America’s “Franz Ferdinand” Moment

Guest Post by Bill Bonner

BALTIMORE, MARYLAND – Whatever good was done by the Trump/Xi trade war truce in Buenos Aires was likely undone by what was done in Vancouver Airport earlier this month.

Bogeyman Program

The U.S. stock market warmed to the idea of a ceasefire last Monday morning. Then came word that the U.S. government had arrested Meng Wanzhou, the chief financial officer of Chinese technology firm Huawei. The feds got the Canadians to collar the poor woman while she was changing planes in Vancouver.

Few people in the U.S. have ever heard of Huawei. Still, the event had a pin-like look to it. And by the end of the week, investors had lost $1 trillion. This morning, by inference from futures trading, they are set to lose a half a trillion more.

What was Ms. Wanzhou’s crime? Mass murder? Grand larceny?

Nope. Even she didn’t know what the charges were.

But whatever they were, the U.S. government had not only made a federal case of it, but an international “cause célèbre,” too.

What Ms. Wanzhou is accused of is neither a genuine crime nor a misdemeanor.

Instead, she apparently ran afoul of the Deep State’s bogeyman program. Officially, her company is accused of using shell companies to access the Iranian market in defiance of U.S. sanctions on the country.

That is, it is not enough for the feds to regulate every living creature and every transaction that takes place in the 50 states. They also claim authority over the rest of the world.

No money can change hands without the consent of the U.S. (which controls the world’s reserve currency – the dollar – and the international banking protocols – the SWIFT system – that allow people to transfer money from one country to another)…

Nobody can trade with a foreign country if it doesn’t meet U.S. approval…

And no sparrow can fall anywhere on the planet without a shove from the Pentagon.

Ms. Wanzhou was told to jump. She apparently didn’t jump high enough.

Media Censored This Rancher But What If He’s Right?

Deep State Hysteria

Ms. Wanzhou is the CFO of the second-largest cellphone maker in the world, and the daughter of its founder. Huawei has 170,000 employees. It is as important to the Chinese government as General Motors once was to the U.S.

Of course, Ms. Wanzhou has nothing against Iran. China has nothing against Iran. Most of the whole bloomin’ world has nothing against Iran.

But the Deep State pretends to protect Americans from bad guys – in this case, Iranians – by imposing sanctions on people all over the Earth.

You can imagine what a hullabaloo would follow if the Chinese pulled a similar stunt.

Suppose they tried to boss other nations around with a “sanctions” list that included some half a million of the world’s leading business and government officials.

And suppose, honoring a Chinese warrant, the authorities in Singapore picked up Mark Zuckerberg or Bill Gates.

The Chinese, for example, regard Taiwan as their territory. And they regard the present Taiwanese government as illegitimate traitors. They could easily announce “sanctions” against anyone trading with Taiwan… which would implicate thousands of American businessmen, politicians, and government employees.

Then, stopping at Singapore airport for refueling, perhaps en route from a conference in Moscow back to a home office in Sydney or San Francisco, an executive could be nabbed by the Chinese – for an offense that Americans might find silly, irrelevant, or plain stupid.

If humans were cows or tree squirrels, no offense might have been taken. But we homo sapiens live in a world of jealousy, hate, and revenge. The U.S. would be outraged. It could be an Archduke Franz Ferdinand moment – the kind of event that is hard to reconcile with today’s power politics… and hard to ignore or forget.

In the present case, the Chinese, who value “face” more than money, took offense. They see the arrest as illegal, high-handed, and a breach of the ceasefire reached only a week earlier.

This guru was mocked by the mainstream. But is his strange financial prediction about to come true?

That Kind of Deal

Trade deals are win-win deals. They are tit-for-tat deals. They are give-a-little, take-a-little deals.

And the trouble with the seizure of Huawei’s CFO is that there was no give in it.

The Chinese must have said to one another, “Oh, it’s that kind of deal, is it?”

And yes, they were right; it is that kind of deal. A raw power deal, where might doesn’t necessarily make right… but it prevents anyone from saying anything about it.

The Deep State’s imperial britches are very large, in other words. But arresting Ms. Wanzhou may have signaled that the Trump foreign policy team has outgrown them.

