Putin Responds: Syria Strikes “Cripple US-Russia Relations”; Deploys Cruise Missile Frigate To Syria

Tyler Durden's picture

Responding to Trump’s unexpected military attack on Syria in which 59 cruise missiles were launched (of which only 23 allegedly hit their target), Russian President Vladimir Putin “regards the strikes as aggression against a sovereign nation,” his spokesman Dmitry Peskov said, noting that the president believes the strikes were carried out “in violation of international law, and also under an invented pretext.”

The Kremlin spokesman insisted that “the Syrian army doesn’t have chemical weapons,” saying this had been “observed and confirmed by the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, a special UN unit.”

The Russian president said he sees the US missile strikes as an attempt to distract attention from civilian casualties in Iraq, Peskov added.

“This step deals significant damage to US-Russian ties, which are already in a deplorable state,” Peskov said and added that the US has been ignoring the use of chemical weapons by terrorists and this is dramatically aggravating the situation, in Putin’s opinion.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)

“The main thing, Putin believes, is that this move [by the U.S.] doesn’t draw us nearer to the end goal in the fight with international terrorism and on the contrary, deals a serious setback to the creation of an international coalition in the fight with it,” Peskov said.

* * *

Other Russians took the opportunity to opine as well, led by Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov who said the US missile attack on a Syrian airbase is an act of aggression under a far-fetched pretext and is reminiscent of the 2003 invasion of Iraq.

Quoted by Tass, the top Russian diplomat said “It is an act of aggression under a completely far-fetched pretext. This is reminiscent of the situation in 2003, when the US and the UK, along with some of their allies, invaded Iraq without the consent of the UN Security Council and in violation of international law.”

“When speaking about the military intervention in Iraq many years after it happened, Tony Blair (who served as the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom from 1997 to 2007) acknowledged that they had misled everybody,” Lavrov emphasized. “Now they did not even bother to provide any facts referring only to photos,” he noted. “They indulged in speculations on children’s photos, on evidence provided by various non-governmental organizations, including the so-called White Helmets, which staged various ‘incidents’ to instigate action against the Syrian government.”

Moscow will demand truth of Idlib events, Lavrov stressed. “It is regrettable that all these causes do more harm to the already damaged relations between Russia and the United States. Hope remains that these provocations will not entail irreversible effects,” Lavrov said.

Russian lawmakers also took to the microphone on Friday, warning that the U.S. airstrikes in Syria could lead to an escalation of conflict in the Middle East and dash any plans for a U.S.-Russian coalition against terrorism.

“It’s a new round of escalation in the Middle East. These ill-judged, irresponsible actions don’t contribute to global security, security in the Middle East,” Andrei Krasov, the first deputy head of the defense committee in the Russian lower house of parliament, told state news agency RIA. “Other military conflicts, an expansion of military conflicts, are entirely possible,” he added.

Russian Senator Konstantin Kosachev said the airstrikes meant the possibility of a broad antiterror coalition in Syria “bites the dust before it was even born.”

He said the aim of the U.S. strike was to “rubber stamp” responsibility on Mr. Assad’s for the chemical attack in Idlib province on Tuesday. “‘The walls of Trump’ are multiplying. And everything started so well. It’s a real shame,” said a post on the Facebook page of Mr. Kosachev, head of the international relations committee in Russia’s upper house of Parliament.

Another lawmaker, Mikhail Emelyanov, warned against the risk of clashes between Russian and U.S. forces. “The U.S. is being dragged into the war in Syria in the full knowledge that Russia is supporting Syria and our troops are there, which means it’s fraught with direct clashes between Russia and the U.S. and the consequences could be the most serious, even armed clashes and exchanges of strikes,” Mr. Emelyanov told Interfax news agency.

* * *

In immediate response, Moscow suspended its memorandum of understanding on flight safety in Syria with the US following the missile strike, calling the attack “a demonstration of force.” The Russian military has supported the Syrian government’s version of the events in Idlib, saying that Damascus attacked an arms depot where chemical weapons had been stockpiled by Islamic State and Al-Nusra Front militants.

“Without bothering to investigate anything, the US went forward with a demonstration of force, a military confrontation with a country that is fighting international terrorism,” the Foreign Ministry’s statement reads.

“Obviously, the cruise missile attack was prepared beforehand. Any expert can tell that the decision to strike was made in Washington before the events in Idlib, which were used as a pretext for a demonstration,” the statement reads.

The Memorandum on air safety was signed in October 2015, after Russia came to Syria to fight international terrorism at the invitation of the country’s government. The document of understanding was designed to prevent possible mishaps between the Russian and US Air Forces operating independently in the region.

Russia’s Foreign Ministry has condemned the attack as an example of the “reckless attitude” that has only worsened “existing world issues” and created a “threat to international security.”

