In today’s, 25th, Wikileaks release, one of the notable highlights is a March 2, 2015 email from John Podesta to Clinton aide Cheryl Mills in which he says “We are going to have to dump all those emails.” The email was sent just days before the NYT story revealing the existence of Hillary’s email server, and Hillary’s press conference addressing what was at the time, the surprising revelation that she had a personal email account, and server, in her home.
Mills’ response: “Think you just got your new nick name.”
It is unclear for now which emails Podesta is referring to in the thread, but Podesta adds: “better to do so sooner than later.” We can hope that a subsequent response, yet to be leaked by Wikileaks, will provide more color.
If the exchange is shown to disclose intent to mislead, it will negate the entire narrative prepared by Clinton that she merely deleted “personal” emails and will reveal a strategic plan to hinder the State Department and FBI “investigation.”
This is the first time that particular exchange has emerged among the Podesta emails.
And in a separate email sent out just days later by communications director Jennifer Palmieri, we get yet another confirmation that the president actively mislead the public when he said he didn’t know Hillary was using a private email address:
Suggest Philippe talk to Josh or Eric. They know POTUS and HRC emailed. Josh has been asked about that. Standard practice is not to confirm anything about his email, so his answer to press was that he would not comment/confirm. I recollect that Josh was also asked if POTUS ever noticed her personal email account and he said something like POTUS likely had better things to do than focus on his Cabinet’s email addresses.
Perhaps while the DOJ is looking into the Huma Abedin emails, it can also take a repeat look at some of these, especially the ones involving POTUS.
by Karl Denninger
Declaration of Intent To Violate The Law
Here it is folks:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:57 PM, John Podesta
wrote:
> On another matter….and not to sound like Lanny, but we are going to have
> to dump all those emails so better to do so sooner than later
This message, which was from Cheryl Mills, is known to not be tampered with because it, like all Gmail emails, carries a DKIM key.
What is a DKIM key? It is a cryptographic signature. It does not prove that the person who claimed to have sent the email actually did so (someone could have hacked their account) but it does mean, with an extremely high degree of certainty, that the actual message displayed is what was sent because it is virtually impossible to tamper with a message and yet have the DKIM key validate.
Further, since the email provider owns the DKIM private key used to generate the signature you can’t tamper with that ex-post-facto either.
In the case of a large cloud email provider (like Google) they couldn’t tamper with this even if they wanted to because changing the key would instantly invalidate all signatures that were produced with the old one for all of their customers. In other words to protect Podesta or Cheryl Mills in this case they’d have to screw literally everyone else.
Google is in the tank for Hillary, by the way, (or at least Eric Schmidt is) but that, if anything, only adds credibility to these emails and their DKIM keys because if there is anyone who has a reason to try to protect Hillary and her minions it’s Google! Yet they can’t in this case, for the very simple reason that their DKIM key is designed to not be able to be tampered with — by anyone.
No intent to break the law eh? This looks like hard evidence of obstruction of justice, which I remind you is a felony.
Now about that “reopened” investigation…..
Hillary’s narrative has been negated for months. In July 2015, her IT doofus, Paul Combetta (“Stonetear”) was querying Reddit how to delete a “very VIP’s” emails. This was the day AFTER all of her emails were subpoenaed by congress. Clear obstruction of justice. Lock her up! Lock her up!
Oh dear me, I need to put hinges on my jaw to stop my chin from hitting the floor.
Nick might like that too.
“Break classification rules for the public’s benefit, and you could be exiled. Do it for personal benefit, and you could be President.”
Edward Snowden