Huge Fukushima Cover-Up Exposed, Government Scientists In Meltdown

Submitted by Sean Adl-Tabatabai via InvestmentWatchBlog.com,

Fukushima radiation just off the North American coast is higher now than it has ever been, and government scientists and mainstream press are scrambling to cover-up and downplay the ever-increasing deadly threat that looms for millions of Americans. 

Following the March 2011 meltdown at Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, reactors have sprayed immeasurable amounts of radioactive material into the air, most of which settled into the Pacific Ocean. A study by the American Geophysical Union has found that radiation levels from Alaska to California have increased and continue to increase since they were last taken.

Naturalnews.com reports:

The highest levels yet of radiation from the disaster were found in a sample taken 2,500 kilometers (approx. 1,550 miles) west of San Francisco.

 

“Safe” according to whom?

 

Lead researcher Ken Buesseler of Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution was one of the first people to begin monitoring Fukushima radiation in the Pacific Ocean, with his first samples taken three months after the disaster started. In 2014, he launched a citizen monitoring effort – Our Radioactive Ocean – to help collect more data on ocean-borne radioactivity.

 

The researchers track Fukushima radiation by focusing on the isotope Cesium-134, which has a half-life of only two years. All Cesium-134 in the ocean likely comes from the Fukushima disaster. In contrast, Cesium-137 – also released in huge quantities from Fukushima – has a half-life of 30 years, and persists in the ocean, not just from Fukushima, but also from nuclear tests conducted as far back as the 1950s.

 

The most recent study added 110 new Cesium-134 samples to the ongoing studies. These samples were an average of 11 Becquerels per cubic meter of sea water, a level 50 percent higher than other samples taken so far.

 

Instead of presenting the findings as an alarming sign of growing radiation, however, Buesseler emphasizes that the Cesium-134 levels detected are still 500 times lower than the drinking water limits set by the U.S. government. The news site The Big Wobble questions whether Buesseler and Woods Hole’s heavy financial reliance on the U.S. government – Woods Hole has received nearly $8 million in research funding from several government agencies – plays any role in this emphasis.

 

Situation still worsening

 

The reality, however, is that radiation along the West Coast is expected to keep getting worse. According to a 2013 study by the Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center in Norway, the oceanic radiation plume released by Fukushima is likely to hit the North American West Coast in force in 2017, with levels peaking in 2018. Most of the radioactive material from the disaster is likely to stay concentrated on the western coast through at least 2026.

 

According to professor Michio Aoyama of Japan’s Fukushima University Institute of Environmental Radioactivity, the amount of radiation from Fukushima that has now reached North America is probably nearly as much as was spread over Japan during the initial disaster.

 

The recent Woods Hole study also confirmed that radioactive material is still leaking into the Pacific Ocean from the crippled Fukushima plant. Cesium-134 levels off the Japanese coast are between 10 and 100 times higher than those detected off the coast of California.

 

Without directly challenging the U.S. government’s “safe” radiation limits, Buesseler obliquely references the fact that any radioactive contamination of the ocean is cause for concern.

 

“Despite the fact that the levels of contamination off our shores remain well below government-established safety limits for human health or to marine life,” he said, “the changing values underscore the need to more closely monitor contamination levels across the Pacific.”

*  *  *

Don’t worry though Olympians, everything will be fine in a few billion or so years.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
13 Comments
card802
card802
December 20, 2015 7:36 am

“…government-established safety limits for human health or to marine life.”

What’s to worry about.

Anonymous
Anonymous
December 20, 2015 8:18 am

I’m seeing very little information presented here other than general talk about something that has no data presentedalong with it.

The only data I’m seeing is that the radiation in question is over 1.500 miles away from us.

I’d like to see some more actual data presented as a basis for forming an opinion about it.

Maggie
Maggie
December 20, 2015 9:13 am

#5 of the most censored stories 2014

http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-fukushima-endgame/5420188

First published in December 17, 2014.

This article by Professor Michel Chossudovsky was granted the 2015 Project Censored Award.

Ranked No. 5 among the 25 most censored news stories.

Nuclear radiation resulting from the March 2011 Fukushima disaster –which threatens life on planet earth– is not front page news in comparison to the most insignificant issues of public concern, including the local level crime scene or the tabloid gossip reports on Hollywood celebrities.

The shaky political consensus both in Japan, the U.S. and Western Europe is that the crisis at Fukushima has been contained.

The truth is otherwise. Known and documented, the ongoing dumping of highly radioactive water into the Pacific Ocean constitutes a potential trigger to a process of global radioactive contamination.

This water contains plutonium 239 and its release into the Ocean has both local as well as global repercussions. A microgram of plutonium if inhaled, according to Dr. Helen Caldicott, can cause death:

Certain isotopes of radioactive plutonium are known as some of the deadliest poisons on the face of the earth. A mere microgram (a speck of darkness on a pinhead) of Plutonium-239, if inhaled, can cause death, and if ingested, radioactive Plutonium can be harmful, causing leukemia and other bone cancers.