* * *

Additionally, according to Tass, in response to the strikes, the Russian frigate Admiral Grigorovich armed with Kalibr cruise missiles will be deployed to the Tartus naval base in Syria. The Russian Black Sea Fleet’s frigate The Admiral Grigorovich, currently on a routine voyage, will enter the Mediterranean later on Friday, a military-diplomatic source in Moscow told TASS, adding that the ship would make a stop at the logistics base in Syria’s port of Tartus.

“The Russian ship armed with cruise missiles Kalibr will visit the logistics base in Tartus, Syria,” the source said.

The Admiral Grigorovich is currently near the Black Sea straits. It is scheduled to enter the Mediterranean at about 14:00 Moscow time. The ship left on a voyage after replenishing supplies at Novorossiisk and taking part in a joint exercise with Turkish ships in the Black Sea. Tass’s source said the frigate’s presence off Syria’s shores will depend on the situation.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
16 Comments
Hollow man
Hollow man
April 7, 2017 7:13 am

Why we can’t stay out of everyone’s business is beyond me. The drug cartels in Mexico are a bigger threat to us than the war in Syria. Police our borders first,control that, before trying to run the world.

RiNS
RiNS
April 7, 2017 7:26 am
TampaRed
TampaRed
  RiNS
April 7, 2017 9:27 am

RiNS,
Good video-thanks.
Now Rinzie,a personal issue.
Last week when you posted your fake news about the ice pack and polar bears where you live in nanukland,I,like many others on this list,was impressed with your bravery when you went out on the ice to film the polar bears.
Come to find out RiNS,you made a fool out of us.Homey no like being made a fool of.
As soon as global warming heats it up enough for a normal American to survive up there,I’m coming up there & kick your butt.

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
  RiNS
April 7, 2017 10:07 am

Skip to 4:50 to get to Mike Flynn in 2015 commenting on the 2013 gas attack.

kokoda - the most deplorable
kokoda - the most deplorable
April 7, 2017 8:19 am

Who defends US Airstrikes on Syria? ShitStain McCain, Lady Lindsey, Rubio, Democrats, RINO’s, NATO, Morons, Idiots and especially ISIS.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  kokoda - the most deplorable
April 7, 2017 9:36 am

And Hillary, she was calling for the strikes just before they happened and Trump listened to her.

Ed
Ed
  kokoda - the most deplorable
April 7, 2017 9:52 am

Add Trump to the list. He called them after all. Reading his name along with McCain’s and Graham’s puts him right where he belongs. Trump the neocon, showing his true face at last.

Flashman
Flashman
April 7, 2017 8:29 am

Early on when Trump declared his run for potus, a friend asked me how I could support him.
I told him I didn’t care if Trump was “certifiable”. Whoops!

Ed
Ed
  Flashman
April 7, 2017 9:28 am

I know what you mean, older brother. It’s a little tough to find out 5 months after the fact that the same people won the election who always win.

Anonymous
Anonymous
April 7, 2017 9:40 am

No one seems concerned but, the attack itself notwithstanding, I’m wondering why only 23 of the missiles reached their target.

What went wrong with the other 36?

A single missile on the base would have served the purpose of saying “No!” to the chemical weapons, but why 59 and why did only 23 make it?

TampaRed
TampaRed
  Anonymous
April 7, 2017 11:22 am

I was wondering the same thing.Maybe,hopefully,maybe,this was Trump negotiating w/Assad or it was Trump letting the neocons think that he’s with them.

TrickleUpPolitics
TrickleUpPolitics
April 7, 2017 8:24 pm

Wow, the comments on this article are pathetic. This attack helps the US in a number of ways. It shows China that we mean business when we say the military option is on the table vis-a-vis North Korea, esp. since the attack took place while Xi was at Mar-A-Lago. It may make the idiot child in N Korea take stock. And it tells the world there is a new sheriff in town. No more namby pamby Obama in charge. The world better straighten up and fly right. BTW, I think it was a measured response. Signed, retired vet

Zarathustra
Zarathustra
  TrickleUpPolitics
April 7, 2017 8:41 pm

I think it would be a measured response to shove a bottle up your ass and break it. Signed, retired draft resistor.

BL
BL
April 7, 2017 9:32 pm

Congrats TrickleUp !! You are the first maroon to trip over his dick and obtain the new title of TBP CHUMPETEER. Now shove it up your ass.

catfish
catfish
April 8, 2017 3:41 am

This is getting boring – Putin aint gonna do fuck all and he will lose Syria. He is false global NWO opposition – just like Trump is US domestic false oppostion who fooled almost all BP readers here. I warned about balding twat Trump being a deceiver from the day he was elected – and got real shit from the tossers here. See my earlier posts if they were not deleted. US population deserve to get shafted for their stupidity.