Dr. Strangelove I Presume?

The Russians, Seth Rich, John Podesta,  Madeleine Mccann, and “Smithman”

 

Reward, Seth Rich Murder

“Making an example”

“All the Money is IN”

Hands Up (Don’t shoot!?)

“Smithman”

“Meanwhile, sources involved with the DNC’s investigation of a foreign hack of its files last year rule out the notion that Seth Rich had any role in the affair. ‘There was no indication that any insider was involved in this,’ says one source, demanding anonymity in exchange for discussing the sensitive and ongoing investigation. ‘Every indication is this was a remote attack from a foreign government— the Russians. There is no indication that…there was any nefarious action taken by any employees in that environment.'”

See, the Russians Did It!

Or not:

A cache of hacking tools with code names such as Epicbanana, Buzzdirection and Egregiousblunder appeared mysteriously online over the weekend, setting the security world abuzz with speculation over whether the material was legitimate.

The file appeared to be real, according to former NSA personnel who worked in the agency’s hacking division, known as Tailored Access Operations (TAO).

“Without a doubt, they’re the keys to the kingdom,” said one former TAO employee, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive internal operations. “The stuff you’re talking about would undermine the security of a lot of major government and corporate networks both here and abroad.”

Said a second former TAO hacker who saw the file: “From what I saw, there was no doubt in my mind that it was legitimate.”

The file contained 300 megabytes of information, including several “exploits,” or tools for taking control of firewalls in order to control a network, and a number of implants that might, for instance, exfiltrate or modify information.

Source: Nakashima, E., Washington Post, August 16, 2016

Meaning the phishing email that caused John’s email leak cannot be reliably attributed to “the Russians”.

Here’s what we know:

  • The Russians had nothing to do with Madeleine’s disappearance.
  • The British had everything to do with Madeline’s disappearance.
  • The Russians did not fabricate the “Smithman” images.
  • The British fabricated the Smithman images in 2008.
  • The Russian’s did not make Smithman look like John and Tony Podesta in 2008.
  • The former head of undercover operations for Britain’s MI5 made Smithman look like John and Tony Podesta in 2008.
  • The Russians did not designate Smithman a person of interest in Madeleine’s disappearance and release the fabricated images in 2013.
  • The British Operation Grange investigators designated Smithman a person of interest in Madeleine’s disappearance and release the fabricated images in 2013.
  • The Russians did not set up and run the Clinton Foundation and the Clinton Global Initiative as a shake-down, pay-to-play, and influence peddling operation.
  • The Clintons set up and ran the Clinton Foundation and the Clinton Global Initiative as a shake-down, pay-to-play, and influence peddling operation.
  • The Russians did not leave Hillary’s private email server wide open to attack while she was Secretary of State and thereafter.
  • Hillary and her staff left her private email servers wide open to attack despite knowing they contained highly classified documents and communications.
  • The Russians did not barge aboard then-AG Loretta Lynch’s airplane in Phoenix, AZ just days before FBI Director Comey was to make his recommendation as to whether to bring charges against Hillary Clinton.
  • It was Bill Clinton who barged aboard Loretta’s airplane in Phoenix, AZ, after which she was reported to have been “trembling” by her staff and Comey let Hillary off with (surely) the most severe tongue-lashing ever administered by an FBI Director.
  • The Russians did not fly aboard Jeffrey Epstein’s “Lolita Express” and overnight at “Pedophile Island”.
  • The Clinton’s, members of the British Royal family and scores of other non-Russian elites either flew aboard the “Lolita Express”, overnighted at Pedophile Island, or were otherwise entertained by Jeffrey Epstein’s stable of underage girls.
  • John Podesta’s email account was compromised by his own IT staffer and his chief of staff, Sara Latham, when they instructed John to reset his Google account password by clicking on what they knew to be a malicious “phishing” email. That’s how John’s private emails were “hacked”. The authentic Google password reset page that was reportedly sent separately didn’t make it to John, or it arrived too late (oops!).
  • Absent Sara’s boo-boo as man-in-the-middle, John’s private emails would have never seen the light of day.
  • Neither John’s IT guy or Sara are Russian, although Sara IS British.
  • Sara Latham formerly worked for the British government and for PM Tony Blair. AND for Matthew Freud. Matthew “seconded” her to John Podesta as his chief of staff in his role as chairman of Hillary’s 2016 Presidential campaign.
  • Matthew Freud is Sir Clement Freud’s son.
  • Clement Freud insinuated himself with the Mccann’s shortly after Madeleine disappeared.
  • Clement Freud was revealed to have been a near life-long pedophile, child abuser and rapist in 2016.
  • Mathew Freud appears in Jeffrey Epstein’s little black book.
  • The Mccann’s government-appointed spokesperson was hired on by Matthew Freud to at his London PR agency where he continued as the Mccann’s spokesperson.
  • Seth Rich, the likely source of the DNC email leaks that showed the DNC to have colluded to deny Bernie Sanders the Democratic nomination, isn’t Russian. By all appearances, he was a loyal, conscientious and patriotic American.
  • It was not the Russians who colluded with the DNC to deny Bernie Sanders the Democratic nomination in 2016. (Parenthetically, it was not the Russians who colluded with the Republican National Committee to deny Ron Paul the Republic nomination in 2012.)
  • The phishing email John clicked on to reset his Google account password at the express direction of Sara Latham was reportedly of Russian or Ukrainian origin.