“In the days following the 2011 earthquake and nuclear plant explosions, seawater meant to cool the nuclear power plants instead carried radioactive elements back to the Pacific ocean. Radioactive Plutonium was one of the elements streamed back to sea.” (decodescience.com).

Wip
Wip
December 20, 2015 10:12 am

Well, Reverse Engineer wasn’t just whistling Dixie was he.

I see 7 million dead people. I think he was off by just a bit.

Maggie
Maggie
December 20, 2015 10:40 am

I submitted the story from Global Research to Admin to post here if he will. The fact is that this is an ongoing disaster that is highly censored in teh news.

WHY? If the news agencies really are so environmentally aware and ready to blame MAN for the destruction of the environment, why doesn’t this story get more coverage?

robert h siddell jr
robert h siddell jr
December 20, 2015 11:55 am

Fukushima is just some canned fish meat compared to the 99 nuke plants in America; 23 are the GE lemon variety that blew up; every plant is a Terrorist target using mortars and rockets. Also, some people have written that many would blow up in an EMP attack; and of course, all out war, and send tons of radioactive waste into the sky. PS: Russian big nukes will explode about a mile high to wipe out cities with the heat and shock waves; that would not pollute like our reactor explosions (on the ground of course).

SSS
SSS
December 20, 2015 12:37 pm

Much ado about nothing.

“In contrast, Cesium-137 – also released in huge quantities from Fukushima – has a half-life of 30 years, and persists in the ocean, not just from Fukushima, but also from nuclear tests conducted as far back as the 1950s.”
—-from the article

Hmmm. Cesium-137 still persists in the ocean from nuclear tests in the 1950s, yet has a half-life of 30 years. 1955 plus 30 = 1985. And another 30 = today. I think we’ve hit the “So what?” factor regarding Cesium-137 in the ocean from above ground nuclear tests. Pffft. And it’s gone.

IndenturedServant
IndenturedServant
December 20, 2015 1:03 pm

Maggie asked:
“WHY? If the news agencies really are so environmentally aware and ready to blame MAN for the destruction of the environment, why doesn’t this story get more coverage?”

Probably because they have no idea how to fix the problem at Fukushima. My understanding is that one or more of the cores has melted completely through the containment vessels AND the foundations of the buildings they’re in and cannot be located. There is also no way to stop the flow of contaminated water into the ocean.

The govt/media has nothing to gain by openly talking about a problem they can’t fix. Now if they could figure out how to profit from it………………

SSS
SSS
December 20, 2015 1:15 pm

“Fukushima is just some canned fish meat compared to the 99 nuke plants in America; 23 are the GE lemon variety that blew up ….”
—-robert h siddell jr

Did I miss something? Another government cover-up? Which 23 nuclear plants of the “GE lemon variety,” here or anywhere else, have blown up? Keeping in mind that Chernobyl was a Soviet-designed and built plant with no shield around the reactor (now that wasn’t very smart, was it?), names, places, and dates of explosions, please? Thank you for your attention to this urgent matter, Bobby.

P.S. I think the number of operable nuclear plants in the U.S. is just north of 100, 102 or 103 to be exact.

ottomatik
ottomatik
December 20, 2015 2:36 pm

I am blessed to live far from any, the closest is 5 or 6 hundred miles down wind jet stream wise, thank goodness.
SSS- Apologies for straying off topic and do not respond if inappropriate, What do you make of Colby’s boating accident?

Westcoaster
Westcoaster
December 20, 2015 3:50 pm

What people don’t get about Fukushima is that the nuclear pile escaped the containment in not one but two reactors. That means some very nasty shit continues to oooze out of the complex and into the Pacific ocean. Nasty shit that will probably outlast our civilization, 30,000 years or so, and we’re downwind.
No wonder the EPA shut down radiation monitoring off the West coast of the U.S. shortly afterwards. The gov doesn’t want us to know the truth, and IMO this should be the #1 “not covered” story.
As far as the other 30 or so GE Mark I reactors in use in the U.S., no they’ve not melted down yet, but an upstream dam burst, natural disaster, or even a station blackout could have the same result as Fukushima.
And don’t you just love the design, with the spent fuel pool 100 feet in the air?
Meantime marine life in the Pacific is all fucked up. Blue whales washing up on the West coast along with all sorts of marine life dead or dying.

Ottomatik
Ottomatik
December 20, 2015 3:57 pm

Further, it was not only crab, but sardine season was nonexistent. The base of the food chain all fucked up. Flee, before it becomees vouge.

SparkStorm
SparkStorm
December 20, 2015 8:12 pm

To those who don’t seem to understand exponential nature of radioactive decay and the gravity of “half-life”,

Cesium-137 with a 30 year half-life is:
50 % decayed after 30 years- 50% remains
After another 30 years, half of the Remaining Cesium decays-25% remains
Half again in the next 30 years- 12.5% remains…
and even after 200 years there will still be ~1% Remaining

Plutonium-239 has a half-life of 24,110 years!