Strippers flipping multiple houses wasn’t a sign of the top in 2006. Right?
This is a perfectly reasonable and logical thing for the COO of Facebook to be doing with shareholder money.
FACEBOOK MINDSET
Strippers flipping multiple houses wasn’t a sign of the top in 2006. Right?
This is a perfectly reasonable and logical thing for the COO of Facebook to be doing with shareholder money.
There are few individual share holders anymore. I’d bet the vast majority of Facebook shareholders are mutual funds and the like. Besides complaining would just interrupt their time on Facebook.
[img
[/img]
When Facebook first showed up as something similar to My Space, where you could have a page to leave messages for friends and make connections with others, I thought there was a lot of really good potential for increased communication and dialog worldwide.
Then, advertising and sharing of data and contacts and the next thing you know Facebook really is Snoopbook and it isn’t even about me and you but about a world that has lost its freaking mind to a bunch of busybotz from busytown. And not the real Scarey kind.
So, Facebook became the tool by which to bind them all. What was the first ring for, Ungolemical? Perhaps Frodo might know?
Hello Maggie,
You are funny today!
I do not (willfully) use facebook…nor do I have a smartphone.
Almost everyone else does…I see it as burdensome.
I think the same thing when I hear about how fucked up Google is internally. If a business has the (wo)manpower to focus so much on diversity and social justice, to me that’s an invitation to be knocked off their game by a business focused on serving the customer efficiently. See this same pattern over and over in tech over the years.
Except, these co’s are directly being paid by usg … so, their efficiency, etc. is immaterial.
Why not donate the leftover corporate house to Habitat for Humanity, or some similar local organization?