The Problem Boils Down to This

Guest Post by Eric Peters

Everyone has their take as regards the problems besetting us. Few seem to grasp there is fundamentally just one problem. It is the problem that animates the others, giving them the power to be problems.

What is this one problem that leads to all the others?

It is force – especially when its use (and threatened use, which has the same effect) is legalized.

If force institutionalized were taken away, there would of course still be disagreements – as well as annoyances. But that is all there would be. Or at least, mostly. Violence – its use and its threatened use – will of course always be with us as there will always be people willing to resort to the use of force to get what they want. But they would be outliers – and occasional rather than ubiquitous threats.

How often have you been mugged?

Have you been able to go even one day without being forced to pay what are styled “taxes” – i.e., legalized mugging? You are forced to pay the “mugger” every single time you pay for anything. And when you get paid for the work you do, too.

Because such mugging it is legal – and so ubiquitous. The mugger in the alley is a kind of freelancer; he enjoys no such advantage and suffers the disadvantage of it being legal to attempt to avoid his depredations and to defend oneself against them.

If you don’t like someone, but he is legally powerless to force you to interact with him, then you are free to avoid him. And because you are able to avoid him, conflict is avoided.

How do you feel about people you’re forced to deal with – because they have the power to force you to deal with them? For example, the proliferation of government employees whose employment centers on your having to not only deal with them politely but also pay for the privilege?

Think of the government employee who comes onto your property uninvited to assess the value of your home – so that the government can force you to hand over money to pay for government “services” you don’t want or use, such as government schools. How do you feel about him? How about the government worker who puts his hands on your wife, your child – or your elderly parent – at the airport?

The cop who simply takes – legally! – the envelope full of cash you were going to use to pay for the used car you were on your way to buy when you got “pulled over” for not wearing a seatbelt. He says it’s “suspicious” – and it’s up to you to prove (at your expense) that the money is “legitimate.”

The mask-faced bureaucrat who forced you to close the doors to your business that no one was forced to walk through – leading to the bankrupting of your business?

Do you not feel hatred for them?

And how do these people feel about you? How does a person who has power over someone else, who can be made to obey, feel about having such power? What sort of person is attracted to that kind of power? How does a schoolyard bully feel about being able to make a smaller kid hand over his lunch money?

Force empowers the sadist – who becomes an official when force is legalized.

Take legalized force out of the equation and the sadist has no official power to torment anyone. He may succeed in finding some victims. But everyone is not his victim. And those who fall victim to him have the consolation of knowing they might be able to loosen their bonds when the sadist isn’t paying attention and lay hands on the bastard – which is considered a “crime” when done to an official sadist, such as the government worker with a uniform, a badge and a gun who orders you to get on the ground now! because you defied his order to “buckle up.”

Most people are not violent and seek therefore to avoid violence. Down that road lies peaceful resolution and co-existence. Your neighbor does not like the color you decided to paint your house. He can ask you to paint it a different color. He can plant tree along his property line, so that he no longer sees what displeases him. And he is free to move. You may not like this neighbor but you are not likely to hate him because all he can do is ask you to paint your house another color, plant some trees along his side of the property line – or move. And because he has no power to force you to do anything, you are probably more likely to give some weight to his preferences and maybe come to an agreeable compromise.

The absence of force encourages this just as charity is encouraged when people are not forced to “help.” They feel compassion for the truly needy. They do not resent them, at any rate – because why would they? They are objects of pity – as opposed to loci of legalized predation.

Libertarians and anarchists are regularly derided for advocating that institutionalized force – which is a tautology for government – be removed from human interaction. The accusations leveled include that the result would be mayhem. It is a hyperbolic and absurd accusation and easily demonstrated by noting the fact that friends and families base their interactions on libertarian-anarchic concepts; no one is forced to be friends with anyone and our families are bound by affection (with the occasional sad exception) and in any case no one is forced to remain part of any family.

Mayhem?

How about the institutionalized mayhem of legalized violence as the basis for human interaction? Which engenders the greater fear in most people – the burglar who might break into their house one night? Or the IRS agent who might seize their house in broad daylight?

Would you rather live with certain risks – as that you might one day fall victim to someone who acts to harm you? Or the certainty that you will be harmed, not just once but over and over again – and every day of your life, to very end of your life? And be legally powerless to raise a hand in you own defense?

To ask these questions is to answer them.

As an Amazon Associate I Earn from Qualifying Purchases
-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
14 Comments
James the Deplorable Wanderer
James the Deplorable Wanderer
October 11, 2023 8:40 pm

Makes too much sense – why libertarian ideas aren’t found in government often

Anonymous
Anonymous
  James the Deplorable Wanderer
October 11, 2023 9:03 pm

Libertarianism and government are antithetical. There cannot be a libertarian government.

All government, by definition, is based on force. Government says you can’t, or must, do something which you want to do, or don’t want to do; and you cannot just disagree and walk away, or force will be applied to you to compel compliance, or expropriate you or cage or enslave or kill you.

There is no justifiable initiation of force. Lethal response in unambiguous self-defense is justified.

“A man’s natural rights are his own, against the whole world; and any infringement of them is equally a crime; whether committed by one man, or by millions; whether committed by one man, calling himself a robber, or by millions calling themselves a government.”
― Lysander Spooner, No Treason: The Constitution of No Authority
https://www.goodreads.com/work/quotes/2095916-no-treason-the-constitution-of-no-authority

“If all mankind minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind.” ― John Stuart Mill, On Liberty
https://www.goodreads.com/work/quotes/2387235-on-liberty
.

.

