‘Senior Trump Official’: “I Hope A Long Shutdown Smokes Out The Resistance”

Via ZeroHedge

President Trump just retweeted the following ‘anonymous’ op-ed from The Daily Caller saying it is “worth the read.”

 

The Daily Caller is taking the rare step of publishing this anonymous op-ed at the request of the author, a senior official in the Trump administration whose identity is known to us and whose career would be jeopardized by its disclosure. We believe publishing this essay anonymously is the only way to deliver an important perspective to our readers. We invite you to submit a question about the essay or our vetting process here.

As one of the senior officials working without a paycheck, a few words of advice for the president’s next move at shuttered government agencies: lock the doors, sell the furniture, and cut them down.

Federal employees are starting to feel the strain of the shutdown. I am one of them. But for the sake of our nation, I hope it lasts a very long time, till the government is changed and can never return to its previous form.

The lapse in appropriations is more than a battle over a wall. It is an opportunity to strip wasteful government agencies for good.

On an average day, roughly 15 percent of the employees around me are exceptional patriots serving their country. I wish I could give competitive salaries to them and no one else. But 80 percent feel no pressure to produce results. If they don’t feel like doing what they are told, they don’t.

Why would they? We can’t fire them. They avoid attention, plan their weekend, schedule vacation, their second job, their next position — some do this in the same position for more than a decade.

They do nothing that warrants punishment and nothing of external value. That is their workday: errands for the sake of errands — administering, refining, following and collaborating on process. “Process is your friend” is what delusional civil servants tell themselves. Even senior officials must gain approval from every rank across their department, other agencies and work units for basic administrative chores.

Process is what we serve, process keeps us safe, process is our core value. It takes a lot of people to maintain the process. Process provides jobs. In fact, there are process experts and certified process managers who protect the process. Then there are the 5 percent with moxie (career managers). At any given time they can change, clarify or add to the process — even to distort or block policy counsel for the president.

Saboteurs peddling opinion as research, tasking their staff on pet projects or pitching wasteful grants to their friends. Most of my career colleagues actively work against the president’s agenda. This means I typically spend about 15 percent of my time on the president’s agenda and 85 percent of my time trying to stop sabotage, and we have no power to get rid of them. Until the shutdown.

Due to the lack of funding, many federal agencies are now operating more effectively from the top down on a fraction of their workforce, with only select essential personnel serving national security tasks. One might think this is how government should function, but bureaucracies operate from the bottom up — a collective of self-generated ideas. Ideas become initiatives, formalize into offices, they seek funds from Congress and become bureaus or sub-agencies, and maybe one day grow to be their own independent agency, like ours. The nature of a big administrative bureaucracy is to grow to serve itself. I watch it and fight it daily.

When the agency is full, employees held liable for poor performance respond with threats, lawsuits, complaints and process in at least a dozen offices, taking years of mounting paperwork with no fear of accountability, extending their careers, while no real work is done. Do we succumb to such extortion? Yes. We pay them settlements, we waive bad reviews, and we promote them.

Many government agencies have adopted the position that more complaints are good because it shows inclusion in, you guessed it, the process. When complaints come, it is cheaper to pay them off than to hold public servants accountable. The result: People accused of serious offenses are not charged, and self-proclaimed victims are paid by you, the American taxpayer.

The message to federal supervisors is clear. Maintain the status quo, or face allegations. Many federal employees truly believe that doing tasks more efficiently and cutting out waste, by closing troubled programs instead of expanding them, “is morally wrong,” as one cried to me.

I get it. These are their pets. It is tough to put them down and let go, and many resist. This phenomenon was best summed up by a colleague who said, “The goal in government is to do nothing. If you try to get things done, that’s when you will run into trouble.”

But President Trump can end this abuse. Senior officials can reprioritize during an extended shutdown, focus on valuable results and weed out the saboteurs. We do not want most employees to return, because we are working better without them. Sure, we empathize with families making tough financial decisions, like mine, and just like private citizens who have to find other work and bring competitive value every day, while paying more than a third of their salary in federal taxes.

President Trump has created more jobs in the private sector than the furloughed federal workforce. Now that we are shut down, not only are we identifying and eliminating much of the sabotage and waste, but we are finally working on the president’s agenda.

