Gays, You’re Not Black

Guest Post by Ann Coulter

For at least a half-century now, every special pleader in America has made the following argument: Yeah, but what if we were black?

This is supposed to be rhetorical kryptonite, capable of anathematizing “discrimination” against any group: atheists, women, gays, immigrants, illegal immigrants, the disabled, Muslims — basically anyone except a fully abled, cis-gendered, white male born in this country.

Oh my gosh! You’re right — we DO have to let girls try out for the Green Bay Packers!

OK, fine, we’ll hire more blind lifeguards.

Of course, Shadi Abdullah is welcome to be president of our campus Hillel group.

Naturally, the “What if they were black?” argument came up ad nauseum at the Supreme Court last week during oral arguments over Colorado’s “anti-discrimination” law. According to Colorado, making two gay guys who are married to one another feel “unwelcome, objectionable, unacceptable or undesirable” is the equivalent of separate water fountains for black people.

A web designer had petitioned the court, objecting to the law’s requirement that she design a website celebrating a gay marriage, in contravention of her religious beliefs. But if you’d heard only the questions from Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson, you’d think the petitioner was refusing to design websites for black people.

E.g.:

JUSTICE JACKSON: “[C]an I ask you a hypothetical … [What if] they want to have a sign next to the [shopping mall] Santa that says, ‘only white children.’ Why isn’t your argument that they should be able to do that?” [The hypothetical went on for hours, but that was the gist of it.]

These were a few of Justice Sotomayor’s questions:

— “What’s the difference between that and ‘I don’t believe black people and white people should get married’?”

— “Tell me how that’s different, by the way. What you’re basically saying is, in our Ollie’s Barbecue case, the company there said, ‘I’ll serve blacks but only on a takeout window, not inside my restaurant because that sends a message that I endorse integration ….'”

— “Well, when I sit down to eat a meal by a full chef who creates this beautiful picture on a plate, why can’t he say, ‘I make specialized meals for my clients. I will not serve a black person.'”

Here’s a cheat sheet that should help answer the justices’ questions:

Can I refuse to let black kids sit on Santa’s lap? — NO.

Can I refuse to serve black people at my restaurant? — NO.

Can I refuse to bake one of my wedding cakes for black people? — NO.

Can I refuse to write speeches for black people? — NO.

Can I refuse to perform marriage ceremonies for black people — NO.

Can I refuse to let black people into the Marines? — NO.

Can I discriminate against black people for any reason, ever? — NO.

Displaying his own unique approach, Eric Olson, Colorado’s solicitor general, who was defending the law (popular name: “We Won the Right to Gay Marriage and Now We’re Shooting the Wounded”), made this pioneering argument: “What [a business] can’t do is say, ‘I reserve the right to refuse service, which means in practice I will not serve black people.'”

A good rule of thumb is that any claim of discrimination that requires a comparison to black people is sophistry.

No offense — I’m sure the rest of you have really moving tales of woe, full of pathos and suffering. But gays, atheists, disabled people, women (whatever the hell that is), immigrants, illegals, please try to remember: YOU’RE NOT BLACK.

It’s discrimination on the basis of race — and only discrimination on the basis of race — that is forbidden by our Constitution. Other forms of “discrimination” may be stupid (if so, the market will punish you) or blindingly logical (football teams allowing only healthy young men to try out, or religious groups limiting officeholders to practitioners of the religion).

Only one type of discrimination ever stirred up such mass revulsion in this country that we decided to amend our Constitution to prohibit it: race discrimination.

You’d think that at a moment when our entire national dialogue is fixated on the legacy of slavery, it wouldn’t be so difficult for people to grasp that black Americans’ unique history is not amenable to cut-and-paste victimhood.

To make up for slavery and Jim Crow, we abrogated constitutional provisions about freedom of association, freedom of contract and freedom of speech. We tossed out basic rules of fairness to allow (temporarily) affirmative action, set-asides and quotas. Behemoth departments were created in Washington to stamp out the last vestiges of discrimination on the basis of race.

By now, of course, the only discrimination involving black Americans is in their favor. But that doesn’t change the rule: NO DISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF RACE.

As G.K. Chesterton said, “When you break the big laws, you do not get freedom, you do not even get anarchy. You get the small laws.”

That’s what “discrimination” law is today. Instead of one big law: “No Race Discrimination!” we have a million little laws about strict scrutiny, intermediate scrutiny, rational basis test, public accommodations, bona fide occupational qualifications, and on and on and on. At the same time, we have open race discrimination against whites and Asians.

