Did Tariffs Make America Great?

Guest Post by Pat Buchanan

Did Tariffs Make America Great?

“Make America Great Again!” will, given the astonishing victory it produced for Donald Trump, be recorded among the most successful slogans in political history.

Yet it raises a question: How did America first become the world’s greatest economic power?

In 1998, in “The Great Betrayal: How American Sovereignty and Social Justice Are Being Sacrificed to the Gods of the Global Economy,” this writer sought to explain.

However, as the blazing issue of that day was Monica Lewinsky and Bill Clinton, it was no easy task to steer interviewers around to the McKinley Tariff.

Free trade propaganda aside, what is the historical truth?

As our Revolution was about political independence, the first words and acts of our constitutional republic were about ensuring America’s economic independence.

“A free people should promote such manufactures as tend to render them independent on others for essentials, especially military supplies,” said President Washington in his first message to Congress.

The first major bill passed by Congress was the Tariff Act of 1789.

Weeks later, Washington imposed tonnage taxes on all foreign shipping. The U.S. Merchant Marine was born.

In 1791, Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton wrote in his famous Report on Manufactures:

“The wealth … independence, and security of a Country, appear to be materially connected with the prosperity of manufactures. Every nation … ought to endeavor to possess within itself all the essentials of national supply. These compromise the means of subsistence, habitation, clothing, and defence.”

During the War of 1812, British merchants lost their American markets. When peace came, flotillas of British ships arrived at U.S. ports to dump underpriced goods and to recapture the markets the Brits had lost.

Henry Clay and John Calhoun backed James Madison’s Tariff of 1816, as did ex-free traders Jefferson and John Adams. It worked.

In 1816, the U.S. produced 840 thousand yards of cloth. By 1820, it was 13,874 thousand yards. America had become self-sufficient.

Financing “internal improvements” with tariffs on foreign goods would become known abroad as “The American System.”

Said Daniel Webster, “Protection of our own labor against the cheaper, ill-paid, half-fed, and pauper labor of Europe, is … a duty which the country owes to its own citizens.”

This is economic patriotism, a conservatism of the heart. Globalists, cosmopolites and one-worlders recoil at phrases like “America First.”

Campaigning for Henry Clay, “The Father of the American System,” in 1844, Abe Lincoln issued an impassioned plea, “Give us a protective tariff and we will have the greatest nation on earth.”

Battling free trade in the Polk presidency, Congressman Lincoln said, “Abandonment of the protective policy by the American Government must result in the increase of both useless labor and idleness and … must produce want and ruin among our people.”

In our time, the abandonment of economic patriotism produced in Middle America what Lincoln predicted, and what got Trump elected.

From the Civil War to the 20th century, U.S. economic policy was grounded in the Morrill Tariffs, named for Vermont Congressman and Senator Justin Morrill who, as early as 1857, had declared: “I am for ruling America for the benefit, first, of Americans, and, for the ‘rest of mankind’ afterwards.”

To Morrill, free trade was treason:

“Free trade abjures patriotism and boasts of cosmopolitanism. It regards the labor of our own people with no more favor than that of the barbarian on the Danube or the cooly on the Ganges.”

William McKinley, the veteran of Antietam who gave his name to the McKinley Tariff, declared, four years before being elected president:

“Free trade results in our giving our money … our manufactures and our markets to other nations. … It will bring widespread discontent. It will revolutionize our values.”

Campaigning in 1892, McKinley said, “Open competition between high-paid American labor and poorly paid European labor will either drive out of existence American industry or lower American wages.”

Substitute “Asian labor” for “European labor” and is this not a fair description of what free trade did to U.S. manufacturing these last 25 years? Some $12 trillion in trade deficits, arrested wages for our workers, six million manufacturing jobs lost, 55,000 factories and plants shut down.

McKinley’s future Vice President Teddy Roosevelt agreed with him, “Thank God I am not a free trader.”

What did the Protectionists produce?

From 1869 to 1900, GDP quadrupled. Budget surpluses were run for 27 straight years. The U.S. debt was cut two-thirds to 7 percent of GDP. Commodity prices fell 58 percent. U.S. population doubled, but real wages rose 53 percent. Economic growth averaged 4 percent a year.

And the United States, which began this era with half of Britain’s production, ended it with twice Britain’s production.

Under Warren Harding, Cal Coolidge and the Fordney-McCumber Tariff, GDP growth from 1922 to 1927 hit 7 percent, an all-time record.

Economic patriotism put America first, and made America first.

Of GOP free traders, the steel magnate Joseph Wharton, whose name graces the college Trump attended, said it well:

“Republicans who are shaky on protection are shaky all over.”

Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
18 Comments
starfcker
starfcker
July 27, 2018 6:54 am

Pat has gotten this right for a long long time

22winmag - when you ask certain persons which floor they'd like, and they respond with "ladies lingerie"- they're referencing the AEROSMITH SONG!!!
22winmag - when you ask certain persons which floor they'd like, and they respond with "ladies lingerie"- they're referencing the AEROSMITH SONG!!!
  starfcker
July 27, 2018 9:25 am

Jewish script readers working for intelligence agencies usually do get things right.

I’m beginning to believe just about everyone of any importance in the media (mainstream AND otherwise) is a LIMITED HANGOUT run by intelligence agencies.

http://mileswmathis.com/supreme.pdf

BL
BL
  starfcker
July 27, 2018 11:00 am

Star- As I posted the other day, the US government was paying the bills and keeping government small and manageable with tariffs as a income stream. The wheels did not come off the bus until after we got the FED and the personal income tax in 1913.

Boat Guy
Boat Guy
July 27, 2018 8:15 am

A large segment of the higher paid American industrial workforce begged , pleaded their case of what was happening with a policy of flooding the American economy with cheaper foreign produced goods while laying off Americans and shutting down factories .
I have heard all the comments of Free trade , open markets , world economy , competition , we are a service economy “BULL SHIT”!
We have become a debtor nation with a bankrupt economy with a small minority profiting from failure to protect American factories and industry working people and their wages and benefits .
Pensions healthcare once a assured to average Americans in their older years after decades of productive work evaporated as soon as they went to collect . Elder people hanging on to any job by a thread to survive and the young people that should be mentored and trained to step in are indebted to banks and government for education and training for jobs that don’t exist .
American working people have been convinced of nonsense like “you were overpaid or not productive enough” , more propaganda BULL SHIT !
We former heavy industry people should be proud , we did not lose our jobs , they were murdered by people in the corporate and government circle jerk to take advantage of poor desperate people around the world in poor working and living conditions and child labor . Yes corporate America your profit margins are up way up and your nation is starting to gag and choke on your success !

Two if by sea. Three,if from within thee
Two if by sea. Three,if from within thee
  Boat Guy
July 27, 2018 5:41 pm

Very,very well said.
I only wish I had two hundred more years to view the show
BTW…the tariffs incomes have historically been squandered
And another thing, the common man of America is what created greatness, Pat

Anonymous
Anonymous
July 27, 2018 8:52 am
Boat Guy
Boat Guy
  Anonymous
July 27, 2018 3:56 pm

A your GDP charts , figures of a 4% plus growth is meaningless when 100 MILLON people are not participating in the work force because of the pathetic pay an benefits . Tell the former Carrier employees who’s jobs went south with a giant sucking sound as soon as president Trump and the cameras were gone !
I still hope our president is on the right path but so far real results for a large segment of the population is still a lot of smoke & mirrors . Wages are stagnant pensions are screwed and health care insurence is out of sight .
I know our president has not had much time however I see no real signs of a drastic reversal of the wealth transfer that has snowballed in a bad completely predictable direction enriching such a small segment of the population . Minimum wage for a full time 40 hour job should be the same as a federal worker as should the benefits . Otherwise all any job is now is some level of indentured servitude . We still are not in a free market level playing field .
Remember Paul Ryan ? He is retiring with full government pensions but introduced legislation to push social security age to 70 . We as Americans need to demand better

Work-In-Progress
Work-In-Progress
July 27, 2018 8:57 am

Why not stand up for American business? Go Trump. And as far as all the forthcoming sob stories about how this industry or that industry is hurting because of the tariffs…1) where was all the crying when millions lost their jobs, pensions and healthcare? 2) no matter what someone loses and 3) make sure corporations aren’t the big winners. Small business desperately needs a champion.

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
July 27, 2018 9:42 am

What I’ve found hilarious is the liberal media suddenly becoming free trade zealots. When Bernie Sanders was running (and proposing tariffs) there was no talk of how tariffs would hurt Americans. Trump imposes tariffs on China and NPR is suddenly interviewing pork and soybean farmers trying to get them to complain about China’s retaliatory tariffs and to turn on Trump. I’ve heard about six such interviews and none of the farmers have turned against Trump. They’ve all expressed understanding of why action by Trump was needed. And now he’s going to effectively use a portion of the revenue raised by the tariffs to ease the impact of the retaliatory tariffs. There’s really no way Trump can lose on this when American pork exports are measured in the millions while Chinese imports total hundreds of billions.

bc aware
bc aware
July 27, 2018 10:43 am

Nah , what made America great was being sold out by the financialization , banker , political scammers , by assraping the 55,000 + manufacturing plants to third world communist/socialist shitholes for the slave labor savings so that lazy , incompetent , inbred banker/political/corporate management could spend more time diddling their sexcretaries/bacha bazi boys and changing their sexual orientation . That’s pretty much it in a nutshell , the rest is history .

robert h siddell jr
robert h siddell jr
July 27, 2018 10:59 am

The GSM cold will damage crops for the next several years so if Farmers put their product in their barn it will be like money in the bank because China will be begging for it in the next couple years. Trump has determined to help Coal Mining and that needs to be stepped up; the Natural Gas pipe lines (which replaced piles of coal) are very vulnerable to earthquakes (ref GSMs) and cities like NY are very vulnerable to riots when the FSA gets cold. PS: For the information of government experts, piles of wet coal were not vulnerable to earthquakes or riots, stupid.

