Church knew for years LA bishop had been accused of abuse but didn’t disclose until now

Via Los Angeles Times

a man wearing a hat: Catholic Bishop Alexander Salazar joins a community prayer meeting on March 24, 2105.

LOS ANGELES – The Archdiocese of Los Angeles knew for at least 13 years that one of its bishops had been accused of sexual abuse at a parish but did not inform the public until this week, despite repeated vows to disclose such information.

The archdiocese, which over the years has paid out a record $740 million in settlements to victims of priest abuse, had promised to publicize the names of clergy accused of wrongdoing. But Bishop Alexander Salazar’s name was not on several lists released by the church, even though he’d been investigated by the Pasadena Police Department in 2002. The inquiry involving Salazar only became public when Pope Francis accepted his resignation Wednesday as auxiliary bishop of Los Angeles.

Neither Salazar nor his attorney could be reached for comment.

The archdiocese said the departure of Salazar, who has long maintained his innocence, was an important step in its effort to better respond to abuse allegations that have roiled the church. But it raises questions about why it took so long for the Vatican to act and for the public to be told about Salazar’s history.

According to prosecutors and police, Salazar was accused of committing a lewd act with a child in the 1990s. The archdiocese said the allegations were made by a family who attended the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary church in Pasadena, where Salazar served as a pastor from 1988 to 1992. The family didn’t go to police until 2002, during the height of the priest abuse scandal. Detectives investigated and submitted their findings to the Los Angeles County district attorney’s office, which decided not to file charges.

In 2004, Pope John Paul II elevated Salazar to the position of bishop. The archdiocese said its officials were not informed about the Pasadena investigation until 2005. But Pasadena police on Wednesday indicated at least some in the church might have known sooner. The department said the incident involving Salazar was said to have occurred at a private residence. But officials made “contact with the church and the school, in an abundance of caution, as they employed the individual against whom the complaint was made,” the department said in a statement to the Los Angeles Times.

Once senior officials learned of the allegations, the archdiocese referred the matter to the Vatican’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which investigates clergy sexual misconduct, Archbishop Jose H. Gomez said in a letter to the parishioners Wednesday.

The congregation “imposed certain precautionary measures” on Salazar, who remained a bishop.

Asked why the church did not name Salazar among the hundreds of clergy accused of misconduct, spokeswoman Adrian M. Alarcon said that the bishop was overseen by the pope and that it wasn’t the archdiocese’s place to make the disclosure.

“As this matter involves a bishop, it is overseen by the Holy See,” Alarcon said.

Some advocates for survivors of priest abuse expressed outrage that Salazar’s alleged conduct was not made public much sooner.

“This is an egregious violation of their policy of transparency. It demonstrates there never was a zero-tolerance policy for abusers in the Los Angeles Archdiocese,” said Joelle Casteix, a leader of Survivors Taking on Predators. “He was elevated to bishop after his abuse was reported to police.”

Salazar’s resignation comes amid growing pressure on the Vatican to deal with a new series of priest scandals.

An Illinois attorney general’s report released Wednesday found that the number of Catholic clergy accused of sexual abuse in the state was much higher than previously acknowledged. The report found 690 clergy accused, although church officials had publicly identified only 185 with credible allegations against them. This summer, a grand jury report out of Pennsylvania uncovered a decades-long cover-up of child sex abuse involving more than 1,000 victims and hundreds of priests, sparking outrage and calls for reform.

In response, the Los Angeles diocese and others across California and the nation have released new lists of clergy accused of wrongdoing.

“We owe it to the victim-survivors to be fully transparent in listing the names of those who perpetrate this abuse,” Gomez said in a statement last month in releasing a list with 54 additional names. Salazar was not among them.

Exactly how the bishop came to resign is unclear.

But Gomez said in his statement Wednesday that he sought and received permission from the Vatican to submit the allegation against Salazar to the Los Angeles Archdiocese’s independent clergy misconduct oversight board.

“The board found the allegation to be credible and I submitted its findings and recommendations along with my own votum to the Holy See to make its final determination as to Bishop Salazar’s status,” Gomez wrote.

Gomez said the resignation shows a “deep concern for the healing and reconciliation of abuse victims and for the good of the church’s mission.”

Salazar, 69, was born in San Jose, Costa Rica, and grew up in Los Angeles. He attended Daniel Murphy High School, East Los Angeles College and California State University, Los Angeles before eventually attending St. John’s Seminary.

He was ordained in 1985 and worked in parishes in Whittier, Pasadena and Los Angeles before rising to become a vice chancellor of the archdiocese. In September 2004, Pope John Paul II named him an auxiliary bishop, leading the pastoral region of San Pedro, one of L.A.’s five pastoral regions.

Casteix said she was skeptical that no one in the archdiocese knew of the 2002 police investigation before Salazar was appointed a bishop.

Patrick Wall, a former ordained priest who works as an advocate for sex abuse victims in civil litigation and is a canon law expert, said he’s surprised that the church did not release Salazar’s name much earlier and that he was not included in the more than 23,000 pages of documents the archdiocese has been forced to disclose as part of its financial settlements with victims.

Wall said Salazar’s resignation may be part of a larger preparation for a summit called at the Vatican in February to discuss the sexual abuse crisis.

“Pope Francis is trying to clean house,” he said.

