Surplus Value Of Diversity

Guest Post by The Zman

U.S. District Judge Allison D. Burroughs ruled that Harvard University’s admission program was a Constitutional application of affirmative action. In other words, Harvard’s systematic discrimination against Whites and Asians was, according to the law, not discrimination against Whites and Asians. In addition to reaffirming the second-class status of Whites and Asians, she wrote, “It is somewhat axiomatic at this point that diversity of all sorts, including racial diversity, is an important aspect of education.”

Now, in general usage, an axiom is something that is self-evidently true, like the sky being blue or water being wet. More precise speakers will use the word to mean “tautology”, something that is true in every possible interpretation. To say, “It is somewhat axiomatic” is therefore a rather tortured assertion, but revealing. It is the sleight of hand we get from the kritarchy. Every alleged statement of fact is really just a form of hairsplitting intended to nibble away at any notion of truth.

That aside, it does bring up some interesting questions. How much diversity is a good thing and how much diversity is too much? There’s no doubt that someone like the judge in this case would reflexively respond that there can never be too much diversity, as diversity is an unalloyed good. There’s also no doubt that like every other diversity fanatic, the judge has organized her life to be around as little diversity as possible, with a special emphasis on avoiding vibrancy. Revealed preferences are real.

Clearly, even the people who say it is somewhat axiomatic that diversity is important think a lack of diversity is important too. Put another way, even the blubbering diversity fanatics assume some upper limit on how much diversity is tolerable, even though they focus on the lower bound in their proselytizing. Somewhere between complete diversity, a place with at least one of every flavor, in perfect proportion to their frequency on earth, and complete homogeneity is the sweet spot according to the advocates.

Arthur Laffer famously explained that there is a relationship between income tax rates and the resulting tax revenues. A 100% tax will result in zero revenue, as no one will voluntarily work without being paid. At the other end, where no tax is imposed on income, the net revenue is also zero, for obvious reasons. Using Rolle’s theorem, there is an optimum tax rate between those two end points. In theory, this should be calculable, so tax rates should be set at that point and left alone.

Now, we know the tax is not a continuous interval, so Rolle’s theorem would not apply in the case of these sorts of social taxes. Still, at one end, zero diversity and vibrancy, we get something less than maximum happiness. Universal homogeneity sounds good in theory, but in reality, people like to punch things up a bit. At the other end, the multicultural paradise ruled by the usual suspects, has nearly no social happiness for normal people. It does not exist, because no one would tolerate it.

The legendary empiricist, La Griffe du Lion, looked at the correlation between the black population in a city and the white victimization rates. The assumption is that blacks prefer to live around whites, as they always seek access to whites. On the other hand, whites are neutral on living near blacks, unless it has some impact on their well-being, which is where crime is a useful metric. Whites move from high crime areas to low crime areas faster than any group, having the least tolerance for crime.

What the numbers reveal is that as the percentage of black residents in a city increases, the white victimization rates begin to climb. At about 20% black population, the white victimization rate climbs rapidly. Blacks commit crimes against whites in this analysis at 64 times the rate of whites committing crimes against blacks. Other studies have found different rates, but it is axiomatic that black crime is vastly higher than white crime and it is axiomatic that blacks prefer white victims more than whites prefer blacks.

Now, it is not somewhat axiomatic, but a universal truth that when Progressives talk about diversity, they mean blacks. Therefore, we can now put the upper bound on diversity as 20% of the population being black. Any more than that and white crime victimization begins to soar and awareness of it begins to soar. This sets off a chain reaction known as white flight. Baltimore is a great example. Once its black population crossed the 25% level, it began a rapid decline into chaos.

This does not address the other issues of diversity. Since it is axiomatic that diversity is about blacks and whites, as demonstrated in that court case, the obvious question is how many white people are required to maintain the multicultural paradise? It is just assumed that whites must be exposed to diversity, so they are not only beneficiaries, but also a necessary ingredient. You cannot purify white people through the healing magic of diversity if they are not actually part of diversity.

