Thoughts from the Frontline: The Gig Economy Is the New Normal

Thoughts from the Frontline: The Gig Economy Is the New Normal

By John Mauldin

 

An already-confusing employment environment grew even more complicated this past week. Many readers responded to my “Crime in the Jobs Report” letter with their own stories. Some confirmed what I wrote, while others disputed it. Some of the stories I read from readers who are stuck far from where they want to be in this job market were very moving. I think everyone agrees the labor outlook is uncertain. I sense a lot of nervousness, even from those who have secure jobs that pay well. In today’s letter, I’m going to respond to some of the observations and data that came in this week on employment.

As we will see, we have a right to be nervous. Big changes in the employment world are happening, and we don’t yet know how they will affect us individually. Analysts like me can say we’ll muddle through, but we must remember that not everyone will muddle at the same pace.

We will also take a look today at a growing new phenomenon: the gig economy. (I should note that today’s letter is a little shorter. I am trying to reduce the word length of Thoughts from the Frontline.)

Employers Want Gray Hair

We talked last week about employers’ reluctance to hire older workers. Reader Steve Lange from Denver pointed me to a ZeroHedge article that questions this premise.

If you look at the BLS age breakdown for new jobs (Table A-9), you’ll see that workers aged 55 and over accounted for virtually all of October’s strong gains. That group added 378,000 jobs last month.

Meanwhile, the number of workers aged 25-54 actually declined by 35,000. That’s supposed to be “prime working age,” so any decline should ring alarm bells. And the numbers are more alarming if you are male: men aged 25-54 lost 119,000 jobs in October.

This pattern isn’t new, either. I’ve written about this ongoing anomaly in previous letters. Since December 2007, workers aged 55 and older have gained over 7.5 million jobs, while those under 55 have lost a cumulative 4.6 million jobs. Older workers are simply taking employment market share from younger workers.

What would cause this trend? Partly it’s demographic. The population is aging as the Baby Boomer bulge grows older and Millennials postpone parenthood. Nevertheless, it does look as though Baby Boomers are not exiting the labor force as fast as we thought.

Some Boomers may delay retirement simply because they enjoy working and are healthier than previous generations were in their late 60s. I’m in that category myself. More ominously, it seems that millions of Boomers are reaching retirement age without much in the way of retirement assets. They don’t retire because they can’t afford to do so.

Tyler Durden, the pseudonymous ZeroHedge writer, connects this pattern to the unimpressive wage growth we’ve seen in this recovery.

Little wonder then why there is no wage growth as employers continue hiring mostly those toward the twilight of their careers: the workers who have little leverage to demand wage hikes now and in the future, something employers are well aware of.

Do older workers really have “little leverage to demand wage hikes?” I think it probably depends on the worker and the job. For relatively unskilled, repetitive work, employers will hire whoever is most productive and reliable for the price they want to pay. They’ll pay what it takes to keep those workers aboard and still make a profit. No offense to the younger generation, but the older generation doesn’t stay out and party and shows up ready to work.

I am sure you have had something like the following experience. I walked up to the busy checkout line at the local Barnes & Noble, where a clearly elderly gentleman proceeded to check out the rather complex combination of books, gift cards, and electronic transfers I wanted to buy. He proceeded flawlessly, and I finally had the temerity to ask, “How old are you?” “Eighty-four,” came back the answer; “I like to stay active, and I get to meet a lot of interesting people.” We had a quick conversation about how much more common people like him are today, and I moved on. I got the definite impression that he could live without the income but preferred working. I also recalled my 17-year-old daughter checking me out at Barnes & Noble 20 years ago. So I walked around and sized up the present-day staff and found an age range decidedly skewed from what I remembered 20 years earlier.

Older people may simply be willing to work for less money, although I don’t think Barnes & Noble is paying high salaries to any of its retail clerks. Some have other income sources, such as Social Security. Those over 65 have Medicare, which reduces the employer’s benefit headache. Younger workers have neither advantage.

Nonetheless, I’m still surprised to see younger workers losing so much ground. I hope it’s because they’re busy learning new skills. That’s what we really need.

The Gig Economy Is the New Normal

But there may be something else happening to skew the work force age distribution. There is growing awareness of what is being called the “gig economy.” My hedge fund friend Murat Koprulu has been busy researching and documenting this phenomenon and regularly regales me with what he finds. He goes and spends evening and weekends with young gig workers, trying to figure out what it is they really do and how they make ends meet in New York City. It turns out they need a lot less to support their lifestyle than you might imagine, and they prefer working intermittent gigs, being able to do what they want, and having no boss.

