Submitted by Joseph Jankowski of PlanetFreeWill
Video From UCLA Shows How Vulnerable Students Are In A Gun Free Zone Lockdown
A campus shooting on Wednesday at the University of California left two men dead in a murder-suicided that sent thousands of students looking for safety and locking themselves down in classrooms.
UCLA is a gun free zone that prohibits students from carrying a gun within 1,000 feet of school grounds under Penal Code 626.9 PC, also known as California’s Gun-Free School Zone Act.
UCLA’s campus policy also, “Prohibits the transportation and possession of firearms and other dangerous weapons on the grounds of UCLA campus, off-campus buildings owned or operated by the University, areas adjacent to University Property or to activities of or programs conducted by the University, whether on or off University Property.”
What this means is that students have little way of defending themselves from a gunman who is seeking to do harm.
In this footage obtained by RT, you can see how students have nothing else to do for their safety but to lock themselves into a classroom and wait for the situation to be defused.
If a determined gunman wanted to barge into the classroom where the students in the video above were hiding, it’s very possible that he could have done so if he had enough time.
As you can see, all the students can do is to sit still and wait, in hopes they do not become targets.
UCLA’s gun policy and the state of California’s penal code establishing gun free zones did absolutely nothing to prevent the man who committed the horrific act on Wednesday from bringing his gun on campus.
Last October the state of California passed a bill that bans concealed handguns on campus.
What this video shows is that the states regulations are putting students in a terribly vulnerable position that could allow a determined gunman to do more damage then he otherwise would be able to do if students and faculty had sufficient means of self-defense.
We all know that Criminals do not obey the law.
The handgun is the single greatest liberator in history. Personal defense, against legal or illegal thugs/murderers, is the most sacred of our rights. Personal defense that can be concealed from all criminals (legal or otherwise) strikes terror in their wicked hearts.
If a Berserker gunman were to break into that room those students were in, there doesn’t even seem to be anything to hide behind to at least try to keep unnoticed and maybe survive.
And since they’re sitting on the floor, there aren’t even any chairs to grab to try to fight back with.
Worse odds than a hen in the hen house when the fox breaks in.
Oh shit! Somebody invaded their safe space? That’s harsh! The SJW’s are gonna be fuckin’ pissed!
Welcome to the real world!
Spec,
With your permission, I’m going to reuse that, OK?
Remain calm and play hide-n-seek.
Send those cards letters to the governor thanking him for allowing you to protect yourself.
The Dishonorable Governor Jerry Brown, State Capitol Building, Sacramento, CA, 95814 Sacramento, California 95814
” California’s Gun-Free School Zone Act.”
California’s Free-Fire School Zone Act.
There. Fixed.
Spec ops , you are so right about the hand guns for personal protection. Criminals fear citizens with guns and big dogs. At least that’s what they say in interviews.
This aspect of the ‘shooter’ situation never gets discussed in the media, for reasons we have discussed here at TBP. Paraphrasing from the line in Animal House, “Hiding in a room waiting to be found and shot is no way to go through life, son!’
Also, how many of those students were hoping/praying that someone willing to protect them would show up with a gun and deal with the shooter? Ironic, moronic, sardonic…whatever fits…
Notice something, when the police show up they are not limited to 10 round magazines, those are 30 round magazines.
[/img]
[img
When the anti-gun liberals first came up with the bright idea to limit magazine capacity to 10 rounds they intended to include the police in that ban. The police immediately reacted by telling the California legislature that that was the stupidest most idiotic idea and wouldn’t stand for it. The legislature then backed off and the 10 round ban only applies to law abiding gun owners.
So the police need unlimited magazine capacity to protect you and themselves but you have no need for more than 10 rounds to protect yourself. Could someone explain that to me?
[img
[/img]
WTF
[img
[/img]