With Borders Open, Evacuees Incoming, SCOTUS Must Rule on Birthright Citizenship

Guest Post by Joe Guzzardi

The rush to resettle thousands of Afghan evacuees and the Southwest border bungling prove one thing if nothing else – the U.S. has little interest in preserving its sovereign nation status. Illegal immigration tolerance and an eagerness to admit worldwide refugees aren’t unique to the Biden administration, however.

Since the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, Republican and Democratic administrations have shown a willingness to look the other way at illegal immigration, create dozens of unnecessary employment-based visas that have diluted the labor market, and enabled foreign nationals to take coveted U.S. jobs. During the same 56-year period, Congress has refused to make legislative changes that could, assuming the legislative bodies were determined to defend the nation, reverse history’s course.

The U.S. is traditionally the largest refugee resettlement nation, and the most illegal immigrant-tolerant. These conditions can only continue if Americans don’t feel that newcomers are displacing them.

Among its other many immigration-related failures, Congress has steadfastly refused to end or even urge a Supreme Court review on birthright citizenship, an issue which has once again surged to the forefront as a major sovereignty concern.

On the Del Rio, Texas-Mexico, border, several Haitian nationals have given birth to U.S. citizen babies, and under the bridge, 300 mothers-to-be await delivery. At Wisconsin’s Fort McCoy, Afghan mothers have delivered three babies. The newborns are, thanks to a misguided federal policy that grants automatic citizenship to anyone born on U.S. soil, American citizens. Mothers could be Disneyland tourists, Neiman Marcus shoppers, birth hotel patrons, or migrants and evacuees, all of whom have little-if-any U.S. ties. Their children are automatically citizens.

Every year, American mothers give birth to about 4 million children. In 2021, immigration officials expect 2 million aliens to enter the U.S. illegally; up to 100,000 Afghan evacuees will be resettled, and President Biden promised to lift the annual refugee cap to 125,000. Aliens, evacuees and refugees will total a record 2.25 million. Most will eventually be entitled to petition their family members from abroad, a population-busting process.

No intellectual argument can be made that birthright citizenship and chain migration are sound policies that have America’s best interests at heart. While both sides of the aisle argue, let the Supreme Court decide whether birthright citizenship is legal, an action that the court must take immediately given nonexistent border enforcement. At the heart of the debate is the U.S. Constitution’s 14th Amendment which includes in the opening sentence: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.” The court must rule on the “subject to the jurisdiction of…” definition. Some scholars say that the phrase essentially means anyone born in the U.S. is automatically a citizen, but critics claim that the 14th Amendment’s authors hadn’t intended to grant citizenship to every foreign national born in U.S. territory.

While Congress and advocates on both sides are stalemated, criminals have been able to take advantage of the birthright citizenship loophole. In 2019, federal officials arrested 20 people who operated businesses helping pregnant women travel to the U.S. expressly to give birth to citizen children. Chinese mothers-to-be paid between $40,000 and $80,000 each to come to California, stay in upscale dwellings and give birth. Perpetrators included the Chinese national and the website You Win USA founder Dongyuan Li, charged with visa fraud, money laundering and conspiracy. Similar schemes have been ongoing, mostly without federal intervention, in the U.S. for more than a decade.

The Birthright Citizenship Act of 2021, introduced by U.S. Rep. Brian Babin (R-Texas), would grant citizenship to any child born in the U.S. if at least one parent were either an American, a lawfully present alien or serving in the U.S. military, a reasonable approach to a critical and escalating problem. To date, only about 10 percent of House Republicans have signed on as cosponsors.

Only Canada and the U.S. among developed nations grant jus soli, the right to citizenship for anyone born on U.S. soil. Taxpayer costs to underwrite illegal immigrant births are estimated at $2.4 billion annually. With the borders wider open than ever, and Afghan evacuees arriving at unprecedented levels, the Supreme Court must intercede to help preserve sovereign America.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
25 Comments
SmallerGovNow
SmallerGovNow
September 29, 2021 4:48 pm

SCREW SCOTUS!!! They don’t deserve to “rule” on anything!!! Chip

falconflight
falconflight
September 29, 2021 4:49 pm

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.
===
If you snuck in…you ain’t subject to the jurisdiction thereof…

So easy a cave man can understand it.

But the SCROTUS will rule with metaphysical certitude that if you got to the land of magic dirt…it’s your oyster.

Ken31
Ken31
  falconflight
September 30, 2021 11:35 am

That is exactly what jurisdiction means. They legally fall under the jurisdiction of wherever their parents are from. It cannot be the case that an alien fall under local jurisdiction except for matters of criminal enforcement including trespassing on the country. That has always been the case.

The only reason it is happening at all is because the State Department willfully twists the meaning there and you are correct that the criminals in robes will back them up. They have been giving citizenship to illegal aliens based on some bureaucrats ridiculous interpretation of the law, and they have been doing it for decades. No Republican president has stopped them.

