“Here you see the Pope kissing the hands of David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger and John Rothschild…the most powerful people on Earth…almost like he’s there for them…instead of his faithful followers…” pic.twitter.com/qZ5V4ffvpq
— Liz Churchill ™ 🇨🇦 (@liz_churchill7) December 4, 2022
-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Is there anymore proof need that Satan and his minions rule planet earth?
Yeah – the dude is GROSS!
Popes kissing rings is just their virtue signaling their humility … kind of like Jesus washing the feet of his disciples, or perhaps even dining with thieves and whores.
so, let’s not read too much into every damned thing he does.
Am I making excuses for the pope? Nope!! The pope is a dope who sucks DDD.
I don’t think all popes were Satan’s minions. This one just stands out. Like Joe Biden.
Pope John Paul II: Zyklon B Salesman
In the early 1940s, that company employed a Polish chemist and salesman who sold cyanide gas, Zyklon B and Malathion to the Nazis for extermination of groups of people in Auschwitz.
After the war the salesman joined the Catholic church and was ordained a priest.
In 1958 he became Poland’s youngest bishop and after Pope John Paul I’s mysterious death, the ex-cyanide gas salesman Karol Wojtyla was elected to the papacy as Pope John Paul II in October 1978.
A young man selling pesticides for a living…reeeeee…the horror.
There are always two sides to every story…but of course Deep Shekels allows nothing against the narrative and nothing outside the narrative.
At this point, anything that declares itself the official narrative, has to be assume a lie.
https://codoh.com/library/document/some-technical-and-chemical-considerations-about/en/
Indeed. Jerry Clower started off life after college as a fertilizer salesman. He became one of the funniest country comedians of all time and never forsook his Christianity while doing so.
Study history, many more have been evil than good.
If you visit the Pope do you think he will kiss your ring? Or offer his for you to kiss? Something here is different.
Frank can virtue signal his humility by kissing my ring too.
As a former Catholic I keep telling people here the Catholic church is satanic and all the popes are antichrists, but the Catholics always get mad at me for some reason. Go figure. I even have a sister that’s in the MT order. I never saw a more sanctimonious, self-righteous, holier than thou ass as her.
What is the “MT order”?
Mother Theresa’s order, I think it’s Missionary’s of Charity…something like that.
Missionaries of Charity. The order is an offshoot of the Sisters of Loretto which is a teaching order.
Love and pray for your sister. Pray that she finds the true and only way to salvation through Christ Jesus. We need to build bridges to the lost if we will ever win souls.
Why is it always the “former Catholics” who don’t know their (former) religion?
I don’t understand your “question?” As a Catholic I never knew that when the Priest holds the sacrament high into the air then bows over the altar to eat the sacrament, he’s symbolizing pulling Jesus out of heaven and sacrificing him on that altar in the church. Do Catholics ever question why there’s even an altar there? I never did. After Jesus died on the cross that was it. There were no more sacrifices needed nor altars. I don’t see how any Catholic will make it into heaven. It’s the Catholics that think they’re the only one’s that’ll be in heaven.
You just proved Anonymous point.
For those that think you know what you are talking about, I decided to add an explanation.
At the last supper, Jesus authorized the first Bishops of His Church, the Apostles, and commanded, to “Do this in memory of me”… What are they doing at the Holy Mass? They are speaking the words given to them by Christ at that supper – which consecrates the bread and wine making it become Jesus Himself. Read the Gospel of John. chapter 6. “Unless you eat my flesh and drink my blood you have no life within you. ” Skipping ahead a bit, it is recorded that the people expressed that ‘This is a hard saying, who can accept it?” then, as a result of this (what He said), many left Him. Why did they leave Him?… they left because he spoke literally and he did not dissuade them from that understanding. He did not call them back and say wait, let me explain better.
The understanding of Christ’s Real Presence in the bread and wine explains why early Christians were accused of being cannibals.
The Church has always understood that the consecrated bread and wine become the body and blood of Jesus Himself and that we are transported in time to the One sacrifice, not re-sacrificing Him over and over again. You are correct, there was only one sacrifice.
The people were correct in understanding Him literally and they were correct that it is a hard saying. Not all will believe the very pointed, clear and direct words of Our Lord.
Thus the altar – it is the sacrifice of Jesus Himself on that altar.
The priest is not pulling Him out of heaven – he is holding up Jesus in the Eucharist for us to worship.
The very earliest Christians believed in the Real Presence of Jesus in the sacrament. An honest attempt to disprove that will show you would be considered heretical for saying any thing else to early Christians.
