$100 Oil Is A Distinct Possibility

Authored by Nick Cunningham via Oilprice.com,

An oil price spike is starting to look increasingly possible, with a rerun of 2008 not entirely out of the question, according to a new report.

https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/2bfb9b1edd5efd7fecb6dbb92580e0e1.jpg?itok=awdkXpZ_

The outages from Iran are worse than most analysts expected, and bottlenecks in the U.S. shale patch could prevent non-OPEC supply from plugging the gap. To top it off, new regulations from the International Maritime Organization set to take effect in 2020 could significantly tighten supplies.

Put it all together, and “the likelihood of an oil spike and crash scenario akin to the one observed in 2008 has increased,” Bank of America Merrill Lynch wrote in a note. BofAML has a price target for Brent at $95 per barrel by the end of the second quarter 2019. In 2008, Brent spiked to nearly $150 per barrel.

The supply picture is looking increasingly worrying, with Venezuela and Iran the two principal factors driving up oil prices in the fourth quarter. Notably, the bank increased its estimate of supply losses from Iran 1 million barrels per day (mb/d), up from 500,000 bpd previously.

U.S. shale can partially make up the difference, but the explosive growth from shale drillers is starting to slowdown, in part because of pipeline bottlenecks. BofAML sees U.S. supply growth of 1.4 mb/d in 2018 but only 1 mb/d of growth in 2019.

That means that there isn’t the same upward pressure on WTI as there is on Brent, largely because infrastructure bottlenecks in the shale patch keep supplies somewhat stuck within the United States. And it isn’t just in West Texas where the constraints are causing problems.

“[B]ottlenecks in the Permian basin could well extend to other areas such as the Bakken or the Niobrara, and we do not even rule out temporary export capacity constraints in the Gulf Coast as domestic output overwhelms logistics,” BofAML said in a note.

Meanwhile, the demand side of the equation is not as clear. For now, demand still looks strong. The IEA puts demand growth for 2018 at 1.4 mb/d, and Bank of America Merrill Lynch agrees. But BofAML says three important demand-side factors to watch, which could undermine the high price scenario.

First, the dollar is strong, which would likely prevent a run up in prices in the same way as in 2008.

Second, higher debt levels in emerging markets means that many countries are in a weaker spot than they were in 2008.

Third, capital could continue to flee emerging markets because of rising interest rates from the Federal Reserve, U.S. corporate tax cuts and U.S. tariffs.

Why the focus on emerging markets? Beyond the possibility of contagion, emerging markets represent the bulk of oil demand growth, so any faltering would upset the global demand picture. The strong dollar, higher debt and capital flight means that “significant [emerging market] oil demand destruction could follow if Brent crude oil spikes above $120/bbl,” Bank of America Merrill Lynch said.

Nevertheless, there are some ingredients in place that could lead to dramatic price spikes, even if the corresponding demand destruction makes the spike only temporary. BofAML puts total global supply outages at around 3 mb/d, only a bit lower than the recent peak of about 3.75 mb/d in 2014. And that doesn’t take into account the unfolding losses from Iran. In other words, if Iran loses around 1 mb/d of supply due to U.S. sanctions, as looks increasingly likely, total global supply outages could balloon to their highest in about two decades, not seen since the roughly 5 mb/d of outages during the 1990-91 Persian Gulf War.

Finally, the 2020 IMO regulations will force marine fuels to lower sulfur content from 3.5 percent to 0.5 percent. This will lead to a sharp increase in demand for diesel and other low sulfur fuels as the deadline for implementation approaches.

“[T]he transition to a lower sulfur fuel specification will not likely be smooth,” BofAML notes.

At a minimum, it appears that bearish sentiment from within the oil and gas industry has evaporated. Bloomberg notes that on the earnings calls of 22 major energy companies for the third quarter, not once was the phrase “lower for longer” mentioned, the first time since 2015 that was true. It wasn’t too long ago that blistering U.S. shale growth was thought to have permanently lowered the marginal price of production, which would lead to a period of lower oil prices for the foreseeable future.

That mantra seems to have been fleeting as a growing number of analysts see higher prices ahead with concerns about the possibility of triple-digits.

“The market does not have the supply response for a potential disappearance of 2 million barrels a day in the fourth quarter,” Mercuria Energy Group Ltd. co-founder Daniel Jaeggi said in a speech at the S&P Global Platts Asia Pacific Petroleum Conference, according to Bloomberg. “In my view, that makes it conceivable to see a price spike north of $100 a barrel.”

Meanwhile, the co-head of oil trading at Trafigura, another top oil trader, said that $100 oil was possible by the end of the year.

One of the key factors that will determine whether this happens or not is how Saudi Arabia responds.

“Our plan is to meet demand,” said Saudi Energy Minister Khalid Al-Falih. “The reason Saudi Arabia didn’t increase more is because all of our customers are receiving all of the barrels they want.” His comments came after the OPEC+, which ended with no plans to increase output.

The Wall Street Journal reports that Saudi Aramco has told its customers that might be running short on Arab light crude in October, and that in the long run, it won’t be able to meet demand if Iran is knocked offline. “[W]e are heading to a price spike, likely $90 to $100” an oil trader told the WSJ. “It’s not just Iran that will suffer. It’s going to have a boomerang effect with rising gasoline prices” in the U.S.

