What Would Happen If Martial Law Was Declared In America?

Submitted by Michael Snyder via The End of The American Dream blog,

In recent weeks, there has been a lot of concern that an upcoming eight week military exercise on U.S. soil known as “Jade Helm” is actually a dress rehearsal for the imposition of martial law in this country.  One of the reasons for the high level of concern is that we have seen a dramatic increase in the number of “urban warfare exercises” conducted by the U.S. military in major U.S. cities over the past decade – including exercises where “dissidents” are hunted down, arrested and hauled away.  As our world becomes increasingly unstable, and as our society rapidly decays from within, many believe that it is only a matter of time before the executive branch will have sufficient excuse to use the extensive martial law powers that it has been accumulating since 9/11.  When that day arrives, what will our nation look like?  What would actually happen if martial law was declared in America?

Well, the first thing that you need to know is that the U.S. Constitution would be “suspended”.

In other words, you would suddenly have no rights at all.

There would be no freedom of speech, no freedom of the press, no freedom of assembly and you could be arrested at any time for any reason whatsoever.

For the duration of the “emergency”, the military would be in control.  There would be troops in the streets, a curfew would almost certainly be imposed, and armed checkpoints would be set up.

If the “emergency” lasted long enough, we would probably see authorities go house to house confiscating firearms, ammunition and food supplies.

And perhaps most troubling of all, “dissidents” and “subversives” would likely be rounded up and imprisoned.

Perhaps you don’t think that this could ever happen in the United States in 2015.

Well, we do know that this is precisely what the FBI had a plan to do in the 1950s.  The following is an excerpt from a recent RT article

Documents show the FBI created a “Plan C” during the Cold War, which could have been triggered in the event the US underwent a nuclear attack. It included putting the nation under martial law, rounding up “subversives,” and interning enemy diplomats.

 

The documents, acquired by transparency journalism organization MuckRock, detail the FBI plan created in 1956, which was shared with several top officials from every governmental department. The FBI also distributed papers regarding the plan to its field offices. The plan would have gone into effect “after a war has begun in which the US is involved or may become involved and prior to an actual attack on the US itself,” according to the documents.

 

Under Plan C, martial law would be declared and the FBI would enact its ‘Emergency Detention Program,’ which entailed apprehending individuals whose affiliations with subversive organizations “are so pronounced that their continued liberty in the event of a national emergency would present a serious threat to the internal security of the country.” The document shows that as of April 1956, almost 13,000 people “were scheduled for apprehension in an emergency.”

Very sobering.

And we do know that the federal government had a list of at least 8 million names of people that were considered to be “threats to national security” back in the 1980s.  This list was known as Main Core, and it is not known whether this list still exists today.

I have a feeling that it does, and that it is probably much larger than it was back then.

We also know that government documents produced during the Obama administration openly discuss rounding up “dissidents” and taking them to internment camps.  Just consider the following example from Infowars

A leaked 2012 US Army Military Police training manual, entitled “Civil Disturbance Operations,” described how soldiers would be ordered to confiscate firearms and kill American “dissidents.” The manual also revealed that prisoners would be detained in temporary internment camps and “re-educated” to gain a new appreciation of “U.S. policies,” in accordance with U.S. Army FM 3-19.40 Internment/Resettlement Operations.

So who would those “dissidents” be exactly?

In “72 Types Of Americans That Are Considered ‘Potential Terrorists’ In Official Government Documents“, I detailed how official U.S. government documents specifically identify those that believe in “conspiracy theories” as possible threats.  Others that the government is concerned about include those opposed to abortion, globalism, communism, illegal immigration, the United Nations and “the New World Order”.

I wish that none of this was true.  Go check out the article for yourself.

Another very disturbing government document talks about the need for the U.S. Army to prepare to battle political dissidents in “megacities” and to neutralize groups “who can influence the lives of the population while undermining the authority of the state”.  Here is more from Infowars

The U.S. Army is preparing to fight political dissidents who challenge the power of the state as “megacities” become the battleground of the future, according to a new report in the Army Times.