Using a search engine of your choice, search on ‘Eucharistic miracles’ He has allowed the physical bread to become flesh many times over the centuries. When tested in modern times, it is always heart muscle and the same blood type every time, with indications of stress similar to a persons heart who has suffered greatly. Jesus is really and truly with us always, until the end of time.
btw – Catholics are well aware that many will be in heaven, however the surest way is to believe in everything Jesus taught, pray always, participate in the sacraments He originated in His Church, and put His teaching into practice in our daily lives.
Hell is not empty – Jesus spoke about hell many times. I worry about my own soul as I know my sins. I fear even more for those who reject the One Church to which He gave authority.
He only established one, not some ephemeral idea of church – the latter is just silly, especially in light of how many ‘churches’ are out there and the disagreements between them all.
Lastly, even one of Jesus’ closest friends, Judas, betrayed Him. There have been many horrible clergymen, Popes included, but there have been many more who lived saintly lives of sacrifice. The Catholic Church is where you got the Bible, it is where we got Western civilization, the idea of the dignity of all people, women being elevated from property to valued humans. It is also how we got great beer! sorry..off on a tangent.
The first pope denied Him 3 times.
Peter was never a “pope” https://www.gotquestions.org/origin-Catholic-church.html
The Catholic church claim they started from Jesus disciples but reality is there was no Catholicism until Constantine hundreds of years later.
ok javelin, prove it.
The burden is on you to prove your negative. Your link proves nothing. Every one of the subjects in the first paragraph can be refuted quite easily so you need more than “because I said so”
“…The Catholic Church is where you got the Bible…”
Mmmm hmmmm. Four fifths of the Bible are the Old Testament, which was finished and codified long before any Catholic Church was a thought in man’s mind.
The remaining 27 Books of the New Testament come to us as inspired writings from men who wrote under the auspices of God Himself — not any institution of mankind.
And the doctrine of transubstantiation was a late innovation, neither believed nor practiced by any of the early church. This fact can be verified by reading the extant writings of the early church from the first to the third century.
The Lord Himself spoke and taught of spiritual things — not of material things. And no one was meant to take His words about eating flesh and drinking blood literally. All throughout the Scriptures, food is representative of doctrine and of right beliefs, which we are to take within us and make an actual part of who and what we are, in His name. Our personal opinions on these matters are irrelevant, considering the words of God Himself in the form of the 66 Books of Scripture, and the massive volume of writing left to us by the very early church, which was neither Roman nor Catholic.
The Holy bible is full of instructional metaphors incorporated into dogma. Only rapturetards and muh chosen worshippers take them all literal. By the way, the Judaized Presbyterian fags, think they’re are the chosen, too.
Give it a rest, fag. We ALL know you think you’re the only person on the planet who’s going to Heaven. Before you die you’ll be telling people YOU’RE actually Jesus. But you keep guessing. Eventually you’ll stumble onto MY denomination to insult. In the meanwhile content yourself with pissing off the rest of the civilized world.
Never knew dumbass glowie was a denomination , but if you say so…
Hi Red – Protestants say that the Catholic Church began with the Emperor Constantine. If that is so then why is it that you use a collection of books called the bible which had its content put together by Catholic bishops?
Of course the Old Testament was written before the time of Jesus, but it was Catholic Bishops who codified the old and the new writings into the Canon of the Christian Bible. This occurred well past the time that Protestants say The Church began.
There were many books which were circulated for hundreds of years among Christians which may have been inspiring in some way but were not included in the Canon as they were declared by The Catholic Church to not be inspired.
Just by the fact that you acknowledge the bible as the inspired Word of God, you are acknowledging the authority of the Catholic Church and her bishops.
btw – There are 73 book that were declared as canonical, not 66. Even the original Protestant bible had them all in there. Some were removed later by protestants because they were not convenient to the protestant positions.
You are using a Catholic collection of books as your holy writings . You implicitly acknowledge the supremacy and authority of The Catholic Church by using the books written by, protected by and and promulgated by The Catholic Church. I included ‘written by’ because the early church believed what I believe. As early as the year 100 it was called the universal Church. universal=catholic
It was Catholics who painstakingly and lovingly copied the Bible word for word for over 1400 years, protecting it from being lost. There was not one Protestant among them – they did not exist.
You protesters define yourself in opposition to The Catholic Church. I say get your own collection of sacred writings or at least have the courage to admit where you got the writings.
There was one commenter who’s step-dad beat his ass and forced him to go to a Catholic Church . This you?
Sounds more like your hateful ass.
I was blessed to be born into a loving family with my Mom and Dad showing us how to live in a sacrificial loving way. Both were Catholic and I was raised to know Jesus. When I grew up, I investigated and remained Catholic. My wife and I have raised our children the same.
All this occurred without any beating.
