Today’s question comes from Donald Trump. Should ending the life of an unborn child have a criminal penalty?
Question of the Day, Mar 31
Today’s question comes from Donald Trump. Should ending the life of an unborn child have a criminal penalty?
Stucky says: I know Donald …. Donald is no Jesus. He should have kept his mouth shut! Really.
I think the Donald was trying to explain how laws are to be enforced. Put another way, if murder was against the law, should the murderer be punished. The Donald would sound insane to say no, but the Democrats get away with that view.
Ask me if I think a man who cuts off his nutsack is a woman. I would say he’s not but there is a particular group devoted to arguing that he would be a woman.
Pretty soon we shall hear that the founders were communists, blacks, moozies or queers.
Legally speaking(since that seems to be the theme now) since the constitution does not contain the word ‘abortion’ and since nothing in the powers given to the federal government by the states mentions abortion or anything related to healthcare, this whole matter is, therefore, left to the states. The federal government has no say in the matter whatsoever.
The whole point about the body rejecting some fertilzed eggs and failing to carry a pregnancy full term is stupid. Miscarriages are a fact of life, they are a body rejecting a pregnancy, which happens in nature. They are also a far cry from intentionally killing a living being, not even in the same ball park.
Abortion is a private matter between a woman and her Dog.
Llpoh: “There should not be welfare mums – such welfare should be eliminated.”
Yes this the whole problem. This is why divorce and kids eithout parents is normal. Without this people would not gave kids without getting married and if a pregnancy happens unplanned, its probably just not the schedule but ok. Then people can get their birth control right if they dont want any more.
nothing so enrages women as the thought that a male has the right to interfere with her plans for her pregnancy, guys, how would you like it if every time you wanted to have an erection, you had to get permission from your mother?
So the Republicans/Conservatives, those tireless champions of individual freedom and curtailment of state power, clamor for the state to force women to carry pregnancies to term against their will. And the Democrats/Liberals, who want to control every aspect of individual life, scream for unfettered abortions for al women who want them. The irony is rich! It’s funny, funny world!
I say abortion is overwhelmingly a woman’s issue, and very personal to that individual. There is some wisdom in the trimester laws — that should be the extent of state interference. And why should anyone pay for an abortion except the parties directly involved?
I am surprised that the concept of “Forced/Compelled Pregnancy against her will” has not made its way into the middle of the argument…
“masterman finsbury says:
nothing so enrages women as the thought that a male has the right to interfere with her plans for her pregnancy, guys, how would you like it if every time you wanted to have an erection, you had to get permission from your mother?”
U can have one of those on your own, a woman can not have a child on her own. A better analogy would be; how would u like it if when u displease your mum she can kill u? ” how many women here agree with you, zero. Try this; nothing enrages pro life women or children or fathers more than the idea a father has no role before or after birth.