On the Ohio State study showing vaccinated Covid patients had a HIGHER risk of death than the unvaccinated

Guest Post by Alex Berenson

It’s just one hospital, just one paper. Except it’s not.

On Feb. 6, Ohio State University researchers published a stunning finding – stunning to anyone overwhelmed by mainstream media mRNA propaganda since 2021, anyway. Vaccinated Covid patients hospitalized with respiratory failure were more likely to die than the unjabbed. 70 percent died, compared to 37 percent.

The gap persisted when the researchers matched patients by age and comorbidities. “Vaccination status of hospital-admitted COVID-19 patients may not be instructive in determining mortality risk,” they wrote.

In their report, published in Frontiers in Immunology, a peer-reviewed journal, the Ohio State researchers also reported vaccinated patients tended to have higher IgG4 antibody levels during their third week of hospitalization.

That finding is notable, since papers last year showed that mRNA jab recipients eventually develop higher levels of IgG4 antibodies – which promote immune systems tolerance of pathogens like viruses rather than a full-on attack.

“In our study, the observed trend for increased total IgG4 concentration in week 3 for [vaccinated] patients may explain the reduced protective [antibody] responses,” the scientists wrote.

The Ohio State paper covered only a single hospital and 152 patients.

But other studies have also found vaccinated Covid patients do not have a survival advantage once they are hospitalized.

As early as November 2021, Spanish researchers published a paper in the European Respiratory Journal showing fully vaccinated patients had slightly higher death rates than a matched group of unvaccinated patients, though the trend did not reach statistical significance.

(34.6 percent is more than 28.6 percent, right? Yay! No correction tonight)

SOURCE

And in January 2023 paper, Italian physicians reported that in fall 2021, vaccinated patients admitted to intermediate care units in their hospital were more than twice as likely to die as unvaccinated patients – 62 percent versus 29 percent.

As with the Ohio State paper, the vaccinated patients had higher comorbidities than the unvaccinated. But even after the doctors accounted for that difference, they found vaccinated patients were at higher risk, though the trend did not reach statistical significance.

“In the severe disease stage few factors, including vaccines, influence outcome,” they wrote. “Once severe SARS-CoV-2 illness develops, mortality is definitely high in both unvaccinated and vaccinated.”

One reason the single-hospital papers show worse vaccine outcomes than bigger data sets from public health bureaucrats is that the physicians who write them typically – and correctly – identify Covid patients who received only one shot as vaccinated.

In the agglomerated papers, those patients are categorized as unvaccinated. That statistical trick makes the vaccines look better. But it does nothing to help the patients who have received them.

Still, in a larger study, a 2022 paper from Centers for Disease Control researchers also found that vaccinations did not lower the risk of severe disease or death in Covid-hospitalized patients – although the researchers did not break out deaths separately.

The papers run contrary to what vaccine advocates have said for three years. During the great mRNA push in summer and fall 2021, the media and doctors insisted vaccinated people fared far better than the unjabbed even after they were hospitalized.

In July 2021, for example, the Associated Press offered this false assurance:

Federal health officials say even when breakthrough infections occur, they tend to be mild — the vaccines so far remain strongly protective against serious illness.

Three months later, in October 2021, NPR gave listeners this sweet-sounding fiction:

[Dr. Hyung] Chun says those who are vaccinated generally tend to do better once they are in the hospital, compared to those who aren’t vaccinated.

“Even if you were hospitalized [with a breakthrough infection], the trend we’ve been observing is that you will likely be far less sick in terms of needing things like supplementary oxygen or mechanical ventilation, or even your risk of death,” says Chun, an associate professor of cardiology at the Yale School of Medicine.

Since the start of 2022, doctors have been more cautious about promising vaccinated people will walk out of the hospital quickly even if they get Covid – probably because the truth they see is too obvious for them to deny.

Yet the broad claim that mRNA jabs save lives even if they do not stop infection has become even more central to the vaccine sales pitch over the same period.

The reason is obvious: the failure of fall 2021’s boosters forced even the craziest jab fanatics to admit the mRNAs would never produce durable immunity against Covid.

Much less provide herd immunity.

Much less control or eliminate Sars-Cov-2.

(That sad fact was clear to some of us even earlier. Please note date, sahib.)

As a result, the only non-laughable promise vaccine advocates could make was that the shots would reduce the severity of infections.

This theory had one great virtue: unlike all the others, it was unfalsifiable, at least to any single vaccinated person.

Get jabbed, get Covid and get really sick? Such bad luck, it happens. Get that booster and walk away with a mild case? The vaccines, a miracle!

So do the mRNA shots provide any benefit against Covid at this point? (Forget their side effects.)

More than three years after mass vaccinations began, huge datasets prove they do not reduce infections in any meaningful way. The original two-shot regimen targeted a strain of Sars-Cov-2 that no longer exists. If boosters targeted at Omicron increase immunity, their added protection begins waning within weeks.

Meanwhile, the hospital outcome reports suggest the shots offer little if any protection to people whose infections progress until they need hospital admission.

So if the vaccines have value, it must be in the days after someone contracts Covid but before he gets really sick.