President Trump does not need Congress to address the border emergency, and yes, it is an emergency. Billions upon billions of hard-earned tax dollars are still being dumped into foreign aid programs every year that do nothing for America’s interest or national security. The president does not need congressional funding to deconstruct abusive agencies who work against his agenda. This is a chance to effect real change, and his leverage grows stronger every day the shutdown lasts.

The president should add to his demands, including a vote on all of his political nominees in the Senate. Send the career appointees back. Many are in the 5 percent of saboteurs and resistance leaders.

A word of caution: To be a victory, this shutdown must be different than those of the past and should achieve lasting disruption with two major changes, or it will hurt the president.

The first thing we need out of this is better security, particularly at the southern border. Our founders envisioned a free market night watchman state, not the bungled bloated bureaucracy our government has become. But we have to keep the uniformed officers paid, which is an emergency. Ideally, continue a resolution to pay the essential employees only, if they are truly working on national security. Furloughed employees should find other work, never return and not be paid.

Secondly, we need savings for taxpayers. If this fight is merely rhetorical bickering with Nancy Pelosi, we all lose, especially the president. But if it proves that government is better when smaller, focusing only on essential functions that serve Americans, then President Trump will achieve something great that Reagan was only bold enough to dream.

The president’s instincts are right. Most Americans will not miss non-essential government functions. A referendum to end government plunder must happen. Wasteful government agencies are fighting for relevance but they will lose. Now is the time to deliver historic change by cutting them down forever.

The author is a senior official in the Trump administration.

Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
71 Comments
goofyfoot
goofyfoot
January 15, 2019 9:57 am

Why is the LSM discussing the pay these fuckers are losing and not the jobs that are “important”they supposedly do everyday?

Vixen Vic
Vixen Vic
  goofyfoot
January 16, 2019 1:39 am

Because they do nothing important. Get rid of them.

Old Shoe
Old Shoe
January 15, 2019 10:27 am

If anyone runs across CC Rider today, tell him one of his TBP comments was given an atta boy plug over at The Woodpile Report.

TampaRed
TampaRed
  Old Shoe
January 15, 2019 11:20 am

cc was over on the” stupid is …. “thread earlier spouting off how stupid you are if you voted–
she’s definitely a one trick pony–

NtroP
NtroP
January 15, 2019 10:30 am

This is the best thing I have read in days, maybe weeks!
What are the chances this goes viral and millions see it and believe it? Unfortunately, very low.
Thanks Jim for posting this. Smaller government NOW, now there’s an idea……

Harrington Richardson
Harrington Richardson
  NtroP
January 15, 2019 2:58 pm

I would think Tucker Carlson will go with this since he is the co-founder of Daily Caller.

Ned
Ned
January 15, 2019 10:41 am

comment image

Donkey Balls
Donkey Balls
January 15, 2019 11:17 am

If only.

TampaRed
TampaRed
January 15, 2019 11:17 am

i bet the resistance does less damage then the republicans do by their cowardice-

https://dailycaller.com/2019/01/14/steve-king-loses-committee-seats/?utm_medium=email

Harrington Richardson
Harrington Richardson
  TampaRed
January 15, 2019 3:01 pm

Pretty worthless symbolism since the other side never takes any action even when the pol involved has committed felonies.

Anonymous
Anonymous
January 15, 2019 11:46 am

Ship all government jobs to North Dakota. Half a salary will go twice as far.

If you don’t like it, quit.

robert h siddell jr
robert h siddell jr
  Anonymous
January 15, 2019 12:16 pm

Good in that they will all quit the first Winter; but ND is not cheap: I was a USAF Officer there 5.5 years and ND is very expensive because of heating obviously but their ground water is gone and it has to be piped from the south; and because everything we consumed had to be shipped so far north.

Anonymous
Anonymous
January 15, 2019 11:46 am

Ship all government jobs to North Dakota. Half a salary will go twice as far.

If you don’t like it, quit.

Mary Christine
Mary Christine
January 15, 2019 11:54 am

Do we not hate anonymous sources? I always take these things with very large grains of salt. Wow, I’m getting thirsty. Must be all the salt I have needed lately.

no one
no one
  Mary Christine
January 15, 2019 12:17 pm

On the other hand, Woodward and Bernstein would never have been able to publish without being able to protect Deep Throat (whose real name eludes me.)

