Guest Post by Michael SnyderDid you know that the United Nations intends to have biometric identification cards in the hands of every single man, woman and child on the entire planet by the year 2030? And did you know that a central database in Geneva, Switzerland will be collecting data from many of these cards? Previously, I have written about the 17 new “Global Goals” that the UN launched at the end of September. Even after writing several articles about these new Global Goals, I still don’t think that most of my readers really grasp how insidious they actually are. This new agenda truly is a template for a “New World Order”, and if you dig into the sub-points for these new Global Goals you find some very alarming things.
For example, Goal 16.9 sets the following target…
“By 2030, provide legal identity for all, including birth registration”
The United Nations is already working hard toward the implementation of this goal – particularly among refugee populations. The UN has partnered with Accenture to implement a biometric identification system that reports information “back to a central database in Geneva”. The following is an excerpt from an article that was posted on findbiometrics.com…
The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) is moving forward with its plans to use biometric technology to identify and track refugees, and has selected a vendor for the project. Accenture, an international technology services provider, has won out in the competitive tendering process and will oversee the implementation of the technology in a three-year contract.
The UNHCR will use Accenture’s Biometric Identity Management System (BIMS) for the endeavor. BIMS can be used to collect facial, iris, and fingerprint biometric data, and will also be used to provide many refugees with their only form of official documentation. The system will work in conjunction with Accenture’s Unique Identity Service Platform (UISP) to send this information back to a central database in Geneva, allowing UNHCR offices all over the world to effectively coordinate with the central UNHCR authority in tracking refugees.
I don’t know about you, but that sure does sound creepy to me.
And these new biometric identification cards will not just be for refugees. According to a different FindBiometrics report, authorities hope this technology will enable them to achieve the UN’s goal of having this kind of identification in the hands of every man, woman and child on the planet by the year 2030…
A report synopsis notes that about 1.8 billion adults around the world currently lack any kind of official documentation. That can exclude those individuals from access to essential services, and can also cause serious difficulties when it comes to trans-border identification.
That problem is one that Accenture has been tackling in collaboration with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, which has been issuing Accenture-developed biometric identity cards to populations of displaced persons in refugee camps in Thailand, South Sudan, and elsewhere. The ID cards are important for helping to ensure that refugees can have access to services, and for keeping track of refugee populations.
Moreover, the nature of the deployments has required an economically feasible solution, and has demonstrated that reliable, biometric ID cards can affordably be used on a large scale. It offers hope for the UN’s Sustainable Development Goal of getting legal ID into the hands of everyone in the world by the year 2030 with its Identification for Development (ID4D) initiative.
The Identification for Development (ID4D) initiative was originally launched by the World Bank, and they are proud to be working side by side with the UN to get “legal identity” into the hands of all. The following comes from the official website of the World Bank…
Providing legal identity for all (including birth registration) by 2030 is a target shared by the international community as part of the Sustainable Development Goals (target 16.9). The World Bank Group (WBG) has launched the Identification for Development (ID4D) cross-practice initiative, with the participation of seven GP/CCSAs sharing the same vision and strategic objectives, to help our client countries achieve this goal and with the vision of making everyone count: ensure a unique legal identity and enable digital ID-based services to all.
Of course all of this is being framed as a “humanitarian” venture right now, but will it always stay that way?
At some point will a universal biometric ID be required for everyone, including you and your family?
And what would happen if you refused to take it?
I could definitely foresee a day when not having “legal identification” would disqualify you from holding a job, getting a new bank account, applying for a credit card, qualifying for a mortgage, receiving any form of government payments, etc. etc.
At that point, anyone that refused to take a “universal ID” would become an outcast from society.
What the elite want to do is to make sure that everyone is “in the system”. And it is a system that they control and that they manipulate for their own purposes. That is one of the reasons why they are slowly but surely discouraging the use of cash all over the world.
In Sweden, this movement has already become so advanced that they are now pulling ATMs out of even the most rural locations…
The Swedish government abetted by its fractional-reserve banking system is moving relentlessly toward a completely cashless economy. Swedish banks have begun removing ATMs even in remote rural areas, and according to Credit Suisse the rule of thumb in Scandinavia is “If you have to pay in cash, something is wrong.” Since 2009 the average annual value of notes and coins in circulation in Sweden has fallen more than 20 percent from over 100 billion to 80 billion kronor. What is driving this movement to destroy cash is the desire to unleash the Swedish central bank to drive the interest rate down even further into negative territory. Currently, it stands at -0.35 percent, but the banks have not passed this along to their depositors, because depositors would simply withdraw their cash rather than leave it in banks and watch its amount shrink inexorably toward zero. However, if cash were abolished and bank deposits were the only form of money, well then there would be no limit on negative interest rate policy as banks would be able to pass these negative interest rates onto their depositors without adverse consequences. With everyone’s wages, salaries, dividends etc, paid by direct deposit into his bank account, the only way to escape negative interest rates would be to spend, spend, spend. This, of course, is precisely what the Keynesian economists advising governments and running central banks are aiming at….a pro-cash resistance movement is beginning to coalesce and the head of a security industry lobbying group relates, “I’ve heard of people keeping cash in their microwaves because banks won’t accept it.”
If you aren’t using cash, that means that all of your economic activity is going through the banks where it can be watched, tracked, monitored and regulated.
Every time the elite propose something for our “good”, it somehow always results in them having more power and more control.
I hope that people will wake up and see what is happening. Major moves toward a one world system are taking place right in front of our eyes, and yet I hear very, very few people talking about any of this.
So solly …. Mr. Snyder is full of shit, as is often the case.
