Nuclear War with Russia Winnable Said Trump’s Incoming National Security Advisor

Guest Post by Mike ShedlockQuestioning “mutual assured destruction,” Charles Kupperman called nuclear conflict “in large part a physics problem.”

Incoming National Security Advisor, Charles Kupperman, made the claim Nuclear War With USSR Was Winnable.

He made those statements in the 1980s. I do not know his views today, but let’s review what he said then.

President Donald Trump’s acting national security adviser, former Reagan administration official Charles Kupperman, made an extraordinary and controversial claim in the early 1980s: nuclear conflict with the USSR was winnable and that “nuclear war is a destructive thing but still in large part a physics problem.”

Kupperman, appointed to his new post on Tuesday after Trump fired his John Bolton from the job, argued it was possible to win a nuclear war “in the classical sense,” and that the notion of total destruction stemming from such a superpower conflict was inaccurate. He said that in a scenario in which 20 million people died in the U.S. as opposed to 150 million, the nation could then emerge as the stronger side and prevail in its objectives.

His argument was that with enough planning and civil defense measures, such as “a certain layer of dirt and some reinforced construction materials,” the effects of a nuclear war could be limited and that U.S. would be able to fairly quickly rebuild itself after an all-out conflict with the then-Soviet Union.

At the time, Kupperman was executive director of President Ronald Reagan’s General Advisory Committee on Arms Control and Disarmament. He made the comments during an interview with Robert Scheer for the journalist’s 1982 book, “With Enough Shovels: Reagan, Bush, and Nuclear War.”

The National Security Council did not immediately respond to questions on whether Kupperman, 68, still holds the same views of nuclear conflict as he did in the early 1980s. Kupperman’s seemingly cavalier attitude toward the potential death of millions of people was criticized at the time both by Democratic politicians and arms control experts.

The article posts excerpts so let’s look at a couple of precise statements.

Kupperman Statements

  • If the objective in a war is to try to destroy as many Soviet civilians and as many American civilians as is feasible, and the casualty levels approached 150 million on each side, then it’s going to be tough to say you have a surviving nation after that. But depending on how the nuclear war is fought, it could mean the difference between 150 casualties and 20 million casualties. I think that is a significant difference, and if the country loses 20 million people, you may have a chance of surviving after that.
  • I think it is possible to win, in the classical sense. It means that it is clear after the war that one side is stronger than the other side, the weaker side is going to accede to the demands of the stronger side.

Winning in the Classical Sense

We lost 20 million, they lost 150 million.

Let’s call that “winning in the “classical sense”.

It’s precisely how one “wins” trade wars, but on a much larger scale.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
31 Comments
CCRider
CCRider
September 14, 2019 5:58 pm

So we got rid of that fucking Bolton lunatic. And the saps rejoiced. So now we got one worse. But at least he’s not hillary.

Saxons Wrath
Saxons Wrath
  CCRider
September 15, 2019 7:23 pm

The only good thing about Bolton was he wasn’t one of (((them))), but he did their bidding. But the new one is much worse than Bolton. (((Charles Kupperman))). What does the loss of 20 or 30 million Goyim (cattle) matter when you have 300 million more to do your bidding, especially once the Goyim are afraid of the “big bombas” and will do blindly what they’re told??? This will be the end of the US if we don’t help Trump see the light of getting untangled from (((them))). Starting with Jared and Ivanka.

Miles Long
Miles Long
September 14, 2019 6:15 pm

Now there are four. Add this one to… Your check’s in the mail, black is beautiful, I promise I wont cum in yer mouth. What could go wrong?

WestcoastDeplorable
WestcoastDeplorable
  Miles Long
September 14, 2019 9:18 pm

We added one when I was in the Radio biz: “The station’s not for sale”.

White Fang
White Fang
September 14, 2019 6:20 pm

I have read that Russia has fallout shelters for most of the population, a legacy of the Cold War. We have zip, nothing, other than shelter in place. So, 40 years ago this wise soul thought 20 million Americans were expendable. He needs to crawl back into the woodwork.

Articles of Confederation
Articles of Confederation
  White Fang
September 14, 2019 8:04 pm

Because Washington doesn’t give a flying fuck about the average citizen, coupled with their brain-dead hubris that no one could stand in the way of DC Hegemony.

https://nypost.com/2017/06/29/russia-has-enormous-underground-bunkers-ready-for-nuclear-war/

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3741902/Russian-military-building-new-underground-bunkers-withstand-nuclear-war.html

Jack Lovett
Jack Lovett
September 14, 2019 6:21 pm

I say we syrap a nuck to bolton, drumph and this asshole , send em to moscow and then detonate.

AC
AC
September 14, 2019 6:23 pm

How the hell did Trump manage to find someone actually worse than Bolton?

Do they have secure mental institutions near DC, just for this purpose?

Vote Harder
Vote Harder
  AC
September 14, 2019 8:41 pm

I think the Trump administration should be red flagged at this point.

Anonymous
Anonymous
September 14, 2019 6:26 pm

Anyone that speaks of winning a nuclear exchange in this day and age is nothing less than a fucking lunatic . To that point either they and their loved ones will rough it out in an Iron Mountain shelter while those of us that survived the initial blast and residual radiation issues Duke it out for a roll of toilet paper and a can of dinty more stew . Be advised a 97 megaton war head creates a crater nearly a mile deep and 35 miles in diameter .
Needlessly to say anyone seriously considering nuclear war needs to be drugged heavily and only allowed to be feed thru a tube in the wall of their rubber room .
I am confident most rational people throughout the world feel the same way .
China however could afford to lose the entire population of the US and benefit but I doubt they would attempt to pull something like that catastrophic off

WestcoastDeplorable
WestcoastDeplorable
  Anonymous
September 14, 2019 9:19 pm
Fleabaggs
Fleabaggs
September 14, 2019 7:13 pm

This new guy has lots of company in D.C. Roberts was writing about it several years ago. In the meantime, while they wait for clearance they are destabilizing as many countries as possible.