The Catholics were not always satanic, but the papacy was infiltrated in the 13th and 14th centuries by the Aragons, who were of supposed Spanish descendency. (We know who it really was, however, and they are still at it today.)
Take a look at the nose on Pope Alexander VI: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Alexander_VI . Then read about how he “inherited” titles, his uncle was Pope Callixtus III, he quickly rose through the ranks of the church and gained enormous wealth by his stature. Classic business tactics by only those with the cunning to encourage nepotism and thus keep the money in the Family.
yup – there have been bad Popes. However, the Church itself, continues to teach the same basic Truths received directly from Jesus, given to the Apostles and transmitted to this day. No bad Pope ever convince me to think that what you describe is the proper way to live and no bad Pope ever has provided official teaching contrary to Christ’s
Which is part of how we know Bergoglio isn’t pope.
Thank you. Your point is exactly what I was going to say.
Bergoglio isn’t Pope. He might, possibly, have been Pope for a short time (I do NOT believe this BTW), but by his own numerous heretical statements – knowingly teaching doctrine that contradict formal Church doctrine of two millennia – he has excommunicated himself from the RCC. Assuming he was ever a Christian to begin with.
I probably qualify as a “former Catholic”, but I recognize that there has always been both good and evil in the RCC. Generally, the further up you go in the hierarchy, the more perverted the players become. The Vatican is basically a homosexual bath-house but, even so, there are still some good individuals there.
FWIW, one of my favorite stories out of recent Church history is the Sheriff and Prosecuting Attorney of Spokane County dropping by the local bishop’s office and giving him 48 hour to get out of town (or face pedophilia-related criminal charges). Frankly, they should never have given him the courtesy of a warning, but I guess rank has its privileges… now more than ever it seems.
As a Catholic, I abhor the infiltration of the communists which started at least as early as the 1930s, and which led to the horrible scandals of this day and age. The perpetrators should be locked away or hung.
Bella Dodd, who wrote ‘School of Darkness’ herself recruited thousands of communists to infiltrate The Church as priests.
She later repented and converted to Catholicism after meeting a holy and knowledgeable priest named Fulton Sheen.
To my mind, the overwhelming attacks on The Catholic Church serve as an indicator of The Church’s importance and position. Many other circumstantial pieces of evidence point to The Catholic Church as The Church. Who is portrayed in movies as being called to excise evil. Hint.. starts with ‘Catholic’ and ends with ‘Priest’….. it is not your friendly neighborhood baptist. In real life accounts of possession, I have read of protestant pastors calling in the big guns (Catholic priest) to perform exorcisms when the pastor efforts were ineffective. A Catholic priest has the authority of Jesus Himself handed down via Apostolic succession, which protestants cannot claim and do not have.
It is all a question of authority. Who has the authority of God? Can one just claim it? Can you walk into a corporation and claim the CEO position?… or any position? …. You cannot. You cannot ‘take’ even the position of janitor. You have to be given authority. Yes you can start your own company, but it is a different company – it is not the original company. It is something else.
In the Old and New Testament, authority comes first from God and then is handed from the original men who received that authority to the next generation.
Moses received authority directly from God and handed some of that to the seventy judges. Aaron received the priestly authority and handed it to his descendants.
Samuel received the authority directly from God to anoint a king over Israel. God anointed judges over Israel and that authority was handed to others.
Likewise, Jesus, who is God with us, breathed the Holy Spirit on His Apostles and gave them authority. That authority did not die with them. The Apostles were the first priests and Bishops and they appointed others and passed authority to them, down to this present day.
I was recently told I provide too much detail – goodnight. God bless you.
The Catholic Church teaches, De Fide (as a matter of faith) that Mary was born sinless and lived without sin.
According to the Scriptures therefore, she would have had no need of a savior and the entire biblical narrative of salvation and the word of God is found to be in error (…if what Rome teaches is true, which it isn’t…).
The Catholic doctrine of Mary’s sinless birth and life, which must be believed by ALL Catholics, is a direct contradiction to what God Himself has spoken to us through the authors of Scripture.
The Catholic doctrine of Mary’s ascension to heaven is another direct contradiction of Scripture. Both of these teachings were ratified by Popes speaking Ex Cathedra (authoritatively and “infallibly” — “From The Chair”) in direct contradiction of the words of God.
Mary herself rejoiced in God as her savior. The Magnificat is a fantastic prayer of praise!
The Catholic Church teaches that Mary needed a Savior and that she was provided saving grace at the time of her conception… Thus the Immaculate Conception and the fact that she did not have the proclivity to sin that we are born with.
Do you think that God, who designed a fantastic ARK for His presence with precious gold and other materials would not design for His Son a vessel at least equally resplendent?
