Free Speech Either is – or it Isn’t

Guest Post by Eric Peters

Rand Paul has been defending free speech again – the bastard.

He says Americans – everyone – ought to be worried about their freedom to speak (more finely, to read and hear about things the government and corporations don’t want them to read and hear about) being arbitrated by government – and corporations.

But, the Chinese!

They own Tik Tok! Even though – as the senator has had to explain to those who already know better – the “Chinese” do not own Tik Tok. There are Chinese people who own part of it. As well as Americans. All of which is completely beside the point that Paul has been trying to make. Which is that it ought not to matter who owns Tik Tok if you are opposed to the government and corporations owning what you are allowed to read and hear and also to where and how you’re allowed to say what you think.

That is the danger. This “bipartisan” (naturally; when it comes to important things, the Uniparty is always bipartisan) effort to ban Tik Tok or place Tik Tok under a regime of official supervision has nothing to do with protecting Americans from the wily Chinese. It has everything to do with placing what Americans are allowed to say and read and hear under the supervision of the corrupt authorities in Washington. The same horrible people who framed people who questioned whether a “pandemic” was afoot when the facts (such as case fatality rates) indicated otherwise as “superspreaders” of “misinformation” are itching to frame anyone who disagrees with any of their narratives as even worse than that.

This talk of “threats to our democracy” being no small threat to those who resent being told what they must pretend to believe and what they are allowed and not allowed to say, hear or read.

Make no mistake, they are going for broke. Because they have no choice. Free speech and authoritarianism cannot co-exist. You can have one – or the other. You cannot have both at the same time – and the authoritarians know it.

It’s why they began – decades ago – to frame obviously odious speech as a threat, implicitly (and, inevitably, explicitly) warranting that it be suppressed. So as to set the precedent for general suppression of speech the authorities find odious.

For example, it is already a criminal act in several Western (sic) countries to “question” what the official history narratives say the National Socialist regime that ruled Germany in the ’30s and early ’40s of the last century did to Jews and other unfavored people in what was then the Reich.

Obviously, the National Socialist were horrible people.

Authoritarian socialism is always horrible because authoritarianism is always horrible. What was done to the Jews and other unfavorable people – including people the National Socialists interestingly referred to as “asocial” people, by which was meant people who resented the regimentation of authoritarian socialism – was horrible. But it is horrible to adopt the tactics of the National Socialists to suppress the speech of those whose speech makes some uncomfortable.

However in error – or obnoxious – a person’s speech may be, it is a much greater error (and far worse than merely obnoxious) to tell a person he is not free to speak; that others are not free to hear or read. Indeed, the doing so makes people suspect there may be something to what is being said; else why the heavy-handed efforts to suppress it?

See that business about “misinformation” regarding what wasn’t a “pandemic.” Keep in mind the dirty business – regarding the regime’s collusion with corporate media to keep people in the dark about the truth. Think about how eager they are to criminalize the telling of it – as has already undergone Beta Testing in California, where doctors who spoke freely – and honestly – with their patients about the drugs that were neither necessary nor “safe and effective” were subject to punishment for so doing.

The truth being no defense.

Is it offensive to “deny” the Holocaust? Many think so. Many also think it is offensive – and ought to be a punishable offense – to “deny” that the “climate” is “changing” and that a man who dresses like and pretends he is a woman actually is one.

This “China” thing is just another ought-to-be-obvious excuse, like the one about “terrorism” that was used as the excuse to terrorize Americans, who after nearly a quarter-century of it have mostly gotten used to it.

Which, of course, was always the point of it.

Just as the point of this effort to place Tik Tok under government-corporate supervision has never been about who owns Tik Tok nor what is beign purveyed by Tik Tok – which people aren’t being forced to view or listen to, it bears pointing out. It is about owning what Americans are allowed to think and say by turning over to government arbitrage what they are allowed to hear and see.

The fact that some of the very worst  people – e.g., Nancy Pelosi – are the people most strenuously in favor while some of the best – e.g., Rand Paul – are opposed ought to tell you everything you need to know.

As an Amazon Associate I Earn from Qualifying Purchases
-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
16 Comments
B_MC
B_MC
March 19, 2024 6:21 pm

German domestic intelligence services are now targeting political dissidents considered guilty of “delegitimising” the state, in yet another ominous development reminiscent of the DDR

The old DDR criminal code defined many offences unknown to Western liberal democracies. Foremost among these was the crime of “defaming the state.” You could spend up to two years in prison if you ventured publicly to “slander or defame” the “state order or state organs, institutions or … organisations, or their activities or members.”…

We were always told that, in the West, you can criticise your government and your politicians all you like. Only in the communist East was one denied such basic democratic freedoms.