A close look at the data indicates that the gig economy is indeed large and growing. Pushing this growth are Generation Xers, who typically prefer more flexible work arrangements, and Millennials, who often have no other choice. The gig economy is rapidly changing the country’s economic landscape – for better or worse.

It’s not just Uber driving or AirBnB. There are literally scores of websites and apps where you can advertise your services, get temporary or part-time work, and do so from anywhere you happen to be. Some “gigs” actually pay pretty good money, but they are for people with specialized skills who prefer to live a somewhat different lifestyle than the typical 9-to-5’er does.

There is a great deal of debate among economists about how big the gig economy really is. It doesn’t seem to show up clearly in the BLS employment data. Typically, we would expect those working in the gig economy to appear in the self-employed category, but that category is actually drifting downward in numbers, relatively speaking. So the Wall Street Journal recently published an article pooh-poohing the concept of the gig economy.

Not so fast, say Harvard economist Larry Katz and Princeton’s Alan Krueger. They are currently working on research to document the rise of the gig economy America. From a story at fusion.net:

Katz said two pieces of evidence suggest current measures of self-employment and multiple-job holding are “missing a large part of the gig economy.”

The first is that the share of the employed (and of the adult population) filing a 1099 form, the tax document “gig economy” workers must file, increased in the 2000s, even as standard measures of self-employment declined in the 2000s.

Likewise, the share of individuals filing Schedule C tax forms to report profits and losses for their homegrown businesses is up “substantially” in the 2000s, “even though survey measure of self-employment are down.”

“These discrepancies suggest a growth of ‘gig’ and ‘share’ economy workers who receive 1099 income, file Schedule C forms on their taxes, but don’t answer the standard [government] question as indicating they are self-employed and don’t say they are a multiple job holder,” Katz said.

Other groups have confirmed this: Zen Payroll, a site that tracks the sharing economy, found increases in the share of 1099 workers across many major U.S. metros.


Source: Zen Payroll via Small Business Labs

And data from research group EconomicModeling.com show the share of traditional, 9-to-5 workers in the labor force has declined…


Source: Fusion, data via EconomicModeling.com

…while those who categorize themselves as “miscellaneous proprietors” is climbing.

 
Source: Fusion, data via EconomicModeling.com

Meanwhile, in preliminary interviews with “gig economy” workers, Katz said he and Krueger have confirmed that a majority of those who have regular, non-“gig” employment don’t answer that they have “multiple jobs” when asked the standard multiple-jobs question, “even in many cases where they have significant on-line and other non-traditional job income.”

They do answer about their share, gig, and freelance economy activities when specifically asked about other specific ways they made income,” Katz said. “But many of them do not seem to consider such activities as ‘regular jobs.’”

Indeed, a recent survey found 60 percent of such workers get at least 25 percent of their income from gig economy work.

This report absolutely squares with what Murat’s research is showing. He is starting to write a book on the gig economy. I’ve read the outline. I don’t think my age peers will quite understand what’s happening. Their reaction may be akin to how my parents felt about their children in the ’60s and ’70s.

As Steve Hill writes at the Huffington Post:

The gig economy is just one sub domain of what is happening more broadly to the workforce, including just-in-time scheduling and other disruptions to the labor markets, whether as a result of the gig economy, automation and robots, artificial intelligence and other factors. Fortune columnist Jeffrey Pfeffer writes, “What is not in dispute is that the proportion of contractors, freelancers, and part-time, contingent workers in the U.S. has been increasing and has been for a long time.”

What I notice with some of my own children and many of their friends is that the gig economy, and the independent contractor world in general, is almost completely divorced from anything that looks like a social safety network. Healthcare? 401(k)s? Retirement programs? Extra help for single moms? Forget about it.

To continue reading this article from Thoughts from the Frontline – a free weekly publication by John Mauldin, renowned financial expert, best-selling author, and Chairman of Mauldin Economics – please click here.

Important Disclosures

 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
10 Comments
Stephanie Shepard
Stephanie Shepard
November 17, 2015 7:39 am

I became apart of the gig economy when employers became too wishy-washy about jobs. Often their expectations were too high for such little pay.

Often my employers didn’t respect other people’s jobs (being cavalier and/or always threatening to fire people or cut hours). There were too many egomaniac managers who simple didn’t care if they were messing with someone’s income. They had no respect for the fact that people depended on their jobs to pay their bills and put food on the table. I can’t respect people who dangled the possibility of unemployment in such a callous way.

Since I quit working a job I now have income security.

Anonymous
Anonymous
November 17, 2015 9:11 am

For most businesses there is a fine line between an employee being an asset and a liability.

Work for yourself to avoid that situation, and hire employees to understand it.