In July, Francis ousted Francis McCarrick, the retired archbishop of Washington, from the College of Cardinals after he was accused of molesting a minor in the 1970s. A former Vatican nuncio to the U.S., Carlo Maria Vigano, then accused the pope of ignoring McCarrick’s behavior for years.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
13 Comments
Donkey Balls
Donkey Balls
December 20, 2018 10:21 am

All, and I mean all, large organizations succumb to evil and abuse power. Eventually, they take advantage of large numbers of people.

Trapped in Portlandia
Trapped in Portlandia
December 20, 2018 10:46 am

The Pope and his Church are hoping to wait this scandal out until it blows over. Unfortunately, when you require your Priests to be celibate, the scandal will never die.

To survive, the Church will need to change their doctrine and allow priests to marry or the Catholic Church will die. I’m hoping for the later, but I can live with either alternative.

Anonymous
Anonymous
December 20, 2018 11:04 am

The Catholic Church: A coven of buttfuckers that calls itself “The Bride of Christ.”

Old Shoe
Old Shoe
December 20, 2018 11:24 am

(weeping) “The priest said he had a present in his pants for me”.

Stucky
Stucky
December 20, 2018 11:49 am

My God, just LOOK at that dude’s face! You can almost see Little Boy Happy Juice flowing down his chin.

I love that many blame the Catholic leadership (and, rightfully so) but, virtually no one (except maybe Ann Barnhardt) blames actually Catholic laity!

Because, listen, none of this could continue if nice little Catholic people simply stopped going to church or, at a minimum, if they simply refused to ever put even one thin dime in the donation plate ever again. Fact is; it isnot only the person who actually does the crime who is guilty …. it is also those who support the evildoer.

grace country pastor
grace country pastor
  Stucky
December 20, 2018 4:16 pm

Agreed. Yet Barnhardt remains a catholic. What’s wrong with this picture?

Laity: The people, as distinguished from the clergy; the body of the people not in orders.

There is no laity because there is no clergy. Catholicism itself is a false paradigm. The only priests God ever ordained were Jewish. Since God is not dealing with Israel in this dispensation of grace there can be no priests having “order” over any others.

Romans 11:32 KJV… “For God hath concluded them all in unbelief, that he might have mercy upon all.”

Galatians 3:28 KJV… “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.”

The desire of some men to exert control over others is the root cause of these sickening problems.

Ginger
Ginger
  grace country pastor
December 20, 2018 5:23 pm

Catholicism, the religion and the worship of ancient deities.
Notice that Jesus is talking about “spirits more wicked” when this woman brings up the worship of his mother Mary.
“Then it goes and brings seven other spirits more wicked than itself, and they go in and dwell there. And the final plight of that man is worse than the first.” As Jesus was saying these things, a woman in the crowd raised her voice and said, “Blessed is the womb that bore You, and blessed are the breasts that nursed You.” But He replied, “Blessed rather are those who hear the word of God and obey it.”… Luke 11:26-27 (NIV)

The children gather wood, and the fathers kindle the fire, and the women knead their dough, to make cakes to the queen of heaven, and to pour out drink offerings unto other gods, that they may provoke me to anger. Jeremiah 7:18 King James Version (KJV)

Oh they (Catholics) will tell you that Mary is not worshipped as the queen of heaven, but saw my niece in law at her wedding lay prostrate before an image of Mary.
“Here’s a way to learn more about Mary, Queen of Heaven”
https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/heres-a-way-to-learn-more-about-mary-queen-of-heaven-86521
Ask a catholic about any of this scripture, they don’t have a clue.

Prusmc
Prusmc
  grace country pastor
December 20, 2018 6:18 pm

Was this child the Bishop abused a boy or a girl? Wasn’t Cardenal Roger Mc Initire a well know cover up perpetrator for many years? YET, he was a holier than thou polically correct SJW.

Prof. Mandelbrot
Prof. Mandelbrot
  Stucky
December 21, 2018 4:53 am

I am non practicing catholic and all my friends are being brainwashed every sunday by their parrish priests to pray for these wayward priests and that they are just humans and the “small” percentage is nothing to worry about nothing to see here. Then the priests sends out tithe bucket to help those priests with counseling or the victims fund because the pope doesnt want to pay. Afterall, he has a large wall to upkeep. He cannot afford his wall and paying off victims too!

grace country pastor
grace country pastor
  Prof. Mandelbrot
December 21, 2018 7:16 am

Professor writes: “I am non practicing catholic”

I guess I confuse easily. Why be a catholic if you don’t practice the belief system?

If you believe “in” the Lord Jesus which catholics do, why not have faith in what He’s done “for” us sinners which catholics miss completely?

Romans 5:8 KJV… “But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.”

BTW… you have my vote for best moniker on TBP. If I ever get a tattoo, it will be of a small Mandlebrot set with the letters DNR in the center over my heart.

Pequiste
Pequiste
December 20, 2018 5:36 pm

Wow, I mean talk about bad judgment on the part of the Diocese and the Vatican. This guy* is perfect material for archbishop don’t you think?

*Disgusting, piece-of-shit pedophile scumbag.

Prof. Mandelbrot
Prof. Mandelbrot
December 21, 2018 4:49 am

Not much difference here than the pedo muslim gang rapers…..

Mac Tire
Mac Tire
December 21, 2018 8:09 pm

At what point is it reasonable to consider all Catholics who continue to support the Church to be accessories to industrial-scale child rape?