Why would anyone presume the Russians were responsible for any of this?

We have two instances (2008 and 2016) in which the British government, its agents, former high-level employees ad operatives and subjects  targeted the Podestas in which the fabricated Smithman images played a prominent role.

What the hell have the Brits been up to with the Madeleine hoax and their obvious meddling aimed against the Podestas and the Obama White House?

If we want to answer that question we’re going to need to do it by ourselves. It’s one of the deepest secrets of the British government – more so than the dodgy dossier WMD hoax that brought about the death of Dr. David Kelly. The answer to that question also now seems to be among the deepest secrets of the U.S. government, or elements thereof.

To begin to understand the full implications of the Madeleine hoax, you can read more at findingmadeleine.com, where you can also purchase the book, “Finding Madeleiene”.

“Finding Madeleine”, which is also being serialized on TBP, documents that Madeleine’s supposed abduction involved a hoax perpetrated by one or more of her parents, one or more of their vacationing friends and the highest levels of the British state and its security agencies.

[You may also want to visit the “Find Madeleine” website maintained by Madeleine’s Fund and her parents; both sites of which “Finding Madeleine” concludes are fronts to obstruct a legitimate investigation and to provide a legal defense and PR fund for Kate and Gerry Mccann.]

Some think we should get over it; Madeleine’s disappearance is old news. It happened 10 years ago. It has nothing to do with us. Some think it’s a “conspiracy theory”.

But Madeleine, via the fabricated “Smithman” images circulated by the British government, came to play a role in the 2016 U.S. Presidential election. And it wasn’t us or the U.S. government that made it so, although someone did. So it’s not over. What happened to Madeleine is relevant to current headlines and events.

Life imitating art

Dr. Strangelove:

General “Buck” Turgidson: “Sir, you can’t let him in here. He’ll see everything. He’ll see the big board!”. And, and the camera!

Last week in Washington, DC:

Author: Centinel

Just a guy from the neighborhood.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
11 Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous
May 17, 2017 11:43 am

At least the MSM has jumped all over this and replaced criticism of Trump doing exactly what he was authorized to do with the Russian delegation in working against terrorism with it.

Fiatman60
Fiatman60
May 17, 2017 11:52 am

The dog caption was absolutely priceless!! Made my day……

Token Whitey
Token Whitey
May 17, 2017 12:07 pm

See FBIAnon’s Q&A in the first post (4 images). http://8ch.net/pol/res/9929744.html#9929744

Some hope that justice will prevail? I admit, I’m desperate.

rhs jr
rhs jr
May 17, 2017 12:22 pm

How Harpy escapes prosecutions: DNC Thugs: “We killed all the people you wanted”. Red Queen: “Good, the tree trimmers out back have your payment”.

Unclassified
Unclassified
May 17, 2017 1:51 pm

Centinel – in spite of any dearth of comments and the fact the series was a little hard to follow at time, I appreciated the postings here on TBP overall and hope you do well with the book.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Unclassified
May 17, 2017 2:57 pm

@Unclassified: thanks, much appreciated. Glad someone is reading. And thanks to Admin as well. Nevertheless, the response has been underwhelming. And since no publisher would touch it the book is languishing in the “self-published” netherworld.

Which isn’t a bad thing considering that were “Finding Madeleine” to capture widespread attention we might also become an “example”.

As with Seth, these people don’t play nice.

We know the story told in “Finding Madeleine” is a bit hard to follow. A better writer or a professional editor could do it better justice.

But “Finding Madeleine” has a few chapters yet to go, and the story is still unfolding as recent headlines demonstrate.

The story behind the Madeleine’s hoax was (initially) difficult for us to unwind. We didn’t know it was faked and we never could have imagined it was part of a British hoax and what the motives were. We had no preconceptions when we started down this path, no intent to write a book, and we recalled little from when Madeleine was making headlines in the latter part of the last decade.

We tried to lay out the fundamentals in Chapter 1 of “Finding Madeleine” while maintaining a bit of the mystery to lead the reader through the story as we encountered it.

We can also report that those in the “anti-Mccann” crowd (including the admin’s/gatekeepers of some of the most popular websites devoted to the theory that Madeleine is dead from her parents hand or neglect) are as unenthusiastic about the book as those in the “pro-Mccann” crowd; even as their hero, former Portuguese Inspector Amaral, has recently highlighted the involvement of the British security agencies (MI5) in Madeleine’s disappearance. Amaral failed to recognize the import of MI5’s involvement, or was steered away from it, when he was directing the Portuguese investigation.

