More adult Americans live with their parents and grandparents

 

Multigenerational households have reached an all-time high

Getty

Inreasingly, two or more adult generations are living under the same roof.

Despite the end of the Great Recession, there’s been a surge in multigenerational households.

Both the number and share of Americans living in multigenerational family households has continued to rise in recent years, according to a new study by the Pew Research Center, a nonprofit think tank in Washington, D.C. In 2014, a record 60.6 million people, or 19% of the U.S. population, lived in a multigenerational household, up from 42.4 million (17%) in 2009 and 27.5 million (12%) in 1980. Multigenerational families — households with two or more adult generations, or one that includes grandparents and grandchildren — is growing among nearly all racial groups and age groups, says D’Vera Cohn, a senior writer and editor at Pew.

There are some demographic reasons. The Asian and Hispanic populations are growing more rapidly than the white population, Cohn’s analysis of the latest U.S. Census Bureau data found, “and those groups are more likely than whites to live in multigenerational family households.” What’s more, foreign-born Americans are more likely than the U.S.-born people to live with multiple generations of family, and Asians and Hispanics are more likely than whites to be immigrants. Some 28% of Asians lived in multigenerational households versus 25% of Hispanics and African-Americans and 15% of Caucasians.

More young U.S. adults live with their folks, Cohn says, and that doesn’t include those still studying. Among Americans aged 25- to 29 in 2014, 31% were part of multigenerational households. The share and number of 18- to 34-year-old adults living with parents surpassed other living arrangements in 2014 for the first time in more than 130 years. Education levels make a big difference: Young adults without college degrees are now are more likely to live with parents than to be married or cohabiting in their own homes, but those with college degrees are more likely to be living with a spouse or partner in their own homes.

As child care costs have surged 50% over the last decade, grandparents can also provide a valuable role as care givers. In fact, 60% of grandparents provided some care for their grandchildren during a 10-year period, and 70% of those who did provided care for two years or more, a 2012 study of over 13,000 grandparents aged 50 and older by the University of Chicago found. “Importantly grandparents with less income and less education, or who are from minority groups, are more likely to take on care for their grandchildren,” Linda Waite, a professor in urban sociology at the University of Chicago, wrote in the report.

Another major change to family life: The share of children living in a two-parent household is at the lowest point in half a century, a separate 2015 Pew report found. Some 69% of children lived in two-parent households in 2014 versus 73% in 2000. People are marrying later, cohabiting rather than marrying, becoming single parents or forming blended families and — as the latest report shows — living with their grandparents. Philip Cohen, a sociology professor at the University of Maryland, sees this trend as a sign that the definition of families is more fluid in America, and that they are more culturally diverse rather than a decline in the traditional family.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
19 Comments
TPC
TPC
August 11, 2016 3:00 pm

My wife and I have plans to buy/purchase a multigenerational home within the next five years or so.

Honestly, even if the economy was better I’d still be pushing for it, there is no real reason to keep everyone separate.

I’d rather be living on a thousand acres with only me and my sweetie, but life hasn’t always been too keen on asking me permission before throwing out curveballs, so I take shit in stride and make what I can of it.

There are too many upsides to combining resources with their parents. People did it for generations before WW2, and people will resume those same activities as soon as this period of post-war credit explosions finally gets flushed down the shitter.

raven
raven
August 11, 2016 4:04 pm

I think this is a GREAT development for society. It’s especially needed in the affluent West!

Overthecliff
Overthecliff
  raven
August 12, 2016 12:22 am

Raven, it is the way it was 1945-1950 for working class people. Families were the safety net not the government. Maybe we will learn something. The 4 th Turning is coming slowly at first then all of the sudden.

Anonymous
Anonymous
August 11, 2016 5:08 pm

TPC has the right idea. This is the way it should be actually and the way it was for generations. Had it remained so we would not be witnessing the destruction of the American family among whites or blacks. Think how much stronger we’d be as a nation of families.

A significant segment of the population will go back to this way of life and that will be a good thing. Many more will want to but won’t due to lack of jobs.

Asians, eastern europeans, beaners and ye old muzzies live in extended family units to great advantage. Besides the financial advantages, the older generations remain more vital and useful and engaged and the younger generations benefit from the wisdom of two generations of adults. TPC planning a multi generational home will give his family the same advantages if they choose/are able to take advantage of it.

IndenturedServant
IndenturedServant
August 11, 2016 5:10 pm

Anon above was I.

unit472
unit472
August 11, 2016 5:10 pm

Before and especially during WW2 there was the ‘boarding house’. If wasn’t expected for single people just starting out to be able to afford their own apartment or buy a house. Fewer than 50% of American households in 1940 owned their homes.

An illusion grew up during the postwar boom that everyone could buy a house or have their own apartment. The US population was much smaller and there was lots of undeveloped land around our major cities to build those 3 br 1 1/2 bath tract homes. Those conditions are over. You cannot build a single family home priced for the median income family anymore.

