Guest Post by The Zman
Privacy is something that has become a front burner topic for everyone, because every day we are treated to stories about how corporations are spying on us. They harvest information from our daily routines, put it into databases and then use it to push ads on us wherever we turn. They are now inserting surveillance devices in our homes to listen in on us as we go about our daily routines. Of course, no one knows how much is done with government blessing and cooperation, but we know it is there.
Of course, the fact that everyone is worried about this issue means the politicians never speak of it. The old Joe Sobran line was that America is a country where the political parties are significantly to the Left of their voters. Today, when Left and Right are meaningless artifacts from a bygone era, both parties simply make sure to never address the concerns of the people. While Democrats are analyzing spectral evidence for signs of Russian gremlins, the GOP is thanking you for not smoking.
Even though it seems that the unwanted gaze is upon us everywhere, we are just at the start of a new problem. In the pre-industrial age, the privacy concern was the king’s men rummaging through your possessions or intercepting your courier. For most people this was never going to be a concern. In the industrial age, the state expanded to the point where everyone could be exposed to a government process. The concern then was your rights within the process. How much did you have to reveal to them?
In the technological age, where the lines between the state and the global technology companies are blurred, we have very different problems. These are the sorts of problems classical liberals, so beloved by libertarians and conservatives, never contemplated. It’s why civic nationalism sounds so ridiculous when debating what to do about these tech firms controlling our civil discourse. For example, this blog is blocked by corporate firewall makers, which are private companies doing the bidding of the political class.
Think about this. Police departments are now using services like Ancestory.com to help solve cold cases. They submit DNA evidence to the service and the service reports back members who have some connection. You committed the perfect crime in 1982, but left behind some DNA at the crime scene. Your cousin decides to trace her (it’s always a her in these cases) ancestry using a DNA service. All of a sudden you have cops at your door asking you about your whereabouts 40 years ago.
It’s easy to shrug this off as the person suddenly tangled in this new technological surveillance web is a criminal. We all want to see justice done. But, think about the implications of this new world. All of us now have a permanent record that is increasingly open to examination by unofficial agents of the state. How long before some tech company gets into the business of solving crimes? How long before the cops start purchasing their services on-line just like they are doing with ancestry?
There is another side to this. The tech companies can also spy on the state, by accessing the records of people working in the state. Every government has to keep secrets in order to function. It is why every modern society has developed processes for determining what can be revealed and what can be concealed by government. There are processes the public and government must follow and they are administered by the courts. What happens when the tech giants can bypass all of this?
Think of another problem. Before the media was completely owned by the government, private media operations would publish government secrets they thought the public had a right to see. It sounds crazy, but it used to happen. The courts carved out exceptions to permit this, basically putting the burden of keeping secrets on the state. Now, with help from technology, the state can fight back and go after the handful of independent media people snooping around government. This story will be interesting.
There are two problems we face in the technological age that are new. One is how to place hard limits on the synopticon. This unwanted stare called the surveillance state that is now on all of us will have to be blinded, unless there are hard limits on where anyone can peer into the lives of the people. In other words, it is no longer about the state and the citizens’ right to privacy. It is about society and the human right to a private space, free of the unwanted gaze. We will need absolute zones of privacy.
The other problem is how to fashion punishments that are so terrifying that they change behavior. What’s happened within these massive technology firms is the evolution of a culture where everyone sees themselves as a member of a clerisy, guarding the public from themselves. These decisions to ban books and censor speech are not made at the top, but in the middle, by functionaries doing what they assume is their duty. Either the firms are destroyed and the people chased off or we change the culture in them.
One way to change the culture is to attach liability to violating the safe zones. The reason every company in America spends money proving they are not racist is there are serious liabilities that come with doing otherwise. Something similar must happen with privacy. Companies need to be as berserk about not looking where they are prohibited from looking, as they are about conforming to current morality on race. Otherwise, the solution is to let a million flowers bloom in Silicon Valley.
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
funny that zman does not even mention the spy phone oops I meant smart phone that most folks had decided they can not live without.
I am amazed at how this little device has been used to solve almost all of the murders and other violent crimes in our area. The cops are using the location data or the tower info to find the idiots who do these crimes, usually within the same day they are committed.
You know it was the phone that gave them away, as the story on the local news will just say something like:
“local sources identified the shooter” which is their way of making it sound like a snitch.
Sorry, working a case using CIs takes much longer than the same day, it takes days/weeks before loose lips sink ships.
Think about that the next time the local news story is about an arrest within a 24 hr period from the crime, and you will start to see the same patterns where you live.
Some may initially squawk about my posting this video as it’s an hour and 36 minutes long. Go to the 3:30 mark and watch for ten seconds. You’ll want to watch the rest later when you have time. The video is about the life of Bill Binney, NSA executive. Mr. Binney started his career with the Army Security Agency (ASA). (The ASA is a direct stepping stone to the NSA.) After college, all of his friends were joining the military and heading off to Viet Nam. Young Binney was patriotic and wanted to do something for his country, but he didn’t want to carry a gun. He didn’t want to kill. He took the military tests, was interviewed by the ASA, and then became a member. While spending time in an underground bunker at an overseas location, he developed a method of predicting future political/military events. His predictions were based on data the rest of the analysts ignored. His first predictions were about four months in advance of actual events. When he started predicting things several hours prior, the NSA came knocking. All of this was done stubby pencil. There were no computers. Computers came of age after he was in the NSA. He later met an NSA computer guy and asked him if an algorithm could be put in a computer. That was the beginning of metadata. Love him or hate him, Mr. Binney is known as the father of metadata. Tons more info in the video.
Things have gotten completely out of this world since those days. There are computers now that can process a quadrillion calculations per second. The US is currently working on a computer that will be even faster. It will process a quintillion calculations per second. Those numbers boggle my mind. With the current world population at just under 8 billion, how many calculations can be done on every person, every second. What chances does your privacy have against that?
I don’t own a cell phone. I have no Wifi other than my electric meter. I have no social media accounts. I do not bank electronically. TOR is my primary browser and DuckDuckGo is my search engine. Even with all those precautions, it’s highly unlikely that I have real privacy. What about you?
Crap, forgot my name. Olderndirt.
“Privacy is something that has become a front burner topic for everyone”
Well, except for all the people who ‘aren’t doing anything wrong’.
The author of the saying, “You have nothing to fear if you have nothing to hide” is actually unknown. It’s often attributed to Orwell or Goebbels, but earlier uses of a similar phrase can be found. A better argument against that line of thought can be found in the link below. The Edward Snowden quote is an excerpt from it.
• “Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.”
— Edward Snowden, US government whistle-blower and former NSA worker
Responding to “Nothing to hide, Nothing to fear”
https://www.openrightsgroup.org/blog/2015/responding-to-nothing-to-hide-nothing-to-fear
For God’s sake, if you’ve purchased one of these snooping devices either unplug it and toss it in the garage or return it for a refund. You don’t want to open a 24/7 channel for snooping your private space and time. And add all the privacy you can to your phone/’net usage.