Did Bankers Foment the “Civil War”?

Guest Post by Paul Craig Roberts

In my last two columns, sufficient evidence was provided that the Lincoln regime was an unconstitutional war crime regime and that the so-called “civil war” was an act of northern aggression against the South initiated by Lincoln for the  purpose of saving the Union. See: https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2020/07/20/the-cause-of-the-so-called-civil-war/

and   https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2020/07/21/how-lincoln-destroyed-the-united-states/ 

Slavery was not an issue.

The Southern states seceded because the Republicans passed a high tariff.

For the North the issue was preserving the empire (saving the Union).

Now comes defense attorney and former public prosecuter John Remington Graham.  Was there a deeper underlying cause, an agenda unbeknown to the southern states and perhaps also to Lincoln?  Graham puts forward an intriguing thesis that bankers spent a decade fomenting hatred between North and South in order to provoke a war that would greatly increase federal debt, which the banks could acquire and use as reserves to support the issuance of money and credit.  Federal debt would become the reserve basis (like gold) for the expansion of the money supply. This power would give bankers control of the government.

Graham states his position:

“The divisive antagonisms between the North and the South, finally erupting in the spring of 1861, were not unfortunate historical accidents, nor the result of some inexorable momentum in events. Those anatagonisms, rather, were deliberately agitated during the 1850s by great international banking houses with a preconceived motive of provoking secession. And secession was to be used as a pretext for a bloody and expensvie war of conquest which was actually launched and carried out. The war was planned as a brutal slaughter, as it tragically became.

The war was planned to generate a stupendous national debt, mostly represented by bonds, and such a national debt was in fact generated. The private interests acquiring these bonds successfully plotted to secure the passage of legislation which enabled them to convert the paper by them acquired in financing the war into a new and dominant system of banking and currency under their ownership and control. And those private interests fully succeeded in their sinister program, and set up a huge financial empire centered on Wall Street from which they have ever since governed the United States from behind the scenes.”

Graham is factually correct about the huge increase in US national debt caused by the war. In 1860 US national debt stood at a mere $65 million. By war’s end, US national debt was $2.7 billion–41.5 times larger.

Graham’s evidence that hatred was intentionally fomented in order to stimulate a war is circumstantial, but strong.  Graham focuses on the questions of who financed John Brown’s raid on Harper’s Ferry, who financed the marketing of Harriet Beecher Stowe’s propagandistic novel, Uncle Tom’s Cabin, and turned it into an international best seller, and who financed the expensive and long drawn out legal case of Dred Scott?  These are honest and important questions.  Graham also stresses the role played in fomenting armed strife in Kansas by Stephen Douglas’ modification or repeal of the Missouri Compromise with the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854.

Today I reproduce with permission a section, “Inciting Hatred: Uncle Tom’s Cabin,” from Graham’s monograph, Blood Money: The Civil War and the Federal Reserve (https://www.turningthetidepublishing.com/shop/blood-money ).

This will be followed by Graham’s analysis, “Transcontinental Railroads and the Repeal of the Missouri Compromise,” and by “The Case of Dred Scott.”  Once the reader is acquainted with some of the circumstantial evidence, I will attempt a review essay of Graham’s monograph. His intriguing thesis that “in order to stimulate a civil war within the United States, it was necessary to foment hatred between the North and the South” should spark a deeper investigation into the cause of the war.

Inciting Hatred: Uncle Tom’s Cabin

          The opening salvo in the campaign to sow hatred was Harriet Beecher Stowe’s Uncle Tom’s Cabin, first serialized in a newspaper, then as a book in 1852. It was not a reasoned argument against slavery. It had no basis in fact. It was pure fiction, reaching a melodramatic climax in a scene where the sadistic master Simon Lagree murders a kindly slave Uncle Tom who pleads, “Mas’r, if you was sick, or in trouble, or dying, and I could save ye, I’d give ye my heart’s blood; and, if taking every drop of blood in this poor old body would save your precious soul, I’d give ‘em freely, as the Lord gave his for me. O, Mas’r, don’t bring this great sin on your soul!” After more gaudy sensationalism, the awful moment: “There was one hesitating pause, — one irresolute, relenting thrill, — and the spirit of evil came back, with sevenfold vehemence; and Legree, foaming  with rage, smote his victim to the ground.”      

