Trump v Cruz & Goldman Sachs

Trump-Cruz

While Trump has held rallies and they are now playing Born in the USA to distinguish him from Cruz who was born in Canada, the real issue Cruz is not addressing head-on, is the New York Times revelation that Cruz failed to properly disclose large loans he received during his Senate campaign. Trump brought up the issue, but in a half-ass manner. Cruz quickly retorted: “Thank you for passing on that hit piece on the front page of The New York Times.” Cruz continued: “The entire New York Times attack is that I disclosed that loan on one filing with the United States Senate … but it was not in the second filing with the FEC.” Cruz even admitted: “Yes, I made paperwork errors … but if that’s the best hit the New York Times has got, they better go back to the well.”

However, that is interesting, but who gave him the loans he forgot to disclose? None other than Goldman Sachs. When you run for office, you are BY LAW required to disclose the source of your funds. It just does not cut it to say – oh, I forgot. Sorry, that disqualifies you from holding office and others have been seriously investigated for such lapses of memory.

Putting that aside, the source of the funds was the notorious Goldman Sachs. The dishonesty here is that Cruz has pretended to stand against the bankers. “Like many other players on Wall Street and big business, they seek out and get special favors from government,” Cruz told the New York Times previously. How dishonest is this statement and then forgetting to report a loan from Goldman Sachs? His wife Heidi, is a managing director at Goldman Sachs and has taken a temporary “leave” during his presidential campaign.

I am sorry. But Cruz is bought and paid for and would be in the pocket of the New York Banks no different than Hillary, Bush, or the rest of them who take money from this crowd. You do not forget to report a loan from Goldman Sachs when your wife is a managing director. Come on. How stupid do we have to be to entertain this excuse?


11 thoughts on “Trump v Cruz & Goldman Sachs”

  1. Cruz was initially my 2nd choice, perhaps as a VP under Trump. About 2 weeks ago there was another devastating dig on CRUZ (hope someone refreshes my memory).

    I no longer like Cruz.

     
  2. Many of us have been pounding the fact that Cruz is owned by Goldman Sachs. Looks like the ammo against him is piling up and people are seeing him for the shitey bastard that he is.

    Wake up and sniff the coffee………there is not one candidate that is not owned.

     
  3. Yeah, but Trump never deals with banks and his bankruptcies show that he doesn’t need bankers’ money. He is soooo much better than the rest.

    Save us, Donald.

    Save Us!

     

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

You can add images to your comment by clicking here.