Do you believe that Enoch was taken up by God, or that Elijah was taken up in a whirlwind as Elisha witnessed it? Did God lose His power in the NT times?
The bible itself states that the whole world could not contain all that Jesus said and did… probably a bit of hyperbole, but it also states (Paul) to hold fast to the words both written and verbal tradition handed down from he and the other Apostles.
What God built cannot be destroyed by any man.
Won’t stop you from tryin’ though, will it?
I went to the Holy Land for 2 weeks for a wedding of a friend and as a tourist. We visited the Church of the Ascension, Calvary, church of the Beatitudes, Nazareth, Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem etc etc… all have Catholic churches full of Mary statues as goddess, Christ dead on a cross and tons and tons of Pyramids with the eye of Horus or “all seeing eye”.
If one is educated on ancient occultism and symbolism, the Isis/Osiris worship, idols, paintings and iconography all over the walls and statuary of every catholic building is repulsive. You see the Ancient Mystery religion of Babylon that has been passed through the ages– I was a fence-sitter about Catholicism before that trip ( thinking they just had some dogmatic errors) but it is too much blatantly in your face to deny.
I never saw a bigger idiot. The Church being the body of Christ are the saved. The Pope is not the Church and never was. There are many Churches across the globe not in communion with the Pope. If you weren’t so anti-Catholic with your head stuck up you ass, you would know this.
Look in a mirror.
New world order piece of shit
“Francis” is an antipope. Benedict XVI is still pope and his resignation was patently invalid. That doesn’t preclude Bergoglio being referenced in the prophecy of the popes, but those are pretty sketchy – like Nostradamus. Some elliptical reference is twisted to make it fit. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prophecy_of_the_Popes
Could we be near the end? Sure. No one knows the day nor the hour, not even the Son, but only the Father. In any case, Bergoglio is a heretic and an antipope. I’m no sedevacantist (yet), but if Benedict croaks, then I’ll become one automatically.
I know that for Protestants, this is all like talking about how many angels can fit on the head of a pin, but I wonder how many cardinals have been elevated by this antipope and how that would affect the validity of the next enclave should there even be one.
Two birds. One stone?
The LAST pope according to Malachi…..
PS, I meant conclave.
The pope is Jewish. Look up his last name.
The catholic leadership also wear those skull caps.
He looks jewy even for a jew, so I have no doubt.
Since Christianity comes from Judaism there are a lot of similarities. I went to a Jewish wedding once and the Rabbi wears vestments quite similar to Catholics or Anglicans. The prayers are the same etc. If you were snoozing off and not paying attention you’d think you were in a Catholic Church.
Your observation is even more true re Jewish and Orthodox practices.
I’m not Catholic but this pope gives me the creeps….wouldn’t let the kids anywhere near him.
The office of the papacy has always been a force of evil. The vicar of Christ on earth… 🙄
1 Timothy 6:10 KJB… “For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.”
Catholics are Jew wannabes if we follow the scriptures as written. I’ll say it yet again; Peter was/is a Jew. Nothing wrong with that save for the entire misplaced religion. Peter is weeping if he sees what’s going on here.
It’s one of the reasons I left the church decades ago. So God needs someone to transmit his message and he picked this monster? Not with me on board.
“…God needs someone to transmit his message…”
Not only transmit, but expound upon and explain. We’re all incapable of understanding what God actually meant in His words to all of us, according to Rome. Yet another direct contradiction of what God has said in the Bible.
“We’re all incapable of understanding what God actually meant in His words to all of us”
If this statement isn’t true then why do we have 22,000 denominations shattering the unification of God’s Church here on earth.
This is what happens when every snake with an agenda was allowed a pulpit to preach their peculiar version what God’s word actually means.
A divided Church is a weakened Church. And, this is how the secular state gained so much authority over the Church and have used it to undermine and supplant the national Christian faith with Satanic tolerance and diversity leading directly to the overt displays of filth we now see in government and society. Can you not see this ?
“If you don’t know history, then you don’t know anything. You are a leaf that doesn’t know it is part of a tree. ”
― Michael Crichton
Philip II: (1527-1598)
William Thomas Walsh
“It did not occur to the kings that if the money-lenders ever got
power enough, if they ever got from under the public-spirited
repression of the Church, they would destroy their own masters.
Kings were not generally as far-sighted as money-changers, and
much less so than priests. This is not to deny that clerics sometimes
condoned usury and profited by it, or that some kings repressed it.
Human affairs are never so simple as that. But there was a line of
cleavage: the Church on one side hostile to usury, the kings
compelled to make use of it on the other.