Dutchman
Dutchman
November 17, 2015 9:45 am

@Stephanie: I couldn’t agree more. This ‘gig’ thing is terribly abusive to the contractor that doesn’t have continuous work. Companies now try to ‘engineer jobs’ so everyone is instantly replaceable – so they don’t care. Also 1099 folks need to provide all their own benefits – vacation, sick leave, 401k, health insurance, liability insurance, plus they must pay 1.5 times the FICA amount cause the employer doesn’t have to pay the matching amount.

The biggest con is this Uber. First, there’s a lot more wear and tear – depreciation on your car. Second more maintenance, tires, fuel, oil changes. Third – increased risk of accident / liability. Fourth – your personal security.

As a software developer (1099) long time ago the IRS came down on ‘perpetual’ contractors. Another words you couldn’t be a contractor at the same company forever. At some point (a year) they have to hire you as an employee.

Stephanie Shepard
Stephanie Shepard
November 17, 2015 10:22 am

@Dutchman: The worse abuse I’ve noticed in regards to contractors is cased like James Foley who was beheaded by ISIS. News affiliations have been hiring freelance journalists so they don’t have to be liable in cases of journalists being kidnapped or killed. I know there’s always risk being a war correspondent but News affiliations used to be responsible for journalists safety and security.

Iconoclast421
Iconoclast421
November 17, 2015 11:36 am

The “world’s oldest profession” is a gig.

Chicago999444
Chicago999444
November 17, 2015 3:19 pm

The “gig economy” is evidence that our economic landscape has changed utterly since the end of the Post WW2 era c. 1980. This is really only a return to life as people knew it before the age of high wage jobs with pensions and gold watches at the end of a 40 year tenure at a stable company. Those days are over, most likely forever.

This is, of course, the reason young people are delaying such markers of adulthood as buying houses and having children. Who wants to make a long term financial commitment, or, God Forbid, bring a child into the world when he or she can’t count on being employed next month, or for how much?

I expect that our millies will live much differently than the fortunate and pampered generations that reached adulthood between 1945 and 1990. I believe they will be a lot like my grandparents. My granddad counted himself fortunate to have a career track job in the 30s even though the pay was too small to move out of my great grandparents house until my mom was about 8 years old. Those were rough years, but they learned frugality and prudence, and went on to become extremely successful. I think our millies will learn the same lessons. If you want to succeed in the “gig” economy, you will learn to live far below your means, plan carefully, and forego costly indulgences, especially if they involve long term financial commitments. You will have to be a lot more flexible and accepting than most people in this country are prepared to be.

Given that the supply: demand equation is very much against workers and that our social safety nets are and always were unsustainable and unaffordable, we perhaps need to revive the private institutions that helped their members in times of need, and were also the centers of their social and community lives.

I’m speaking of the old-time benevolent societies, that proliferated in the 19th century. The Elks, the Lutheran Brotherhood, the Masons, and others like them, came into being as mutual aid societies, to aid like minded members in times of needs, and provided a sort of safety net, while discouraging long term dependence and parasitism.

However people cope with this economy, they will not be able to rely on the institutions and systems we’ve taken for granted for the past 60 years.

Stucky
Stucky
November 17, 2015 4:24 pm

Many many years ago I saw a cartoon I still recall.

Two men talking. One says to the other, “So, what do you do?” The man replies, “I’m a consultant.” To which the other man says, “Yeah, I’m unemployed also.”

I thought that was funny.

This is funny too, and usually true:
[imgcomment image[/img]

Bob
Bob
November 17, 2015 4:48 pm

The ‘Gig’ labor market treats most of its participants like slowly-boiled frogs. You may not realize you have been exploited until it is too late. Rate setting by means of a bidding process is the worst. And the Uber pay arrangements, for example, are a travesty. NEVER, EVER underprice your skills, assets and time in the marketplace! They are all you have! If at all possible, walk away rather than set precedents you can’t survive on…

KaD
KaD
November 27, 2015 11:17 am

The class action lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Manhattan, accuses Goldman Sachs Group (GS.N), Bank of America Merrill Lynch (BAC.N), JPMorgan Chase(JPM.N), Citigroup(C.N), Credit Suisse Group (CSGN.VX), Barclays Plc (BARC.L), BNP Paribas SA (BNPP.PA), UBS (UBSG.VX), Deutsche Bank AG (DBKGn.DE), and the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS.L) of colluding to prevent the trading of interest rate swaps on electronic exchanges, like the ones on which stocks are traded.
Read more at Reuters http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/11/26/us-interestrateswaps-lawsuit-idUSKBN0TE2YQ20151126#rTGDUr1SggXErM2L.99

KaD
KaD
November 27, 2015 11:17 am

Trans-Pacific Partnership a big win for corporate interests: http://www.canadianprogressiveworld.com/2015/11/19/23772/