According to leaked information obtained by The Rebel, the RCMP is set to unveil a new uniform, featuring a hijab, the sharia-compliant Muslim head covering for women.
This news was leaked to us by people within the RCMP concerned about the inherent sexism of using a symbol of the oppression of Muslim women, as an official symbol of Canada’s secular police force.
There are other obvious issues besides sexism — like the religious and political meaning of the hijab. It’s a symbol of political Islam, like a flag, to show that Islam inhabits once-secular offices of the state.
The RCMP now endorses sexism. The Muslim hijab suggests women must be covered in public, and that any women who aren’t covered in public are haram — that is, dirty. That’s what a hijab means — unlike non-hijabbed women, they’re halal, or clean.
A hijab is about social ranking. Women are lower than men. But women without hijabs are lower than those with them. This is now part of the RCMP’s doctrine.
The Koran does not prescribe a hijab. That is a political statement, a fashion popularized by the Ayatollahs of Iran and the Wahhabis of Saudi Arabia. Only white, western liberals think it’s being tolerant to accept it in a secular institution like a police force to begin with.
Separation of church and state. We’ve heard that phrase forever. But what about the separation of mosque and state?
Imagine any crime that has a sharia component — from wife-beating; to alcohol or gambling crimes, to of course terrorism recruitment. If you’re taking a political stand for political Islam, if you’re dressing in a sharia-compliant way, are you enforcing Queen Elizabeth’s laws, or Mohammed’s?
This is too far. This isn’t what Canada looks like. In Canada, we’re all equal before the law. This isn’t even a religious symbol, it’s a political symbol.
You’ll see the same things coming here soon, already are in a somewhat different way.
‘The Future Must Not Belong To Those Who Slander the Prophet of Islam” -Obama.
Watch for special accommodations popping up everywhere for Muslims in public and work places that would not be allowed to Christians in the slightest degree and other special privileges given to them.
So where’s the FFRF on this? Or is it not really religion the oppose and want restricted , just Christianity?
“So where’s the FFRF on this?”
I don’t know much about FFRF, but as an atheist I assumed these would be like-minded folks.
After visiting their website, I see that nothing could be further from the truth. They appear to be primarily anti-Christian (I am not), and there is no mention anywhere on their site I could find condemning Islam as fervently as they do Christianity.
Good catch, and thanks for the education.
That picture is absurd. Canada is pandering and looking like
a colossal fool. I suspect something is terribly amiss with Trudeau.
Either he has a screw loose, or he is getting a big $ bribe.
He spent a considerable amount of time in Mosque’s prior to the last election. He is either pandering, ignorant or he has converted. So much for this country being a secular state.
Mosque Controversy Follows Trudeau
by Tarek Fatah
The Toronto Sun
August 13, 2014
The controversy surrounding Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau’s March, 2011 visit to a Montreal mosque that had been identified in a leaked U.S. Department of Defence report as an al-Qaida recruitment centre, just won’t go away.
After the Sun News Network broke the story, Liberal deputy leader Ralph Goodale said Trudeau had visited the Al-Sunnah Al-Nabawiah mosque in March, 2011 — a month before classified U.S. intelligence reports naming it were made public in April, 2011.
But Trudeau’s defence he was not aware of the mosque’s troubling background in March, 2011 falls apart on closer scrutiny.
It now turns out as early as 2006 the mosque in question was well known in Quebec as a hotbed of Islamic extremism, and where the Imam and congregation was committed to jihad and hatred towards non-Muslims.
As Marc Lebuis of the website Pointe de bascule revealed last week, CBC’s Radio Canada had done a lengthy investigative report on the mosque Trudeau visited as a well known centre of radical anti-West rhetoric.
CBC hired an Algerian journalist, Mohamed Sifaoui, to infiltrate the mosque.
On Friday, July 21, 2006, Sifaoui went to Assuna mosque in Montreal to attend midday prayers.
He brought back video that was aired on CBC showing the imam praying to God to “kill all the enemies of Islam to the last.”
The CBC documentary also revealed the mosque Trudeau would later visit had issued fatwas from a radical Saudi cleric asking for Muslims to kill any Muslim who does not practice the rituals of their faith (meaning someone like me).
One could have excused Trudeau had he said, “I didn’t know,” apologized and moved on.
But he did the opposite. He boasted about having attended the mosque which he himself identified as a “Wahhabi Mosque.”
Does the Liberal leader know about the war within Islam that pits Saudi-funded, Muslim Brotherhood-promoted “Wahhabi” Islam against the Islam of other Muslims who wish to keep their religion out of politics?
If it turns out Trudeau does not know the difference between Wahhabi Islam and the Islam of say, Bangladesh Prime Minister Hasina Sheikh, or the Islam of former Indonesian president Abdul-Rahman Wahid, that is truly scary.
If the latter is true, Trudeau would be unfit to head a NATO country at war with the terrorist organization Islamic State (ISIS) and the network of Islamic terror ranging from soft jihadis in Canada and the U.S.A to Boko Haram in Nigeria and Al-Shabab of Somalia, not to mention the Taliban, LeT and of course, al-Qaida
Instead of backing down, Trudeau is now trying to play the victim card.
Speaking in front of an audience of Muslims Tuesday, Trudeau portrayed himself as the white knight in shining armour trying to protect Canada’s Muslims.
He said: “Regardless of the attacks on me, be it for attending RIS [Revival of Islamic Spirit], or simply visiting a mosque in my riding, I want you to know that I will always stand up to the politics of division.”
Division? Isn’t it Trudeau who defends “division” when a Muslim audience is segregated by gender in a mosque?
Shame on you, Justin Trudeau, for not standing up for gender equality, for not keeping religion out of politics and for failing to clearly denounce the Islamofascism that seeks to destroy Canada.
Tarek S. Fatah is a founder of the Muslim Canadian Congress, a columnist at Toronto Sun, host of a Sunday afternoon talk show on Toronto’s NewsTalk1010 AM Radio, and a fellow at the Middle East Forum. He is the author of two award-winning books: Chasing a Mirage: The Tragic Illusion of an Islamic State and The Jew is Not My Enemy: Unveiling the Myths that Fuel Muslim Anti-Semitism.
“Nothing was ever settled by violence’. The mohammedans want you to keep that foolish idea .
The mistake of allowing Sikhs to wear turbans as part of the uniform in 1990 made this inevitable.
It should be noted that according the the CBC no Muslim female RCMP officers have yet requested wearing the Hijab as part of their uniform.
Although regrettable this is not that big a deal, and hopefully it will cause some ulcers for the assholes at the Canadian Jewish Congress.
Skippy strikes again!!!!………..
Sorry to say, but us Canucks are a real dim lot……