Is there a biologically possible reason they might offer that protection?

Yes.

Although the mRNAs were designed mainly to stimulate B-cells and antibody production, they also produce some T-cell response. Immunologists call that secondary response “cellular” immunity, as opposed to the “humoral” (blood) immunity of antibodies.

The T-cell response lasts longer than the antibody production – in part because T-cells tend to focus their attack on parts of the coronavirus that mutate more slowly than antibodies do. Further, T-cells are typically most important in the middle and late stages of infection – once the coronavirus takes hold and begins to reproduce in force in lung cells.

Still, a naturally infected person should also mount a T-cell attack within days. The point of the mRNAs was supposed to be that they would stop any initial infection from progressing, thanks to their overwhelming antibody response.

As I wrote yesterday, for a few months in 2021 after mass vaccinations began, the mRNAs did seem to work as advertised:

In the “happy vaccine valley” of spring and summer 2021, the mRNA jabs worked against Covid infection and Covid deaths also plunged.

But despite what the vaccine fanatics have claimed ever since, those halcyon months do not and cannot prove the shots prevent severe disease independent of their ability to stop infection.

They prove the opposite – if you don’t get Covid, you cannot die from it.

But as these new papers show, if you do, you can.

Vaccinated or not.

Notwithstanding my mistake yesterday, every word in those bolded sentences was true.

So what are vaccine advocates really claiming at this point?

They’re claiming that even though the mRNAs don’t work as they were designed to, they somehow drive a T-cell response in the weakest, oldest people (the most vulnerable to Covid) that offers a meaningful advantage over the response those people will produce in response to actual infection.

Further, they’re claiming that although the benefits of that response are invisible once vaccinees are hospitalized, they’re meaningful earlier.

Is that theory possible?

Anything’s possible.

It’s also possible that the mRNAs have not offered any protection against Covid at any stage of infection since early 2022, at the latest.

In that case, the big studies showing they do are artifacts of healthy vaccinee bias – the fact that people who get jabbed are provably healthier than those who do not.

The former story suggests the mRNAs, though flawed, remain helpful.

The latter suggests they have been effectively useless at least since late 2021 – all side effects and no upside, at a cost of tens of billions of dollars.

No points for guessing which story the people who’ve been desperately promoting the vaccines since the first shots went in arms in December 2020 would rather tell you.

As an Amazon Associate I Earn from Qualifying Purchases
-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
24 Comments
hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer
February 27, 2024 7:56 am

I would bet a thousand dollars that there is a correlation between IQ and risk of death from injecting untested compounds into your bloodstream.

Mary Christine
Mary Christine
  hardscrabble farmer
February 27, 2024 9:28 am

There is a difference between IQ and wisdom. There are a lot of PHDs out there who would not know wisdom if it hit them in the mouth.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Mary Christine
February 27, 2024 10:00 am

My brothers are very bright, and they buy the whole story. They have hard science degrees; one got 800 on his math SAT and went to MIT. One’s an emergency/trauma doc. Another’s a science teacher and math tutor. They’re all vaxed.

The doctor has a stent now. He thinks it’s from cheese, though he can still run two 8-minute miles with his late-fifties ankles, knees, hips, lungs, and stented heart.

Smart, they are. Right about pHARMakeia, they’re not. The doctor has even voted for Ron Paul, and felt that the lockdowns were insane, the masks sucked, and that no medicine should be coerced . . . and thinks you’re a fool to not vax.

IQ is not the alpha and the omega.

zappalives
zappalives
  Anonymous
February 27, 2024 10:51 am

Agree………….common sense and critical thinking skills coupled with a very healthy distrust of any central authority is a SURVIVOR’S trait.

Hardscrabble Farmer
Hardscrabble Farmer
  Anonymous
February 27, 2024 11:04 am

Then we need a word we can all agree on that reflects real intelligence, like common sense used to indicate.

An intelligent person would not have taken that shot.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Hardscrabble Farmer
February 27, 2024 11:14 am

At the least, they wouldn’t have leapt into such an extreme situation without pause. That knee-jerk salute to authority is dangerous, foolish, and frequently, criminal.

Rock Creeker
Rock Creeker
  Hardscrabble Farmer
February 27, 2024 7:54 pm

A critical thinker reflects true intelligence and would score high for not taking the jab.

GetSmart
GetSmart
  Anonymous
February 27, 2024 3:07 pm

IQ doesn’t measure credulity.
Or does it?
Hmm.

GetSmart
GetSmart
  Anonymous
February 27, 2024 3:10 pm

My brothers are very credentialed, and they buy the whole story.

Fixed it.
Being able to remember info does not make one bright.
Being able to identify correct info is the metric I would measure.

Joe Blow
Joe Blow
  Anonymous
February 27, 2024 4:13 pm

My brother is 77. Lives in Alaska. USAF grad, pilot, then grounded due to medical issues, went and got a MD.

Vaxxed, thinks I am mad for not. He still won’t leave his house either.

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
  Mary Christine
February 27, 2024 10:00 am

And MDs.