As the moral influence of the Church was weakened in the
political and economic spheres, in consequence of a series of
calamities for which she was not to blame—the Black Death, the
papal exile at Avignon, the Great Schism, the return of paganism
with the Renaissance—usury began to accumulate wealth and to
organize its influence. With canny insight it threw its influence, by
and large, against the power of Church and State, supporting now
one, now the other, until, by a see-saw process, it succeeded in
weakening both.
It early identified itself with the forces of heresy in religion and
liberalism in politics, until Protestantism at last gave money-lending a certificate of respectability, until a Lord Bacon could write a serious defense of it, and Harrison (in Holinshed) must chronicle the capitulation of the new Protestant England to “usury, a trade brought in by the Jews, but now perfectly practised almost by every
Christian, and so commonly that he is accompted but for a fool that
doth lend his money for nothing.”5 ”
https://libgen.is/book/index.php?md5=1889B28539B7506D637C3D5605BFD2A0
Flash,
There is plenty of criticism to go around, to all churches calling themselves Christian. I only turned my guns on Rome in this case because of the original post headline and the short vid.
The fact is this: no sooner does a body of man incorporate and become a material entity, than the Enemy of God has something to put his hand to and get to work doing what he does, which is sowing confusion and mingling seed in his efforts to destroy and corrupt. Another fact is this: Satan has had longer to work on the Catholic Church than he has any other Christian church, so it stands to reason his corruptions are a bit more extreme in that case.
Satan never bothers to do his work where there’s not a target worth his efforts to corrupt. At one time, the entity which today calls itself the Catholic Church was something we might recognize as legitimately Christian. But no more.
Today it’s the body of Christ which is Christs “vicar”, not a single man. We are here in His stead pleading with people to be reconciled to God. We are ambassadors of the Most High.
2 Corinthians 5:19-21 KJB… “To wit, that God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them; and hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation. Now then we are ambassadors for Christ, as though God did beseech you by us: we pray you in Christ’s stead, be ye reconciled to God. For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him.”
What if Peter was a Hebrew? What if one doesn’t understand the difference? What if the issue was/is that the religious leaders were/are practicing a religion that was documented in the Babylonian Talmud as opposed to the Scriptures. What if speaking to the Pharisees it was said ‘But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.’? What is the chance that Jesus would say the same thing to the Pharisees leading the ‘Jewish’ and Universal ‘religions’ of today?
“…What is the chance that Jesus would say the same thing to the Pharisees leading the ‘Jewish’ and Universal ‘religions’ of today?…”
One hundred percent. Only He probably wouldn’t be so nice about it.
Peter was/is a Hebrew! He will be resurrected a Hebrew, he will sit on a Hebrew throne (one of twelve) judging one of the twelve Hebrew tribes.
Matthew 19:27-28 KJB… “Then answered Peter and said unto him, Behold, we have forsaken all, and followed thee; what shall we have therefore? And Jesus said unto them, Verily I say unto you, That ye which have followed me, in the regeneration when the Son of man shall sit in the throne of his glory, ye also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel.”
The Hebrew leaders of the day (who remain to this day) are preaching and practicing some talmudic religion that goes completely against what God originally intended for them. You are spot on Russ.
Jesus was sent to the lost tribes of the house of Israel.
Matthew 15:24 KJB… “But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.”
He came to divide believing Israel from unbelieving Israel in order to present the remnant with the keys to Gods earthly kingdom.
Luke 12:51 KJB… “Suppose ye that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, Nay; but rather division:”
Matthew 16:18-19 KJB…. “And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.”
This is the Jerusalem church; it is not the same as the church which is His body!!! This is absolutely critical to comprehend! These churches must be “rightly divided” one from the other. The implications are staggering!
The “new creature” the church the “body of Christ” wasn’t in existence during Christs earthly ministry. Christ was only and ever speaking directly to Hebrew people, with precious few exceptions such as the woman he called a dog.
Is it any wonder that some Hebrew people today think of non-Jews as gentile dogs??? There it is straight from Gods lips! God only turned His attention directly to the gentile nations after Israel blasphemed the Holy Spirit in Acts 7. He speaks to us via the apostle He sent to us, Paul. Our instructions are found ONLY in Paul’s epistles. The whole Bible is for our learning, but only a small percentage is written to us.
“jew wanabes”? Good luck to you gcp. Might want to take the plank out of your eye before you try to fix me.
Jesus was born Jewish and so were His closest followers. They saw Jesus teaching as a fulfillment of Jewish teaching, not a repudiation of it. The Catholic Church is the continuation of that teaching in a Church founded by The Savior Himself. What was His last prayer? That his followers would be one as He and the Father are One.
“The Catholic Church is the continuation of that teaching in a Church founded by The Savior Himself.”
Exactly. And that’s the problem! It is a strictly Jewish institution. Thank you for making my point for me.
