Big Business Loves Big Government

Guest Post by John Stossel

Big Business Loves Big Government

Politicians say they pass laws to “protect Americans from big business.”

People like hearing that. Many don’t like big business.

Unfortunately, most people don’t realize that those laws often help big business while hurting consumers.

“Big business and big government are not enemies like a lot of people think they are,” says American Enterprise Institute fellow Tim Carney in my new video. “When government gets bigger, whether it’s through spending or taxes or regulation, the big guys, big business benefits.”

Consider the $15 minimum wage. People think of that law as pro-worker. But big companies like Walmart, Costco and Amazon lobby in favor of it. Why?

Because big business can afford robots. Their competitors often cannot.

“Capitalism is a cutthroat thing,” says Carney. “But this isn’t capitalism. When you turn to government to regulate your competitors out of business, that’s where we need to say this is wrong.”

“Maybe you’re too cynical,” I suggest. “Maybe (Amazon boss) Bezos really just does want people to be paid more.”

“If Jeff Bezos wants people to be paid more,” Carney responds, “he can pay people more! But what Bezos is trying to do is outlaw competing business practices.”

He’s not alone.

When the big toymaker Mattel was caught selling toys that contained lead, its lobbyists got Congress to force all toymakers to do expensive lead testing.

That sounds like they just want to protect children, I tell Carney.

“If you’re trying to test 1,000 Barbie dolls,” he replies, “that might be fairly efficient. But if you are a grandpa making little wooden handmade toys, you’d have to hire some third-party tester. That could cost you $1,000, and you’re not going to sell your wooden toy for $1,000. It effectively outlawed handmade toys.”

After small toymakers screamed about that, Congress exempted toymakers that make fewer than 7,500 toys per year. So small toymakers must stay small.

“Maybe what (Mattel) did,” says Carney, “is say, ‘This is our opportunity through regulation to kill some of our competitors!'”

Facebook tries to do that, too.

At an international conference, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg said, “We don’t want private companies making so many decisions about how to balance social equities without a more democratic process.”

In other words: “Government, please regulate all of us.”

That sounds noble.

Carney points out the catch.

“He’s calling for a mandate that platforms impose some sort of artificial intelligence to weed out misinformation or hate speech. Facebook can afford that, but Zuckerberg’s smaller competitors (like Odysee, Rumble, Parler) … would struggle to pay the thousands of content moderators and the expensive artificial intelligence that Congress may require. New social media sites may never even start.”

That last sentence is a key point that we often miss.

“Regulation doesn’t just kill existing businesses,” says Carney. “It keeps new businesses from ever entering.”

Big business has always pushed for regulation.

More than 100 years ago, Henry Heinz, founder of Heinz Ketchup, started using refrigerated rail cars because, says Carney, “he could get fresher tomatoes, and therefore he could make a ketchup that didn’t rely on sodium benzoate as an artificial preservative.”

“Everybody loved Heinz ketchup, and it rose up to be about half of the market,” Carney continues. “But sometimes people who are half of the market want to be all the market. So Heinz himself started lobbying to outlaw sodium benzoate.”

Sodium benzoate is a preservative that Heinz’s competitors used. Heinz claimed it wasn’t safe, but it is safe. It’s still used in Sprite, Jell-O Kool-Aid Gels, and other foods.

Henry Heinz almost got those products banned, says Carney. “He almost got Teddy Roosevelt on board, which would have outlawed all of his competition. Sometimes businessmen hate nothing more than competition.”

Not “sometimes.” Usually. Almost all businesses hate competition.

But competition is what helps us consumers most.

When big government colludes with big business to kill competition, we all pay the price.

John Stossel is author of “Give Me a Break: How I Exposed Hucksters, Cheats, and Scam Artists and Became the Scourge of the Liberal Media.” For other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit www.creators.com.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
7 Comments
SeeBee
SeeBee
July 8, 2021 3:29 pm

Mussolini’s fascism = Government take-over corporations.
USA’s fascism = Corporations usurp and replace government.

Voltara
Voltara
  SeeBee
July 8, 2021 7:12 pm

‘Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power’

Mussolini

The Oragutan
The Oragutan
July 8, 2021 3:29 pm

For an example of where this all leads, look no further than Canada’s internet market. There are 3 choices : Bell, Rogers, and Telus (the Big Three). All in collusion with each other. All in bed with high level government figureheads. All keeping ISP prices in Canada among the world’s highest. All lobbying to keep competition out of the market.

The recently introduced Bill C-10 is a draconian measure to elevate the CTRC’s (the governments regulatory telecommunications commission) already abusive powers, to that of an omnipresent Big Brother overlord who would now be able to dictate what Canadians can and cannot access over the internet! (i.e. just like China does). They have already been doing this to Canadian TV since inception. Free speech has long been dead in Canada, but now government through the CTRC will control and censor all access to external, non-government approved media. I expect this will lead to me being unable to access TBP in due course.

How embedded are government and the Big 3? On Tuesday, an actual PHOTO surfaced of CRTC Chair Ian Scott’s private meeting with Bell CEO Mirko Bibic over beers at an Ottawa pub. After the meeting, the CRTC went on to pull a complete about-face on its 2019 wholesale rates decision. The CRTC ignored the facts AND their own analysis to rule in favour of the Big Three, raising the rates back to their higher 2016 levels and making it near impossible for smaller ISPs to survive — ultimately OK-ing another round of Internet price hikes.

Welcome to Chinada

Glock-N-Load
Glock-N-Load
July 8, 2021 5:40 pm

So, honestly, who do you blame? I blame the rich actually. They are the ones that can buy influence. Tax the shit out of monopolies and the rich…I’m talking about the RICH.

fujigm
fujigm
  Glock-N-Load
July 9, 2021 12:23 am

Tax the shit out of monopolies and the rich

More government to fix too much government?
I must have missed the /sarc tag.

robinson
robinson
April 1, 2024 9:48 am

In the business world, the relationship between large corporations and government intervention is complex. “Big Business Loves Big Government” reflects a symbiotic relationship in which large companies often benefit from regulations and policies that favor their interests. However, navigating the intricacies of government involvement can be challenging for businesses, and this is where outsourcing services come into play. Outsourcing offers companies that need help with various aspects of their operations, from customer service to IT support, the opportunity to focus on their core competencies while leaving specialized tasks to external experts. By using outsourcing, businesses can effectively manage their resources and streamline processes, which ultimately contributes to their growth and success. Thus, the synergy between big government and outsourcing services highlights the dynamic nature of modern business strategies, where adaptation and collaboration are key to remaining competitive in an ever-changing marketplace.

alanstatener
alanstatener
April 11, 2024 12:12 pm

There’s a good reason that so many dystopian futures feature countries run by corporations. Unfortunately, America has been run on the profit motive for a very long time now. While it seems to support small businesses and entrepreneurs, the barriers to entry are quite high. Think about it for a second, why is it more cost-effective to outsource many functions overseas? Companies offering support, like https://supportyourapp.com/help-desk-outsourcing/ can provide very competitive pricing. Part of the reason is that the cost of living where companies operate is lower than in the US. There’s also significantly more action with regulators encouraging entrepreneurism.