Special Counsel John Durham’s Failed Russiagate Investigation

Guest Post by Paul Craig Roberts

Years ago I wrote that nothing would come of Special Counsel John Durham’s Russiagate investigation.  Yesterday I was proven correct. A politicized Washington, D.C., jury threw out the only case Durham has brought against a seditious operation that began six years ago.  Michael Sussman, a Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer was cleared of lying to a FBI agent, the only crime Durham could find of a massive operation orchestrated by the CIA and FBI to prevent President Trump from normalizing relations with Russia.

American foreign policy was set on a totally different course from Trump’s intent by the neoconservatives with the Wolfowitz doctrine of US hegemony.  Russia has to be pushed back and overcome with problems that would drain and redirect the Kremlin’s energy away from opposing US unilateralism.  After pouring $5 billion into preparing the overthrow of the Ukrainian government, the neoconservatives struck with the US-orchestrated “Maidan Revolution” in 2014 and installed an anti-Russian puppet government.  Neither the military-security complex nor the neoconservatives were going to let President Trump proceed with his goal of normalizing relations with Russia.  The relations were on schedule to be much worsened with the humiliation and isolation of Russia as the goal.

Trump, being a real estate developer with no sound or knowledgable advisers, had no idea of the challenge his normalization posed to the ruling establishment, Republicans as well as Democrats.  Trump was a sitting duck.

It was obvious that Durham’s job was to make sure the Russiagate investigation failed.  We have known for years of the FBI’s role in orchestrating Russiagate. The facts are available.  High level FBI officials were involved in the plot against Trump. The FBI lied to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, prompting one judge to resign in protest.  But Durham focused on low level Clinton campaign officials.  Despite evidence, he didn’t even go after Hillary.

He couldn’t.  Hillary on the stand would have said that the CIA and FBI brought her the issue and whereas it served her interest she did not originate Russiagate.  Conservatives no less than liberals would not want to shake the public’s confidence in government by implicating the CIA and FBI in a plot to control US foreign policy and perhaps remove a president from office.  There was no way there could be a real investigation of Russiagate.  Indeed, Attorney General Bill Barr could have stopped the orchestration while he was in office, but he did not.  Trump was out of step with the ruling establishment and had to be reduced to impotence and got rid off.

The Kremlin thinks that foreign policy is used to further a country’s national interest, but not in the United States. In the US foreign policy serves the power and profit of the military/security complex and the hegemonic ideology of the neoconservatives. A $1,000 billion annual military/security budget requires an enemy, not normalized relations.  Clearly, the Kremlin has been in the dark about this and has been waiting patiently for the West to act rationally rather than in a suicidal manner.

The neoconservatives’ well thought-out plan to overthrow the Ukrainian government, install a puppet, and train and equip a neo-Nazi militia to shell the Russian population in the Donbass area of Ukraine was designed to provoke a Russian intervention that could be used to justify sanctions that would isolate Russia from Europe and justify more US missile bases on Russia’s borders. This plan was threatened by President Trump’s declared goal of normalizing relations with Russia. Trump had to go, because he positioned himself as an obstacle to a hegemonic foreign policy two decades in the making.

In the US the justice system is politicized.  That Durham had to bring his case in the District of Columbia guaranteed that Sussman would not be convicted.  I suspect that Sussman’s acquittal is the end of the Russiagate investigation.  Just as the media demonization of police officer Derek Chauvin meant no jury would fail to convict him, the demonization of Russia means that no jury would rule against the belief that there was Russian collusion in our internal affairs.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
12 Comments
Sionnach Liath
Sionnach Liath
June 2, 2022 7:46 am

I want to take a short look at one aspect of this Durham investigation. As I remember at the time of Durham’s appointment, his objective was to discover the origin and source of the “Russia-gate” conspiracy. The objective was discovery and disclosure. His job was not to get convictions. Convictions would be an added bonus if actual criminal activity is uncovered.

Durham could have simply written all of the Sussman material into his report and filed it with the DOJ; then the Attorney General would have buried it and the public would not have known what went on. Instead he sought and got an indictment against Sussman and forced it to trial. Once the evidence, documentary and testimony, got on the record, it became a public document. Now the entire scheme is a matter of public information.

