How Executive Order 6102 Doomed America

Guest Post by Bill Bonner

BUENOS AIRES – Today, we woke up in Buenos Aires with a disagreeable headache… and a depressing hypothesis:

First, it doesn’t matter whether Brett Kavanaugh is on the Supreme Court or not; one more Deep State toad won’t make any difference.

Second, the Supreme Court has been derelict in its duty for the last 80 years.

For years, the Court has looked the other way as the feds robbed one class of citizen (ordinary, working people) and rewarded another (the elite).

Third, as a result, the American empire faces a catastrophic money crisis… probably accompanied by internal schisms, social breakdowns, and dangerous political scuffles.

Let’s begin by looking again at the connection between time and money.

Losing Time

If you work by the hour, the guy with money can buy your time. That’s what it really means to say someone is “rich” – he has more time because he can control not only his own, but yours, too.

The guy who had $1,000 worth of stocks in 1971 could buy approximately 250 of the average working man’s hours. Today, that $1,000 worth of stocks is worth about $28,000… which, at today’s $26-per-hour average, will buy 1,077 hours of the typical working man’s time – four times as much as in 1971.

In other words, compared to the wage earner, the capitalist is four times as rich.

Invert it, and you see about the same thing. A working man would have had to labor for 212 hours to buy the 30 Dow stocks in 1971. Today, his time is much less valuable; he has to sweat for 1,000 hours to buy the Dow.

That’s why the liberals whine about “inequality”… and probably why Donald J. Trump was elected. Few people may have done the math, but a lot of people suspected a rat.

And they were right.

Many – including the president – pointed their fingers… but at the wrong rat!

They thought it was the foreigners who had done them dirty: the Chinese with their “unfair trade practices” and the Mexicans “pouring across the border, stealing our jobs,” was the jingo.

For their part, investors, the rich, and the cronies and insiders thought they were smart. They earned their wealth fair and square, they believed, by funding America’s enterprises… and by carefully allocating precious capital to worthy businesses run by able corporate champions.

But the fix was in.

Executive Order 6102

How exactly was the fix put in place?

In 1933, the matter first came before the Supreme Court. Franklin Roosevelt’s Executive Order 6102 made it illegal for citizens to own gold, except in the smallest of quantities.

It came to the Supremes in a series of disputes called the “gold clause” cases. “Where in the Constitution did the president get that power?” people wondered.

Back then, some investors recalled that the feds can play fast and loose with the dollar, as Lincoln had during the War Between the States.

Gold clauses in contracts protected them by insisting on gold as a means of settling up. Eliminating the gold clause meant taking away the ability to protect against inflation… and substantially altering the terms of the deal.

But the Supremes went along with it. Colleague Dan Denning tells the tale:

…First, let me quote a few brief passages from [Justice James] McReynolds’ dissent. They capture the spirit of his objection and the relationship between sound money and political liberty. McReynolds writes that:

“Just men regard repudiation and spoliation of citizens by their sovereign with abhorrence; but we are asked to affirm that the Constitution has granted power to accomplish both. No definite delegation of such power exists; and we cannot believe the farseeing framers, who labored with hope of establishing justice and securing the blessings of liberty, intended that the expected government should have authority to annihilate its own obligations and destroy the very rights which they were endeavoring to protect. Not only is there no permission for such actions; they are inhibited. And no plenitude of words can conform them to our charter.”

McReynolds went on to make the point that when you buy a bond or make a loan, “the creditor agrees to accept and the debtor undertakes to return the thing loaned or its equivalent.” Because Roosevelt’s Executive Order meant companies could be paid back in depreciated dollars instead of gold coin or gold equal to the value of the original loan, McReynolds recognized that this was a de facto default.

The gold clause guaranteeing creditors be paid back in gold or something of equal value, “prevents the borrower from availing itself of a possibility of discharge of the debt in depreciated currency.”

Congress went along with it, too. And then, still in the minority, McReynolds saw the handwriting on the wall. The feds themselves might be the main beneficiaries. Congress would be able to borrow… and then wipe out its own debt by inflation:

“We are dealing here with a debased standard, adopted with the definite purpose to destroy obligations. Such arbitrary and oppressive action is not within any congressional power heretofore recognized. The authority of Congress to create legal tender obligations in times of peace is derived from the power to borrow money; this cannot be extended to embrace the destruction of all credits. […]

For the government to say we have violated our contract, but have escaped the consequences through our own statute, would be monstrous. In matters of contractual obligation, the government cannot legislate so as to excuse itself. […]

Whatever may be the situation now confronting us, it is the outcome of attempts to destroy lawful undertakings by legislative action; and this we think the Court should disapprove of in no uncertain terms. […]

Loss of reputation for honorable dealing will bring us unending humiliation, the impending legal and moral chaos is appalling.”

Humiliation Afoot

With the gold clause out of the way, the coast was clear. The feds floated out one program after another, meddling in every aspect of human life.

There was now a third party in almost every transaction – the federal regulator.

By the 1950s, the fake wars had begun, too – major wars – with no declaration or funding from Congress.

By the 1960s, the Johnson team had a full-scale war in Vietnam (a country with no capacity or intention to harm the U.S.).

In addition, it launched a War on Poverty, too… intended to create a Great Society, where the lambs would lie down with the wolves and fruit would hang from every ghetto palm.