As I’ve been documenting here, that is no longer the case. The pandemic appears to have broken something fundamental in German politics. Beginning with the Covid protests in 2021, the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV) took it upon themselves to define a new area of unconstitutional (and therefore potentially illegal) political agitation. This bears the cumbersome title of “Delegitimisation of the State,” and the concept has much in common with the DDR crime of state defamation.

https://www.eugyppius.com/p/german-domestic-intelligence-services-9b8

Anonymous
Anonymous
March 19, 2024 6:58 pm

We aren’t passing laws to protect chinese people from hurt feelings we are passing laws giving special protection to JEWS

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
March 19, 2024 7:48 pm

This has nothing to do with TikTok – how it’s run, who owns it, who gets its data, what ideas are promoted on it. It’s about establishing a law that gives the Attorney General the power to declare any media company to be acting in the interest of a foreign adversary. Once they do that, they can shut it down. They’ll probably use it first against Twitter, but it could even be used to shut down TBP.

zappalives
zappalives
March 19, 2024 7:53 pm

KTA

Aunt Acid
Aunt Acid
March 19, 2024 8:00 pm

“Make no mistake, they are going for broke. Because they have no choice. Free speech and authoritarianism cannot co-exist. You can have one – or the other. You cannot have both at the same time – and the authoritarians know it.”
– Eric Peters

The kernel of the matter indeed.

Universal masking was the programme devised for obedience training as well as humiliation, also in part to stifle speech LITERALLY.

Tell them ALL . like the tagger at the sign in the photo above:

comment image

and be prepared to back it up against the biggest MOB in the world: so be careful.

49%mfer
49%mfer
March 19, 2024 9:23 pm

“Well, what are you going to do about it, whitey? Just sit there?”

Indeed.

lamont cranston
lamont cranston
March 19, 2024 9:34 pm

TT is domiciled in the Grand Caymans. 80% is Amer. owned….BlackRock/Vanguard/State Street et al, being the main owners here.

Anonymous
Anonymous
March 19, 2024 9:39 pm

No one cared about tik tok until it was being used extensively to show zionist genocide against Palestinians. A whole lot of people are waking up to the JQ.

javelin
javelin
  Anonymous
March 20, 2024 6:15 am

Just for the sake of truth and not getting into the zion sentiments:

It was actually Trump who first tried to ban TikTok because of Chinese accessibility to user records/info- this was in 2020.
In 2022 the US government banned use of TikTok on any phones of govt employees.
This movement for govt using “national security” to over-reach into controlled speech has been going on since 2022 when Trump’s original bill was amended to increase govt control overall and not TikTok specific.
All of this of course pre-dates Israel’s invasion/retribution/whatever against Gaza.

The Central Scrutinizer
The Central Scrutinizer
  javelin
March 20, 2024 8:17 am

Thank you for your restraint and common sense.

Elder Son
Elder Son
March 19, 2024 11:36 pm

comment image

comment image

Andrew Torba is correct. The power is not in the paper, the power is in the ideas and those ideas have been adulterated and perverted wherever they haven’t been abandoned. Neither the words nor the ideas have ever applied in any way to newcomers, immigrants, citizens, illegals, invaders, foreigners, or the children of those diverse peoples, they only ever applied to the Posterity of the Founders, the direct genetic blood descendants of the men who fought the American Revolution against their British brethren for independence from the King of England.

The Constitution was written to safeguard the liberties of the sons and daughters of the American Revolution and no one else. That’s what the Preamble to it says and that’s literally what Posterity meant. And that’s what it still means today, the legalistic fantasies of the would-be inclusive midwits who overrate the importance of their credentials and their own cognitive capabilities notwithstanding.

The smallest minority in America today are the direct descendants of the Founding Rebels.

Most Americans are Paper Americans or descendants of Paper Americans or Mongreled.

Voltara
Voltara
March 20, 2024 3:16 am

“Free speech” is a ruling class strategy to create division. You have never been allowed to speak freely on any real issue

The Central Scrutinizer
The Central Scrutinizer
  Voltara
March 20, 2024 8:19 am

If either of your parents ever slapped you for speaking out of turn?

You already know everything you’ll ever need to know about “free speech”.

OutOfTime
OutOfTime
March 20, 2024 5:12 am

I am fed misinformation every time I see an ad for a new drug, or youth serum or car. I trust that those distributors of misinformation will be severely punished as well.

The Central Scrutinizer
The Central Scrutinizer
  OutOfTime
March 20, 2024 8:23 am

Terribly sorry, old chap. This is the Ministry of Funny Hats . I believe you’re looking for the Ministry of Truth! Two doors down from the Ministry of Funny Walks.

Well? Crack on then!

Anonymous
Anonymous
March 20, 2024 9:23 am

Tic Toc has never been a problem for me, it has never been on and will never be on any device I own.

Now if we go full 1984 and they put Tic Toc an a screen on my wall that watches me and can never be shut off, then it needs to be shut down.