One Thing at a Time

Guest Post by Eric Peters

If you’ve ever restored an old car or a motorcycle – a basket case that needs everything – you know the importance of focusing on one thing at a time. Because it’s easy to feel overwhelmed by the totality of the mess.kaw_50_ontruck

The last bike I restored (a ’75 Kawasaki S1 triple) I started with just the frame. I had the entire bike completely disassembled, the parts laid out like the famous skeleton of Lucy, the oldest semi-complete fossil of a distant ancestor of humanity yet found.

Looking at all those rusty, worn out grease-caked parts, the peeling chrome and  pitted metal, made it hard to imagine the “like new” bike I hoped to have at the end of the odyssey.

Which is what makes it hard to even begin.

Which makes it easy to give up.

Our situation, politically, is a lot like this. So much needs fixing, so much is broken, it’s easy to just give up and resign ourselves to the hopelessness of it all.

But so long as we are not in FEMA camps or waiting for the bullet at the edge of a ditch, there is hope. There is still the chance something might be done.

Even if it’s just one thing.P1020053

Like eliminating taxes on people’s homes (and the land that they are built on).

People kvetch about the IRS and the income tax and – agreed – both are at odds with a free society. Not primarily because of the money taken from our hides but because of power over our lives acquired by the government, which it must have in order to enforce compliance with this particular tax.

Consider the difference between a sales tax and the income tax.

A sales tax is basically anonymous. You buy something and you pay a percentage of the purchase price in tax. You – the buyer – are not required to divulge personal details about the source of your income, your employment, your private affairs. Heck, you don’t even have to give them your nickname.

And you can pay the tax in cash.frame2

The income tax, in contrast, endows the government with police state powers. It cannot exist without such powers. The power to monitor our affairs; the requirement that we disclose our affairs – even to the extent that incriminate ourselves (on pain of perjury, no less) as regards what we allegedly “owe.” Filing a 1040 is on the face of it as egregious a violation of the Fifth Amendment as randomly stopping (and questioning ) motorists without even the pretext of individualized suspicion they’ve committed a crime is an affront to the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition of unreasonable searches, executed without a warrant or probable cause.

But as noxious as the income tax is, it’s not as noxious as the taxes applied to our homes and land.

The property tax (as it is usually called) is an outright assault on the concept of property, of ownership itself.

The income tax can be avoided – legally. When one no longer earns income, one no longer “owes” the tax. It is therefore possible to be free of this tax – and everything that comes along with it.cleancase

But the tax on property is inescapable – unless one chooses to live a property-less life. This effectively means living as a vagrant. Or in a van down by the river.

Even if you rent, you still pay. The cost of the tax being folded into what you pay in rent.

But imagine if – once you’d paid for your home/land in full – it was really yours. Owned, free and clear. No payments in perpetuity to the government as the price of being allowed to continue to live in “your” home and on “your” land.

Italics added to emphasize the obvious. That being, if you must forever pay money in order to remain in your home and on your land then you do not own your home or land. Whether you are paying a lender (your mortgage) or the government (the tax on property) you are a tenant. The home/land is the property of someone – or something – else.

This is a much greater affront to our liberties, our status as free men and women, than the income tax.

Because you can never be free. '75 S1 250 detail

Contrariwise, imagine how free you’d feel – and would be – if, after having paid off your home and land, you really did own it. No longer owed anyone a cent.

Could live free – beholden to none – on your land.

Without the need to continue to earn money in order to pay endless (and always rising) taxes. Without having to live in constant dread of not being able to afford those taxes.

But if you owned your home and land once you paid it off, these worries would evaporate.

Even if you lost your job or your income went way down due to hard times, you’d still have a place to live, guaranteed. A literal physical refuge against what were once referred to as the vicissitudes of life.

Which is exactly why there is a tax on property.

To keep us all in a state of perpetual anxiety. To apply constant financial pressure to generate income – not for our own maintenance but for the maintenance of the state. To provide the very means used to tyrannize and enslave us.

And yes, slavery is precisely the right word.'75 S1 250C

A slave is forced to work for the benefit of his master; the degree to which he is forced to work for the benefit of his master does not change his status or the nature of the relationship.

Free men only “owe” debts they have freely assumed.

 A slave  is not allowed to own property. He is property. Property being defined as that which is legally under your control.

Are we not legally under the control of the government? Legally denied our right to own property ourselves, including even ourselves?

Remember, ownership is defined as an item being under your control, not under the control of someone else.

When it comes to “our” homes and land, we are permitted a sort of at-will occupancy sufferance. So long as we continue to pay our taxes, we’ll be allowed to live in “our” homes and on “our” land. But stop paying the endless taxes and see who really owns your home and land… .