But humiliation was afoot. It was soon clear that the feds were going to run out of money.

And this time, it was the Nixon team that shirked its duty. Rather than admit that it had overspent, Nixon repudiated the last link with real money and the ability of foreign governments to exchange their dollars for gold at the promised rate.

Now, the feds had gone Full Paper. Their money was nothing but pieces of paper backed by what was soon to be the world’s biggest debtor.

And now, there was nothing stopping them… There was nothing to stop the chaos McReynolds foresaw.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
7 Comments
CCRider
CCRider
September 28, 2018 9:33 am

Bonner is really coming up with some bell ringers lately. This one is spot on. The constitution was a very good start down the road to overthrowing the natural order where the weak get eaten by the strong. It exists everywhere in every living organism on earth. Who can doubt it also exists with humans-especially dumb ones? The Founders tried to even the score by protecting ‘rights’ as inalienable, which they should be in a just society. Only the system depends on an elected elite-the strong-to oversee it-democrazy. It was defeated before the ink dried. But it was a start.

So if you hung on every word in yesterday’s freak show and I did, it was a great display of the deceit, deception and disgrace that is government which made the time spent worthwhile. As Rothbard taught us THEY hate being laughed at and how could you not considering loud dolts like senators spartacus and crazie hirono. But if you cheered when kavanaugh looked like a shoo in for the court, relieved that at last the constitution was saved:
You got PLAYED sucka.

overthecliff
overthecliff
September 28, 2018 10:14 am

The love of money is the root of all evil.

EC
EC
September 28, 2018 11:10 am

Glass beads worked well for a while until somebody began to counterfeit them. Lincoln messed up the slave trade. Tulips worked for a while.

People are just stacking coconuts. – Old Pangloss

KeyserSusie
KeyserSusie
September 28, 2018 1:13 pm

Back in the day when I hung out at a flea market I met a legit American Indian who had amazing artifacts. (the same market where I met the man with an well patinated OSS coin in his pocket, the ‘retired’ US Postal service man who had done personal security work and an operator who retrieved objects from dead people that the government did not want to get out, and UK devotee – (that does not stand for University of Kentucky)) The native American sold me a clam wampum bead, cylindrical in shape. The purple colored symmetry exposed from the careful carving of the thick part of the clam was exquisite. The size of the quahog must have been huge, and most likely ones that big do not exist any longer. And the effort to shape and polish the work of art represents much time of someone. It looked something like these below, only more finely shaped. It was 2.5 inches by .75 inch.
comment image

Also among my flea market contacts made in those days was one of the Mario brothers. Luigi I think. He and his brother is/was the real inspiration for the iconic video game. He had a thick Italian accent. He gave me a history of beads. And sold me rare antique tubular glass that was the basis for currencies when small sections would be cut from the tube for a “smaller denomination”. Think Venice and Murano as sources.

What struck me was how similar the manufactured glass beads were to the specimen the Indian sold me. The native American said Columbus had glass beads on board. And hinted at a swindle. I can only imagine a native American placing incredible value on the beautiful colorful beads not knowing how they were made. The thought that someone who had them belonged to a tribe possessed of incomprehensible sea creatures and amazing artisans. And the value of the glass beads/faux wampum, contained supernatural qualities perhaps and perhaps analogous to gold versus silver, gold versus paper.?

Maybe like replacing gold with paper? With resulting essential theft by the industrial widespread manufacturing/counterfeiting of a product as proxy for a limited natural resource (shell wampum).

Another man I met at the flea market had a veritable treasure trove of old objects, many many incredible American civil war relics and African objects related to the slave trade. Hundreds of lions teeth and the so called slave beads. And simply amazing African art objects. He told me certain beads were equivalent in trade for a certain number of slaves.
True historians perhaps can expand on this.

I admit I am uneducated in finance despite my education here on TBP the last two years. But sometimes I believe the digital currencies represent the value of collected histories of online content, including each person’s online history, etc… To own that information and use it for marketing, social control, government boots on your face and political gaming is what so many of us fear, nicht wahr Herr Stuckmeister? Why else would McAfee say a bitcoin will be worth a million dollars by 2020? Maybe the pervert knows sumthing.

Forgive me for my mindful rambling signifying an idiot’s story…..?

I will take a penny for these thoughts, maybe two cents. Or a tinker’s damn.

Chubby Bubbles
Chubby Bubbles
  KeyserSusie
September 28, 2018 11:10 pm

Why else would McAfee say a bitcoin will be worth a million dollars by 2020? Maybe the pervert knows sumthing.

Because he’s a risk-taker and borderline psycho. In a world without reliable electricity, bitcoin is worth less than zero.

Free Speech Forum
Free Speech Forum
September 29, 2018 5:58 am

If you’re good-looking when you’re 20, you might think that you’ll look good for the next 20 years.

If you look like shit when you’re 50, you might think that it’s all downhill from here.

MadMike
MadMike
September 29, 2018 11:47 pm

“Today, that $1,000 worth of stocks is worth about $28,000… which, at today’s $26-per-hour average, will buy 1,077 hours of the typical working man’s time – four times as much as in 1971.

These figures are not what they seem. What are the inflation-adjusted numbers?

In 1971 I could buy a four door all-the-bells-and-whistles Ford LTD for $4700,00.
What does the equivalent car cost today? 60 Grand?
New home prices?