Seven Things You May Not Know About Coal

Seven Things You May Not Know About Coal

By Marin Katusa, Chief Energy Investment Strategist

The days of tossing another lump on the fire to keep warm are behind most of us, but coal is still vital to keep our modern computers, air conditioners, and even cars humming. How much do you know about one of the world’s most indispensable commodities?

#1. Before turning into coal, layers of ancient swamp bed transition through another familiar carbon compound in as little as 9,000 years. That’s peat.

In the right conditions, high pressures and temperatures below Earth’s crust can turn organic material from ages-old swampy sediments into coal. But before that happens, the material passes through an intermediate stage that the Irish made famous. Peat is coal in the making, and as most everyone knows, it burns too. (For connoisseurs among us of the single malt, peat also helps give Islay scotches their distinctive flavor.)

There are also different kinds of coal itself. They vary in their content of water, carbon, and other ingredients, and in the time it takes to fashion them as well. The hardest coal, called anthracite, requires on the order of millions of years to form. That’s a long way from peat.

#2. A single percentage-point improvement in the efficiency of a coal-fired power plant results in a 2-3% reduction in CO2emissions.

Facilities that convert coal into power currently generate 41% of the world’s electricity, according to the World Coal Association. At about 43%, the United States rates about average. But the world’s second-largest economy, China, depends on coal for 81% of its electricity; and with nearly as many people, India depends on coal for 68%. A few countries rely almost completely on burning coal to make power—South Africa (94%) and Poland (86%), for example.

Small surprise, then, that a lot of research has been devoted to reducing the carbon emissions and other pollutants that result from combusting coal. Once it’s mined, washing it to remove impurities can reduce ash by more than 50%, while also removing much of the sulfur that causes acid rain. Grinding lumps into powder makes the coal burn more efficiently as well as quickly. In smokestack exhaust, filters capture soot and more ash, and scrubbers capture mercury and more sulfur.

We’ve come a long way from Victorian London and its noxious yellow fog. But there are strong incentives to keep at it. The return on improvements is still significant, as you can see above.

Furthermore, coal’s vital role in power generation is likely to be around for a long time yet—most predictions even set it as increasing slightly in the next few decades. With all the talk about natural gas and alternative energies, coal still provides the always-on, baseload type of power that’s so hard to replace.

#3. Unlike many commodities, the prices we refer to for coal come directly from negotiations between producers and consumers.

In the oil sector, you’ll see prices quoted that benchmarks like West Texas Intermediate or Brent Sea Crude are bringing on the market. You may see a spot price and a contract price for uranium.

However, coal prices aren’t standardized like that. Instead, they’re set by whatever bargain a producer can drive with a consumer (or the other way around, for that matter).

To track the coal market, there are a few key negotiations we watch. For metallurgical coal, the most important contract price is that between Australian producers and Japanese steelmakers. There’s a much larger array of contracts for thermal coal—the kind power companies use to generate electricity—but most observers keep their eyes on Indonesian export prices.

#4. The world’s fastest-growing coal importer is… China? Nope: India.

This is a great example of tricky wording that’s possible with statistics. China and Japan both import more coal than India, and China’s rankings at the top tier of coal consumption and overall growth put it in the driver’s seat of increased global demand. But the world’s fastest-growing coal importer is India.

Just look at the last couple of years. From 2011 to 2012, India increased its production from 585 to 595 million tons (Mt)—but at the same time, it had to increase imports from 105 to 160 Mt in order to meet domestic demand. India has been on that track for several years now, and it isn’t expected to get off anytime soon.

The reason why is widespread inefficiency. New coal projects face delays in regulatory approval—and once they do get approval, they face challenges that range from resettlement to opposition based on environmental concerns. Then there’s inefficiency in moving coal where it needs to go around the country. By some estimates, half of coal transports are affected by rail capacity that isn’t implemented properly.

The result: power companies have to import coal just to make sure they can keep the lights on.

#5. The number of Indonesian billionaires has almost tripled since 2010 to 29.

Australia was the world’s largest coal exporter for a long time. It’s been overtaken by Indonesia, however, first in thermal-coal exports and now in total exports. The land above the Land Down Under exported 52% of the world’s coal in 2012, the latest year for which global figures are available.

Indeed, Indonesia has huge reserves of thermal coal, totaling 4.5 billion tons at the end of 2013. Plus, the country has one major advantage over Australia: location. It’s almost half the distance from the largest coal importers—China, India, South Korea, and Taiwan. And with friendlier regulatory hoops to jump through, Indonesian companies have been able to build basic infrastructure, such as conveyor belts, railways, and ports, more easily and quickly.

