Why the fight over abortion? Can’t they use birth control?
Anonymous
October 12, 2018 2:29 pm
And by the marks of the beast, ye shall know them. Talk about not only condoning something, but openly supporting termination of creations and miracles. A symbol.
Their body, and theirs alone, to deface and defile, in defiance of a creator who sourced to them such an extraordinary temple. Vulgar, offensive grafitti, such symbolism, in permanent ink no less.
For all to see such vanity and ego.
Come judgement day,
They can try to remove that when they get nearer to their own cessation of life here, but any erasing will not hide it, and will not be forgotten. Weeping and gnashing of the teeth.
If I was a single man, this would be a very convenient identifying Mark to eliminate those I wouldn’t want to waste my time with
Mary Christine
October 12, 2018 3:17 pm
Abortions are probably less safe now than they were before R v W. Most clinics get by without being inspected for cleanliness and safe practices. They always fight any attempt to be regulated like any other outpatient facility.
“In his book, “The Abortion Papers,” Dr. Nathanson admitted that the 5,000 to 10,000 death figure which was fed “to the public and the media in the late 1960’s,” was fabricated because it was a “nice, round, shocking figure.” And, just like they do today, the media — willingly and with no documentation — repeated that figure with no demand for proof. Nathanson reiterated this point in his book, “Hand of God,” and shockingly admitted that one of his strategies to changing perception about abortion was to attack the opposition, “at every opportunity,” which was in that day, the Catholic Church. He also admitted that in 1969:
Our favorite tack was to blame the church for the death of every woman from a botched abortion. There were perhaps three hundred or so deaths from criminal abortions annually in the United States in the sixties, but NARAL in its press releases claimed to have data that supported a figure of five thousand. Fortunately, the respected Dr. Christopher Tietze was our ally. Though, he never actually staked himself to a specific number, he never denied the authenticity of these claims.”
I used to think we needed to repeal R v W but I no longer think it is necessary. I believe it would be counter productive. What we need are studies that are not politicized to come to a preconceived conclusion before the study is ever done. With honest dialogue we could continue to bring the already dropping abortion numbers way down.
Honest dialogue…who am I kidding..that will never happen. (I had to go 5 pages in to find anything other than the usual propaganda.)
The hanger is just a stupid symbol for something that hardly any women ever tried.
Dutchman
October 12, 2018 4:14 pm
A hanger is OK with me – but she’d also need tats of an: iron, washing machine, range, vacuum, dust cloth.
Indeed. How bout that tat in the middle of the forehead, a la Charlie Manson. Accessorize, with shiny little coathanger earrings or better yet, as a piercing, to go along with the spike in the tongue or through the lip or eyelid. Like fishing lures.
Wear your feminism loud & proud, arrogant warrior pro choice advocates and protestors.
Ladies? Don’t you think?
Hardly.
Anything but ladies or thinkers.
Idiots, as described in post title.
In abundance.
JR Wirth
October 12, 2018 6:02 pm
I thought is would be a little black baby.
Capn Mike
October 13, 2018 1:54 am
As a circumcision survivor, I sport a little mohel with some clippers.
Why the fight over abortion? Can’t they use birth control?
And by the marks of the beast, ye shall know them. Talk about not only condoning something, but openly supporting termination of creations and miracles. A symbol.
Their body, and theirs alone, to deface and defile, in defiance of a creator who sourced to them such an extraordinary temple. Vulgar, offensive grafitti, such symbolism, in permanent ink no less.
For all to see such vanity and ego.
Come judgement day,
They can try to remove that when they get nearer to their own cessation of life here, but any erasing will not hide it, and will not be forgotten. Weeping and gnashing of the teeth.
But….what if you only get your clothes….folded?
Lol…”What? My family owns a dry cleaning biz.”
If I was a single man, this would be a very convenient identifying Mark to eliminate those I wouldn’t want to waste my time with
Abortions are probably less safe now than they were before R v W. Most clinics get by without being inspected for cleanliness and safe practices. They always fight any attempt to be regulated like any other outpatient facility.
“In his book, “The Abortion Papers,” Dr. Nathanson admitted that the 5,000 to 10,000 death figure which was fed “to the public and the media in the late 1960’s,” was fabricated because it was a “nice, round, shocking figure.” And, just like they do today, the media — willingly and with no documentation — repeated that figure with no demand for proof. Nathanson reiterated this point in his book, “Hand of God,” and shockingly admitted that one of his strategies to changing perception about abortion was to attack the opposition, “at every opportunity,” which was in that day, the Catholic Church. He also admitted that in 1969:
Our favorite tack was to blame the church for the death of every woman from a botched abortion. There were perhaps three hundred or so deaths from criminal abortions annually in the United States in the sixties, but NARAL in its press releases claimed to have data that supported a figure of five thousand. Fortunately, the respected Dr. Christopher Tietze was our ally. Though, he never actually staked himself to a specific number, he never denied the authenticity of these claims.”
I used to think we needed to repeal R v W but I no longer think it is necessary. I believe it would be counter productive. What we need are studies that are not politicized to come to a preconceived conclusion before the study is ever done. With honest dialogue we could continue to bring the already dropping abortion numbers way down.
Honest dialogue…who am I kidding..that will never happen. (I had to go 5 pages in to find anything other than the usual propaganda.)
The hanger is just a stupid symbol for something that hardly any women ever tried.
A hanger is OK with me – but she’d also need tats of an: iron, washing machine, range, vacuum, dust cloth.
Wear heels, stockings, a garter and a French Maid outfit too, oui?
Don’t forget a sammich tat.
If you support abortion, put it where people will see it.
Indeed. How bout that tat in the middle of the forehead, a la Charlie Manson. Accessorize, with shiny little coathanger earrings or better yet, as a piercing, to go along with the spike in the tongue or through the lip or eyelid. Like fishing lures.
Wear your feminism loud & proud, arrogant warrior pro choice advocates and protestors.
Ladies? Don’t you think?
Hardly.
Anything but ladies or thinkers.
Idiots, as described in post title.
In abundance.
I thought is would be a little black baby.
As a circumcision survivor, I sport a little mohel with some clippers.