KJ
KJ
September 29, 2021 5:11 pm

The U.S. is traditionally the largest refugee resettlement nation, and the most illegal immigrant-tolerant. These conditions can only continue if Americans don’t feel that newcomers are displacing them.

It doesn’t make a difference whether Americans feel that newcomers are displacing them. This shit is being forced on America by the elites – the vast majority of Americans are opposed to so many illegal aliens invading the country, but it has continued for years.

Ken31
Ken31
  KJ
September 30, 2021 11:40 am

It really angers me when people pretend this was ever done with any kind of popular support or consent. That voting ever mattered on these issues, once the levers of power were controlled.

nkit
nkit
September 29, 2021 5:49 pm

Replacements don’t need no stinkin’ vaccine..

JoeBob
JoeBob
September 29, 2021 6:49 pm

The author of this article seems to be under the impression that the federal government works on behalf of, and in the best interests of, the american citizen.

He is part of the charade, or painfully stupid, or both.

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
September 29, 2021 6:52 pm

Maybe we should approach this entirely differently. What if we just let all the Mexicans and Haitians and all their buddies sneak in here, and – now hear me out – while they’re not looking, we break into Mexico. Only we leave behind our (((“elites”))) and all the wokesters and commies and fags. Also fat chicks. We’d get Mexico looking ship-shape in about 5 years. And we’d have built a wall to keep them all out of OUR Mexico.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Iska Waran
September 29, 2021 7:32 pm

I’ll trade a “fat chick” for a Little Sweet Dark-Eyed, Dark-Haired Senorita any day. Count me in. E Ole! Yeppa, Yeppa, YEPPA! AAaIIiiiEeeeee!

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Anonymous
September 30, 2021 3:55 am

and some claim EC is no longer with us.

Warren
Warren
  Iska Waran
September 29, 2021 9:56 pm

I was thinking the same thing about Haiti. In a few years it will be empty.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Warren
September 29, 2021 10:22 pm

Sadly, no. We’ll just have two Haitis.

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
  Anonymous
September 30, 2021 1:22 am

You never want to go double-Haiti.

Ken31
Ken31
  Warren
September 30, 2021 11:42 am

Maybe a tree can finally grow there again. That has infinitely more value than a Haitian.

Anonymous
Anonymous
September 29, 2021 7:28 pm

U.S. law used to flatly state that the lawbreaker couldn’t benefit from his illegal act. Crossing the border outside normal and authorized immigration processes is illegal, thus the new babies of illegal aliens who give birth here cannot and must not be viewed as legal citizens in any way, shape or form, and the mother must not be allowed to stay here simply because of what is typically known as an anchor baby.

They’ve arrived illegally and they must not be rewarded for doing so. This is the continuing problem. The Democrats continuously protects, defends and rewards the bad behavior and criminal acts of the illegal aliens to the detriment of our country, because all that really matters to them is expanding their commie voter base, and damn the real world cost to the nation, local communities and Americans who’ve lived here all their lives.

~ J Smith

Quiet Mike
Quiet Mike
September 29, 2021 8:48 pm

I’m no longer angry but I am amused with folks that still believe the rule of law exists.

overthecliff
overthecliff
  Quiet Mike
September 29, 2021 9:32 pm

Mike, I agree . The end is not near. It has already arrived. The question now is what will rise out of the ashes.

Warren
Warren
  Quiet Mike
September 29, 2021 9:57 pm

But…but…but if we just vote harder next time…right?

overthecliff
overthecliff
September 29, 2021 9:28 pm

The Supremes will do exactly what their bosses tell them to do.

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
  overthecliff
September 30, 2021 1:26 am

And that STUPID bitch Amy Coney Barrett (who Ann Coulter warned us about) thinks that because she’s supposedly all super-Catholic she has to either 1) do what the fake pope says or 2) recuse herself. A judge should leave their religious dogma at the door. Besides, “Francis” isn’t the real pope. At best he’s just an evil antipope.

Ken31
Ken31
  Iska Waran
September 30, 2021 11:44 am

Catholics are not Christian. I am tired of that lie being perpetrated. There are good reasons American societies made a point to exclude them. And our SCROTUS is an excellent example.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Ken31
September 30, 2021 9:51 pm

As much as I dislike Rome ruling the north, it’s still christianity. Protestants got some freedom but also larped harder as jews. And White countries got depopulated over all that gay Abrahamic shit.

Warren
Warren
September 29, 2021 9:54 pm

Does it really matter, when the country is going to dissolve and fragment?

Ken31
Ken31
September 30, 2021 11:34 am

If you can read the Constitution, you can understand there is zero language in there allowing “birth-right citizenship”, but implicitly it would not be allowed. There is no room for debate on this. It is not in question. You do not need a black robe and mystical powers to understand the Constitution.

Anyone not a citizen falls under the jurisdiction somewhere not in the USA and therefore their spawn are not citizens.

falconflight
falconflight
  Ken31
September 30, 2021 8:51 pm

Only one other country (El Salvador?) permits the conferment of citizenship strictly based upon where one was birthed.