If you want Christian teaching, look to Paul whom Jesus sent to to teach it.
1 Timothy 1:15-16 KJB… “This is a faithful saying, and worthy of all acceptation, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners; of whom I am chief. Howbeit for this cause I obtained mercy, that in me first Jesus Christ might shew forth all longsuffering, for a pattern to them which should hereafter believe on him to life everlasting.”
Where were Christian’s first identified? Jerusalem??? No…
Acts 11:26 KJB… “And when he had found him, he brought him unto Antioch. And it came to pass, that a whole year they assembled themselves with the church, and taught much people. And the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch.”
Antioch, Paul’s home base.
But, but, but… what about all that activity in early Acts??? Look there; it all takes place in Jerusalem in the temple and in synagogues around the area among Jewish believers! Read it yourself. Tell me where you find the word “Christian”…
Paul deferred to Peter and called himself least among the Apostles – try again
‘each man his own pope’ (Look it up)
And what does Peter have to say about Paul? He is explaining to the little flock why the kingdom didn’t come.
2 Peter 3:15-16 KJ B… “And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you; As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.”
2 Timothy 2:7 KJB… “Consider what I say; and the Lord give thee understanding in all things.”
“No one can say ‘Jesus is Lord’ except by the Holy Spirit.” 1 Cor 12:3.
That’s why the “Catholic Church is satanic” stuff is unbiblical. It’s also why I would never say that any of the other variants of Christianity are “evil” or “satanic” – even though I think they’re wrong in some respects.
Consider this from Mark 9:
John said to him, “Teacher, we saw someone driving out demons in your name, and we tried to prevent him because he does not follow us.” Jesus replied, “Do not prevent him. There is no one who performs a mighty deed in my name who can at the same time speak ill of me. For whoever is not against us is for us.”
Iska, there is much Biblical teaching taking place which is wrong. It’s very easy to be Biblical; one MUST be dispensational to be correct.
If I preached Ark construction, that would be Biblical. It would be wrong but it would be Biblical. Along the same lines… if I preached commandment keeping, tithing, water baptism, etc, etc, etc, I’d be in error.
A preacher today MUST be a good steward of the mystery revealed to Paul. One who is not has no place in a pulpit. Unfortunately that is the vast majority of preachers today. It is the reason “Christianity” is such a complete mess, much to satans delight.
1 Corinthians 4:1-4 KJB… “Let a man so account of us, as of the ministers of Christ, and stewards of the mysteries of God. Moreover it is required in stewards, that a man be found faithful. But with me it is a very small thing that I should be judged of you, or of man’s judgment: yea, I judge not mine own self. For I know nothing by myself; yet am I not hereby justified: but he that judgeth me is the Lord.”
Using scripture from Mark 9 as instruction for believers today is Biblical. It is also wrong. Also, reading “bibles” other than the KJ will lead you astray. ALL new versions deliberately obscure the teaching of right division. You’ll not find correct doctrine in them.
Peace…
The only Jew wannabes are rapturetards and Presbyterians , who like Orthodox Jews believe they were chozen . Which one are you?
Blah, blah, blah… 🙄 Come back to me when you grow a conscience and a brain.
Some time ago when the previous pope was stepping down and this current one was ‘elected’. It was being said by many catholic scholars that this pope would be the black pope. In other words the last of the popes.
The catholic church has long ago turned its back on truth and Christ. It took up the adoration, the worship of Mary as being primary to faith. These last two popes stated their positions that the church worships and prays to Mary first, saints and somewhere down the line comes Christ.
One of the reasons many feel this pope will be the last one is the efforts to ‘unit’ all religions under one umbrella. He stated recently that ALL faiths, pagan, satanists, exetentionalists, etc are all welcome and invited to join. Except real Christians. Many are seeing this as the false teacher heading the leadership role of the one world religion spoken of in scripture.
Even ten years ago would anyone have ever said that one day soon the catholic church and islam would be buddies and looking to join together?? Nope no way. and yet here we are… The pope kissing the feet of a top Imam, and now subjugates the church to the worlds top satan cultists. any surprises left??
The “Black Pope” that is so often talked about is the head of the jesuit order. This is claimed because the Jesuits have been so influential at times within the Church.
Pope Francis is a Jesuit. Which means he has broken a vow of his order. Jesuits vow to take no high office, including bishop, cardinal, and pope.
The “Black Pope” has nothing to do with the last pope, nor the end times.
Not according to some of the articles coming from catholic sources. Most catholics will turn out in support for any of the popes regardless of where they stand. Locked in by fear.
brian – ‘worship’ Mary? No one who spends even a slight amount of time investigating what The Catholic Church teaches or what an individual Catholic believes thinks we adore or worships Mary.