So, let’s begin with this: The abolition of all taxes on personal homes/land. The restoration of the concept of ownership.

If we can achieve that, we’ll have achieved much. The tax on income – and the affront to our liberties that flow from it – can be next on the list.


Subscribe
Notify of
guest
19 Comments
TC
TC
July 11, 2016 7:02 am

Couldn’t agree more.

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer
July 11, 2016 7:17 am

I disagree about property taxes. Where does he suppose local services come from? Snow plowing, police, fire, rescue, library, trash collection, schools, public spaces?

Paying a tax on property INVESTS in the community and makes it a place worth living and it keeps control LOCAL rather than dependent upon the FEDGOV.

I agree with the theme, just not the logic.

Wip
Wip
  hardscrabble farmer
July 11, 2016 7:35 am

I’d rather be free.

Ed
Ed
  hardscrabble farmer
July 11, 2016 8:35 am

OK, hsf, you pay for all that shit if you want it. Here’s the way it shakes out if I fall for your con: I live so far out in the county that none of what my tax payments is spent on benefits me. I collect my own trash or pay a private company to bring a truck to take it away. The cops can’t respond to my call in less than an hour, ditto ambulances or fire trucks.

I have a septic system that I paid to have installed and maintained, ditto a deep well, which I paid $12k to have drilled and I pay for the electricity to pump the water. Snowplowing my private road, .75 miles of it, is my responsibility. Library, school, public spaces are all a minimum of 18 miles from my house, making them of little use to me, especially since I have no school age children.

So, I pay about $1400 per year for services that aren’t even available to me. The people who live “in the village” as we say here are the only ones in the county who have connections to the city water and sewer. My tax money goes to pay tax collectors, including county police, who make the place unlivable for me. Control is still state level and federal. You don’t escape those levels of control by paying tribute to a local government. In fact you’re tagged by the local government so that you can be controlled by distant assholes.

Taxes aren’t an investment in anything of value for me. Investment is a word thrown around by politicians and bureaucrats as a euphemism for wasting other people’s money. Investment’s ass. Bullshit.

Your comment illustrates that you watch waaaay too much TV, and can’t think your way out of a paper bag. That’s why you can’t agree with the logic. You can’t think logically.

Stucky
Stucky
  Ed
July 11, 2016 9:08 am

Hey, Ed. If HF wants to pay taxes …. LET HIM DO IT! lol

He is somewhat correct though. Just because you don’t perceive any benefit, that doesn’t mean others don’t. Surely, you use the roads. Surely, there are people in your town with children in school. Surely, someone’s house burned in your town at one time or another. And, so on. WHO is to pay for that?

Don’t misunderstand me. I LOATHE property taxes as well. My parents got a 30 year mortgage … at the beginning about $150/mo, including taxes. At the end of the 30 years? The property tax was $500/month. And if they don’t pay the government will send their storm-troopers to literally throw them out on the street. This is an abomination of abominations.

I don’t know what the answer is.

Perhaps one solution is to LIMIT THE DURATION of property taxes. Surely, 30 fucking years of paying taxes on the SAME PROPERTY is enough!!!

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer
  Ed
July 11, 2016 11:09 am

I don’t watch TV unless I’m in some waiting room. And if you can find a paper bag big enough for me to fit, I promise you I will think my way out of it. Assuming that any services will be provided absent revenue seems illogical to me, but then maybe you have a better plan for things like fire departments and rescue squads. I’m all ears.

I stated all the benefits I get from my property taxes. Am I happy about paying them? No, I don’t like going to the dentist either, but some things that benefit us are not always things we look forward to.

I’ve always thought that if you pay off your mortgage that should end your liability as far as property taxes go because it means you’ve fully invested in your town. If you rent the property out, then you should continue to pay regardless of the status of the note.

That sounds logical, doesn’t it?

harry p
harry p
  hardscrabble farmer
July 11, 2016 11:03 am

A local sales tax. That way there is a forced budgetting mechanism to keep things in check.
Property taxes allow the govts to grow and grow until people literally move away.

Freedom to own my property far exceeds the right the people have to get their roads plowed.
Get rid of the diversity nonsense and war drugs and stop violating the 2nd amendment and police costs will plummet.
Fire depts used to be funded by insurance companies so they could protect their policy (repair vs total loss) and people can choose wheher or ot they want insurance.