The keys to unravel the Madeleine hoax are the two Smithman images (whose genesis we will explore in the forthcoming Chapter 5 here on TBP), Clement Freud to a lesser degree, and understanding who Exton and Halligen are and the roles they played.

Those keys helped us recognize that the sniffer dogs the Brits so kindly offered 3 months too late to be of any use to Find Madeleine were part of the hoax.

Which is something most of the anti-Mccann crowd cannot bring themselves to acknowledge because it means the Mccann’s are not responsible for Madeleine’s death and disposing of her body. They’ve all hung their hats on the Mccann’s being murderers or (at the very least) guilty of negligent homicide, and of disposing of her body weeks later; a body that no one has yet to find.

The rest is part of the existing evidence assembled by the Portuguese and the public record, the latter of which parts were excised by the British. In particular Mark Hollingsworth’s article in the Evening Standard from late August, 2008.

Anyway, should anything happen, we’ve laid it all out sufficiently to date for even the most thick-headed British detective to figure it out or for the Portuguese to re-activate their investigation. Our work is done and our conscience is clear that we did our best to direct those genuinely wishing to do so to “Find Madeleine”.

Should they do so, they’re going to find much more than they bargained for.

Cent.

Token Whitey
Token Whitey
May 17, 2017 2:31 pm

Must see! True or false, it’s hilarious. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlluyU5uBf8

unit472
unit472
May 17, 2017 3:53 pm

Rather than go through “intelligence agency’ halls of mirrors and missing children the basic story is not that complex. President Obama and his intelligence chiefs, Comey, Clapper and Morell were charged with protecting the United States from foreign espionage. A Russian intelligence operation to destroy the Democratic nominee for President would be a top priority IF it existed. That no such scheme was detected, no announcement made of it and no arrests made before the election or since reflects on the competence of the Obama Administration not Donald Trump.

This, not the Russians, should be the focus of any post election investigation. We cannot undo the election but we can ask why Obama and his national security team as well as Hillary Clinton and her billion dollar plus campaign organization were not alert enough to detect a hack of Pizzagate Podesta’s computer?

Anonymous
Anonymous
  unit472
May 17, 2017 4:45 pm

Unit, excellent point.

A minor correction. John Podesta’s computer was not hacked to acquire his emails. As briefly mentioned in the post, Podesta was the object of a malicious “phishing” email. When he asked Sara Latham (his chief of staff) and his IT guy what he should do, he was told the phishing email was “legitimate”, after which he clicked on the phony link to re-set his password.

Podesta’s private google account wasn’t hacked to get his emails. Hillary’s server, however, was hacked after being left wide open to attack. Which is how her emails got out.

Podesta was sabotaged by his chief of staff, Sara Latham, who was a British subject with high-level links to the British government, the British Prime Minister, the British security agencies and Matthew Freud. She also had worked for Matthew Freud. Accordingly, it must be assumed she was a British operative until proven otherwise.

But you point is correct. If the Ruskies were “hacking” or interfering with the U.S. campaigns or election machinery the U.S. security agencies damn well would have known it at the time. Yet they were silent.

It’s another case of the dog that did not bark.

Their silence is damning to any suggestion the Ruskies were interfering in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

QED, and touche’.

digitalpennmedia
digitalpennmedia
May 17, 2017 4:15 pm

think what you will of different “crazy” whistle blowers and “prophetic” types but certain individuals have been telling these tales over and over and over for about 30 years…
none of this can come out and none of it will be believed because the deeper one goes the more one finds that the “governments” of the world are all colluding on the most evil crimes on the planet because they make and enforce the laws. These crimes arent just wars for profit, but drug trafficking and farming, human slavery and pedophilia, as well as murders and hits too numerous to count.
I recall the first time I came across a book by D. Icke and think what you will about him, his piecing together of the elites and their criminal rings are all coming into the light…while he lost me on the alien thing I am now waiting for it to happen since so much of other things he proclaimed now are showing signs of merit. He isnt the only one as several other researchers of governments and secret societies, researchers that have traced these entities back centuries, are finding that governments are directly tied into the biggest money changer families since the Templars and that these families all tie back into the monarchy in England who the PM of Canada was tapped swearing fealty to. Now why would a supposedly sovereign country swear fealty to a supposedly “just in title figurehead” like the Queen?
The real issue is that people cant put together time frames of the last 5-10 years let alone hundreds and they definitely cant seem to believe that it could go back hundreds of years… it doesnt really matter if you are able to follow that particular bit, but just focus on the current and how all these bodies stacked up by the Clintons and the dems seemingly have many strings all tied together and given that there would be reason to conclude that it takes a village to cover these sorts of things up.

Stubb
Stubb
May 17, 2017 7:16 pm

Sick bastards and bitches

Katy Perry’s “Bon Appétit” is a Nod to Occult Elite Rituals