Paul Roberts is just wrong that Durham is simply another political hack. This concept of disclosure came to my attention when I read of the jury selection process and the obvious conflicts of interest. Durham could have moved to change the venue of the trial out of D.C. but chose to not do it. Changes of venue are routine and with the evidence of likely prejudice on the part of the jury pool, would undoubtedly have been granted.

I think Durham knew he was not going to get a conviction, he did not need a conviction. Even if convicted, Sussman would have just been slapped on the wrist; no jail time. Durham wanted the trial in an environment of extreme prejudice against his prosecution, disclosure of the whole sorry scenario to the public, and the resulting public upset and anger over the judicial process. I believe there was a deliberate purpose here.

Brewer55
Brewer55
  Sionnach Liath
June 2, 2022 8:15 am

And lets see, Trump and his ‘vice-president’ JFK jr. are waiting in the wings for more of the cretins to be put on display and their misdeeds displayed in the public before he rides in on his white horse to save the day.

Sorry, but your response sounds like that of the Q cult that there is some 5D chess being played here.
Durham has been at it for many years now and it was all for show. The country is lost and it the swamp too deep with too many traitors to be made right again.

Sionnach Liath
Sionnach Liath
  Brewer55
June 2, 2022 8:49 am

If one is trying to interpret the actions taken by a lawyer in a hostile judicial environment, you really need to have “been there, done that.” I have. 48 years worth.

Stucky
Stucky
June 2, 2022 9:27 am

Mr. Durham,

Ya promised so much!

Ya gave millions hope that there just might be a modicum of justice left in America.

Ya fucked up! Ya couldn’t even get a conviction on a relatively minor bit player after all this time???

JUST GO AWAY, WILL YA??!

Red River D
Red River D
  Stucky
June 2, 2022 10:42 am

Who the fuck is John Durham?

(RRD blood pressure = 118 over 76, 79 bpm. Ignoring most of this goatfuck is GOOD MEDICINE!!!)

Ken31
Ken31
  Stucky
June 2, 2022 8:35 pm

The small fish was needed to crack the big fish open. It is all ridiculous.

Fielding Mellish
Fielding Mellish
June 2, 2022 9:41 am

We have no justice in America anymore. A cop goes to Jail for not killing a black man and someone who admitted to lying to the FBI goes free. Only in America.

FarmerChet
FarmerChet
June 2, 2022 9:46 am

Planned or not, the Durham investigation laid out the players on court transcripts for numerous seditious conspiracies. We now know many Facts which show there was a coordinated effort to oust a sitting president and who was involved with fabricating all the lies.
We also know all media was complicit with the effort and that they no longer report any truths to We The People.
Even without prosecutions the Truth has been revealed – your government lies to you, elected officials are self-serving useless idiots, and there is a cabal of authoritarians standing on your neck.

KJ
KJ
  FarmerChet
June 3, 2022 12:00 am

We now know many Facts which show there was a coordinated effort to oust a sitting president and who was involved with fabricating all the lies.

We already knew all these facts before Durham was appointed. What difference does knowing make when there will be no consequences for the guilty?

brian
brian
June 2, 2022 10:55 am

Can anybody point to a live or recorded video interview with the so called prosecutor j durham?!?!?

Even the released statement from the failed conviction was a text media release and not a video of said durham. Funny how the stacked jury of complete killery donators didn’t convict sussman, who saw that coming.

I’m really thinking the whole thing is a cia, in your face, flaunting of the law and whatcha gonna do about it challenge… I’m thinking the saul alinsky was a trained cia asset because it sure seems like everything happening in the communist left is exactly what the cia does…. everywhere.

Call me Jack
Call me Jack
June 2, 2022 1:24 pm

Being a pessimistic,cynical ass has served me well. As ususal,i expect nothing from Uncle Sam———and i am never disappointed.

Mountainrat
Mountainrat
June 2, 2022 2:17 pm

The rule of law is dead, dead ,dead, and we need to accept it and move on and adapt to the reality of the situation. We are truly a banana republic. Voting is just as dead right along with the constitution. Time to start emulating 3rd world citizens and find work arounds to the system.