Hardscrabble Farmer
Hardscrabble Farmer
  Mary Christine
February 27, 2024 11:03 am

I said IQ not degree.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  hardscrabble farmer
February 27, 2024 9:49 am

I would take that bet.
Unless you mean an inverse correlation.

Hardscrabble Farmer
Hardscrabble Farmer
  Anonymous
February 27, 2024 11:05 am

I’m fairly certain you know what I was trying to convey.

m
m
  hardscrabble farmer
February 27, 2024 1:05 pm

That’s like saying you would bet the climate is changing

I’ll go out on a limb, and declare your correlation is slightly negative.

Anonymous
Anonymous
February 27, 2024 8:05 am

Hmm…
So they are suggesting that injecting toxic materials into humans tends to shorten their lives?

Who would have ever guessed!

zappalives
zappalives
February 27, 2024 8:30 am

Nearly every day another study comes out with more damning facts about the fake virus crisis.
Servile sheepnigger democrats who took the POISON and wanted to put me and my kind into unvaxxed camps are sensing the MORTAL DANGER they volunteered for.
Guess what ?
ZERO FUCKS GIVEN for jackoffs with blind obedience to the democrat party….the state and their beloved mega-corps.
Their mass compliance will prove to be a good thing when the last of them die off.

Mary Christine
Mary Christine
February 27, 2024 9:28 am

Doctors continue to be baffled.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Mary Christine
February 27, 2024 10:03 am

For money.

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
February 27, 2024 10:00 am

Seems the more important common denominator is going to the hospital, where they murder you rather than give you Ivermectin or other things to actually fight the issues.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  MrLiberty
February 27, 2024 11:18 am

Nurses have testified that they kept the ventilators on at many times above their customary operating pressure, blowing out people’s lungs, while sedating them and applying kidney-killing Remdesivir and disallowing visitation by loved ones. The criminal intent is clear.

The shocking testimony of the Covid-19 nurses

MORE:
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/?s=ventilators
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/?s=covid
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/?s=remdesivir

T4C
T4C
February 27, 2024 10:43 am

“You Are the Winners”

Scott Adams finally and unambiguously concludes that even the fanciest analytics are trumped by a heuristic based on instinctive distrust.

“The anti-vaxxers are clearly the winners at this point, and I think it will stay that way. And I don’t want to put any shade on that whatsoever. They came out the best. They have the winning position. The unvaccinated have an advantage. Because they feel better. The thing they’re not worrying about is what I have to worry about. I wonder if that vaccination five years from now.

“Because really, I think the antivaxxers were just really distrustful of big companies and big government. That’s never wrong! It’s never wrong to distrust government. It’s never wrong to distrust big companies. So if you just took the position let’s just distrust everything the government did, well, you won!

“You won, you won completely – I did not end up in the right place. Agreed? You would all agree with that, right? I did not end up in the right place. The right place would be natural immunity, no vaccination. You should take that as a victory, and I should take defeat. We could agree on that, right? That my position is now the weakest, and your position has gone from the weakest to the strongest, and we can just say that’s true. The people who didn’t get vaxxed are absolutely in the winning position.

“You win. You win! You are the winners. You are the winners. Let me say that part with no ambiguity. You won. You won. All of my fancy analytics got me to a bad place. All of your heuristics – don’t trust these guys, it’s obvious – totally worked.”– Scott Adams

It doesn’t really feel like winning, to be honest. But give Scott credit, as unlike most vaccinated individuals, he is willing to come out publicly and declare that he made the wrong decision, explain that the various bases for that decision were unreliable, and admit that he will have to live the rest of his life under the shadow of the possible adverse effects of that decision.

This is very important, not for the satisfaction of his critics, but for Scott himself, because now he knows he has to embark upon an early-detection regime for cancer and be careful to avoid activities that will elevate his heart rate to now-dangerous levels. And it’s also important for his fellow vaccinated, because perhaps failing this test will give them the wherewithal to pass the next one.

Because the next one is definitely coming, sooner or later.

The fundamental failure in Scott’s syllogism was the assumption that lay beneath his logic. He assumed, incorrectly, that scientistry and scientage could be trusted. This is quite common in those who fail to distinguish between the three aspects of science and don’t understand that scientistry is not only not scientody, but these days, does not necessarily have any connection to scientody at all.

The heuristic is even more clear, and even more obvious, for the Christian. Never, ever, trust the wicked. Not riding a black horse, not wearing a white coat.

m
m
  T4C
February 27, 2024 1:12 pm

Oh, great.
Fucking voxday also heard about it, 13 months later! {/facepalm}

Cartoonist Scott Adams: ‘The anti-vaxxers clearly won – you’re the winners!’

GCE
GCE
  T4C
February 27, 2024 1:44 pm

Ok, so we won? I don’t feel like a winner, because too many of my extended family, friends and neighbors all took the fagcines. I tried to warn all about a product that had NO LONG TERM TEST DATA, but was blown off as a conspiracy nut (particularly with my baby-boomer in-laws). I tried to fix stupid, but I forgot my mantra…”You can’t fix stupid”. Most of these people I know (who took the fagcines) don’t want to talk about it now, it’s “water under the bridge”, move on. I have, just waiting and praying (it’s Lent) for them.