Steve
Steve
September 14, 2019 8:11 pm

Maybe he was channeling Gen. Buck Turdgison (George C. Scott) from Dr. Strangelove. “I’m not saying we’re not going to get our hair mussed. 10 to 20 million dead tops.”

Anonymous
Anonymous
September 14, 2019 8:56 pm

The guy is nuts. Overthecliff

Vote Harder
Vote Harder
September 14, 2019 8:59 pm

How many times have we seen Trump drain a swamp creature and replace them with another swamp creature?

People get tired of senseless wars from the Clinton, Bush and Obama administrations, so they go and vote for a guy named Trump who promises them “no more senseless wars”, and what do they get? More senseless wars. So a sort of learned helplessness sets in and as a result is burned into the base of their brain mixed with a good supply dose of cognitive dissonance. It’s pure salesmanship.

This is how elites harvest the power of psychology and mind control…..and it’s working!

VOTE HARDER NEXT TIME.

Shinmen Takezo
Shinmen Takezo
September 14, 2019 9:35 pm

Out with one nut-fuk (Bolton) –and in with a new nut-fuk.

Vote Harder
Vote Harder
September 14, 2019 9:36 pm

Afghan Taliban Stronger Than Ever After U.S. Spends $900 Billion…..Almost a TRILLION dollars.

https://news.yahoo.com/afghan-taliban-stronger-ever-u-144102193.html

TampaRed
TampaRed
September 14, 2019 10:12 pm

the guy was 32 yo then,find out his views today–
besides,it didn’t say he favored starting a war,just that we could win it–
if russia launched on us would you favor launching on them?

RageforOrder
RageforOrder
  TampaRed
September 15, 2019 12:04 am

yep, my thoughts as well.

javelin
javelin
  TampaRed
September 15, 2019 11:04 am

Is what I read also. I never saw him advocating for the horrors of a nuclear exchange and I don’t know the context in which he was answering or making this analysis.
The Black Death killed one of every 3 people across Europe- during WW1, WW2 and many classical/historical wars like the Peloponnesian war, war against Persia, Ottoman wars against Hungary/Austria etc etc etc.. many nations lost 10-25% of their entire populations, so 1/13th loss is actually light historically ( not by total numbers but by %).

I don’t know enough about this guy to form a knee-jerk reaction. Thirty years ago I was still in college and had a lot of naïve, humanistic, idealism in me– people change over 3 decades– but sometimes they don’t. I’d like to know if he still holds this attitude. If so, he shouldn’t even start unpacking his stuff at his office and just follow Bolton.

KaD
KaD
September 14, 2019 10:33 pm

A boss of mine once asked me if I thought we’d ever have a nuclear war. I thought it out for a minute and told him, we aren’t the only life on this planet, I don’t think we have permission to destroy it. Think that through a little.

RageforOrder
RageforOrder
September 15, 2019 12:01 am

I don’t see what the big deal is. “What are his views now?” is the important question.Anyways having a guy say he believes that, actually could make our negotiations go better for us. And with trump being unpredictable….it would certainly give other nations pause before messing with us.

Lebowski
Lebowski
  RageforOrder
September 15, 2019 1:32 am

(((His))) views are probably worse today but I’m guessing

TampaRed
TampaRed
  Lebowski
September 15, 2019 10:32 am

((( ))) has nothing to do with it–
will ((( ))) gain if a nuclear war is fought?

Anonymous
Anonymous
  TampaRed
September 15, 2019 1:49 pm

They seem to think so. A nuclear exchange between Russia and the JSA would cripple, if not destroy, two powerful white nations.

It could just be the pervasive mental problems within their populace, arising from thousands of years of inbreeding – and I’m not joking about this.

We know they are willing to murder tens of millions of white people to get their way, because they did so in the Soviet Union.

yah sure
yah sure
September 15, 2019 10:58 am

The psychopaths would be in hardened bunkers. So yeah for them it’s winnable.

Francis Marion
Francis Marion
September 15, 2019 11:28 am

It’s not the Russians we need to worry about.

Anonymous
Anonymous
September 15, 2019 11:43 am

yeah it would be just great to win and be a survivor in a nuclear war

22winmag - Guns now, due process later DJT 2-28-19
22winmag - Guns now, due process later DJT 2-28-19
September 15, 2019 2:16 pm

When is the last time you gave the prospect of nuclear annihilation any serious thought?

40 years ago?

60 years ago?

The 80’s was the last time I gave it any thought because nukes are clearly fake and hoaxed.

Is anyone paying attention here?

Some J00ish-swmp-fossil from the Ronald Reagan SDI BILLION DOLLAR BOONDOGGLE ERA is telling us that 60+ years of MAD was bullshit and nuke wars are winnable.

So again, from the minute they were supposedly invented and supposedly deployed 74 years ago- the narrative is always coming from J00ish mouthpieces.

The “policy”of MAD was the biggest joke ever, but not because of this assplug Kupperman.

If nukes were real, mankind would not hesitate to use them without restraint.

As if humans suddenly grew restraint when these supposed J00ish-invented, world-ending weapons were “devised.”
comment image

(Japan suffered incendiary clusterbombs not MAGATON nukes)