I worked in and for the federal government for a long time. He speaks truth to power and will be found out and punished. Because, if too many people speak out truthfully, without fear of reprisal, the taxpayers might realize most of those lazy assholes really don’t do a damn thing of any value to anyone most of the time.

Like I did for a few years. But, I knew how to take good notes during meetings without paying attention and how to nod, smile and suggest the engineer(s) in the room explain (am spoofing that article on “how to look smart in meetings” from a couple of weeks ago). I rarely said a word in the weekly/sometimes daily staff meetings. I took copious notes and tried to keep up with which airframe was furthest behind schedule and overbudget.

Donkey Balls
Donkey Balls
  no one
January 15, 2019 1:56 pm

G. Gordon Liddy for $1,000?

Vixen Vic
Vixen Vic
  Donkey Balls
January 16, 2019 1:45 am

Liddy was one of the Watergate burglars. (And involved in JFK assassination.) Another of the FBI. See a pattern?

Mary Christine
Mary Christine
  no one
January 15, 2019 6:28 pm

I suppose you have a point. Still, isn’t it a good idea to verify the information? This just sounds like more Q shit to me. Just repackaged. I think there is a point to a long shutdown. I’m just not sure what it is yet.
If we just got rid of TSA it would be progress.

Platoplubius
Platoplubius
  Mary Christine
January 15, 2019 7:07 pm

The point to the shut down is to begin the austerity agreed upon from meetings like the G20. As the anonymous author mentioned,

lock the doors, sell the furniture, and cut them down.

A smaller Federal government is definitely needed, just pay attention to what gets cut, what gets sold and who is doing the buying.

Here is a page from Perkin’s book, “Confessions of an Economic Hitman” that explains how the CON works.
comment image

Vixen Vic
Vixen Vic
  Mary Christine
January 16, 2019 1:46 am

Agree, Christine, as to anonymous op-eds, as in my comment below (which I wrote before reading other comments.) Getting rid of TSA would be a huge start.

Vixen Vic
Vixen Vic
  no one
January 16, 2019 1:43 am

Deep Throat = Mark Felt. Of the FBI. History is cyclical.

Stucky
Stucky
January 15, 2019 12:06 pm

“The author is a senior official in the Trump administration.”

I think Trump wrote the article.

NtroP
NtroP
  Stucky
January 15, 2019 1:25 pm

Stuck, you’re giving him quite a bit of credit.

splurge
splurge
  Stucky
January 15, 2019 1:52 pm

It would not shock me if you were proven correct.

Impeach the Em Effer
Impeach the Em Effer
  Stucky
January 15, 2019 5:16 pm

That is Sock Puppetry 101. The latest use here was Yokes posting a pro-Natz article anonymously and then whole-heartedly agreeing with the piece.

Vixen Vic
Vixen Vic
  Stucky
January 16, 2019 1:49 am

Could be Jared Kushner with a disguised pen.

no one
no one
January 15, 2019 12:08 pm

“They do nothing that warrants punishment and nothing of external value. That is their workday: errands for the sake of errands — administering, refining, following and collaborating on process. “Process is your friend” is what delusional civil servants tell themselves. Even senior officials must gain approval from every rank across their department, other agencies and work units for basic administrative chores.”

I worked on a program management team obsessed with statistical measures of efficiency. I could sit here and try to defend what I did as part of the “team” (um, in hindsight? Not much of any value to humanity or the maintenance facility, but I handed out nice presentations.) But, I won’t. I watched numbers load into a database and sent out reports nobody read. I only did no one any good by saving money for retirement.

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
  no one
January 15, 2019 1:04 pm

Was your job in the government/violence-funded sector, or the private/voluntary sector? Because if private, it was up to your corporate leadership to keep watch over the usefullness of what was going on at all levels of the company. If they fail to do a good job, then the company fails, and PRIVATE individuals suffer the consequences. If it was a government position, then you obviously, from the minute you took the job, were part of the problem.

no one
no one
  MrLiberty
January 15, 2019 6:23 pm

Both… I worked for a program management corporation out of DC… on a team at Tinker AFB Maintenance Depot. Best of both worlds. And, yes… I realized we were part of the problem.