The article details how the Army’s Capabilities Integration Center (ARCIC) worked with US Army Special Operations Command, the chief of staff’s Strategic Studies Group and the UK’s Ministry of Defence earlier this year to wargame the future of armed combat, which will revolve around the neutralization of groups “who can influence the lives of the population while undermining the authority of the state,” a chillingly vague description which could easily be applied to political dissidents.

The plan foresees an unprecedented realignment of U.S. military strategy focused around putting “boots on the ground” in megacities to deal with “politically dispossessed” populations while relying on “more lethal and more autonomous” methods.

Very alarming stuff.

And if we did see martial law declared nationwide, it is likely that all elections would be suspended indefinitely.

That could also potentially include the 2016 presidential election.

Is it possible that Barack Obama could use his emergency powers to stay in the White House beyond his second term?  There are some out there that believe that this could actually happen under the right circumstances.  For example, check out what Dr. Ben Carson said during an appearance on the Alan Colmes radio show

COLMES: What do you mean though when you say there may not be an election in 2016?

 

DR. BEN CARSON: There may be so much anarchy going on.

 

COLMES: Anarchy? So you really think we risk risking an anarchic America to the point where elections might be put on hold, or some kind of emergency is declared with such anarchy that there wouldn’t be a Presidential election in a couple of years?

 

DR. BEN CARSON: I don’t want to find out. I really don’t want to find out, I don’t want to continue down this pathway that we’re going down.

And the groundwork has certainly been laid for such a scenario.

During his time in the White House, Barack Obama has signed a series of executive orders that give him and his minions an extraordinary amount of power in the event of a major national emergency.

For example, read the following excerpt from an executive order that Obama signed in March 2012

Sec. 201.  Priorities and Allocations Authorities.  (a)  The authority of the President conferred by section 101 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2071, to require acceptance and priority performance of contracts or orders (other than contracts of employment) to promote the national defense over performance of any other contracts or orders, and to allocate materials, services, and facilities as deemed necessary or appropriate to promote the national defense, is delegated to the following agency heads:

 

(1)  the Secretary of Agriculture with respect to food resources, food resource facilities, livestock resources, veterinary resources, plant health resources, and the domestic distribution of farm equipment and commercial fertilizer;

 

(2)  the Secretary of Energy with respect to all forms of energy;

 

(3)  the Secretary of Health and Human Services with respect to health resources;

 

(4)  the Secretary of Transportation with respect to all forms of civil transportation;

 

(5)  the Secretary of Defense with respect to water resources; and

 

(6)  the Secretary of Commerce with respect to all other materials, services, and facilities, including construction materials.

That sounds like it covers just about everything.

Basically, during a time of martial law all of the things that you take for granted today would be out the window.

You would have no rights, and the federal government would be able to do just about anything that it wanted to do.

If that sounds really bad to you, then maybe now you are starting to understand why so many people get upset when they see preparations being made for the eventual imposition of martial law in this country.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
24 Comments
Erasmus Le Dolt
Erasmus Le Dolt
April 3, 2015 7:47 am

It would be so easy to pull off it’s actually blatantly obvious. A Bill Ayres wet dream. Within a week it would be 100% supported by James Howard Kuntsler and further supported by a new book. Peter Schiff would at last be right on Gold and the equity markets. Pat Buchanan would be washing dishes in a FIMA camp. Wondrous times ahead for all.

John Coster
John Coster
April 3, 2015 9:05 am

Yes, this is scary stuff, but I actually have a hard time seeing how martial law (lawlessness) could function efficiently enough to prevent total collapse. I mean if the military starts trying to control so many functions of our working society, I can imagine any number of breakdowns in critical systems, given the complexity of our current world. Police and bureaucrats aren’t usually very good at fixing broken equipment or making the crops grow. It might go just as well as the three month war plan in Iraq.
Only on a much vaster scale. I don’t know. Just thinking out loud. At this point a voluntary attempt by all parties to keep the peace, unlikely though it is, may be the only hope. Of course the more insidious and gradual sacrificing of certain areas to chaos and containment might work for a while and still allow for that beach house on the Vinyard. What a way to start the day. More coffee please.

flash
flash
April 3, 2015 9:10 am

ELD -100% supported by James Howard Kuntsler

The only way JHK would support support martial law was if NASCAR , vinyl siding and independent suburban residences where banned and every one but him and his enlightened crew of faggot infested progtard New Urbanists were forced off their land and into high-rise tenement houses.

dilligaf
dilligaf
April 3, 2015 9:49 am

“There would be no freedom of speech, no freedom of the press, no freedom of assembly and you could be arrested at any time for any reason whatsoever.” —— From the article..
_______________

And how would that be different from today?