As the examples of Rhodesia, Baltimore and now South Africa show, there is some minimum number of whites required to keep the lights on, so everyone can enjoy the wonderfulness of diversity. In the case of Rhodesia, the number fell below the minimum and it became Zimbabwe. In Baltimore, they have hovered along the critical number for decades, always ready to tilt into chaos, but saved by the state. South Africa staggers on, but they too are approaching the inflection point.

As Steve Sailer has pointed out, America schools are starting to run out of white kids to maintain the diversity is magic assertion. Once a school gets too diverse, no one wants to send their kids to it, not even the diverse, so diversity requires a certain threshold of white people to make it work. According to the data in that Sailer post, a good starting place seems to be 50%. Once the white population falls below 50%, the negatives of diversity increasingly outweigh the positives.

Another example seems to make the same point. This story about white flight from tackle football in America has some interesting numbers. Again, the 50% number appears to be a threshold. Peak football in America was when whites were 50% of the youth leagues, which eventually supply the NFL. The decline in play and interest in the NFL over the last few years also supports the observation. The NFL now has a diversity problem, created by their efforts to fix their diversity problem.

Taken together, the starting boundaries of diversity are no more than 20% black, with no lower limit definable, and no less than 50% white. The diversity sweet spot lies somewhere in that zone. Given the ethnocentrism of Jews and Asians, a hard limit on their numbers is certainly part of the formula. Hispanics, a group that is a social construct, should not be a consideration. Most likely, the right mix for maximum diversity benefits is something close to what America was like in 1965.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
27 Comments
flash
flash
October 5, 2019 9:05 am

comment image

Martel's Hammer
Martel's Hammer
October 5, 2019 9:21 am

Harvard and the other schools practicing this discrimination in the name of correcting historical injustice (essentially all) are “bombing the village to save it”….hurting those who are qualified but excluded (Asians/Whites) but also the unqualified who are admitted (Black/Brown). The Affirmative Action students are grossly underprepared and drop out at higher rates, cluster at the bottom of the class GPA wise and tend to take the easiest majors (social sciences). This produces angry social justice warriors who have massive inferiority complexes that they carry into the rest of their lives.

Nobody wins except the white liberal (including Fauxchahontas) virtue signalers and even they are distorted into an unhealthy state by the guilt they feel and then assuage with more Orange Man Bad proclamations.

Sick.

TampaRed
TampaRed
  Martel's Hammer
October 5, 2019 11:05 pm

martel,
walter williams has said the same thing as you about black kids being in schools they aren’t really qualified 4 on many occasions–they’d be better off at lower tier schools where they could get a real degree–

Donkey
Donkey
October 5, 2019 9:29 am

The goal is rage.

overthecliff
overthecliff
  Donkey
October 5, 2019 9:54 am

The plan is working.

flash
flash
October 5, 2019 9:34 am

All cultures are the same. Stop resisting racist.

Man accused of punching pregnant woman in
stomach, stealing her purse
Malcom Hodges says he robs people ‘when he doesn’t have any money,’ deputies say

https://www.local10.com/news/florida/palm-beach-county/man-punches-pregnant-woman-in-stomach-steals-her-purse

WHEN YOU DON’T HAVE MONEY AND YOU WANT SOMETHING NICE

overthecliff
overthecliff
October 5, 2019 9:54 am

Washington University in St Louis has announced free tuition for poor students(read niggers and maybe spics). The recipients must have ability. Tuition at Wash U is around 50,000 dollars/year. Guess who will pay for that.

Anonymous
Anonymous
October 5, 2019 9:55 am

Give whites a pile of bricks , they build a city ! Give blacks a city and they demolish it into a pile of bricks !
As for the judges findings for the discrimination against Asians and whites , she obviously has no understanding of “equal protection under the law”!
My experience with the racial divide in our country has been an eye opener . Every area where blacks become the majority everything turns to shit . About 20% of blacks seem to possess the skills and abilities to coexist be accepted and thrive peacefully regardless of the minority mix . The other 80% drag society into a shithole .
I wonder where the honorable judge sent her children or grandchildren to school ?
I bet it was not in a predominantly black populated and controlled school system like Baltimore !