Houston Davis
Houston Davis
July 11, 2016 7:53 am

HERE, HERE! And services that are supported by property tax could be supported by a voluntary consumer/ sales tax. That would make the government less tyrannical due to the fact that would have to have a more business friendly tax structure. Rather than, as they are likely to do, create another government program. And no deficit spending so if they mismanaged or if the economy tanks then the government, like family budgets, will have to cut back. That creates an incentive to create a better economic environment and keep the @#&^/$!*& do gooders at bay.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Houston Davis
July 11, 2016 8:40 am

Any historical references where voluntary taxes or contributions have worked to fund civilization?

bb
bb
July 11, 2016 8:38 am

Property taxes are evil .You never truly own anything. I bought a Toyota Tacoma brand new in 1998 .Got 449+ thousand miles on it .Best car / truck I have ever driven but I still don’t own it.I keep getting statements from the tax agencies. If you don’t pay this tax we ( the state ) will revoke your drivers license .Take your vehicle and sell it for back taxes.On and on.Same with house and land .

Dutchman
Dutchman
July 11, 2016 9:23 am

I’m 67, been paying my fair share of both income and property taxes my entire life.

Because of property taxes, it costs me $1,200 a month to live in a house that’s already paid for. There should be a cutoff where you have contributed enough and you either get a big discount, or no tax at all.

ragman
ragman
July 11, 2016 9:27 am

Taxes are bad but undeclared, unconstitutional war is the most profound evil our govt engages in. Get us out of this bullshit and put our troops on OUR borders, where they belong. My property tax in Western NC is very low. Of course I wish it was zero but money has to come from somewhere for basic services. What really irritates me is the exorbitant amount we pay for schools. Upwards of 10K/yr in some places and the kids are dumb shits after 12 yrs of public schooling.

rhs jr
rhs jr
July 11, 2016 9:34 am

Present taxes are unjust and here is some proof. Sharyl Attkisson’s show Sunday night about Lewiston Maine’s African-Muslim refugees showed that. They are 10% of the population but suck up 40% of the Welfare (leaving Natives short) which jacked up everybody else’s taxes (the Feds and State aren’t kicking in anything to help Lewiston for some reason). By Obama’s Laws, the refugees don’t have to do paperwork to get hired like legal immigrants and (by some mystery of the Social System) they get about four times the aid that Americans on Welfare get. If this ain’t unjust to American taxpayers, I’ll eat my hat. Vote Trump.

.prusmc
.prusmc
  rhs jr
July 11, 2016 9:03 pm

Hard to feel bad about Maine. Great Governor who tells truth even when it hurts snowflake sensitivities. Yet they want to tar and feather him. Senator Susan Collins supports not a Republican like her but Hitlery who thinks Barry is not bringing enough refugees in (Maine needs more). Other Senator Black Angus claims to be an independent but is as reliable Socialist/Leftist vote as FSA Bernie. You get what you vote for and Maine wants out with the proud and more of the humiliated.

Rise Up
Rise Up
July 11, 2016 11:54 am

I wish I still had my 1977 Suzuki GS750:

[imgcomment image[/img]

starfcker
starfcker
  Rise Up
July 11, 2016 12:59 pm

Typo. Kawasaki triple 500s from the 70’s were designated H-1, not S-1. I used to have one. They were the first street bike built strictly for speed. Scary, but really fast.

daddysteve
daddysteve
July 11, 2016 5:38 pm

I would have lost a bet on what Hardscrabble’s comment would be.

IndenturedServant
IndenturedServant
July 11, 2016 10:00 pm

Another pointless argument. Aim higher. Throw off the yokes of central banks and restore sound money that cannot be inflated away. That single act will solve an EFUCKINGNORMOUS number of tax issues.

I do agree with those who believe that property taxes should expire upon paying off your mortgage.

All taxes should be like sales taxes. The more you buy, the more you pay. The more you save, the less you pay.

Never gonna happen as long as we remain slaves on the plantation though. O’ Lordy pick a bail of cotton, O’ Lordy pick a bail of hay.

jamesthewanderer
jamesthewanderer
July 12, 2016 12:35 am

The early republic was expected to get by with tariffs and customs / excise duties. If we had stuck to that pattern, the enormous growth of the USGov would not have been possible. The Whiskey rebellion to enable taxation of commerce was the first signal that the dream was dying – armed suppression of a tax rebellion was a symptom of what led to the later conflicts. The South was hit with tariffs to support profits of Northern manufacturers, and led to the War Between the States. The 1913 Federal Reserve act and associated income taxes were later expanded to finance WWI; and so on and so forth.
Trim to USGov back to tariffs on imported goods and let’s trim the bloat back to manageable. Once 3/4 of the USGov actually has to work for a living, let’s see how small it gets.