We reserve worship and adoration for The Lord Himself.
Pray, tell me what does a Catholic mean when we say we ‘Pray’ to saints? I pray thee brother brian that you will pray to The Lord for me and my problems.
Please spend ten minutes on the internet and find out about your subject matter before you comment.
I will state again, good Popes, bad Popes, they come and go. The official doctrines of The Catholic Church cannot be changed by a Pope who speaks loosely off the cuff or even one who is overtly evil.
Hale Satan, you creepy, crawling demon from hell. St Malachi says that he will be the last pope, the false prophet. I don’t know much about it, but his actions speak volumes. May your time in hell be particularly unpleasant you filthy kike.
Pax Romanis…the last pope
I’ll never understand how so many associated with the Mises Institute continue to remain members of the Catholic Church.
I agree, Tom Woods-who I love- actually gets angry if you bring up his faith. A strange reaction for an anarchist.
I don’t know how any Catholic or Protestant still follows the faggotted infested “Do what thou wilt is the whole of the Law” cult, most commonly referred to nowadays as LoLbertz.
I wasted a lot of time with those groveling shitheads, too…smh.
Fuck the pope and the Catholic pederasts
Kissing Hank Kyssyngers ring? Hey, it’s nothing personal, just business.
Look how King Charles g0t his chest poked by the Redkids’ boss.
Taking the humiliated bondsman rout comes with the territory when being beholden to the evil rulers of this world.
So no one has pointed out to the Pope the scary snake motif in his giant cineplex looking sanctuary? Do they think we can’t see it, or is that they know we can?
These guys are all so creepy, makes you wonder if this is something other than flesh and blood we’re talking about.
Ya think?!?……
Learning about the evil worshipped by the leaders of this world is just what drove me into the Bible, farmer.
The powers in this world literally bow at the altar of the Enemy of God.
That’s neither euphemism nor hyperbole.
Well, God DID create Lucifer, all the while knowing he would become Satan. A thinking person has to ask themselves why He would do such a thing. We can’t know for certain, but you have to assume He had a very good reason.
You may just have found it.
There are no choices when there isn’t anything to choose from. Even the angels were given free will to choose and look how many choose to reject their Creator. I’m sure if God did not allow free choice he could have simply vanished the problem.
With freedom comes both good and bad, choices…
I’ve heard the theory that to create something of enduring nature, an imperfection must be placed within or it could not exist at all. Sounds more like planned obsolescence to me…but what do I know?
I don’t believe God created Satan. I don’t believe Satan was ever an angel. I don’t believe any angel could stand in God’s presence and conclude that God was to be resisted or could ever be overthrown.
I believe the Scriptures teach that Satan is not and never was an angel.
The Serpent was MORE crafty than any beast of the field which the Lord God had created. Not the most crafty of them all. And Satan pretends to be an angel of light. Not actually is or was an angel of light.
Satan’s “genesis” (if such a word can be used in application to non-being) can be seen in the first chapter of the Bible.
Satan is uncreated because he (strictly speaking) has no being. He is an emergent non-entity which was not, but even now is coming forth from the Abyss. Darkness was over the Abyss in a diabolical counterfeit of the Spirit of God hovering over the waters. God brought forth Light. The Darkness brought forth (is bringing forth) the still-born abomination of unconscious non-being we know as the Accuser — a murderer from the beginning. He murdered Adam and Eve and he murdered Cain (by Cain’s own hand when Cain murdered Abel) through his subtle and crafty whispering. And he whispers to us now. He’s the voiceless voice within each of us trying to murder us and get us to show our backs to God.
I suppose if you ignore what scripture says then all that you state is true. But unfortunately scriptures state otherwise.
Now it came about on the day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, that Satan also came among them (Job 1:6).
How you are fallen from heaven, O day-star, son of the morning! how you are cut down to the ground, that did lay low the nations! (Isaiah 14:12).
You were the anointed cherub that covered: and I set you, so that you were upon the holy mountain of God; you have walked up and down in the midst of the stones of fire (Ezekiel 28:14).
Then Jesus was led up by the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted by the Devil (Matthew 4:1).
And the woman said to the serpent, “From the fruit of the trees of the garden we may eat; and the serpent said to the woman, “You surely shall not die! “For God knows that when you eat from it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil” (Genesis 3:2,4,5).
But the Pharisees said, “By the ruler of the demons He drives out demons” (Matthew 9:34).
He goes by many names, the Destroyer, the evil on, the Accuser, Dragon of Old, Beelzebub, Liar, Father of Lies, Murderer, God of this world, and there are more.
