The Bank Is Being Robbed

Guest Post by Jeff Thomas

In 1903, the desperado in the image above appeared in an early film about a robbery. He was the classic guy in a black hat and, of course, he was eventually foiled by the guys in the white hats.

That was a simpler time.

Today, law enforcement is assisted so much by modern technology that the guys in the black hats rarely try to rob a bank, as they’ll almost surely be caught.

So, does that mean the end of bank robberies? Well, unfortunately, no. In the future, we’re likely to witness bank robberies on a scale such as we’ve never before witnessed.

The difference is that they’ll be robbed by the guys in the white hats. And, the kicker is that the laws of the land will be entirely in their favour. It will be legalized robbery.

In 2013, the world saw its first “bail-in,” in which the banks of Cyprus confiscated the deposits of many of their clients. There was no warning and there was little in the way of explanation, except to say that it was “necessary.” What that really meant was that the banks had been mismanaged to the point that, unless the deposits were confiscated, they would fail.

Under the guise of “assuring the security of the institution of banking,” the banks were robbed by the bankers themselves.

Cyprus was seen by the world as an anomaly, but, unknown to most people, the US had already, in 2010, passed a law (buried in the back of the Dodd-Frank Act), allowing any bank, unilaterally, without further authorization from the US government, to confiscate the funds of depositors, if the bankers determined that a bank emergency existed.

Almost identical legislation was passed in Canada in 2013, buried in the back of that year’s National Budget.

This was followed in the EU by similar legislation in 2014.

The collusion by banks and governments in this development is much the same as a lamb and two wolves voting on what to have for dinner, with the depositor in the role of the lamb.

Since that time, the EU has also passed legislation authorizing the confiscation of wealth kept in bank safe deposit boxes.

And in the US, in 2015, Chase Bank advised clients who rent safe deposit boxes that the storage of “cash or coins other than those found to have a collectible value,” was no longer acceptable. Therefore, cash or coins in safe deposit boxes could, in future, be confiscated by the banks.

In 2017, Greece took this concept even further – approving the mass confiscation of safe deposit boxes, plus confiscation of securities and wealth held in private homes.

So, what’s happened since then? Have we seen a rash of bank robberies throughout these jurisdictions by the bankers?

Well, no. What we’ve seen is the occasional minor confiscation – each time with little or no reporting by the media. These little trial balloons have served to confirm that the confiscation by banks is to be accepted by the depositors as “the new norm.”

So, is there reason for concern? As long as the confiscations are occasional isolated events, shouldn’t we assume that the odds of us being affected are slim?

Well, the fly in that particular ointment is that, whilst business is booming for banks at present, and certainly we’re not looking at a state of emergency, the likelihood of a mass confiscation being in the offing is substantial.

We know that in the EU, US and Canada, the level of debt within the banking industry is now far beyond anything the world has ever seen. If, for any reason, this enormous bubble were to encounter a pin, what we’d be looking at would be a banking emergency of unprecedented proportions. And the leading jurisdictions of the First World would be at ground zero in the crisis that would immediately follow.

When (not if) the bubble pops, the banks have the authorization for unlimited confiscation of deposits and the contents of safe deposit boxes.

So, what would this look like? Well, based upon historical banking emergencies, the way it would be likely to play out would be that, after some holiday weekend, you, the depositor, would go to your ATM on a Tuesday following the Monday holiday and find the screen of the ATM dark.

Assuming that the ATM was malfunctioning, you’d drive to another ATM and find that that one was also out of operation. After the third or fourth dark ATM, your new situation would begin to sink in.

At some point, the banks would release notices that an industry-wide emergency existed and that they were doing all they could to return to normalcy. They would assure the public that the ATM’s would be reactivated soon but, for the time being, limited withdrawals would be allowed.

This, of course, was what happened in Greece several years ago. The Greek people suffered under the “allowance” that the banks gave them, patiently waiting for the resumption of normal banking.

That normalcy never came. To this day, the Greek people are on an allowance from the banks, with no relief in sight. The Greek people do their best to survive on this pittance in the hope that, one day, they’ll have access to all of their deposit money.

That day will not come for the Greeks. The money is gone – swallowed up by the banks.

In the coming economic crisis, the laws are already in place to assure that the bankers (at least in the EU, US and Canada) can rob the banks and do it without any threat of prosecution.

Whether an economic crisis is triggered by rising interest rates, market crashes, the dumping of treasuries back into the system, the collapse of the petro dollar, or any one of a host of other possible triggers, all of which are looming in the wings, the bankers have prepared themselves for the coming crisis.

The depositor will pay for the bail-in and the banks, having created the economic crisis, will be the net recipients.

Just as in Greece, the public will bite their nails, ever-hopeful that their deposits have not been lost and that they’ll once again be able to withdraw any portion of their deposits they wish – the total amount, if they so choose.

As for the fellow in the image above, we fully understand that, if he succeeds in robbing the bank, he has no intention of returning so much as a farthing.

The reader may speculate whether he feels the fellows with the white hats are more likely to return what they’ve managed to take away. If he decides in the negative, he may wish to begin his withdrawals now and place his wealth (however great or small) in a non-banking institution – one that doesn’t have a license to steal.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
As an Amazon Associate I Earn from Qualifying Purchases
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
9 Comments
Donkey Balls
Donkey Balls
March 18, 2019 10:11 am

Hmm, is this G.R.E.E.D. or E.N.V.Y.?

robert h siddell jr
robert h siddell jr
  Donkey Balls
March 18, 2019 10:19 am

It’s greed because rich Banksters don’t envy us poor SOBs.

Robert H. Burt
Robert H. Burt
March 18, 2019 10:18 am

The world is a dark place.