Bea Lever
Bea Lever
April 3, 2015 9:58 am

What would happen if martial law was declared in America?

White people would sit in front of the tv watching Faux News waiting for them to tell the sheep what to do.

Black people would start tweeting- Imma Riot and Git Me Some Shit. Then they would strip all Walmarts clean etc.

Beaners would gather in front of their homes armed and drink beer waiting for whatever would happen.

TBP posters would be throwing shit and blaming Oreo and some would have already left for their doomsteads as there is a possibility of a class 5 chimpout causing the martial law to be imposed.

Mark
Mark
April 3, 2015 10:30 am

You can’t impose martial law on cities where wealthy people work and make commerce that pays for the taxes and not have it counter productive with respect to tax revenue.

Martial law will have to be imposed at some point because the Al Shaptons have got to uppity with respect to what they are entitled to . Irrespective of the ability of the rest of society to pay for it.

Cities are the place of greatest synergy and economic activity and have to remain safe. Therefore , trouble makers will be rounded up and put in FEMA camps while people who work in cities will text from their suburban homes.

KaD
KaD
April 3, 2015 10:54 am

Banks Turning Accounts over to Police for Seizure: http://www.wholesaledirectmetals.com/index.php/gold-blog/643-banks-turning-accounts-over-to-police-for-seizure/?cid=BearingArmsDedicated

The following are just a few of the horrifying cases exposed by the New York Times:
•The government confiscated $447,000 from a family business in New York
•The government confiscated $33,000 from a small restaurant owner in Iowa
•The government confiscated $66,000 from an army sergeant in Virginia who was saving the money for his daughter’s college education

Mark
Mark
April 3, 2015 11:00 am

KaD

You nailed it. It will be all about some from of wealth tax and the government picking the public apart like wolves. One sheep at a time. It’s always the “other guy”.

Stucky
Stucky
April 3, 2015 11:10 am

I don’t see Martial Law happening in the near future — (subject to change depending on many things) — primarily for this reason;

[imgcomment image?w=640[/img]

There’s no need for it!! (Yet). Amerikan sheeple have been taking it up the ass for decades now … no matter what the gooberment does. There is little indication this will change in the near future. Taking it up the ass is the new normal.

Martial Law might have actually unite the sheeplefuks to … you know … fight back! Not something the asswipes in D.C. want to see.

Stucky
Stucky
April 3, 2015 11:11 am

[imgcomment image?w=640[/img]

DRUD
DRUD
April 3, 2015 11:22 am

I think Bea nailed it, but only the first 2-3 weeks…then I think more along the lines of what Coster was saying. Supply lines break down, even for FEMA assholes and copfuks…how do they react??? Also, perhaps the biggest difference in the US from everywhere else is Suburbia…what happens when middle class white people in their suburban sprawls (I happen to be one, BTW) start to get hungry and their SUVs run dry??? I can scarcely even guess…but I think it is Suburbia that will determine whether collapse can be contained and eventually reversed (unlikely) or we get a downward spiral that lasts for decades/generations until some sort of new normal is reached. The other big question is what happens to the grid and other critical infrastructure? Surely this would be a priority for the assholes in charge, but would they be able to maintain supply lines to keep power plants cranking out juice? Who knows, but if the grid fails on a large scale it is game over…tens of millions die in first year.

bb
bb
April 3, 2015 11:24 am

Because of lawlessness the love of many will grow cold .(Jesus Christ)God gives people and nations over to The sin they want which produces more sin which is a consequence of Gods wrath .Reaping and sowing .You see it every day.

