Peterson reminds me of William F Buckley back in his hay-day. He was a neocon warmonger, cia plant and fierce statist. But he was as smart as they come, had great wit and would slay those who opposed him in debate. Gore Vidal, another towering figure of that day, was the only one who could hold his own against him. Peterson is cut from that mold. He also has brass balls. I love that he refuses to use the gender pronouns required by the pc crowd, especially on college campuses. We all can revel in the agony of those laid waste in his wake, like this clown.
kokoda the Deplorable Raccoon and I-LUV-CO2
March 10, 2018 8:22 pm
Yup, liked that back and forth; Peterson is really quick.
Try speaking truth to an idiot soon. It shuts them up most of the time. I have a little book I think would benefit a lot of folks interested in propaganda wars and how to win them.
I bought it when in a really fascinating Constitutional Law History course. It helped a lot with the legalese. And, with grasping when to use logic and when to use humor.
More often than shutting them up, it results in an idiotic response.
David
March 10, 2018 9:44 pm
De Tocqueville said, and I apologize for any misphrasing, that a man frequently does not find his interest in managing the affairs of the nation until he discovers his inability to manage his own.
What’s so bad about New York City going underwater?
Iska Waran
March 11, 2018 1:33 am
We should encourage teenagers to tell everyone how everything should be. Because it’s freaking hilarious. You go, girl, with your badass pink-haired placard-waving self. Don’t forget your pussy hat.
overthecliff
March 11, 2018 7:26 pm
If New York was under water, all those people would disperse to God’s country.
Alfred1860
March 11, 2018 8:54 pm
That wasn’t an accurate title for that video at all. I like Peterson a lot, and he was at his best in that clip, but his interviewer was whay used to be a honest representation of the dominant left viewpoint. I’m npt saying he bwsted Peterson, but his points were valid and well articulated for the most part. I’m glqd he wasn’t Kathy Newman – it allpwed Peterson bit mpre free rein because he wasn’t having to continually restate himself.
Peterson reminds me of William F Buckley back in his hay-day. He was a neocon warmonger, cia plant and fierce statist. But he was as smart as they come, had great wit and would slay those who opposed him in debate. Gore Vidal, another towering figure of that day, was the only one who could hold his own against him. Peterson is cut from that mold. He also has brass balls. I love that he refuses to use the gender pronouns required by the pc crowd, especially on college campuses. We all can revel in the agony of those laid waste in his wake, like this clown.
Yup, liked that back and forth; Peterson is really quick.
And now for a little humor:
FUNNY!
Try speaking truth to an idiot soon. It shuts them up most of the time. I have a little book I think would benefit a lot of folks interested in propaganda wars and how to win them.
I bought it when in a really fascinating Constitutional Law History course. It helped a lot with the legalese. And, with grasping when to use logic and when to use humor.
https://www.walmart.com/ip/A-Rulebook-for-Arguments/10773005
More often than shutting them up, it results in an idiotic response.
De Tocqueville said, and I apologize for any misphrasing, that a man frequently does not find his interest in managing the affairs of the nation until he discovers his inability to manage his own.
People think they can do when they cannot.
Stupid people think they know it all.
And rarely realize they’re the stupid ones.
If they did, they wouldn’t be stupid.
What’s so bad about New York City going underwater?
We should encourage teenagers to tell everyone how everything should be. Because it’s freaking hilarious. You go, girl, with your badass pink-haired placard-waving self. Don’t forget your pussy hat.
If New York was under water, all those people would disperse to God’s country.
That wasn’t an accurate title for that video at all. I like Peterson a lot, and he was at his best in that clip, but his interviewer was whay used to be a honest representation of the dominant left viewpoint. I’m npt saying he bwsted Peterson, but his points were valid and well articulated for the most part. I’m glqd he wasn’t Kathy Newman – it allpwed Peterson bit mpre free rein because he wasn’t having to continually restate himself.