To Really ‘Make America Great Again,’ End the Fed!

undefined

Former Dallas Federal Reserve Bank President Richard Fisher recently gave a speech identifying the Federal Reserve’s easy money/low interest rate policies as a source of the public anger that propelled Donald Trump into the White House. Mr. Fisher is certainly correct that the Fed’s policies have “skewered” the middle class. However, the problem is not specific Fed policies, but the very system of fiat currency managed by a secretive central bank.

Federal Reserve-generated increases in money supply cause economic inequality. This is because, when the Fed acts to increase the money supply, well-to-do investors and other crony capitalists are the first recipients of the new money. These economic elites enjoy an increase in purchasing power before the Fed’s inflationary policies lead to mass price increases. This gives them a boost in their standard of living.

By the time the increased money supply trickles down to middle- and working-class Americans, the economy is already beset by inflation. So most average Americans see their standard of living decline as a result of Fed-engendered money supply increases.

Some Fed defenders claim that inflation doesn’t negatively affect anyone’s standard of living because price increases are matched by wage increases. This claim ignores the fact that the effects of the Fed’s actions depend on how individuals react to the Fed’s actions.

Historically, an increase in money supply does not just cause a general rise in prices. It also causes money to flow into specific sectors, creating a bubble that provides investors and workers in those areas a (temporary) increase in their incomes. Meanwhile, workers and investors in sectors not affected by the Fed-generated boom will still see a decline in their purchasing power and thus their standard of living.

Adoption of a “rules-based” monetary policy will not eliminate the problem of Fed-created bubbles, booms, and busts, since Congress cannot set a rule dictating how individuals react to Fed policies. The only way to eliminate the boom-and-bust cycle is to remove the Fed’s power to increase the money supply and manipulate interest rates.

Because the Fed’s actions distort the view of economic conditions among investors, businesses, and workers, the booms created by the Fed are unsustainable. Eventually reality sets in, the bubble bursts, and the economy falls into recession.

When the crash occurs the best thing for Congress and the Fed to do is allow the recession to run its course. Recessions are the economy’s way of cleaning out the Fed-created distortions. Of course, Congress and the Fed refuse to do that. Instead, they begin the whole business cycle over again with another round of money creation, increased stimulus spending, and corporate bailouts.

Some progressive economists acknowledge how the Fed causes economic inequality and harms average Americans. These progressives support perpetual low interest rates and money creation. These so-called working class champions ignore how the very act of money creation causes economic inequality. Longer periods of easy money also mean longer, and more painful, recessions.

President-elect Donald Trump has acknowledged that, while his business benefits from lower interest rates, the Fed’s policies hurt most Americans. During the campaign, Mr. Trump also promised to make audit the fed part of his first 100 days agenda. Unfortunately, since the election, President-elect Trump has not made any statements regarding monetary policy or the audit the fed legislation. Those of us who understand that changing monetary policy is the key to making America great again must redouble our efforts to convince Congress and the new president to audit, then end, the Federal Reserve.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
14 Comments
Stucky
Stucky
November 28, 2016 6:42 am

I wonder if Indentured_Servant masturbates to articles like this.

🙂 🙂 :mrgreen:

BB
BB
November 28, 2016 7:19 am

Amen,Amen and Amen : end the damn Federal Reserve

Yes , Indent Service masturbates to post like this . Probably gives blow jobs to.

Anonymous
Anonymous
November 28, 2016 9:30 am

FWIW, the Fed seems to be rather nervous about Trump and how he will change the way they operate. No more free hand in things is what they fear most, and they are already doing what they can to head it off under Trump.

At least it seems that way to me, I’m no expert about analyzing things like this by a long shot.

Anonymous
Anonymous
November 28, 2016 10:35 am

Ron Paul should have a cabinet or senior advisor position .

Bea Lever
Bea Lever
November 28, 2016 10:50 am

Now do you really think da joos will let tRUMP dismantle their cash cow? The Federal Reserve Bank of NY is a pipeline of free money straight to Israhell.
Ron Paul continues to talk which is all he has ever accomplished in 30+ years so dream on.