Vixen Vic
Vixen Vic
  MrLiberty
January 16, 2019 1:53 am

Mr. Liberty, that’s Maggie in disguise.

robert h siddell jr
robert h siddell jr
January 15, 2019 12:08 pm

I retired from the BLS and Second the Entire Article. Most government employees are minority Democrats who oppose Conservatives, especially Trump and they never give a dimes labor for a dollars pay. The Federal and State “Civil” Service Bureaucracies have been taken over by a Brotherhood of Minorities and Liberals who serve their interest over National Interest; when Conservative Presidents replace the Heads of Departments, it results in negligible trickle down. If Pelosi and Schumer continue their anti-America anti-Wall Shutdown Program, it will become an Unintended Consequence Godsend that could never be accomplished Within the System, and Trump will get The Wall built anyway.

Anonymous
Anonymous
January 15, 2019 12:23 pm

It may not be true (actual account) but I bet it is correct.

Bob P
Bob P
January 15, 2019 12:29 pm

Great missive. I worked in government for six years before I had to get out for fear of becoming one of them, and this “source” has it exactly right. 80% do nothing, most of the rest make things worse, and a pitifully small core of talented people work on behalf of the taxpayer. Government would work so much better by getting rid of the 90+% who do nothing or make things worse–but the chances of that happening are nil, though a massive depression would help. Meanwhile, it’s just as well 80% do nothing, otherwise they’d definitely fit into the “make things worse” category and we’d have more harmful regulations and taxes.

Yancey_Ward
Yancey_Ward
January 15, 2019 12:31 pm

The Senate Republicans will eventually stab Trump in the back and send him a bill without the wall funding or anything else that strengthens border control. Trump will probably veto this bill and the votes to override the veto will be there in the Senate, I am just unsure whether the House Republicans will override it. I predict this happens sometime early next month.

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
January 15, 2019 1:10 pm

Hardly matters who wrote it as it is 100% on the money. The “Rock” is saying that he never did an interview where he blasted “snowflakes” for being such pussies who couldn’t handle criticism. Everything that was attributed to him was still right on the money.

Make a pledge to remind everyone you know that the takeaway message from all of this is that we must NEVER allow the government to hold the US economy hostage again. And the ONLY way to make sure that happens, is by DEMANDING that the government END its monopoly control over all of this crap (airport security, loans, air-traffic control, food inspection, and on and on). We deserve to have a stable marketplace of service providers who are providing the services to us that WE as consumers demand, not what politicians and lobbyists demand.

Bilco
Bilco
January 15, 2019 1:35 pm

Government employment. Just another form of welfare.

RiNS
RiNS
January 15, 2019 2:05 pm

some good commentary here….

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1IzAvX6JPcU

Harrington Richardson
Harrington Richardson
  RiNS
January 15, 2019 3:33 pm

This guy is great! “Give us the wall or you don’t fuckin’ eat.” This early recharging of the ebt cards is going to be a real shitstorm when the idiots go out and blow February before the end of January.

TampaRed
TampaRed
  Harrington Richardson
January 15, 2019 8:30 pm

build the wall–hang tough,trump–
trump is also catching hell for not wanting to count illegals in the census,here’s why–

The Value of Illegal Immigrants

And you thought it was because the DemoRats are caring and loving people!

The MAJORITY of Americans don’t realize just how much POWER & MONEY the

Democrats make off Illegal Aliens being in our country even without voter fraud!

THIS is why they created ‘Sanctuary’ cities and states.
Simply by including their numbers as part of the population in the US Census, they get MOUNTAINS of money from the federal government and for every 770,000 illegal aliens in their Democrat-controlled area, they get a seat in the US House of Representatives apportioned to their area following the census.

After the US Census (performed once every 10 years), the 435 seats in the US

House of Representatives are divided up by state populations and the last one resulted in one seat for roughly every 770,000 people. Soooooooo, let’s say California has about 4 MILLION non-citizens living there right now.

That means that FIVE of their seats in the US Congress are due to people who are not Americans being counted in the Census!

NOW, imagine if by 2020, when they do the next census, they had 10 MILLION non-citizens living in California.

That would mean California would get 10 SEATS in the US HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES due to non-citizens.

NOW, do you see why Democrats want Open Borders?

Don’t believe it the next time you hear the bleeding-heart liberals and Democratic

Party Leadership claiming how they ‘care’ about these poor illegal aliens.

The Democrats found a way to get money and seats in Congress without even having to rig elections!!

Vixen Vic
Vixen Vic
  TampaRed
January 16, 2019 2:38 am

I understand your points, but isn’t the census supposed to be taken of U.S. citizens only? If you’re “visiting” this country, you’re not a citizen.