What do all these delightful facts have to do with billionaires in Indonesia? Most owe their wealth either directly or indirectly to commodities. The coal sector has created a marked change in Indonesia’s wealth, a nation of 247 million relatively poor people. A retail boom started taking off even as the rest of the world reeled from the 2008 economic crisis; segments of its real-estate market rose 30% just in the last year.

This may be a difficult trend to keep up, though. China is considering legislation to ban the import of coal with a caloric content (a measure of energy it contains) below 3,900 kilocalories per kilogram. This is the kind of coal typically burned in low-tech, “dirty” power plants—and the kind that most often comes to China from Indonesia. In contrast, most thermal coal from Australia, North America, and Russia rates above the 3,900 kcal/kg floor.

#6. The long-term picture sees the world needing an additional 500 million tons of metallurgical coal annually by 2030—a 200% increase from today.

Again, China is a major driver. In 2012 China’s steelmaking industry consumed 581 million tons of metallurgical coal (AKA “met” coal and coking coal), an increase of 8% in a single year even as signs emerged that its economy was slowing. China had to import 71 tons of it.

China is far from alone, however. Brazil has been busy building major infrastructure, stadiums, and housing in preparation for the 2014 World Cup and the 2016 Summer Olympics. Japan has plenty of rebuilding to do, and consumption of met coal is rising in India along with its needs for thermal coal. And let’s not forget South Korea: Home to the world’s second-largest shipbuilding industry, it consumes the most met coal on a per-capita basis on the planet.

In the face of all this demand, supply is markedly constrained. Only five countries in the world export significant amounts of metallurgical coal: Australia, Canada, the United States, Russia, and Indonesia. The global recession forced several producers to shelve plans to expand mines, and good, new discoveries are few and far between.

#7. It’s not just floods in Australia—labor issues and looming higher taxes on coal are putting pressure on coal prices as well.

The 2010 floods that inundated coal mines, washed out railroads, and shut down port facilities in Australia may have been news to the rest of the world, but Australians know they’re not that uncommon. It doesn’t take much to disrupt supply of a commodity that’s in high demand.

Expect labor issues to nag the industry as well. For example, thousands in Turkey have gone on strike to protest unsafe working conditions after an explosion in a coal mine killed more than 300 miners in mid-May. Australia’s top coal transporter Aurizon Holdings Ltd. is seeking to end more than a dozen union agreements after a year of negotiations with workers have fallen through. These are just a couple of examples.

Then there are the taxes that will only increase on the world’s two largest suppliers of coal.

Increased demand and tightening supply… sounds like a situation we investors like to get in on.

Take the Lead… We Make It Simple

On Thursday, May 22, we’ll publish the brand-new monthly issue of the Casey Energy Report, and most of it is about coal. We haven’t recommended coal companies in a while, but the sector looks so promising now that you’d waste an opportunity for great profits if you didn’t get in now. Our coal company pick for this month is a good-size coal producer with very limited downside and excellent upside potential.

You can find out all about it by giving the Casey Energy Report a try. It comes with a free one-year subscription to our Casey Energy Dividends newsletter (a $79 value), and you risk nothing by test driving it. If you don’t like it or don’t make any money within your first three months, just cancel within that time for a full, prompt refund. Even if you miss the cutoff, you can cancel anytime for a prorated refund on the unused part of your subscription. Click here to get started.

You don’t have to travel 300+ days a year to discover the best energy investments in the world—we do it for you.

The article Seven Things You May Not Know About Coal was originally published at caseyresearch.com.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
13 Comments
crazyivan
crazyivan
May 22, 2014 9:16 pm

What about charcoal lighter fluid? That should be a worry also.

Roy
Roy
May 22, 2014 10:28 pm

This site has enough clutter without adding Casey Research crap. When we devolve to cannibalism I hope they eat these hucksters first.

SSS
SSS
May 23, 2014 12:37 am

“This site has enough clutter without adding Casey Research crap.”
—-Roy

What other clutter are you talking about, Roy? Your comments?

Did you learn anything new about coal, Roy? I did. Then again, I like to clutter my mind new information. Silly me.

Stucky
Stucky
May 23, 2014 12:48 am

#8…. If you eat at Wendy’s, you can shit coal.