1. What the UN wants and what the UN gets are two ENTIRELY different things altogether. Isn’t one of the UN’s goals to end world conflict? Bwaahahahaha
2. The UN is composed of a bunch of effeminate fag boys, incompetent and impotent. Who the fuck cares what the UN says??
3. Snyder is a born again nutter who views Revelation as LITERAL. As such, he looks for “news” that matches his idea of end times. In this particular case, he is grasping at straws to match the idea in Revelation that every human on earth will receive the Mark Of the Beast. Clear thinking people would do well to ignore him. However, if you’re a Fundy, you probably hang on every word this charlatan says.
Never. Going. To. Happen.
Think Putin, or even Xio, are going to sign up for this? They are the fly in the ointment of the IMF, World Bank, and UN at every turn.
Creating fear feeds the bastards coming up with this shit.
Opt out. Quit eating their poisons, get a good filter and remove those poisons too, quit signing up for the toxic death meds that are advertised 24/7. Oh yeah, quit watching the damned tv and quit logging into Facebook to tell the world about whatever minutia you think the “world” gives a flying flip about.
You think those living in shanty towns are going to walk around with Biometric cards? You think the UN is going to be able to get the US to fund the billions and billions this will cost?
You think it freaking matters? I no longer do. A dying Cabal and their dreams of death and domination is grasping at straws to keep us afraid and in line.
2030 is a long, long, time from now. And Mr. Snyder truly doesn’t know what he speaks of.
The World Bank Group (WBG) has….
Well, guess that ends the who is freer than who feces flangst….
Splain to me how biometric id will be processed as the survivors huddle around burning trash cans roasting rat and dog for dinner.
I thought ID was rascist?
When FB first appeared, I said interesting name. Names DO mean something and as the phones and tablets and monitors all came equipped with cameras , I said they want everyone on FB so the elites can collect the biometric data they want for their database.
If I had to bet who wins this, I would put my money on the elites……..2030 is just around the corner.
SMILE….. You’re On Candid Camera
The U.N. has a massive worldwide vaccine program, one that would be readily adopted by governments that promote mandatory vaccinations of their populations and accepted by those that don’t but are too weak and dependent to object to it.
A biometric ID system in the form af a DNA altering vaccine that provides a unique genetic marker on its subjects is not unrealistic. I can easily see that being implemented since it would be universal and readily used by any country in any situation whatever be it war or peace with the newly emerging instant DNA readers that are as cheap and portable as cell phones.
If they don’t do it by 2030, they’ll do it eventually. I don’t know who “they” is. Could be the computers. I’m more concerned about artificial intelligence than the UN.
I’d need two chips – my cock is so huge!
Hey Stucky , give Michael a break. You were once just like him.Now you’re just a ???????
STUCKY
“I like the cut of your jib.”
Stucky- Dutchman is challenging your 12 inch python as best in show. What say you?
Bea
Dutchman said he needs two chips ….. those chips are less than 1cm long …. so, in truth, Dutchman has a teenie tiny weenie.
@Stucky: You know I’m an immigrant, and the though polize could arrest you for making slurs about my trouser snake!
Most of the time I go out without a cell phone. I’ve switched to cash for at least 80% of my purchases. I have never been on FB.
Does that mean “they” can’t track me, no I suspect they still could if they wanted to , it’s just that I don’t make it easy for them.
Mark of the beast. Truly.
It’ll never happen.
As the John Birch Society has said so well for all these years now: “Get us OUT of the U.N.”
Bet our SSN’s are already used for much of this, probably as income streams to guarantee debt no less. All effective managers, manage numbers. When everybody has a number, we can relax and enjoy effective management.
ASIG, I am with you . Never been on FecesBook because I do not knowingly deal with crooks and Zuckerburglar is a crook.
I also buy mostly with cash. In my case it is not even about being tracked but it is my big FU to the financial institutions. My bank accounts are with small and local guys..credit union and small bank.
And this is thing will never happen…. Although anyone that travels internationally already has something that is very close to that – your passport… Because in today’s world governments like to share. Of course what they share is not theirs but they are a very giving bunch.
What the fuck are they waiting for? Do it now, fer christsakes. Start with the muzzies with guns and work your way next to the yankees with guns. It should work out beautifully.
ASIG, Aheinousanus:
Not having a FB profile can lead to problems for you (more so for the younger people). Many HR departments use FB as a quick check of possible candidates ‘suitability’ (I’ve heard some even detract points for lack of profile – considered to be suspicious) – so much for the anti-discrimination movement.
Also, FB can act as a secondary check against identity theft (i know it’s a stretch but bear with me, I thought it was BS too until talking to a particularly security conscious sys-admin).
Although not meant as a means of verifying one’s identity, it can be used to support getting ‘pseudo-ID’ like library cards, gym memberships. With sufficient ‘pseudo-IDs’ and a couple of pieces of mail you can start climbing up the ID ladder towards more difficult to obtain identification (just consider how inept the average – or even top 5% – bureaucrat is). Having a FB profile, regardless of use, operates as a placeholder for you, gives you an added line of defense in the event of ID theft. Just don’t post anything public and keep a generic profile picture.
One example of how FB is being used as a ‘verification’ of identity online:
http://www.theguardian.com/money/blog/2014/nov/14/airbnb-wont-let-book-room-facebook-friends
I imagine as technology progresses (and BS ‘Cybercrime’ bills become more common), FB (or the next ‘social’-network) will gain legal approval for this type of use. The airbnb example is frightening because it could have financial repercussions if a fake-profile verified guest trashed the place – even just the time/money to fight a false claim. Plus, given the role FB plays in PoPo ‘investigations’, it’s entirely conceivable that a faked profile would be sufficient for the gorillas to boot down your door and kill your dog in the name of crime.
Personally I only use mine to post about how invasive and despicable FB is, along with every article I can find on the crock called internet.org, but use polite language so as not to upset the FB overlords.