Unless you’re alleging race discrimination, take your lumps like a cis-gendered white man. You can be fired, not hired, turned away, rejected, called names, disciplined, looked askance at — and no one cares.

This simple rule allows us to live in what we call “freedom.” As the libertarians would say (if they were real libertarians), start your own website business, bakery, Hillel organization, professional football team, holiday, all-women’s eating club, etc. etc. etc.

Gays, you’re not black. (And you’re not Allan Bakke.) Gays’ median household income is about $115,000 — the highest of any group in America. It’s $45,000 for black people. To my gay readers, answer this honestly: When you move into a neighborhood, do home prices go up or down?

Blacks must be looking at gay rights activists in bewilderment, thinking: Why couldn’t we be oppressed like that?

For the rest of you, memorize this, recite it in the shower, write it on your hand: “Unless I’m being discriminated against on the basis of my race, I will stop being a pain in everyone’s ass.”

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
25 Comments
Iska Waran
Iska Waran
December 15, 2022 3:17 pm

You’re born a certain race. You don’t choose it. Having homosex is choice. The whole “born this way” thing was pushed in order to make it seem like there’s no choice involved. Beside even if you’re attracted to someone of your own sex, it’s not like you HAVE to engage in homosexual behavior.

Anonymous
Anonymous
December 15, 2022 3:27 pm

This is terrifyingly ignorant. There are far more protected classes in federal law than just race.

For example, Title VII protects against discrimination against:
Age
Race
National Origin
Religious Beliefs
Gender
Disability
Pregnancy
Veteran Status

Obbledy
Obbledy
  Anonymous
December 15, 2022 3:53 pm

Yet they are without teeth and are SELECTIVLEY prosecuted.Where does the federal government get off telling me ANYTHING!!!
If people are commiting crimes against other people prosecute THOSE people!
Go ahead!,get a job at 60! I am a technician and not a soul thinks my EXPERIENCE is valuable and I DON’T work for nothing!
The biggest issue? When you single out certain people as protected “classes”then you have destroyed the whole notion of EQUAL rights and have in fact created “special”rights!
To which some people WILL BE EXCLUDED!
REPUGNANT to the Constitution!!!!
Coulter is a progressive idiot!!!

Trapped in Portlandia
Trapped in Portlandia
  Anonymous
December 15, 2022 3:58 pm

And where is sexual orientation in your list?

Oh yeah, it isn’t there.

Ann, may have simplified her argument, but her conclusion is valid.

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
  Anonymous
December 15, 2022 4:57 pm

Unless you’re white, straight, male, and older.

Obbledy
Obbledy
December 15, 2022 3:42 pm

So,even if your a lowlife scumbag OF WHATEVER STRIPE ,I have to accommodate you????…..piss the HELL off….

Aunt Acid
Aunt Acid
December 15, 2022 3:46 pm

Next (p)resident should be a blind Black Muslima Lesbian in a wheelchair; cover all the bases as it were you fucking rayssiss, sexist, ableist, infidel…

Boogie
Boogie
December 15, 2022 3:49 pm

I’ve always been partial to most straight white people that see thing’s like I do? They’re a lot like me. We just naturally get along better and can relate to each other. We are better suited for one another due to our cultural links.

Is that a racist statement?

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
  Boogie
December 15, 2022 4:59 pm

No, but its a damn good reason to divide up this country into a few thousand parts and let people associate with whom they wish, and tell the others to f-off.

Iggy
Iggy
  MrLiberty
December 15, 2022 7:20 pm

Yeah but it will not stay that way because the whites will hire the spicks and nigs to do the labor and the cycle will start again.

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
  Iggy
December 15, 2022 11:20 pm

My brother called them “cans” – MexiCANS, and AfriCANS.

FJB
FJB
December 15, 2022 4:43 pm

In what was the most open and free country on the planet, the Former USA, immigrants of every stripe came and when they had the freedom to choose where to live, each group chose to live with others from the same background. Neighborhoods were almost monocultures and in some cases entire cities and even states became homogenous based on country of origin, religion, or race.
Only when it was forced upon us did integration across the spectrum become a thing. To this day, given a choice of where to live, most people will chose to live with others who are like them, who share common values of life, culture, and religion. It’s call Freedom. Anything else is tyranny.
Stay safe and prepare accordingly.