Either move back in with mom and dad or accept that college dorm style living or the ‘boarding house’ will be all most young people can afford, at least initially, when they leave school.

iconoclast421
iconoclast421
August 11, 2016 5:42 pm

This is actually a good thing. It is the one good thing that comes from being financially raped by this globalist wall street cabal. The family must strengthen as a survival mechanism to combat the forces aligned against it. With a stronger family comes the hope that more wisdom will be passed down to future generations, hopefully allowing them to become smart enough to not keep voting for the Bushes and the Clintons and falling for all these obvious scams.

Bea Lever
Bea Lever
August 11, 2016 7:20 pm

Oh, I am loving this multigenerational family living . What was old is new again BUT will the younger crowd that is mooching a free ride off their parents now be the caring and ever so willing providers for mom and dad when the shoe is on the other foot? Will they REALLY be willing to put their nose to the grindstone and pay the bills for everyone involved? Coddled lazy asses tend to be worthless for a lifetime, not exactly the most productive people you will ever meet.
TPC is an exceptional person and cut from better cloth than the average Merikan mouthbreathers. We shall see how this plays out over time but my bet would be that most of the people living off their parents now will continue to freeload without pulling their own weight and taking on the role of provider in the future.

Overthecliff
Overthecliff
  Bea Lever
August 12, 2016 12:27 am

I see Bea has the same optimistic opinion of the American people as myself.

Lulu
Lulu
August 11, 2016 7:29 pm

My mother’s 80-something neighbor already had her 50 year son living with her when last month she told my mother she didn’t know if she could take it because her adult daughter had told her she’s moving in and bringing the adult grandson to this poor woman’s small rambler.

mark
mark
August 11, 2016 9:17 pm

Lets see.

Lowest home ownership in 40 years.

Rising rent prices.

Tens of million more people.

People have to live somewhere.

Llpoh
Llpoh
  mark
August 11, 2016 10:57 pm

In the Great Depression my kin lived in tents.

When the shit hits the fan and is flung widely, people will do what is necessary to survive. People have to live somewhere. It just does not have to be houses or apartments.

Bea Lever
Bea Lever
  Llpoh
August 12, 2016 1:16 am

Llpoh
Are you serious? These adult children would not live in a freakin tent….good Lord, where would they plug in their XBox and 60 inch flat tv for gaming and watching Netflix?
You are tough and adaptable, them…….not so much.

jamesthewanderer
jamesthewanderer
August 12, 2016 12:00 am

It can work quite well or be a living hell, depending on the family. Right now I have both my kids (elder 29, younger 26) living with us; younger working on IT degree, elder with English degree but working full-time now. It makes no sense for elder to move out and get an apartment; savings come first, and eventually elder will leave to join love interest in Canada. I certainly feel better that I know where they are, and they don’t seem to mind my providing room and board for them. Elder even pays some.
The goal is to get them to self-sustaining adulthood in one piece. If it takes a few more years to get them there, then it’s well worth it and the government can blow me instead of Admin; kids don’t mature and cope at the same rate, and saying that all 26 year olds should be out of college and paying off their student loans by then is simple-minded. But then, most government employees ARE simple-minded so what kind of regulations can be expected out of them?

acetinker
acetinker
  jamesthewanderer
August 12, 2016 1:10 am

You’re being kind, James. They’re not simple-minded; They’re stupid fucks who have a high opinion of themselves and think everybody else owes them something.

Can you name ONE gov’t. agency that actually produces something of value?
Didn’t think so.

Don’t get your feelings hurt- I’m agreeing with you.

IndenturedServant
IndenturedServant
  acetinker
August 12, 2016 6:40 am

The US Mint does a pretty good job and turns a reliable profit every year I believe. They make every single coin and medal for the US and many foreign countries as well and they turn a profit on every single one of them.

The Mint is totally out of tune with what collectors or the public wants in coins and they move at the “speed of bureaucracy” but do a pretty decent job for a govt agency. Yeah I’m a collector and well aware of their history over the last two decades. The upside is that they are “reliably fucked up” and that helps one navigate the hurdles when buying from the Mint.

jamesthewanderer
jamesthewanderer
August 12, 2016 1:54 am

Unlike some, I read for comprehension. Thanks!

Boat Guy
Boat Guy
August 12, 2016 2:31 am

As with most academia they seem to have this lefty comby ya bull shit for today’s family crisis situations . I was 18 and working full time made a fairly comfortable life married at 20 first home purchase at 24 sold that and second house settled in at 26 and I got my hands dirty earning a living and did well . Sadly that’s a story rarely played out now , yes there are success stories but for the most part the 20 somethings are in the basement of their parents house mom & dad both work if one or both are not laid off and grandparents unless they lucked out with a pension that was not bankrupted are hanging by a financial thread unless one or both are having health trouble then the affordable health care act are doing their damdest delay or deny care to save a few bucks while milking them for premiums . Yes the generations are under one roof but not by choice it’s due to the fact we as a country are “FUCKED”

diogenes
diogenes
August 12, 2016 9:05 am

How is this possible with the raging Obama recovery? Shocking.