Following the Money on Climate Change Media Coverage

Via The Daily Sceptic

The Associated Press (AP) is assigning another two dozen journalists across the world to cover ‘climate issues’. AP Senior Vice President Julie Pace described the move as a “far reaching initiative that will transform the way we cover the climate story”. Over 20 of the journalists will be new hires and they will be funded by an $8m gift from five billionaire philanthropic organisations, including the Left-wing Rockefeller Foundation. The money is just the latest in a series of such gifts and AP reports that 50 writing jobs are funded from these sources.

AP is not the only large media company to collect such hand-outs. The BBC and the Guardian regularly receive multi-million dollar contributions from the trusts of wealthy philanthropists. It is estimated that Bill Gates has given over $300 million over the last decade to a wide variety of media outlets. Faced with plummeting paid readers and advertisers, mainstream legacy media seems eager to tap a new revenue stream.

The money is spread wide across such media. This month, the Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting received $1.5 million from Rockefeller to “expand coverage of under-reported and/or inaccurately reported critical public health information”. The Quadrivium Foundation, run by Democrat power couple James and Kathryn Murdoch, is also paying climate wages at AP. On its website, the Foundation notes that it also invests in Climate Central, using meteorologists as “trusted messengers” of the links between extreme weather and climate change. Since it is not possible to link individual weather events to long term climate change with any scientific certainty, this aim looks to be a waste of money, or perhaps not.

‘Trusted messengers’ seems to be a phrase much in vogue around philanthropic operations. Last October, Rockefeller gave $4.5 million to Purpose Global, a non-profit company that aims to help corporate clients with their “cultural intelligence”. The money was given in support of facilitating a “communication network of trusted messengers”. This would “amplify accurate information and combat mis- and dis- information on COVID-19 vaccines”. In September 2020, the Gates Foundation gave the Guardian $3.5 million to “support” its regular reporting on global health. Likewise, the Global Health Security Team at the Telegraph is Gates-funded.

Old school journalists might be a little happier to see less of the ‘trusted messenger’ stuff and more of the requirement to investigate. But critical inquiry of climate change science has been more or less banned from many mainstream outlets. This is despite the fact that the hypothesis that humans cause all or most global warming is unproven, and many scientists look more to natural causes for long term change. Predictions – often termed evidence – of future warming, are based on climate models that have never provided an accurate forecast in the last 40 years. Global warming started to run out of steam two decades ago, and it has been at a standstill for the last seven. When Google Adsense banned the main climate web page tracking accurate satellite data showing the standstill, the interest was confined to just a few outlets, including the Daily Sceptic.

One of the largest suppliers of cash for climate change is the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the BBC and the Guardian are two of its favourite giftees. The Guardian has received upwards of $20 million over recent years starting with £6m in 2011 to establish a “millennium Development Goals” feed that provides “compelling evidence-based content”. During the last decade, Gates has given at least $20 million to help fund the BBC World Service and $5.5 million for the Corporation’s Media Action charity.

In that time, the software tycoon, once treated with great suspicion for early monopolistic tendencies, has become a prized ‘talking head’ across the BBC for epidemics, vaccines and anti-meat diets. His recent scary tales of climate change, “How to Avoid a Climate Disaster”, was recently given five airings on prime time Radio 4.

Elsewhere, there are prizes for the best behaved – sorry – most distinguished climate journalist. Every year, the foundation of BBVA, a Spanish bank heavily involved in financing Net Zero projects, hands out €100,000 to the lucky recipient. Last year it went to Marlow Hood of Agence France-Presse, who describes himself as the “Herald of the Anthropocene”, the latter being a political renaming of the current Holocene era. In 2019, Matt McGrath of the BBC pocketed the cash, while in 2020 the award went to – no great surprise – the Guardian.

Much of the BBC money appears to support advocacy in the developing world, although the terms of specific grants are sometimes hard to understand. A letter from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in August 2019 describing the purpose of a $2.03 million grant to the BBC reads as follows: “To help us learn deepen our underpinning of processes and user journeys for different sets of women’s empowerment collectives, develop use cases for where digital can help amplify effects bring efficiencies, and close gender gaps for women”.