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
December 15, 2022 4:55 pm

Let’s make it even simpler. Is this YOUR business or the government’s business? Yours? Then do whatever the fuck you want. Want to serve blacks, go for it. Don’t want to…then don’t. As an idividual I don’t have to let anyone in my home if I don’t want and nobody says a damn thing. Why should it be any different for a business ? IT ISN’T!!!

Want to solve the problem of businesses that discriminate? Boycott them or open your own damn business. Government regulations, fees, restrictions making that impossible? THEN FIX THE GOVERNMENT SIDE OF THINGS!!

A business does NOT become something special because the government FORCES THEM to have to have a license to operate. THAT is a violation of their rights from the start. The ONLY THING that the Civil Rights Act should have addressed was the OVERT DISCRIMINATION practiced by government in government bathrooms, drinking fountains, schools, public buildings, etc. that EVERYONE WAS FORCED TO PAY FOR. Seems reasonable to stop that. Instead, it violated the rights of EVERY private property owner in America.

But if its MY BUSINESS….fuck off. THAT is the proper way to look at business. And YES, government makes owning, operating, expanding, starting, etc. a business a giant misery. FIX THAT FIRST.

Vigilant
Vigilant
  MrLiberty
December 15, 2022 5:34 pm

This is the core of the issue and the only logical, freedom-friendly, pro-American response to the problem. The ones who yell hate the loudest are the true haters.

Glock-N-Load
Glock-N-Load
  MrLiberty
December 15, 2022 5:40 pm

Government is in business to CREATE problems not fix them.

Colorado Artist
Colorado Artist
  MrLiberty
December 15, 2022 6:33 pm

In 1860, only 3% of the population owned slaves.
Then we ended even that.
Time to end all the lies about niggerdom.

VOWG
VOWG
  MrLiberty
December 16, 2022 8:20 am

Just remember some level of government provides the license for the business for a fee. They tax the business and they think they own the business.

pyrrhuis
pyrrhuis
December 15, 2022 6:38 pm

Straight white people built America…When minorities accomplish something similar (not happening), they can whine about equality, whatever that is….

Anonymous
Anonymous
December 15, 2022 7:05 pm

More distractions to keep plebes squabbling with each other over the latest division tactics.

cricketTheFirst
cricketTheFirst
December 15, 2022 7:14 pm

NO DISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF RACE.
Sounds great.
However…
“Blacks have confronted California’s new state “reparations” panel, set up to review the idea of paying members of that race”….every black person.
That demand was from Max Fennell, who told the commission that every black should get $350,000, and black-owned businesses should get an additional $250,000 plus 15 to 20 acres of land.
“It’s a debt that’s owed, we worked for free. (WE? ) We’re not asking; we’re telling you,” he demanded.
“such payments would help “shrink the racial wealth gap and right historical wrongs.”
“another activist, Deon Jenkins, demanded that reparations of $800,000 be “handed out.”
Not just to ancestors of slaves, but all black persons.
(Would it be ongoing? To every black baby born in Cali going forward? Anything else would be discrimination…right?)
“the discussion also included how how the state may address its impact on black families whose [ancestors] property was seized through eminent domain.”
Gimme gimme gimme.

Black activist demands $350,000. ‘We not asking; we’re telling you’

Iggy
Iggy
  cricketTheFirst
December 15, 2022 7:22 pm

Man it’s gonna be a hell of a good year at the Cadillac dealerships.

VOWG
VOWG
  Iggy
December 16, 2022 8:21 am

Do they have any cars these days?

WilliamtheResolute
WilliamtheResolute
December 15, 2022 7:18 pm

Poor sodomite snowflakes…it’s about feelings. They feel that you must be made to accept and approve of their undeserved status as a privileged and protected species.

TampaRed
TampaRed
December 15, 2022 11:26 pm

dictionary.com’s word of the year–it fits in this article’s comments section —

https://www.theblaze.com/news/dictionarycom-word-of-the-year

Anonymous
Anonymous
December 16, 2022 5:55 am

[What if] they want to have a sign next to the [shopping mall] Santa that says, ‘only white children.’
Obviously this woman is not familiar with the bible. Jesus was a Jew, and one tribe of the 12 tribes of Israel was black. Moving on to the new testament Jesus invited all people, Jews and Gentiles to follow him. There is no prohibition on any race in the Bible.
JUSTICE JACKSON is either to ignorant to be on the Court, or to biased and racist.