He is a created cherub same as Michael the archangel. So many of these names are descriptions of his character not what he is. He’s not a dragon, serpent or any animal of sorts. He IS a former archangel thathas the timbre, lyre and other musical instruments were ascribed to him. He WAS accounted as one of the sons of God, an angel. He’s fallen because the seeds of corruption were in him, he deceived a third of the angels to follow him and they are now children of darkness. All of Gods presence is removed from them, all light, although Satan can imitate an angel of light. But that imitation soon fails when his fruits reveal him for who he is.
btw, where in scripture is it that satan murdered adam and eve??
“…Now it came about on the day…”
Satan showed up. Anything here about being an angel? Nope. That would have to be insinuated into the passage. I’m not going there. But what were God’s words to Satan in the passage? Where do YOU come from? Whose benefit was God asking for. His? Or ours.
Isaiah 14 is not an address to Satan. The passage tells us specifically whom is being addressed: the Prince and the King of Babylon — that is the end-age personage who bears that title. Nothing here about Satan being an angel either.
Re Ezekiel 28:14 — look at it in Hebrew. Then look at all of the translations which render this enigmatic verse differently:
Aramaic Bible in Plain English
And you have been with the Cherub who is anointed and who shelters, and I have settled you in the mountain of the holiness of God, and you have been among the stones of fire
Brenton Septuagint Translation
From the day that thou wast created thou wast with the cherub: I set thee on the holy mount of God; thou wast in the midst of the stones of fire.
Contemporary English Version
I appointed a winged creature to guard your home on my holy mountain, where you walked among gems that dazzled like fire.
Good News Translation
I put a terrifying angel there to guard you. You lived on my holy mountain and walked among sparkling gems.
New American Bible
With a cherub I placed you; I put you on the holy mountain of God, where you walked among fiery stones.
NET Bible
I placed you there with an anointed guardian cherub; you were on the holy mountain of God; you walked about amidst fiery stones.
New Revised Standard Version
With an anointed cherub as guardian I placed you; you were on the holy mountain of God; you walked among the stones of fire.
https://biblehub.com/ezekiel/28-14.htm
There is ONE VERSE in the Old Testament which, when translated carelessly, seems to indicate that Satan was a cherub. I submit to you this is not the kind of evidence you should be leaning on. Paul said Satan is not an angel but pretends to be one. He said it plainly.
Satan is not now and never was an angel.
Satan beguiled Eve into direct disobedience and she then enticed her husband into the same. Satan did this, even though Eve consented. That is tantamount to murder, and the Lord Himself said that Satan was a murderer from the beginning.
And, incidentally, there is nothing in the Hebrew verse Ezekiel 28:14 about God creating Satan. Satan was established (put or placed) on the Mountain.
And remember how many times the Lord excoriated the lying scribes all throughout the Gospels. Don’t rely on the scribes. Verify everything with the tools we’ve been given in the time we have left.
You used two statements to to make it appear as if satan just appeared. THAT would be on the order of miraculous, now it came about on the day. Also the argument that God somehow didn’t know where he came from when asked the sons of God, the angels, where he had been. This implies that God is not omniscient. Is this what you are suggesting???
also there is nothing in scripture that states Michael the Archangel was created, or Gabriel either, so does that mean they just appeared as well??? You statements are filled with assumptions not grounded in scriptures.
I suggest you reread Isaiah 14 again, it s all about satan.
You cannot attribute this to any king of the earth.
Anyrate, you believe whatever you want. But I’ll take truth born by scriptures.
“…You statements are filled with assumptions not grounded in scriptures…”
No, brian. I haven’t even begun laying bare the argument for my position, and you’re ready to quit because this seems to bother you.
If you want to get into this seriously, put your big boy pants on and lets get to work.
I doubt you have the courage for it now, since you’ve just exposed yourself for a very immature believer.
I’ve already written books about this subject. Literally.
Feature, not bug. There have been even worse popes.
Vatican City is listed as one of the 3 great corporations that runs the world …
The TRUTHS that they have locked away in their archives are the real treasure. One can only imagine what they are keeping hidden from the rabble.
When the Muslims sack the Vatican we’ll all find out together…IF you can trust the word of a Muslim…the sort of Muslim who would sack the Vatican.
The Catholic Church has been the most evil institution on earth for hundreds of years, are you just now catching on?
Baphomet aka Satan is a transgender. It has the head of a goat, tits and a man’s junk. And there’s the “pope” waving a rainbow flag. Nuff said.
We all fall short in the eyes of the Lord. Only through Jesus and his sacrifice, are we saved. We came into the world as sinners, from the original sin. Praise be to God our Father and Jesus for his sacrifice to give us eternal life. We are saved by the grace of the Son of the Lord, not by works.