Mygirl...maybe
Mygirl...maybe
  Anonymous
October 5, 2019 4:46 pm

I often imagine a world where the productive, seeing how they are marginalized in favor of ‘diversity’ decide to no longer produce and withhold the fruits of their labors. Imagine how the ‘diversely vibrant’ groups would do without the producers, how long would they fare, could they even survive?
Little snots like the Anitfa can do what they do because society protects them. Ditto the ghetto rats. Should the ebt go away along with the social services, there’d be rioting in the streets and demands to be taken care of. There would be looting and violence so long as there was something to steal but when that’s gone….well…

TN Patriot
TN Patriot
  Mygirl...maybe
October 6, 2019 7:42 pm

Who is John Galt?

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Anonymous
October 5, 2019 11:28 pm

“About 20% of blacks seem to possess the skills and abilities to coexist be accepted and thrive peacefully regardless of the minority mix . The other 80% drag society into a shithole .”

You do understand that the 80% that you know suck are the relatives of the 20% you speciously believe don’t suck, right?

EC the vulgar
EC the vulgar
  Anonymous
October 6, 2019 1:13 am

Do you suck?

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Anonymous
May 15, 2022 5:08 pm

As a White person, dumb niggers are not my problem. I will never accept a joke of a country run by jews and full of foreigners. I will have my freedom someday, no matter what.

If any of you are still lolbergs, you need to read about National Socialism. Only a radical authoritarian hardcore military order gives us any hope of survival. Freedom will be impossible until we totally defeat our enemies.

Anonymous
Anonymous
October 5, 2019 10:53 am

I think “it is somewhat axiomatic…” is more precisely defined as a dogma, an unproven assertion assumed to be true. It is just one of the many upon which leftist belief rests.

robert h siddell jr
robert h siddell jr
October 5, 2019 11:11 am

Please support Vouchers so no White or Asian child is left behind in a public school. PS: We should call Affirmative Discrimination what it is: Reconstruction and treat it the same as Southerners did after Lincoln’s War.

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
October 5, 2019 8:13 pm

“Hispanics are a social construct”. Really? I thought they self-identified as La Raza. I mean, Cameron Diaz might be a social construct. George Lopez?

EC the vulgar
EC the vulgar
  Iska Waran
October 6, 2019 1:21 am

“Hispanics, a group that is a social construct, should not be a consideration.” – article

I seem to recall that I made this same argument not long ago. This sort of confirms my belief that people are stealing my ideas. Seriously, I wrote that stuff without benefit of learning, it was an effort of mine to say that Mexicans are not Cubans or Puerto Ricans even though we are lumped together because we share a common heritage in the old Spanish empire.

nkit
nkit
  EC the vulgar
October 6, 2019 1:41 am

Go fry some more plantains and whine some more…No speaka Espanol…Lump crab meat is good…

BL
BL
  EC the vulgar
October 6, 2019 1:53 am

EC- People steal our material all the time, I find it interesting that they must actually read our blather. Just proves we are worthwhile for the readers. Aggregate sites all have the same dribble, the commenters make a site, I’m even non-binary….ask Flash.

flash
flash
  BL
October 6, 2019 7:39 pm

ha ha ha …. ” they must actually read our blather. ” Truest think you’ve ever said .

Anonymous
Anonymous
October 5, 2019 10:19 pm

You want to know who is really discriminated against at Harvard, read this

http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-racial-discrimination-at-harvard/

TN Patriot
TN Patriot
October 6, 2019 7:32 pm

I have never understood how affirmative action squares with equal protection under the law.

U S Constitution Amendment XIV
1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  TN Patriot
May 15, 2022 5:09 pm

It doesn’t. This country is a joke.