Schumer’s Electric Escort Service

Guest Post by Eric Peters

If you have to pay a girl to go out with you, there’s probably something wrong with you. Especially if you let yourself believe she is going out with you because she likes you.

The same applies to electric cars – which most people, if they’re honest with themselves, only “date” because they’re handed wads of bills as compensation for the EV’s many functional deficits – as well as its much higher expenses.

The compensation is tendered in the form of  tax kickbacks (paid for by other taxpayers) and various special privileges, such as “free” (and tax-free) electricity  . . . also paid for by others.

That this is absolutely essential – in terms of perpetrating the fiction of EV viability – tells us all we need to know about the viability of EVs.

They aren’t.

We know this because when the bribes are withheld, the EVs stop selling  . . . for the same reason the escort isn’t going to show up at your hotel room just because you ask her to.

Something else is required.

If EVs could be sold on the merits, the bribes wouldn’t be essential. And yet, they are.

QED, as the saying goes.

We’re not supposed to notice this. We are supposed to pretend the attraction is real rather than bribed. That there is a “market” for cars that cost 30-50 percent more than their non-electric equivalents, but which only go half as far (maybe, if you take it easy and don’t use the AC or heat too much) and take 5-6 times as long (minimally, if you can umbilical up to a “fast” charger) to get going again.

And which only last half as long – due to the lifespan of their batteries, which is about half that of an engine or transmission.

The “market” for EVs is like the “market” for air travel via DC-3s (15 hours in an unpressurized cabin from NY to LA, with multiple stops for fuel) vs. five hours no-stop via 757.

We live in delusional times.

Or rather, we are expected to be delusional in our thinking –  like the liver-spotted old guy with tufts of hair spouting from his ears who lets himself believe the pretty young woman in his hotel room is there because she likes him . . . not because of the wad of $100 bills he just handed her.

Speaking of delusional (and dangerous) hairy-eared old guys . . . and billions…  .

New York Sen. Chuck Schumer wants to pay people even more of other people’s money (about $400 billion) to “date” electric cars.

His “bold new plan” – announced last week in The New York Times – would increase the existing federal bribe of up to $7,500 used to cajole people into buying  EVs to potentially more than $10,000  – the amount of the bribe depending on the range of the EV.

The farther it goes, the more of other people’s money you’d get.

But only if the bribed also give up their ICE car to be destroyed, a la Cash For Clunkers – the infamous Obama-era ‘plan” used to “stimulate” demand for new cars by destroying the supply of used cars.

It’s also similar to another government “plan”- the one that preceded Cash for Clunkers and which triggered the financial meltdown that led to it.

This was the Chimp-era “plan” to “incentivize” homeownership by qualifying everyone not actually homeless for a home loan. Lots of people “bought” homes. Voila – the Ownership Society.

It worked so long as no one had to pay.

When the bills began to come due – and then past due – the whole thing came down like WTC 7 (another government-engineered crash). People lost “their” homes – and of course, could no longer afford to buy new cars by tapping into the equity credit lines they longer had.

And then the government dried up the supply of affordable uses cars by paying people to hand them over to be crushed.

Fast-forward. People increasingly can’t afford homes. And soon, cars.

Because of Schumer’s “plan”  . . . only it is the plan.

First, bribe people into electric cars; then make it impossible for them to get out of them by leaving no alternative to them – the supply of affordable ICE cars having been eliminated.  Schumer wants to “rapidly phase out gas-powered vehicles” within the next ten years; to destroy 63 million of them over the next ten years. 

Once that has been achieved, the bribes used to get people into the EVs will go the way of the nothing-down/no-interest home loan.

With similar and entirely predictable results.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
14 Comments
diverdown
diverdown
October 29, 2019 5:17 pm

The development and production of electric vehicles both in Europe
and the US greatly predates that of vehicles with internal combustion
engines.

And although the technologies used then are quite primitive compared
to those today, the electric car was supplanted at that time by those with
ICE primarily due to its inherent defects: 1) high cost and 2) limited range.

Nothing much has changed.

22winmag - w/o tagline
22winmag - w/o tagline
October 29, 2019 5:18 pm

“If you have to pay a girl to go out with you, there’s probably something wrong with you. ”

You could decide to never read another Eric Peters article just based on the above horse shit. He just described thousands of years of marriage AND not hookers.

Johns don’t pay for women to stay, they pay them to go away. Certainly nothing wrong or loser-ish about that.

SeeBee
SeeBee
  22winmag - w/o tagline
October 29, 2019 6:44 pm

I’ve got to tell you .22. Your sure make me look at things in a different way.