No doubt when this non-sensical gibberish was translated into understandable English, the money was spent wisely.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
15 Comments
BL
BL
February 26, 2022 6:52 pm

What is the carbon foot print of a full scale invasion? Just so ya know, reports are the elite private jets and yachts out off the coast of Ukraine are still operating for the absolute comfort of the monied special snowflake carbon shitters.

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
February 26, 2022 6:55 pm

The best lies that money can buy. All the lies we’re paid to print.

Captain_Obviuos
Captain_Obviuos
February 26, 2022 7:02 pm

This is not only journalistically unethical, it is also unlawful; having supposedly unbiased writers is the raison d’etre of the media, and to blatantly show these people are being bought off is disgusting and shameful.

Until we decide money has no control over us, this is going to be the result. The truth will never be set free.

Balbinus
Balbinus
  Captain_Obviuos
February 26, 2022 8:38 pm

Welcome to facist city USA.

AK John
AK John
February 26, 2022 7:17 pm

Article confirms what most BPer’s already know. There is no such thing as real news. News is what the global tyrants pretend it to be. Are the tyrants drugged out psychopaths and sociopaths? Evidence shows definitely.

Anonymous
Anonymous
February 26, 2022 7:25 pm

Anything that needs constant rebrands is complete bullshyte.

Anyone remember the next ice age was coming in the 60s 70s. Then it was a huge hole in the ozone layer was going to fry our eyeballs. Then we had years of globull warming hype with no warming. Rising seas were/are going to drown everyone, even though the rich live at the beach.

Now we have climate change a great catch all term for all of the above.

Remember, just remember, NONE of the above would have been possible if it were not for a fully compliant press. The Conjob 19 the financial corruption the lies to bring countries to war, none of that would have been possible if not for the bought and paid for Presstitutes.

Maybe we should forget about the oligarchs and polieticians and concentrate on making a law to have at least some honest press people.

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer
February 26, 2022 8:33 pm

Walt
Walt
February 26, 2022 8:43 pm

What’s with the picture – is Bill practicing his “Hands up Don’t Shoot!” in preparation for his Big Day?

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
  Walt
February 27, 2022 1:42 am

I think he’s dancing.

Ray Jason
Ray Jason
February 27, 2022 7:21 am

Wow! That next to last paragraph is a perfect example of what I call “Grant-speak.” A good translation might be, “If you give me the money I will write what you wish.”

Anonymous
Anonymous
February 27, 2022 8:29 am

We must gut the Globalists climate change con the way we have done to their Covid con. We can’t save everyone, but we can beat them at their own game. Time to stop whining about all of their nefarious moves and fight fire with fire.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Anonymous
February 27, 2022 12:18 pm

Well, it’s tough when those ostensibly on our side (e.g. The Daily Sceptic) concede the validity of the oppositions claims:

“Global warming started to run out of steam two decades ago, and it has been at a standstill for the last seven.”

There cannot be a “standstill” in a process that never existed.

This statement avers that there had been global warming. It is confirmation of the claim that Global Warming is settled science.

It is a statement that, until seven years ago, there definitely was global warming.

Hint: there wasn’t.

Booster Fish
Booster Fish
February 27, 2022 12:24 pm

Oh look, Bill Gates again. What a surprise.

When did they switch from using the term “global warming” to “climate change?” Was it anything specific, or did they just realize they needed a more generic term so they can point at literally anything in mother nature?

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer
  Booster Fish
February 27, 2022 12:44 pm

When some discredited farmer started posting comparison photos of water levels to 500 year old paintings proving there wasn’t an inch in sea level rise?

Or when all the elites started buying up shorefront mansions despite the threat of being underwater in less than 10 years?

Or when Winters started being colder than they were before?

Booster Fish
Booster Fish
  hardscrabble farmer
February 27, 2022 7:57 pm

Sounds about right.

In just looking for a Liberty Island photo that I just saw on TBP that showed the water level that appears to be actually lower in recent photos, Reuters actually fact-checked it:

https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-statue-of-liberty-sea-level-idUSL1N2RV1SK

They say it’s a rising and lowering tide, and impossible to gauge, and that sea levels rise approximately 2.9mm every year (2.9mm x 100 years = 11.417 inches). And yet, they never show a pic that proves otherwise. I really wish these fact-check sites had comments sections.

When nauseating liberal Michael Moore does a documentary (i.e. Planet of the Humans) about what a huge grift the climate change industry is, it might just be scam.