TJF
TJF
  Bea Lever
November 28, 2016 11:14 am

Bea,

I think Ron Paul started the flame that ignited and ended up leading to the inferno that is Trump. It is really selling him short to say he has not accomplished anything but talk.

That is not to say that Trump is in any way a Ron Paulite. Just saying that Ron Paul tapped into the feeling from the dirt people that something was wrong and the story we were being told was not the correct one. Trump took that idea, turned it up to 11, even if he may not really understand the root cause of the problem. He essentially dumbed down the message, formed it into 2nd grade level sound bites that he repeated frequently, usually in the same sentence, and used the anger of the dirt people to get elected. Ron Paul has done a lot for the country in my opinion.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  TJF
November 28, 2016 12:09 pm

No doubt, he gave voice when no one else was willing to.

starfcker
starfcker
  TJF
November 28, 2016 5:58 pm

I am as critical of Dr Paul as anyone on this website, and it’s not a popular position. But you can’t trash the guy, which is a different thing altogether. He is what he is. And he will go down as a great man. No, he didn’t turn out to be the guy to crush the corrupt establishment. That’s Trump’s job. But you can’t deny he swam upstream and spoke truth to power, and woke up lots of people, at a time not many had the courage. Did he have all the answers? No. Was his pimp game strong enough to slap all the bitches? No. But to deny his contribution is just flat wrong.

KaD
KaD
November 28, 2016 11:45 am

Speaking of banking, totally this guy’s fault for dealing with criminals like BofA. If everyone just wised up and stopped doing any business with them, Wells Fargo and Chase they’d go under like they deserve to. http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2016/03/25/what-happened-when-i-tried-to-take-1500-cash-out-of-bank-of-america-bank-holiday-is-near/

M. I. A.
M. I. A.
  KaD
November 28, 2016 1:24 pm

KaD – Great capital controls find. – The What happened when I tried to take $1500 cash out of Bank of America needs a separate post.

Yesterday, I went to Bank of America to withdraw $1500 cash. You would of thought I had a sign around my neck saying that I was a heroin dealer. What happens next is amazing!

tampa red
tampa red
  M. I. A.
November 28, 2016 8:31 pm

Unfortunately guys I can somewhat top that.A few weeks ago I went to make a deposit at BOA for my dad.There was in excess of $1000 cash in the deposit and the teller asked for my id.She swiped it thru a scanner like you see in convenience stores to check age for alcohol/tobacco sales.I asked if it was because of the large amount of cash.”No,if we don’t know you we have to ask for id no matter how small the amount,even $10.”

mark branham
mark branham
November 28, 2016 12:32 pm

So, what will replace the FED?

Ron never mentions what monetary system he proposes. Who, for example, will create “money” when there’s no FED to do so? Since the main benefit of the FED is to increase the money supply when conditions warrant, who and how will supply those dollars? Since the FED sits at the center of money movement, who will set up the payments process? Without a central monetary organization, who will regulate monetary policy?

And don’t give me that ‘free market’ crap… a free market simply means enough freedom for the unscrupulous among us to game the system; always happens.

Ending the FED means an entirely new monetary system. Which will mean an entirely new world-wide monetary system. Do you really think that is something we’ll do? Absent an enormous world-wide calamity?

I’ve always maintained we can’t get there from here. Fortunately, the Forth Turning means such an event is likely to happen. None of us alive today will welcome such a change when it comes because it brings the shit with it.

The whole ‘end the fed’ thing is nonsense. Events themselves will end the current monetary system and that will end the FED. May even be a few of us left when that happens.

BB
BB
November 28, 2016 7:03 pm

Mark ,… End the Federal.We should do exactly what Hitler did when he took control of the currency in Germany. Google it.Makes for long read but well worth it.Meathead.

mark branham
mark branham
November 28, 2016 8:02 pm

If BB, you’re suggesting the Treasury print money directly, I heartily agree… however, with the current and any likely future congress, don’t even consider it. There is nothing in Washington except corruption. Every single element within government is corrupt, so much so that there is zero chance it will succeed. First the deluge, then the re-making… all that currently exist must be wiped away AFTER they’ve been so exposed that even the dullest dimwit will understand the damage that a debt-money system does.

I suppose about 200 years sounds about right.