Lerby
Lerby
  SeeBee
October 29, 2019 10:26 pm

.22 is spreading well established wisdom. Many wives qualify as nothing more than one-client-hooker. Multi-client-hookers are honest at least.

WestcoastDeplorable
WestcoastDeplorable
October 29, 2019 5:35 pm

Cars like the Prius Plug-In and Prius Prime are the next step, not fully electric inpractical cars like Tesla. A Prius is cheap by comparison all-around. My old 2012 Plug-In still delivers about 9 miles fully EV and the ICE kicks in afterward, with EV power through regeneration, achieving between 45-65 mpg depending on how I drive it. Just turned over 82K and it’s never needed a brake job, or really anything other than oil & filter changes every 8-10,000 miles. But if you do need service, Toyota dealers are everywhere. Try getting a Tesla serviced!
One other thing…you can plug the Prius into regular house current, no need to call an electrician.

Apple
Apple
  WestcoastDeplorable
October 29, 2019 6:40 pm

Is it a factory defect that those prius piece of shit cars can never manage to drive at least the fucking speed limit?

Coalclinker
Coalclinker
  Apple
October 29, 2019 10:34 pm

No, they think by driving slow they’re saving the Earth and you can bet your rosy ass they don’t want anyone else to drive faster than they are. They are masters of driving slow in the fast lane and only speed up if they think they can keep you from passing them.

Pat A Hines
Pat A Hines
October 29, 2019 5:44 pm

See the story of the man who burned to death in his Tesla because no one could open the doors to rescue him.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/10201877/tesla-driver-burned-death-model-s-car-handles-keyfob-trapped-florida/

Coalclinker
Coalclinker
October 29, 2019 6:37 pm

The whole purpose of the Washington D.C. Globalists is to destroy our ability to own cars. This gig was started around 1965 and it has gone so far down the rabbit hole that nothing less but the use of brick walls and firing squads are going to put this scam and its purveyors to a well deserved extraction from the anus of human society.

SeeBee
SeeBee
October 29, 2019 6:40 pm

Schumer is a large boil on the ass of life. He needs to be lanced…..and discarded. Has he made NY better? Has he done anything except exert control over his minions. I despise and detest that man. I put him and Fck-in Bloomberg in the same pile of arrogant potentate predator BS. (that felt good to get off my chest.)

TomMacGyver
TomMacGyver
October 29, 2019 6:50 pm

I have a 2012 Chevy Volt gas/electric. I bought it used; no rebate. I don’t get “free electricity.” I paid $400.00/month for gas in my old 4-cylinder car for my 75-mile out & back five days a week. I pay around $60.00/month for the gas the Volt uses, and around $40.00/ month for the electricity it uses for the same distance traveled. Do the math. The batteries in the Chevy Volt have a really good track record, often outlasting the rest of the car. Some rack up over 300K miles!

I’m with you on the rebates though. Why should taxpayer money be used to make it cheaper for the rich to buy a Tesla, when the rest of us could never afford a Tesla? No, if the car can’t sell on its own merit, it should end up in the dustbin of history…

As for buying electric to “save the planet,” that’s a bunch of crap. For me it was a strictly economic decision. The car was bought cheap, and runs cheap. End of story. If a diesel would give me the same cost per mile, I’d be driving one of those instead, hands down.

Anymouse
Anymouse
  TomMacGyver
October 30, 2019 10:23 am

The volt was probably one of the better hybrids, your lucky you got one, as GM decided that making quality cars was not worth investing in.

There is not enough lithium (the metal required to make lectro car batteries) on the planet, to be able to replace all the ICE cars, this is just more pandering by politicians to lobbyist in the EV market.

EV cars are just like EV panels, idiots buy them to virtue signal, govt. give you a “tax break” for pre-paying your electric bill for 10 years, then you own degraded panels that nobody wants. in 10 years the panel tech will be improved to the point that current owners will be experiencing buyers remorse, as you will only need a few panels, instead of the entire roof.

oh, and if you already have your roof covered with these things, go ask you local fire dept how they will deal with your house if it is on fire (they won’t be cutting holes in the roof, so they won’t be entering your house, they will just make sure your neighbors house does not catch fire)

TampaRed
TampaRed
October 29, 2019 10:48 pm

tesla filed it’s 10-q today 4 the 3rd qtr–
us revenues are down 39%–

22winmag - w/o tagline
22winmag - w/o tagline
  TampaRed
October 30, 2019 7:53 am

Down 39%? Dayum!