Millennial Repo

Guest Post by Eric Peters

An interesting data nugget percolated the other day about a “sharp worsening” – that is to say, an increase – in the number of car loan defaults among borrowers under 30 years old. According to Bloomberg Financial News, the rate for the Millennial demographic was 4.04 percent last quarter vs. 2.36 for the general population, or about twice as high.

But it’s not just The Youth who are in danger of having their cars repo’d.

The overall delinquency rate last quarter was at its highest level since 2012 – and the total number of car loans (new and used) as well as leases is up by 5.2 percent.

More people, in other words, are buying cars they can’t afford.

What’s especially interesting is that the increase in delinquencies isn’t happening in parallel with a recession. Unemployment is at a 50-year low. So people aren’t defaulting on their car loans because they lost their jobs.

Their jobs just don’t pay enough to support a car loan.

This shouldn’t surprise anyone who has been following the car business even casually. It now takes roughly twice as long to pay off a new car loan as it did in 1970 – about six years vs. three once upon a time. Because the cost of cars has geometrically outpaced what people are earning.

But not all cars.

In fact, today’s entry-level cars cost about the same as their analogs of almost 50 years ago.

For example, in 1970, you could by the all-new Chevy Vega (God help you) for just $2,090 – the equivalent, adjusted for inflation, of just under $14,000 today. Which could buy you a car like the 2019 Mitsubishi Mirage I recently reviewed. See here for that.

And the new Mirage does not have a self-melting engine, as the Vega did (Chevy decided to install the pistons in the aluminum block without iron cylinder liners) but does have air conditioning, power windows, locks and even cruise control – things which only Cadillacs had back in 1970.

The problem is the cost of the average new car.

It approaches $35,000 – which is almost-Cadillac money. Well, it was – once.

You could buy a ’70 Sedan deVille for $6,118 in 1970 – equivalent to $40,740 today, or only slightly more money than people are paying for average cars.

But average people are not earning Cadillac money – while trying to finance cars that cost Cadillac-equivalent money.

Wherein lies the rub.

If lending standards were stricter, there might not be a problem. It might even solve some other problems.

One of the reasons – probably – that most people don’t raise a ruckus about the cost of endlessly proliferating government regulations and mandates is these costs are made less noticeable to them by extending the time it takes to pay for them.

Six years now vs. three years then. 

If loans were still three or even four years, it would be impossible for probably half or more of the people currently buying cars to do so.

This would impose market discipline on government regs and mandates, motivate average people to take an interest in cost vs. benefit.

As opposed to believing, like little children, in the Free Lunch.

They might question, for instance, the value of a car that “saves gas” by costing them $3,000 (or more) to buy, because it has a direct-injected rather than merely fuel-injected engine. Or a micro-turbo’d four that costs 10 percent more to buy than a slightly thirstier V6.

Stricter lending standards – loans issued based on people’s ability to repay them – would also serve the salutary purpose of encouraging people to live within their means and even possibly below them.

To purchase what they can afford – as opposed to what some shyster bank will lend them. The bank being shystery for making the loans it knows borrowers can’t afford and because it knows it can offload the inevitable delinquencies onto someone else in a kind of musical pickpockets game.

One hand doesn’t wash the other – it filches the cash out of the wallet of the other. 

People might have to drive cars like the $14k Mirage rather than $38,000 Camrys with 300 horsepower engines that get them to 60 in 5 seconds, climate control AC, a cheerily glowing LCD touchscreen and such. But they’d own the thing after making three or four years of manageable payments – and wouldn’t have to worry about making a payment on the car – or paying the rent.

They might even have a couple hundred bucks in actual cash money in their bank accounts, to pay for an unexpected expense – without having to charge it.

Oh, the humanity.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
As an Amazon Associate I Earn from Qualifying Purchases
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
12 Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous
February 15, 2019 1:36 pm

Who can “afford” $35k+ for a car … $55k for a truck?

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Anonymous
February 15, 2019 2:14 pm

Folks with skills working for a living, but I’m still buying older and cheaper because I insist on paying cash.

AC
AC
  Anonymous
February 15, 2019 2:34 pm

Stupid people that finance for longer than the service life of the vehicle?

These are about $4000
comment image
It’s profitable to build and sell them.

One thing that needs to be done in the US is to gut the regulatory mess that needlessly adds massively to the price of vehicles.

For example:
Eliminate DOT cafe standards, and preemptively prohibit the various states from imposing such requirements.

Use the precedents set under Obama to castrate emission laws in states like California, replacing them with sane national standards.

Eliminate the requirements for airbags and such – I’ll decide if I want to spend an additional $4000+ for something that offers little real protection.

I could keep going.

Coalclinker
Coalclinker
  AC
February 15, 2019 5:36 pm

That Chinese truck would never get to 50,000 miles. They can’t even make a decent cast iron skillet that is smooth or will not warp or crack. If you don’t seen anything wrong with their cast iron skillets, there is a word for that-ignorance.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Coalclinker
February 15, 2019 6:29 pm

I think you may need a pair of binoculars to see the point going over your head.

Trick
Trick
  Anonymous
February 16, 2019 10:37 am

Those who have a good job and don’t go crazy buying a bunch of junk. Burger flippers in the 70’s couldn’t afford a Vega, and they can’t afford a Mirage today.

In the 70’s if you wanted a nice car you got a good job so you could pay for it. Its the same today as it was back in the 70’s.

Coalclinker
Coalclinker
February 15, 2019 5:44 pm

Once upon a time America built cars that even poor folk could buy brand new. You could buy a Ford Roadster for about $7900 in today’s money. It was powered by engines like this:

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
February 15, 2019 6:10 pm

Who could have foreseen that someone with a shitty credit history would be a bad risk and would be likely to default on a loan???

yahsure
yahsure
February 16, 2019 12:18 am

I figured this stuff out long ago. I own an Older paid for car and an old truck. I just Fixed them up and I use the truck for a spare. The truck is for offroading and towing. I laugh when I keep hearing about electric cars. like everyone will sell their paid for vehicles and buy an electric car that won’t go far or tow anything. Most peoples wages do not match the cost of living. Get ready while you can.

Jon Jones
Jon Jones
February 16, 2019 10:22 am

Libs believe EVERYTHING should be provided for free by the Government. They told us so in their insane doctrine of those not willing to work being paid by the Government.

Trick
Trick
February 16, 2019 10:35 am

It’s not all doom and gloom. Millennial’s believe everything should be free thanks to people like AOC and Sanders. They cheer when elected leaders go after the rich and companies who bring jobs. Who needs a job when you have those who (or at least make you think so) get everything for free if you vote for them or still have your parents to pay for everything?

We have $1100 in car payments and we are now in to year 3 of 5. While I’m no fan of interest charges we have 1.99% loans, we also have no credit card debt and our cars are not sh*tboxes like the Mitsubishi Mirage.

What we do have is good jobs that allow us to buy a nice car, savings for an emergency, a nice house and within reason enjoy some of the good things in life.

Ron Nedos
Ron Nedos
February 16, 2019 1:19 pm

So I guess the moral of this story is, “Don’t lend money to deadbeats?”