Vixen Vic
Vixen Vic
  RiNS
January 16, 2019 2:33 am

I agree with everything he says, except for the old people. People planned their retirement based on government promises without realizing they were being lied to and that the money would be robbed and put in the general budget and dependent on current taxes instead ( or Fed printing).

Vixen Vic
Vixen Vic
  RiNS
January 16, 2019 2:36 am

Plenty of whites on welfare. I know quite a few, usually very young, unmarried, with kids. Uncle Sam is the daddy.

22winmag - Q is a Psyop and Trump is lead actor
22winmag - Q is a Psyop and Trump is lead actor
January 15, 2019 3:23 pm

This is in early running for DUMBEST STORY OF 2019.

The “resistance”, Q, Trump ‘fighting the good fight’ is all just proverbial tilting at windmills.

There is no real fight going on in government, just squabbling over scraps of meat, and the shutdown is simply a tropical vacation for billionarires and trillionaires.

Mary Christine
Mary Christine

I think there is a fight. I think it’s between two different factions of New World Order types. Neither of them is good. But I’m so jaded now there is no coming back from it.

BL
BL
  Mary Christine
January 16, 2019 12:21 am

MC- Welcome to the club.

We are screwed
We are screwed
January 15, 2019 3:50 pm

The democrats want illegal immigration then amnesty to increase their voting power and base. They have the govt employee locked down. However, if we shut the many agencies down and fired 50% of federal workers we would convert 99% of the out of work fed employees to patriotic voters of capitalism, eventually. You see we could support our most needed programs decrease tax rates allow govt to be efficient and work again. These out of work would eventually either see it and get a real job and compete daily to keep it by actually being useful and producing or be fired and starve. Funny how they will choose to eat therefore work and be competitive. Thats the miracle of capitalism you pull your own weight or you go on the Maduro diet and your ass starves to death. Getting paid to sit on your ass and make threats is over. One way or another. Either capitalism returns and they hate that or socialism wins and it fails. Either way to my relief, is these bastards will soon starve to freaken death and die.

Llpoh
Llpoh
January 15, 2019 7:09 pm

Nice article, and it reflects reality well.

I have said the same thing re businesses on this site for years. Business is full of middle managers that behave in the same way as the 85% he describes above – their goal is to keep surviving in their jobs, and they have zero intention of actually doing anything. My job was tocut a wide swathe through them, and I did.

These types are archors to a business, or in the case of what the author describes, to an agency. My experience is the same as his – when you cut a dragging anchor, the ship speeds ahead. And businesses, and agencies, have many anchors.

And there is this little benefit – as you cut away anchors, the rest of the anchors notice. Some stubbornly remain anchors, and get cut away too. But some suddenly decide it is wiser to become oars to drive the ship. And when that turning point is reached, the ship really begins to move.

Which is why I say that this stuff is not really that hard, and that Trump has been unsuccessful in his goal of draining the swamp. He should have put in supporters, with the immediate mandate of cutting say 15% of the headcount of every agency. It may have been difficult, but it is possible. And by selectively cutting anchors, the ship would have sped up markedly. I do not know if Trump has experience turning business around – he seems more likely to have had experience growing business and making deals. The skills are different.

It is likely too late for him to do now. He waited too long. My timeframe for this stuff was always around three months – cut the anchors in three months, and then trim the ship out over the next year. He needed to get people in place, so he would have needed 6 -9 months to get the anchors cut. It does not seem he did that. So he has probably missed his chance.

TampaRed
TampaRed
  Llpoh
January 15, 2019 8:24 pm

he has tried–fed work rules are totally effed up–just t’fering dead weight to another position so you can put a more effective person in that position leads to personnel hearings,suits,arbitration,etc.–

Llpoh
Llpoh
  TampaRed
January 16, 2019 1:43 am

Tampa – wish I had a dollar every time I was told I could not fire some incompetent oaf for those reasons, and did it anyway. It can be done, but it takes balls and fortitude.

Vixen Vic
Vixen Vic
  Llpoh
January 16, 2019 3:14 am

Great analogy of using the ship and anchors to describe the process.

Vixen Vic
Vixen Vic
January 16, 2019 1:38 am

That was absolutely great. Glad Trump saw it. I just don’t like anonymous op-eds.