          This vindictive fabrication was published as a malicious libel against the Old South. It was mass marketed, requiring vast capital which could only have been supplied by the largest banking houses in the United States and Great Britain. This book was promoted lavishly like no other book had ever before been promoted in the history of Western civilization. The King James Bible and the Book of Common Prayer aside, ten times more copies were published and sold than of any other work then known in the English-speaking world.

Mrs. Stowe’s corny novel could not have gained a large readership without the kind of advertising and fanfare that only powerful connections and big money could assure. Pushing her work was like selling a low-grade Hollywood film today. It might be tasteless as so many films are, but with enough capital it is possible to sell almost anything. Northerners read Mrs. Stowe’s absurdity, and were outraged because they believed it was true. Southerners read her lie, and were outraged because they knew it was false. There was enough resulting anger in the air to generate the desire in men to kill each other, an essential ingredient of war — exactly what the financiers behind this “literary” production wanted.  

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
9 Comments
Fleabaggs
Fleabaggs
July 23, 2020 3:42 pm

The very same Fish Bankers who promoted that story also relentlessly promoted and installed the Schofield reference bible throughout the country to make sure it was accepted as fact. Every seminary got one and every college library that would accept it got one. 40 years later Dispensationalism and Pre-Tribulation Rapture doctrine ruled the roost and the rest is history.

Coronald McDonald
Coronald McDonald
July 23, 2020 3:42 pm

Anybody named Simon can’t be all bad

Anonymous
Anonymous
July 23, 2020 9:40 pm

All wars are banker’s wars.

TN Patriot
TN Patriot
July 24, 2020 9:06 am

1/2 million dead is a small price for the bankers, as long as it is others who are dying while they gain more control.

Two if by sea. Three if from within.
Two if by sea. Three if from within.
July 24, 2020 9:37 am

By the end of these “Tales”, if a majority wishes to relocate the Lincoln Memorial onto my property, I`ll gladly accept it.

theOtherDan
theOtherDan
  Two if by sea. Three if from within.
July 24, 2020 10:36 am

I want Lee and/or Jackson.. and I’ll arm wrestle for them

gammer
gammer
July 24, 2020 10:59 am

Yes, just think of it….the bankers back the social justice BS, they know nothing more than hate and destruction so they destroy their own cities…driving down the price of all real estate and business assets. The bankers then back the govts to kill the SJW’s, then they swoop in and buy up everything for pennies on the dollar. They already own a substantial percentage of homes, businesses and stocks from the last crises, now they become lioke Japan; more than 90% of the market is central bank owned. Look it up, blackrock who bought all those foreclosures is actually doing the bidding of the central bank who finances their market buying opportunities…In your face obvious!

So thanks all you SJW’s I am one of the people who see your stupidity and profit off it too. All my powder is dry and ready to buy up assets after you trash their prices! All you divorced couples, our family stays together to consolidate our wealth and compete against you, our kids make out with future wealth handed down to them and yours suffers huge debt burdens. The next iteration, my grandkids own your grandkids debt, from which they will NEVER climb out from under because of your selfishness and short sightedness. I plan for 100 years from now, you cannot get past last week.

Thanks, keep up the STUPID.

Montefrío
Montefrío
  gammer
July 24, 2020 4:57 pm

I admire your ability to plan so far ahead; I find myself limited to a far shorter time span, but then I’d prefer my grandchildren don’t become userers. They’re alive and well right now and I too am waiting to buy up assets, tangible assets with which they’ll have property, dwellings and the mean to earn a living if I’ve chosen wisely, which in these times is unpredictable to say the least. Buying debt, however, is not among choices made or to be made as the situation becomes more clear. I’m hoping debt-based finance is on its way out and while that’s not certain, I’d prefer to stick with the tangibles over which I can exert some degree of direct control while I remain alive. Once I’m no longer capable or have “crossed the river”, well it’ll be up to my children and grandchildren to assume control over what I hope I’ll have left them. Neither you nor I can do much more than that, given the societies in which we live. God only knows what they may be up against!

Nevertheless, game’s not over quite yet and the central bankers, their behind-the-curtain owners and their willing dupes haven’t won yet!

Anonymous
Anonymous
July 24, 2020 12:28 pm

A younger Dr. Paul “Doobie” Roberts, explains to the youts the secret behind his success during his college football playing days.