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
May 23, 2014 2:08 am

We could mass produce the Wendy’s coal. We get a thousand 61 year old Austrians to commit micro aggression against 1,000 NIGGAZ-tatted darkies…

Kill Bill
Kill Bill
May 23, 2014 9:28 am

Coal ash is also radioactive.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/coal-ash-is-more-radioactive-than-nuclear-waste/

And no one wants to buy that.

Roy
Roy
May 23, 2014 9:59 am

SSS claims to have a BS in Political Science from the US Air Force Academy. All other Service Academies graduate only engineers. All other Political Science degrees are BA’s. The AF claims a BS is justified because of other science included in the curriculum. A lowering of standards results in people like SSS being placed in positions of authority.

A Political Science degree is pretty much useless for employment except for Government. SSS being unable to live on his AF retirement choose the only option available to him, double dip to another tax payer funded employment. The following excerpt from Chris Hedges partially describes people like SSS:

“ Most institutions have a propensity to promote mediocrities, those whose primary strengths are knowing where power lies, being subservient and obsequious to the centers of power and never letting morality get in the way of one’s career. The military is the worst in this respect. In the military, whether at the Paris Island boot camp or West Point, you are trained not to think but to obey. What amazes me about the military is how stupid and bovine its senior officers are. Those with brains and the willingness to use them seem to be pushed out long before they can rise to the senior-officer ranks. The many Army generals I met over the years not only lacked the most rudimentary creativity and independence of thought but nearly always saw the press, as well as an informed public, as impinging on their love of order, regimentation, unwavering obedience to authority and single-minded use of force to solve complex problems.” http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article37535.htm

In an earlier post SSS said he would be buried at Arlington. Isn’t that special. Arlington was Robert E Lee’s plantation which was taken over by the government as a National Cemetery. Once again SSS demonstrates his selfish egotism by using prime agriculture land rather than being cremated and having his ashes replenish the earth.

I believe he learned something from the post as a void is easily filled.

SSS
SSS
May 23, 2014 12:40 pm

“The AF claims a BS is justified because of other science included in the curriculum. A lowering of standards results in people like SSS being placed in positions of authority.”
—-Roy

Semester length courses on my college transcript: college algebra and trigonometry, analytical geometry, inorganic chemistry, organic chemistry, engineering drawing, applied physics (2 semesters), differential calculus, integrated calculus, electrical engineering (2 semesters), aeronautical engineering (2 semesters), astronomy, mechanical engineering (2 semesters), and astronautical engineering.

Throw in multiple law, economics, history, literature, and language courses ON TOP OF all the political science courses I took, and it comes out to 163 credit hours in 4 years. That’s MORE than the equivalent of 5 years of college.

Now then, you were saying something about “lowering of standards” for people like me, Roy. Would you care to elaborate further?

Roy
Roy
May 23, 2014 1:03 pm

The title of the course may or may not be related to the content of the course. Although anecdotal my experience with Academy graduates was the Navy produced the highest quality officers although there are exceptions (McCain). I was commissioned one year before the first AF Academy class graduated and they were mostly a bunch of Prima Donnas. Many officers felt building an AF Academy was a waste of money as well as separating the AF from the Army in 1947. .

Stucky
Stucky
May 23, 2014 2:00 pm

Upon graduating with honors from the Academy, SSS then joined the CIA and took even more courses;

[imgcomment image[/img]

… where he also graduated with honors;
[imgcomment image[/img]

Stucky
Stucky
May 23, 2014 2:02 pm

SSS’s accomplishments were recently published ….

[imgcomment image[/img]

SSS
SSS
May 23, 2014 6:50 pm

Stucky

I just mailed you a coupon for Wendy’s. Buy one Triple Baconator, get one free. It’s only good for Wendy’s stores in the Plainfield NJ area, so I can’t use it. Enjoy.

“The title of the course may or may not be related to the content of the course.”
—-Roy @ SSS

Ya got me, you slick devil. The textbook for my “Differential Calculus” course was filled with Grimm’s Fairy Tales.

Roy
Roy
May 24, 2014 9:40 am

“Ya got me, you slick devil. The text book for my “Differential Calculus” course was filled with “Grimm’s Fairy Tales/” SSS @ Roy

“Grimm’s Fairy Tales” is certainly an appropriate training and indoctrination manual for our future Military leaders. Was it used in other courses? Did they also use “Aesop’s Fables” and “Jack and the Beanstalk”? A belief in magic beans is almost mandatory. Glad to see you learned well and benefited from your Academy training.