Guest Post by Eric Peters
“Nimrata” must mean something along the lines of I don’t care who you want to represent you. . .
How else to explain the refusal of this woman to concede that GOP voters do not want her to represent them?
Italics to emphasize just that fact as well as an implication. Is it not remarkable that Nimrata insists – channeling Nixon – that she’s the one when it’s clear it’s someone else? The audacity is as remarkable as it is revelatory. These people – and she is an archetype of them – think of themselves as born to lead (paraphrasing Springsteen) and us to follow.