on condition that the police officer’s name and department is not used so you can verify the story.
Think of the enormous good you would do by validating that the medical community has been misinforming the public on SIDS for decades!
And of course the McDowell story is easily verifiable without contacting me; just watch this short clip from Vaxxed II.
You will accomplish four valuable things by fact checking me:
- Embarrass the medical community
- Create enormous distrust in “medical consensus”
- Cause parents of kids who died from SIDS to seek justice
- Save lives by letting parents know just how dangerous the vaccines are
Summary
With these two anecdotes (which weren’t hard to find), we can completely discredit the medical consensus on SIDS and autism.
Will the medical consensus change? Unlikely, even if these are published as case reports in the medical literature, they’d ignore it as an “anecdote” because that’s what they do. But that’s not science. Both anecdotes are verifiable and would be impossible to happen under the null hypothesis. So any real scientist would have to reject the null hypothesis. The problem is that there are too few real scientists left in the world because they would lose their job, lose their NIH funding, and/or lose their medical license if they speak out against the medical consensus.
So even though the medical consensus won’t change, I thought you all should know the truth: vaccines are the primary cause of SIDS and autism.
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Shhh… don’t say these things you are going to give those with some spark of soul left in their body the idea that maybe ‘the science’ is fucked. We all know the science is always correct and unquestionable
Thank you. I have a young family friend who is pregnant (4months.) Your research and advocacy is what empowers me to warn her and her mother. I discuss and forward your articles. (Somewhat ashamed of vaccinating my daughter 30 years ago, just ear infections.)
When the young mother said she didn’t feel comfortable arguing with a doctor I told her I would take her to her visits. She is single and on the state doll for insurance. Looking into if DO’s are covered.
Thank you again for the children!
Just for us geeks, maybe at the end of an article you could do the math a little fuller treatment. For instance, babies are vaxxed every 60 days not 30 days. I would like to follow along and play with the numbers.
Sorry, back with one more thought
Almost all of us just go to the doctor (MD.) and don’t know that there are other flavors of doctor than MD.
A little information on how to find a medical practitioner who hasn’t been hypnotized by big pharma would help everyone except Vaxx pushers. Also, is a doctor bound by ethics to answer truthfully if I ask if they are participating in a pharmaceutical company reward program (like a financial advisor would be.)
I recommend not going to the doctor. Suneel Dhand, MD, also says he never goes for checkups or anything like that, even though it would be free. Only trauma or tumors (maybe).
As for your second question: most physicians now work for large hospital systems, which have rules that you cannot even accept as much as a pen from a pharmaceutical rep. That is not where the conflict of interest lies nowadays, in my opinion (direct physician bribes from companies). The conflict of interest is between the conscience of physicians who are informed and want to do the right thing and the regulating bodies (State Medical Boards, CDC, Hospital committees etc.) who coerce them to do the wrong thing. It is an abusive relationship, and many physicians are not even aware of it. So as a patient there is really not a good way to find out about it. Hence, avoid having any interaction with the medical system at all, if possible. The regulatory bodies must be dismantled before trust can be reestablished, maybe in a hundred years from now.
So, they know this and continue injecting infants/children with poison?
At what point do we call this assault and murder?
I saw an article on the web that stated that 99% of SIDS cases were after vaccinations and only 1% occurred before vaccinations. Once again evidence of the effect of vaccinations.
The problem is that Americans can’t do math and probabilities escape them….As the election fraud saga proved…
Americans are infantalized.
They can only think in terms of possibilities.
Re: the number of people who participate in the government lotteries.
Possibilities are the domain of children.
It requires no critical thought.
(One rarely hears a child discussing probability…)
Before one has a grasp of reality, anything is possible.
As one’s world becomes tainted with reality, probabilities should take a much larger role.
By mid 20’s, decisions should be made with respect to probability.
Competent engineering decisions are.
The next time some idiot adult retorts with “It’s possible!”
Simply reply, “Sure, anything’s possible. It’s just not probable.”
This usually ends any retarded argument.
Preaching, to the choir.
Injections deliberately bypass ALL immune system defenses.
Injecting deadly metals/materials past all the natural immune defenses sounds really really stupid.
And that is what the product does.
Completely bypassing your immune system.
These actions are a 100% unnatural for the biome.
I can see how injecting these toxins might clear up a parasite infection, but there are alternatives that do not kill or permanently damage the subject.
I know multiple families where the first child developed autism after being on the recommended vaccine schedule, then they stopped vaccinating and none of the younger siblings got autism.
I know nobody who refused to vaccinate their children but wished they didn’t.
Nobody regrets not getting a “vaccine” shot…
Although I do believe that vaccines are likely causing thing such as SIDS and autism, the author has no understanding of “mathematical proof”. What he offered instead was inductive reasoning. What would be a convincing argument is an actual double-blind study of vaccines. This will not be done since the MIC (Medical Industrial Complex) does not want to give up its fraudulent vaccine cash cow; even if millions are injured by them around the world. You can’t let real science get in the way of profit.
Using the tragedy of sick, dying and dead babies to promote your anti vax nuttery must be about as low as one could get.
Everyone knows vaccines, yes ALL. OF. THEM., are Safe and Effective™.
Shame on you, Steve.