Dr. McCullough Explains How the COVID Vaccines Can Cause Cancer
#1 – "The vaccines knock down the p53 and BRCA tumor suppressor systems … So, we don't have our own ability to snuff out early cancers."
#2 – "The messenger RNA impairs DNA repair. And the Chinese have published… pic.twitter.com/olqhP2rFb8
— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) December 6, 2023
Dr. McCullough Reveals More Bad News About the COVID Shotshttps://t.co/JX14GLmBca
— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) December 6, 2023
-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
But the main mechanism of tumor generation is compliance with “the science”.
Disclaimer:
I’m not a doctor, but I play one on this “series of tubes*”.
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Series_of_tubes
I personally don’t care. Anyone stupid enough to take the vaccine is a waste of oxygen anyway.
Except for innocent kids, and people in tight situations who were trying to keep eating and living indoors, etc., with little choice? And they’re spreading it to all of us, it seems, through various means. And they’ve still not been brought down. Maybe we’re all a bit less than we could or should be.
We laugh at the vaccinated…but the truth is they are coming for us all
And there really are many innocent victims.
Indeed. There will be MANY more to come. Let God sort them out. Life is for the living. Use it while you’re able.
…and they fucking MISSED!!!
Exactly how many more chances do you think I’M going to give them?
After the past three years I’m not sure cancer is real.
but poison is.
Aren’t coroners doctors and don’t they work in the same place where the people who died were treated?
I’m beginning to sense a pattern and I don’t think the vax was their first at bat.
If you aren’t questioning everything you think you know about illness and modern medicine, then you’re not really in the game.
Amen and Amen , HF.
Welcome to the Collins Estate. PLEASE come in! Barnabas is waiting!
Coromers aren’t necessarily Doctors, it’s an elected office.
Pathologist then, whoever determines cause of death.
That guy.
Seems like a choke point.
That vote ratio explains masks.
Then you’ve never seen someone die from cancer. glock farmer!?
I’m not sure air exists either because I’m questioning its existence. Never seen it and don’t know anyone who has.
I’m all for questioning everything but sometimes the things questioned here just get very stupid.
When you start studying cancer, P53 and BRCA are some of the first things you learn.
How wifi causes skin cell death.
Unless you consider ALL the inputs affecting a physical biome?
You are just guessing.
I NEVER see people discussing the EMF/Photon ELEPHANT in the room.
Playing the notes of DNA with light: extremely high frequency nanomechanical oscillations
We use a double nanohole (DNH) optical tweezer with two trapping lasers beating to excite the vibrational modes of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) fragments in the extremely high frequency range. We find the resonant vibration frequency of a 20 base ssDNA to be 40 GHz. We show that the change in the resonant frequency for different lengths of the DNA strand is in good agreement with one dimensional lattice vibration theory. Thus the DNH tweezer system could distinguish between different lengths of DNA strands with resolution down to a few bases. By varying the base sequence and length, it is possible to adjust the resonance frequency vibration spectrum. The technique shows the potential for use in sequencing applications if we can improve the resolution of the present system to detect changes in resonant frequency for a single base change in a given sequence. The technique is single-molecule and label-free as compared to the existing methods used for DNA characterization like gel electrophoresis.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25584811/
____
is clear that biological objects interact not only with static fields but also with alternating electromagnetic fields at a range of frequencies. The biological response is varied and depends on the organism, tissue, molecular composition of the particular cell as well as on the parameters of the electromagnetic field itself: frequency, intensity, modulation, polarization, pulsing mode, instantaneous and average power, total energy absorbed etc. There is evidence of dynamic changes in the electromagnetic properties of tissue due to its natural activity, which alters the reaction of biological objects to externally applied electromagnetic radiation. It was shown in crab nerves in vitro that due to alterations in the transmembrane potential in the neuronal membrane, correlative changes in (externally applied) light scattering were observed along with the birefringence effect [28]. The same effect was observed in later studies with a squid giant axon and a correlation between optical retardation and externally imposed voltage steps on the axon membrane was reported; the authors assumed that effect might originate from molecular relaxation processes analogous with the Kerr effect [29]. Overall, the above evidence shows that electromagnetic effects are ubiquitous in physiology, yet the precise nature of these effects varies significantly.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5746568/
__________
If you leave the electromagnetic spectrum out of your calculations?
You have not considered all the inputs.
Your thesis is incomplete.
DNA is a fractal antenna in electromagnetic fields.
Results: EMF interactions with DNA are similar over a range of non-ionising frequencies, i.e., extremely low frequency (ELF) and radio frequency (RF) ranges. There are similar effects in the ionising range, but the reactions are more complex.
Conclusions: The wide frequency range of interaction with EMF is the functional characteristic of a fractal antenna, and DNA appears to possess the two structural characteristics of fractal antennas, electronic conduction and self symmetry. These properties contribute to greater reactivity of DNA with EMF in the environment, and the DNA damage could account for increases in cancer epidemiology, as well as variations in the rate of chemical evolution in early geologic history.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21457072/