Not that the U.S. is not still the muscular man for whom they were made long ago. But in the last 40 or so years, it has added more than a little fat around the middle. It has troops in 170 countries. Its government has 20 times the debt it had in 1980.

Its people suffer 100 times more regulatory control. Its stocks (in Dow terms) went from being valued at 1 ounce of gold in 1980 to more than 20 today.

The flab is everywhere – debt, waste, boondoggles, cronies and zombies, regulations, fantasies, absurd myths, fake news, BS statistics, phony money, claptrap wars… and trillions of dollars’ worth of promises that can’t be kept.

Many of those promises are marked to market each day – in the stock market. Prices go up. Or they go down.

We’ll see what they do next.

Trump’s New Law Hands Retirees A Big Gift.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
9 Comments
CCRider
CCRider
December 10, 2018 4:04 pm

Is there any real difference between the u.s. military and a junta at this point? Civilian control is a joke. THEY do whatever they want and we’re along for the ride-for now.

22winmag - Unreconstructedsouthernerbygraceofgod
22winmag - Unreconstructedsouthernerbygraceofgod
  CCRider
December 10, 2018 4:27 pm

Clearly Trump is not the commander in chief.

Does CONgress have genuine oversight over the military? That’s hilarious.

Bob P
Bob P
December 10, 2018 5:31 pm

Remember the Warner Brothers cartoon with the big dog, Spike and the little shitty dog, Chester, that idolized it and did anything it wanted, while Spike slapped it around? The US is Spike, and we Canadians are brownnosing Chester, jumping around Spike and pleading, “Hey Spike, you want to start a war? That sound like fun? Huh, Spike?”

Martel's Hammer
Martel's Hammer
December 10, 2018 6:56 pm

Well, this issue of Chinese IP infringement and network intrusion with Huawei has been around for at least a decade. Huawei simply stole quite a few Cisco products in the telecoms networking and cable space and didn’t have the courtesy to change the name in the manual!

A couple of early adopters of Huawei offerings actually rec’d manuals with Cisco prominently displayed…….I was a cable exec……and this was 2009-10 time frame.

There is a reason why on the networking side Huawei has had very limited penetration of the US market. If that was not bad enough (while I hate the USA Deep State Kakistocracy with every fiber of my being) Huawei, ZTE et. al are just extensions of the Chinese government and the Chinese Commie Rat Bastard Party……there are lots of backdoors in the software, hacked chips etc……..Our F’Tard government is not actually lying about that threat.

So this is not a mistake, overreach or really anything to do with Iranian sanctions…..this is actual pushback against a direct and realistic threat to US national security……and I am not just talking about you being unable to surf circus midget porn on the internet…..

Monday Jubilee
Monday Jubilee
  Martel's Hammer
December 10, 2018 7:10 pm

I have read other articles where it is said the uSA /NSA is pissed because there are no back doors for them to breach.

Not Sure
Not Sure
  Martel's Hammer
December 11, 2018 1:50 am

While I agree with everything you put forth in your post, what about the timing? Infractions commited 10 years ago should have consequences, but was it worth escalating tensions with China?
Trump has already made the pirating of US patents a part of his negotiations, is the arrest of this woman a part of his intention, or the deep states attempt at damaging his negotiations, by pushing an already bubble of an economy off the cliff; not to mention bringing the US and China closer to war?
The only real question is who did it, Trump or the deep state? And if it was the deep state, are they truly willing to damage the country just to satisfy their hatred of Trump? We are living in scary times.

Big Ed
Big Ed
  Martel's Hammer
December 12, 2018 3:36 pm

So, are you saying midget porn is a problem???

KeyserSusie
KeyserSusie
December 10, 2018 7:30 pm

“who value “face” more than money,”

A wise salesman once told me when I hear “it is not about the money” it’s about the money. And negotiation position.

I will take a stab at macabre death humor.

They shoulda khashoggi’d her

Hollow man
Hollow man
December 10, 2018 9:24 pm

Uh really, China may not take much more crap. They hold a card or two of their own. Hell we are already communist and just haven’t come the realization just yet. Fine thing the 2 Nd amendment. This crap is unreal.