James
James
March 18, 2019 11:43 am

I will say besides keeping minumum in banks necc. for say purchases online/bills /business keep the rest in solid goods.Solid goods can be stolen but they need to actually send folks to enforce the theft,not just 1’s and 0’s on a computer,how folks respond to such theft on a personal basis is up to each citizen/team/community ect.

I would say a list of those who pass these laws/the bankers and their families ect. in your local area might be a good idea so you can find them and explain the error of their ways.

Pequiste
Pequiste
March 18, 2019 12:50 pm

“One lawyer with a briefcase can steal more than a hundred men with guns …”

― Mario Puzo

“Banks do God’s work.”*

– Lloyd Blankfein

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-goldmansachs-blankfein/goldman-sachs-boss-says-banks-do-gods-work-idUSTRE5A719520091108

*(Especially when your “god” is Satan.)

ordo ab chao
ordo ab chao
March 18, 2019 1:04 pm

I just seem to stumble across this stuff, then memory dictates I search for the G20 news from 5 yrs ago.

From article posted Nov. 18, 2014:

https://www.birchgold.com/dollar/g20-ends-bailouts-with-new-banking-rules

“The key implication of these new measures is that your bank will no longer recognize your deposits as money. Instead, your bank deposits will basically become paper investments that will subject you, the account holder, to depreciation – much like that experienced by stock holders in a financial crisis.”

In other words, you should no longer view the savings that you trust with your bank as money but instead as an investment that are part of your bank’s capital – which, of course, is controlled by your bank. The Economic Policy Journal puts it this way:

“The risks of holding any cash in a bank or financial institution will have to be weighed as heavily and with as much determination of risk as if you were holding a stock or municipal bond, which could decline in an instant should the financial environment bring a crisis even remotely similar to that of 2008.”

As we already explained, the purpose of this new agreement is to shift the burden of bailing out too-big-to-fail banks from taxpayers to… to people who have savings in the bank. Put another way, the G20 nations, including the United States government, will force Americans who choose to store their wealth in bank accounts to save financial institutions that have failed on account of their own greed, giving out lavish bonuses and committing massive frauds even after they’ve been bailed out by the taxpayer in a financial crisis that was mostly their own doing.”

From article posted 3-14-19: (book excerpt Zentih 2016, author Tom Horn)

http://www.skywatchtv.com/2019/03/14/sanders-cortez-soros-democratic-socialism-new-world-order-antichrist-its-all-starting-to-add-up/

“It’s been assumed for centuries that a prerequisite for the coming of Antichrist would be a “revived” world order—an umbrella under which national boundaries dissolve and ethnic groups, ideologies, religions, and economics from around the world orchestrate a single and dominant sovereignty. At the head of the utopian administration, a single personality will surface. He will appear to be a man of distinguished character, but will ultimately become “a king of fierce countenance” (Daniel 8:23). With imperious decree, he will facilitate a One-World Government, universal religion, and global socialism.”

The article (book excerpt) continues:

“Four days later, on January 5, 2009, the chorus call for a New World Order was ramped up by former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger while on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange. A reporter for CNBC asked Kissinger what he thought Barack Obama’s first actions as president should be in light of the global financial crises. He answered, “I think that his task will be to develop an overall strategy for America in this period, when really a New World Order can be created.” Kissinger followed on January 13 with an opinion piece distributed by Tribune Media Services titled “The Chance for a New World Order.” Addressing the international financial crises inherited by Barack Obama, Kissinger discussed the need for an international political order (world government) to arise and govern a new international monetary and trade system. “The nadir of the existing international financial system coincides with simultaneous political crises around the globe,” he wrote. “The alternative to a new international order is chaos.” Kissinger went on to highlight Obama’s extraordinary impact on the “imagination of humanity,” calling it “an important element in shaping a New World Order.”[ii] Kissinger—a Rockefeller functionary and member of the Bilderberg group and Trilateral Commission who routinely turns up in lists among senior members of the Illuminati—peppered his article with key phrases from Masonic dogma, including the comment about the “alternative to a new international order is chaos,” a clear reference to “ordo ab chao” from ancient Craft Masonry, a reference to the doctrine of “order out of chaos.” Like the mythical phoenix firebird, Kissinger visualized the opportunity for a New World Order to be engineered from the ashes of current global chaos, exactly the point he had made years earlier at the Bilderberger meeting in Evian, France, on May 21, 1991, when describing how the world could be manipulated into willingly embracing global government. He said:
Today Americans would be outraged if UN troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead with world leaders to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by their world government.[iii] ”

annuit coeptis novus ordo seclorum- Order outta CHAOS…..what is more ‘chaotic’ to the natural order of things than the neighboring article ‘Library admits they let a convicted SEX OFFENDER read to children as young as two in drag…..’ The very question of allowing ANY SOB IN DRAG TO READ TO CHILDREN is the offense to which I refer !

Anonymous
Anonymous
  ordo ab chao
March 18, 2019 1:27 pm

Keystrokes. Tear up your bills and use your coins for fishing weights.

Rob Clark
Rob Clark
March 18, 2019 1:40 pm

Great article, as a former banker, I am actually familiar with this hidden legislation. We’ve run out of red flags. There’s about to be a collision at the intersection of greed, and stupidity.

Anonymous
Anonymous
March 18, 2019 1:49 pm

More Federal Reserve bank policy. Who owns all the world’s Fed Res Banks? Hmmm…
Wonder if Greek commons are allowed to have guns? If no, then skewer a few banksters. Make banker-kabobs.
Betcha a few Greeks who had / have physical gold are doing ok. For now.
Paper fiat, whether Euros, or return to drachmas?
Opa!
Gonna go up in flames one day.
Have another shot of Ouzo.