It will probably be up to the national guard. Where I live the guard is more prepare then the police.Theydid 4 tours in Iraq . They have most of the weapons the regular Army has.Tanks , Machine guns , helicopters.If the national guard decide to follow orders We will probably lose the republic.

starfcker
starfcker
April 3, 2015 12:32 pm

Flash, that’s funny

OutLookingIn
OutLookingIn
April 3, 2015 12:49 pm

If? What do you mean? IF?

Don’t you mean WHEN?

It’s coming. Just a matter of time.

Under King Barry the First and his loyal court of stooges! By executive order.

Phaedrus
Phaedrus
April 3, 2015 2:55 pm

Michael Snyder continues to try to scare us to death. It’s the American Way.

Rise Up
Rise Up
April 3, 2015 3:38 pm

Many of those executive orders are simply renewed by incoming presidents. Bush had many of the same ones–just different EO numbers. Nothing new, appalling as some may be in what they decree.

“An executive order comes into force 30 days after it has been issued by the president. Once it is made, the president can choose to amend or retract it at any time. Incoming presidents also have the choice either to maintain or abolish the orders of their predecessors.

Orders deemed to be in violation of the US Constitution it can be struck down by the Supreme Court. In 1935, five orders made by Franklin Roosevelt were overturned, says Bloomberg’s David Knowles. Harry Truman had his order to seize steel mills during a labour strike struck down in 1935, and Bill Clinton’s 1995 decree preventing the government from employing organisations that employed strike-breakers was also overturned by the court.”

overthecliff
overthecliff
April 3, 2015 6:50 pm

This has happened before. one of the most recent examples is Yugoslavia. Civil War II . Sarajevo anybody?

AC
AC
April 3, 2015 7:03 pm

People in California and New York would not see any change at all?

SSS
SSS
April 3, 2015 7:10 pm

“The other big question is what happens to the grid and other critical infrastructure? Surely this would be a priority for the assholes in charge, but would they be able to maintain supply lines to keep power plants cranking out juice?”
—-DRUD

Texas is the only state not “on the grid.” It has its own grid, which more than amply meets the power needed by Texas residents and businesses and even exports power to other nearby states on the grid and Mexico.

Now then, which state would be the first to react negatively to and resist a decree of martial law by the federal government? I’ll give you a teensy-weensy hint. The name of the state starts with a T (there are only two), and it’s not Tennessee.

SSS
SSS
April 3, 2015 7:25 pm

“It will probably be up to the national guard.”
—-bb

Bb is correct, for which he already has 6 thumbs-down. Strange.

overthecliff
overthecliff
April 3, 2015 7:29 pm

bb, the republic is lost already. Be ready to defend yourself and little bb. It is going to happen, just a matter of when.

flash
flash
April 3, 2015 9:11 pm

bb-. Where I live the guard is more prepare then the police.They did 4 tours in Iraq .

..and that’s the scary truth… testosterone crazed young men on psychotic soothing meds experienced in kicking people’s doors down at three in the morning under the banner of serving their nation now patrolling the streets of the nation ..can’t wait to see how that works out.

ASIG
ASIG
April 3, 2015 9:36 pm

I suspect TPTB want to run these trial Exercises in Texas because if anyone is going to object to this Bull Shit it will be those Good Ol Boys in Texas, and that is what they want to test more than anything.

Because if they can pull off this shit in Texas, then they’ll probably assume all other states will be less of a problem.

indialantic
indialantic
April 4, 2015 10:17 pm

Your military is waiting for its citizens (YOU) to grow some stones. Military personnel are not cops or DHS. When THEY are stopped for a burned-out license plate bulb or for jaywalking, do you honestly think they are treated any differently than you are by aggressive LE?

I know what I’m going to do when the knock comes at 3:00 am. Do you? If not, you might as well paint “SLAVE” on your front door and on your fucking mail box for all to see. Ya follow me?

This shit has very little to do with what Texas does or doesn’t do. The question is: what the fuck are YOU going to do when your life, your family or your property is threatened without legal due process? Hello? A waterfall starts with a single drop of water.

It’s really that fucking simple.