Worse, Saudi Arabia has officially said that it could cover for Iran’s losses, even if most of Iran’s production goes offline. In the past, Saudi officials have suggested that they could produce up to 12.0-12.5 mb/d if it the market needed it. But Saudi sources told the WSJ that producing “11 million is already a stretch, even for just a few months.” With output already up to about 10.4 mb/d, that leaves a significantly smaller pile of spare capacity than is commonly thought.

“It’s tearing higher,” said Ole Hansen, head of commodities strategy at Saxo Bank A/S, according to Bloomberg. “Technicals and fundamentals seem to be pointing in the right direction at the moment and that can be quite a potent cocktail.”

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
13 Comments
javelin
javelin
September 26, 2018 7:34 am

Kind of the opposite report of what I read yesterday. I thought we were heading towards being an oil exporter?

22winmag - Unreconstructedsouthernerbygraceofgod
22winmag - Unreconstructedsouthernerbygraceofgod
  javelin
September 26, 2018 7:53 am

At $100/bbl oil would buy a lot of fried chicken and watermelon.

KeyserSusie
KeyserSusie
September 26, 2018 11:02 am

A decade ago my limited understanding of the world broke things down to two factions. Big Oil and Big Pharma – under whose umbrella sat healthcare in all its manifestations including insurance.

As my awareness grew I realized the other factor was money. I could not grasp how the machinations of the money machine worked.

I try to reconcile this oily subject with the money machine and the oft repeated theme (((central banks))) found here on the TBP.

So if it goes to above $100 I am thinking it hurts China the most while certain oil producers benefit. Some more than others.

Does anyone else wonder how these things are related?

I wonder how some with large oil reserves – Venezuela Iran – are in huge dysfunction and how can that be, and for what reasons contrived by TPTB.

Perhaps some savant could shed light on my dim understanding.

Fleabaggs
Fleabaggs
  KeyserSusie
September 26, 2018 1:35 pm

Susie..
In the case of Venezuela, embargoes of crucial replacement and repair parts for oil production are causing severe cutbacks.

KeyserSusie
KeyserSusie
  Fleabaggs
September 26, 2018 2:06 pm

Flea, yes there are immediate causations. I kinda think TPTB created Venezuela’s collapse as revenge for nationalization of the oil companies. Give a socialist enough rope…. And I am inclined to believe TPTB want to keep production low AND see its reserves held in reserve for future use for the USA mostly.

Harrington Richardson
Harrington Richardson
  KeyserSusie
September 26, 2018 9:53 pm

Venezuela also has heavy crude which is more difficult to refine. There are a limited number of refineries that are equipped to refine heavy crude. China might come to their rescue. Who knows?
Merely because they have heavy crude their product is always the last choice if light crude is also available.

bluestem
bluestem
September 26, 2018 12:23 pm

Run up the price, draw the suckers in and then pull the rug out from under them. Repeat, wash and rinse. Didn’t they let Bitcoin go to $19,000 before they did that? Silver to $45 and Gold to $2000? Sucker born every day. Been one, once. That was enough. John

Per/Norway
Per/Norway
September 26, 2018 5:11 pm

the saudi salafi wahabist fake muslim bastards depended on occupying Yemen to use Yemens oil to boost their output.. lucky for us a rag tag band of youths, Yemeni thinkers and leaders said HELL NO, and stopped the wahabist pigs bragging about their option to increase their output of oil.

pyrrhus
pyrrhus
September 26, 2018 6:35 pm

Fracking is a money losing operation, at least for the investors, and strictly short term..Meanwhile, oil reserves are not being replaced…so look out.

Harrington Richardson
Harrington Richardson
  pyrrhus
September 26, 2018 9:57 pm

You may want to do a little research. The oil outlook is way better than that.

Jed Clampett
Jed Clampett
  Harrington Richardson
September 26, 2018 10:42 pm

No, it isn’t. Oil is toast, sorry.

KeyserSusie
KeyserSusie
  Harrington Richardson
September 27, 2018 1:25 am

I have said before I do not subscribe to peak oil predictions. I tend to believe there are virgin reserves untapped. I read long ago (decades) how Afghanistan holds not only vast mineral deposits but also oil. Hence why we occupy it, and the opium cartel gets to flourish in the meantime. Oh, and I include illicit drugs under the umbrella of big pharma in my bipolar world of pharma/healthcare/insurance AND big oil, I just can’t factor ((())) in the equation. National security dictates we should keep the ruskies and China out of Afghanistan. Prolly Israel seeks to eventually own and occupy it too via you know who.

China purchased rights to oil tracts off the coast of Cuba if my memory serves me, many years ago. Not sure how those rights still hold up.

And then there is Antarctica. And wtf is this stuff Gaii keeps putting up about ancient civilizations down there? And someone on board of TBP was inferring Byrd found weird stuff there too.

We be desperate in these fracking efforts imo. But good to have should an interruption of supply occurs. And I can think of many scenarios, one being desert sands turning to glass.

Free Speech Forum
Free Speech Forum
September 26, 2018 10:58 pm

Your country is collapsing.

The elites laugh when the 99% are divided.

Instead of blaming others, name-calling, or giving up, why not try to find ways to fix things?