Covid Vaccines Have Saved Millions of Lives…in Models 

Guest Post by Manfred Horst

models absurd

As more and more questions are being asked by more and more scientists, health professionals and journalists, the narrative of “safe and effective” Covid-19 vaccines is crumbling by the day, and scientific truth is slowly beginning to impose itself.

The simple scientific truth is that these vaccines are clinically useless, but not entirely harmless (no medical intervention is).

It is not surprising that all those who promoted them are now desperately trying to cling on to their story. How? Well, let’s publish some models, as we have done since the inception of the whole Covid propaganda and hysteria. Who needs hard clinical data?

Another modeling study, comparable in its basic assumptions, algorithms and results to the one published in The Lancet a few weeks ago, is now claiming that the Covid vaccines have saved millions of people from death and hospitalization. This time it is in the US alone that – over roughly a two-year period (December 2020 to November 2022) – 3.2 million people would have died and 18.5 million would have needed in-patient treatment, had it not been for the Covid jabs.

Given that the annual death rate in the US was around 3.4 million in both 2020 and 2021, the model pretends to demonstrate that total mortality would have risen by around 50 percent without the vaccines. Five million people would have died in both 2021 and 2022, 2 million would have been counted as “Corona-deaths” (a rise of more than 500 percent compared to the “pandemic year” 2020), and Covid-19 would thus have become the absolutely predominant cause of death in the United States of America.

Which is to say that Covid-19 would by now have to be the absolutely predominant cause of death in the unvaccinated part of the population – and in countries with low vaccination rates.

Perhaps our distinguished modelers are so detached from clinical reality that they actually believe in this output, as absurd as it is.

Brownstone’s scientific and medical writers are not “anti-vaxxers.” We all recognize the historical and current benefits of immunization. Some of us still believe that there may be a place for Covid vaccines in the at-risk population.

Nor are we opposed to scientific progress – on the contrary. Most of us agree that mRNA technology holds great therapeutic promise. During my time at Merck & Co., I visited BioNTech in Mainz several times and then tried to convince my headquarter scientists of the interest of the company’s cancer vaccine programmes.

However, we all claim the right to think freely, and to ask for clinical evidence. We do not concede to the argument: “How can you assume that the FDA, the EMA, the peer-reviewed journals, the politicians, and the media all got it wrong?” We take the liberty to analyze the data, and to draw our rational conclusions. And we all remain open to any rational discussion of these conclusions.

One of my conclusions is that the Covid deaths are part of normal and inevitable population mortality which cannot be prevented by an immunization against one particular respiratory virus. If the vaccine clinical trials had demonstrated a mortality benefit, I would have been swayed in this conclusion – and Fitzpatrick et al. would have had a credible fundamental input for their population model.

However, the endpoints in all the clinical Covid-19 vaccine trials were common cold and flu symptoms, plus a positive test.

My conclusions from the available trial data (as per the publications and FDA submissions documents) are the following:

  • The observed reductions in test-positivity for the SARS-CoV-2 virus (the “95 percent efficacy”) in people presenting with a common cold or flu are an interesting biological result – if they are real (The numbers are small, and clinical reality appears to not confirm this result).
  • Clinically, people were much sicker (altogether more common cold and flu symptoms) in the vaccine than in the placebo groups.
  • No conclusions can be drawn for severe forms of pneumonia and mortality.
  • As Covid-19 is a disease with non-specific symptoms, the pivotal trial endpoint would have to be all-cause pneumonias and all-cause mortality, in order to gauge any intervention’s clinical benefit (or harm).

Any public health model needs good and credible clinical and epidemiological data for its input and algorithms. For the Covid-19 vaccines, good and credible data demonstrating a prevention of severe pneumonia, hospitalization, and death do not exist. My conclusion from the clinic and the epidemiology is that they cannot exist.

It is therefore not surprising that published models yield absurd results. Unfortunately, it is no longer surprising either that these absurd results are being swallowed and regurgitated by medical journals and the media, by politicians and agencies.

It may be a long struggle, but the scientific truth will prevail in the end.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
12 Comments
Cricket
Cricket
January 22, 2023 9:00 pm

It won’t matter if the truth finally prevails in then end. My government has taken my rights, destroyed the health care system, and endless lockdowns have lead to investment destroying inflation. Not one of the a**holes who destroyed the western way of life in the name of covid will be held to account. What difference at this point does it make if the truth comes out now, when the lie has propagated around the world for nearly 3 years now and brought with it a whirlwind of death, destruction and ruin.

Colorado Artist
Colorado Artist
  Cricket
January 22, 2023 11:23 pm

The truth is indisputable.
The “vaccine” is not only deadly by itself, but it also facilitates the infection it was supposed to prevent.
Just as designed.

m
m
  Cricket
January 23, 2023 4:37 am

Inflation was/is caused by lockdowns?
That’s almost as stupid as “it’s all Putin’s fault.”

Anonymous
Anonymous
  m
January 23, 2023 5:58 am

Indirectly, but yes. The lock downs killed businesses and jobs. The idiot politicians, both Democrats and Republicans (though it was a Democratic initiative) voted for the Covid Relief bills, that had the US Treasury printing $5 trillion in money, causing inflation. Those lock downs also help prevent Trump from being re-elected, along with enabling Democratic cheating with “mail in ballots” after they screwed up the spring primaries purposely and got us Biden and another $4.7 in printed money. So covid brought us about $10 trillion in printed money, and we know it will be higher as the government never does anything within budget.
Also the fact it enabled Biden to get in office and screw up energy is another reason for the massive inflation. So yes the shut downs did.

VOWG
VOWG
  Anonymous
January 23, 2023 6:44 am

Typed my post before I saw yours.

VOWG
VOWG
  m
January 23, 2023 6:43 am

Well, yes they were, as the government “printed trillions of dollars and added trillions more in debt to pay people for doing nothing. So yes, the lockdowns did in part cause inflation.

m
m
  VOWG
January 23, 2023 6:50 am

To both of you:
And the previous 20 years [before the lockdowns] were mostly irrelevant?
I’d like some of what you’re smoking.

Massive inflation some day was baked in the cake since the Fed refused to have the Dotcom bubble clear by free market forces. And only got worse by the following bubbles.
That TPTB allow inflation to become a little more visible now, because they have a good scapegoat, in no way proves the scapegoat caused it.

Steve Z.
Steve Z.
January 23, 2023 12:17 am

The Covid survival rates across the board are 99.9+%. At the tail end, the old are more susceptible. No news there.
Me and the wife never “vaxxed”, haven’t been sick for years and years. If we had Covid, it was asymptomatic.
While we live in a country setting we frequently got to the close cities of Jacksonville, St. Augustine and Daytona. All of which have large tourist and transient numbers. So, we’re not isolated. Why haven’t we been sick? The only ones I know who have been sick are the “vaxxed”. Funny how that works. Yeah, the “vaccines” musta saved millions.

Arthur
Arthur
January 23, 2023 2:26 am

“Models” are a plague in themselves.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Arthur
January 23, 2023 9:42 am

Computer modeler scamdemic chief, Neil Ferguson:
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/tag/neil-ferguson/

Visayas Outpost
Visayas Outpost
January 23, 2023 8:05 am

I wish I could feel happy about all this vindication. Headline after headline reaffirming what many of us have been saying for 3 years. Boy does it feel hollow. Hard to even care, because the opinions of those just now figuring it out I no longer respect.

DFJ150
DFJ150
January 23, 2023 11:01 am

mRNA “vaccines” have not saved, but rather MADE billions for the elites, and that is in $$, not lives.