BL
BL
  robert h siddell jr
July 27, 2018 11:04 am

RHS- The truth of the matter is they have nothing to replace coal completely. Or at least anything they are willing to admit to.

Alfred1860
Alfred1860
July 27, 2018 11:41 am

I think free trade amongst like nations in sectors not related to long-term security (food and military, primarily) is generally positive for all involved, but only if CORPORATIONS with their limited liability and cancerous growth-at-all-costs modus operandi are not involved. The rise of corporations has skewed the playing field so much that free trade vs. protectionism is a secondary concern.

Montefrío
Montefrío
July 27, 2018 12:45 pm

I’m waiting for llpoh to weigh in on this, but I will say that protectionism has its pros and cons (how profound!) and I suspect it has a great deal to do with the culture and work ethic of the nation in question. I live in Argentina, a nation that has had protectionism as its policy for longer than I’ve been alive, and I’m 72. The present prez is trying to open the door to some degree of free trade, as Chile,Colombia and Perú have done. Those three have seen considerable benefits, particularly to consumers. None of these countries has anything approaching the work ethic that certainly existed in the USA and likely still does to lesser extent. Argentina? Macri must know that given the “work ethic” here, the financial-big ag-corporate oligarchy along with corrupt and criminal labor unions, plus a bloated and inefficient public sector adds up to ruin for the domestic economy if the consumer is to be favored. Stimulating competition is next to impossible if your industries are unable and/or unwilling to compete. And let’s not forget the unsustainable tax and regulatory load on small and mid-sized start-ups!

I wish I had answers, but I don’t. My guess is that tariffs will help the USA, but free trade might be more beneficial to Argentina in the long run.

overthecliff
overthecliff
July 27, 2018 2:04 pm

Our trading ” partners”all have tariffs and trade barriers of other kinds. They want free entry for me but not for thee(USA). Trumps tariffs are just pissing on their heads and telling them that it is rain. Just to let them know we aren’t going to bend over any more.

Boat Guy
Boat Guy
  overthecliff
July 27, 2018 5:31 pm

No need to bend over when your already bent over a barrel and many of your own countrymen are taking turns on you and laughing about it

Llpoh
Llpoh
July 27, 2018 6:54 pm

Questions for everyone: how much total does the US import? How much does it export? How much is the current value of what the US manufactures?

How many jobs would be created if ALL the imports were eliminated? Here is a little factoid to help the brain get moving: US automakers sell around $500k per employee. Divide the total imports by say $250k to get an estimate of number of mfg jobs that might be created.

Now, take off the number of workers involved in exports.

Given that if you assume a constant population in 1950 as today, in 1950 you would have had around 70 million Americans working in mfg. Versus around 10 million today. Add the number of jobs creatd by eliminating all mfg imports. That might get you a very few million more – hell, lets be incredibly optimistic and say it jumps up to 15 million mfg workers. How in the hell, given we are assuming no imported goods at all, did constant population manufacturing workforce drop from 70 million to 10 or 15? Automation, my dear people. And it will continue. The idea that the mfg jobs were taken by China is fake. Because even with zero imports whatsoever, allowing for zero jobs lost to China, the workforce would be down over 80%.

Then let us all understand that continued automation will kill off jobs at a rate of around 500k employees a year. In a decade you will be right back to where you started from at around 10 million people. A decade after that you will be down to around 7 million employees.

A perfect example is steel mills. A highly automated steel mill requires almost no workers these days. There is a vid floating around of a car engine plant where the engines are manufactered with almost zero human labor.

Mfg will NEVER come back so as to employ a large part of the workforce. It is simply not possible. Even if the US made every single mfg item on earth, it would still employ fewer mfg employees as a percent of the workforce than it did in 1950.

It is never coming back, tariffs or otherwise.

Boat Guy
Boat Guy
  Llpoh
July 27, 2018 8:55 pm

Had we as a nation not imported cheap labor and had we protected and modernized our production capabilities a great deal would be different however when you are incentivized to bankrupt an entire nation treason economical becomes ruthless human nature . So our children play with soccer balls sewn by 10 year old Pakistani children now there is a fact this world economy can be proud of if you are an abusive corporate pedophile