Text of the above book:
https://cdn.mises.org/Boundaries%20of%20Order%20Private%20Property%20as%20a%20Social%20System_0.pdf

Obbledy
Obbledy
  Anonymous
October 11, 2023 10:38 pm

The ultimate minority is a minority of ONE!…..

Gary
Gary
  Anonymous
October 11, 2023 11:42 pm

I believe you meant anarchy and government are antithetical. Anarchy is derived from Greek, the prefix an meaning without and archon meaning ruler; it means without ruler or no masters, no slaves. Government is derived from latin, the verb gubernare meaning to control and suffix mente meaning mind; it means mind control.

What we have is a world population literally LARPing, believing the mind virus ‘authority’ actually exists. No one has any right to tell you what you can do so long as you don’t harm anyone else, their rights or property. Authority doesn’t exist in nature, there is no lie in nature.

If we lived in a society where if one’s rights were violated they were morally justified in ending the life of the violator, we would be living in a VERY polite society!

The Liberty Advocate
The Liberty Advocate
  Anonymous
October 12, 2023 10:26 am

A true democracy where everyone has full veto authority, is not based on force. Neither is a government that is established via contract law.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  The Liberty Advocate
October 12, 2023 1:34 pm

Neither is a government that is established via contract law.

What?
The freedom to contract or not is freedom of choice. If you are forced to do things because of these contracts, dissolve the contract.
Why maintain contracts where you are at a disadvantage?
What other choice for a rational human is there?

A “Duh these people I have a voluntary contract with are abusing me”

B “End the contract.”

A “But I get benefits.”

B “And abused. Terminate the contract.”

A “Naw, I guess it ain’t that bad… all I have to do to get “my social security” is stay up to date on any injections they tell me I have to take.”

B “Was a medical injection requirement part of this contract when they first offered it?”

A “No.”

B “Why is a requirement now?”

A “I don’t know.”

B ” Ever wonder if their motive for changing the rules was to lessen the amount they will have to give you back by quickening your demise?”

A “???”

B “Terminate the contract, your money is gone.”

Jdog
Jdog
October 11, 2023 9:59 pm

Government is evil by its very nature. People are evil to begin with, when you give them power over others like government does, then you raise that evil to an unimaginable level.

Gayle
Gayle
  Jdog
October 12, 2023 10:27 am

A spiritually healthy person is not interested in having power over others. The converse implies that spiritually ruined, pathological individuals are attracted to positions of influence. (That’s why no governing system ever conceived by man is successful over the long term.) Klaus Schwab is a perfect example of this phenomenon as he glories in his plans to dehumanize – and depopulate – the kingdom he imagines for himself and his minions. The destruction of the material world and all mankind is the ongoing operation of Satan. The Bible describes how this conflict began, continues, and will end, apparently sooner rather than later.

gadsden flag
gadsden flag
October 11, 2023 10:12 pm

three views:

1. government persists because it has the power of death over you and that power corrupts those in power.

2. government persists because mankind are cannibals and would consume each other without the death-power of government.

3. government persists and becomes the league of cannibals installed to protect cannibals from cannibals.

if you are gonna deal with cannibals anyway, it would be less expensive if we would eliminate the government-cannibals.

the money saved could be invested in chicken broth.

Gary
Gary
  gadsden flag
October 11, 2023 11:49 pm

Replace the word government with men and women DBA ‘Government’ and I’d agree.

Obbledy
Obbledy
October 11, 2023 10:37 pm

That’s how you the Constitution is not in effect(I know,I,know)….Nowhere in the document does it say you are OBLIGED TO TAKE ORDERS from ANYBODY!!!……go ahead ,take a look….not there,yet a LEO seems to think he has a lawful,legal right to shoot you if you don’t!…where did THAT come from???…..
PS,all “laws”repugnant to the Constitution are null and void!!….who gets to decide??We The People…that’s who!

O.M.'s Perspective
O.M.'s Perspective
October 12, 2023 5:47 am

Two rancid examples come to mind, after reading EP’s great essay here.
Why did the I.R.S. purchase and equip agents with firearms and ammunition, besides Congress’ plan to hire another 87k of them?
Sounds like armed confrontations are coming down the pike.
Will the tax man have SWAT squad goons and armored vehicles?
The 2nd example is those arrogant, evil bastards & bitches who sit on local public school boards, with progressive curriculum tools to recruit more mush heads into the gender delusion, and who tout a superiority power complex over the parents they despise, who have children subject to their lust for power & control.
-“people” who are paid with taxes that get raised higher every other year, even punishing homeowners in the district who have no children attending the public school indoctrination programs.

There ought to be local school tax exclusions / exemptions for:
A. Seniors on fixed incomes, and
B. Adult tax paying homeowners who have no children in the school system.
THAT would be fair.
Unfortunately, that is too reasonable of an argument, and goes against the emotions of the Karens and Kevins who want everybody to pitch in and foment diversity, for the good of the community.

Once the school boards get a millage increase on the tax rolls, there wont be any rebates in your future.
They are, after all, government worker sponges, ever thirsty for more coin to soak up from out of your meager savings.

anon a moos
anon a moos
October 12, 2023 9:40 am

I’ll ask again.

What would ((they)) do if the People finally grew a back bone and said they won’t pay the extortion fees any more?

Do you honestly think they can jail millions of people? Yes they would def try and make examples of some People to frighten the rest into compliance, J6’rs. We are IN a war whether you think so or not, and there will be casualties.

But this war is global, do you want to fight for your children’s, grand children’s future freedoms?? Or sit on your hands and say tough shit that’ll be their problem.

The solutions are not difficult. Simply stop complying and funding the cultists

Anonymous
Anonymous
  anon a moos
October 12, 2023 1:39 pm

They already killed all their enemies.
They just have not all succumbed to the dermal bypass installation……….yet.